"When you arise in the morning, think of what a precious privilege it is to be alive - to breathe, to think, to enjoy, to love."

"Give thyself time to learn something new and good, and cease to be whirled around." 

"Search men's governing principles, and consider the wise, what they shun and what they cleave to." 
- Marcus Aurelius


1. Senior N.K. official warns Pyongyang could resume war of words against U.S.
2.Jitters as North Korea reverts to sabre-rattling rhetoric
3. North Korea Turns Up Heat on Trump, Calls Him 'Dotard' Again
4. North Korea Threatens New 'Dotard' Insults if Trump Revives Name-Calling
5. Defense cost-sharing talks fail to yield concrete result amid U.S. demand for hefty rise: Seoul negotiator
6. US Analysts See Risks in Military Spending Showdown With Seoul
7. Trump once suggested all of Seoul's 10 million residents move to avoid North Korean threat
8.  No Free Pass for North Korea's Abuses: UN Security Council Should Confront Atrocious Rights Record
9. Amid increasing crisis on Korean Peninsula, S. Korea's diplomacy remains lost
10. N. Korea's toned-down criticism signals willingness for talks: experts
11. Time to End the N.Korean Denuclearization Charade
12. Tensions across Korean Peninsula increase as year-end reaches closer



1. Senior N.K. official warns Pyongyang could resume war of words against U.S.
Very interesting.  The  "war of words" may resume.  This is a fascinating statement:

"If he uses remarks and expressions that heat up the atmosphere of confrontation again at such a critical moment as now, it would be deemed that he is in dotage," Choe was quoted as saying.

(LEAD) Senior N.K. official warns Pyongyang could resume war of words against U.S. | Yonhap News Agency

en.yna.co.kr · by 최수향 · December 5, 2019
(ATTN: RECASTS headline, lead; ADDS more quotes, background throughout)
SEOUL, Dec. 5 (Yonhap) -- A senior North Korean official said Thursday that U.S. President Donald Trump's recent remarks hinting at the use of military force against Pyongyang will be a "very dangerous challenge" if they were not made in error.
North Korean First Vice Foreign Minister Choe Son-hui made the remarks in a statement carried by the North's official Korean Central News Agency, warning that Pyongyang could resume the tit-for-tat name-calling against the U.S. if similar expressions are used again.
"If he uses remarks and expressions that heat up the atmosphere of confrontation again at such a critical moment as now, it would be deemed that he is in dotage," Choe was quoted as saying.
While attending a NATO summit in Britain on Tuesday, Trump said Washington could use force if it must, urging North Korea and its leader Kim Jong-un to honor their agreement to denuclearize.
Choe said what is more displeasing is that Trump referred to Kim as "Rocket Man," an expression the U.S. leader used when they exchanged barbed remarks against each other amid heightened tensions.
In 2017, Trump and Kim exchanged threats and insults against each other, with Trump belittling Kim as "Little Rocket Man" and the North calling Trump the "mentally deranged U.S. dotard."
"If Trump's remarks on use of force and metaphor were a mistake it would be a relief, but if they were a calculated provocation intended against us, that makes things different," she said.
Yet, in an apparent effort to prevent the situation getting worse, Choe added at the end of the statement that Kim has not used any harsh words against Trump.
Choe's statement came one day after Pak Jong Chon, chief of the General Staff of the Korean People's Army, lashed out at Trump in a separate release, saying that Pyongyang will also take "prompt corresponding action at any level" if the U.S. uses force against the North.
The nuclear negotiations between the U.S. and North Korea remain stalled since the two leaders' summit in Hanoi ended without a deal in February.
The two sides held their last working-level talks in October in Stockholm, but the meeting ended without much progress, with Pyongyang accusing Washington of failing to come up with a new proposal.
Amid the deadlock, North Korea said it will convene a key meeting of the ruling Workers' Party later this month to decide on "crucial issues," raising speculation that a major policy change could be forthcoming, possibly with regard to nuclear negotiations with the United States.
en.yna.co.kr · by 최수향 · December 5, 2019



2. Jitters as North Korea reverts to sabre-rattling rhetoric
Sticks and stones.... I guess the Kim-Trump bromance is over but breaking up is hard to do.

Note the activity at Sohae launch facility.  I wonder if it will be more than an engine test.  I think he might try to launch another satellite.

Excerpts:
"He definitely likes sending rockets up, doesn't he? That's why I call him 'Rocket Man'," Mr Trump said on Tuesday (Dec 3).
"We have the most powerful military we've ever had, and we're by far the most powerful country in the world," he added. "And, hopefully, we don't have to use it, but if we do, we'll use it. If we have to, we'll do it."
...
On Thursday, satellite images emerged indicating North Korea may be preparing to conduct rocket engine tests at the Sohae Launch Facility, which Mr Kim once said had been dismantled in a concession to President Trump.
"Looks like North Korea is going to resume rocket engine testing at Sohae. This isn't the 'Christmas gift' the North Koreans have promised, but it is a lump of coal in Trump's stocking," tweeted Dr Jeffrey Lewis, director of the East Asia Nonproliferation Programme at the Middlebury Institute of International Studies.

Jitters as North Korea reverts to sabre-rattling rhetoric

straitstimes.com · by NIRMAL GHOSH · December 6, 2019
WASHINGTON - Increasingly bellicose rhetoric from North Korea has raised the spectre of a long-range ballistic missile or atmospheric nuclear test by Pyongyang, perhaps as early as the New Year as it tries to force concessions from the United States in return for steps towards denuclearisation.
Earlier this week in London, President Donald Trump was distinctly less effusive about North Korean leader Kim Jong Un than he has been since they met and, in Mr Trump's words, "fell in love" in Singapore in June 2018 - and twice subsequently.
"He definitely likes sending rockets up, doesn't he? That's why I call him 'Rocket Man'," Mr Trump said on Tuesday (Dec 3).
"We have the most powerful military we've ever had, and we're by far the most powerful country in the world," he added. "And, hopefully, we don't have to use it, but if we do, we'll use it. If we have to, we'll do it."
North Korea, which has been regularly testing shorter-range missiles, had earlier warned of  an undefined "Christmas present" for the United States.
After Mr Trump's remarks, a North Korean official fired back swiftly, saying should President Trump call Mr Kim "Rocket Man" again, that  would represent a "very dangerous challenge".
On Thursday, satellite images emerged indicating North Korea may be preparing to conduct rocket engine tests at the Sohae Launch Facility, which Mr Kim once said had been dismantled in a concession to President Trump.
"Looks like North Korea is going to resume rocket engine testing at Sohae. This isn't the 'Christmas gift' the North Koreans have promised, but it is a lump of coal in Trump's stocking," tweeted Dr Jeffrey Lewis, director of the East Asia Nonproliferation Programme at the Middlebury Institute of International Studies.
In April, North Korea gave the United States  a year-end deadline to pitch for a deal on denuclearisation - a deadline the US has dismissed.
Since then, signals from North Korea - including successive visits, the latest just days ago,  to the sacred Mount Paektu by Mr Kim on a white horse - indicate that the enigmatic leader may be preparing for a major event, potentially coinciding with his traditional New Year speech on Jan 1.
President Trump faces three options before the year is out, Dr Duyeon Kim, senior adviser for North-east Asia and nuclear policy at the International Crisis Group, wrote in a Nov 28 article for CNN.
"He could try to buy time by sending another 'love letter' to Kim Jong Un; hold another summit with the North Korean leader; or insist on continuing with negotiations at the working level," she wrote.
"Each option comes with risks. The third option is the best, but Trump should intervene with another letter if a breakthrough or progress can't be made next month, in order to keep diplomacy open."
"Another letter from Trump to Kim would give both sides some time to iron out how to advance  their June 2018 Singapore summit statement on achieving a new relationship, peace, and denuclearisation and prevent a possible North Korean provocation," Dr Kim wrote.
The North Korea issue is thus once again heading towards the edge of a cliff. But that depends on the perspective.

A North Korean official said that should US President Donald Trump call Mr Kim Jong Un "Rocket Man" again, that would represent a "very dangerous challenge". PHOTO: AP
"It's headed in a wonderful direction - for North Korea," says Dr Sung-Yoon Lee, professor of Korean Studies at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy.
North Korea's messaging about a new path in 2020 if the United States does not come up with an offer conducive to starting denuclearisation, may indicate that a missile test over Japan, or a medium or intermediate-range ballistic missile test, may be on the way, he said.
But an atmospheric nuclear explosion may be more likely, since North Korea's foreign minister had made that explicit threat in September of 2017.
"I take that threat seriously, because there's a need to demonstrate to the world, and particularly the United States, that it has the capability to do that, that it is a continual, credible nuclear threat to the US mainland," Dr Lee said.
Dr Go Myong-Hyun, research fellow at the Asan Institute for Policy Studies in Seoul, told The Straits Times North Korea was likely to conduct a test, possibly of a long-range missile, but would be careful not to provoke President Trump to the extent that he would have no other option but to retaliate militarily.
"He (Mr Kim) will always leave two options for President Trump to choose from - one military, one dialogue," Dr Go said. "North Korea is very crafty, very calculating with risk. Despite the fact that North Korea is making all these threats, at the end of the day they will try to moderate."
"The chances of a major catastrophic provocation breaking out in the Korean peninsula is actually lower than perceived," he said.
straitstimes.com · by NIRMAL GHOSH · December 6, 2019

3. North Korea Turns Up Heat on Trump, Calls Him 'Dotard' Again
Note that we have not seen any statements directly attributed to Kim Jong-un that directly insult POTUS.  They are coming from his close confidants such as Choe Son Hui.

Excerpt:

"If any language and expressions stoking the atmosphere of confrontation are used once again on purpose at a crucial moment as now, that must really be diagnosed as the relapse of the dotage of a dotard," Choe Son Hui, first vice-minister of foreign affairs, was quoted Thursday as saying by the state's official Korean Central News Agency.

North Korea Turns Up Heat on Trump, Calls Him 'Dotard' Again

Bloomberg · by Jon Herskovitz · December 6, 2019
Photographer: Alexander Demianchuk/TASS via Getty Images
Photographer: Alexander Demianchuk/TASS via Getty Images
North Korea may be preparing to conduct engine tests at a long-range rocket launch site, stepping up pressure on President Donald Trump ahead of a year-end deadline it imposed to get a better deal from the U.S. in nuclear disarmament talks.
A satellite image from Thursday shows activity at its Sohae Launch Facility, which leader Kim Jong Un had once said he  dismantled in a concession to Trump. The move comes as the two sides have revisited old insults -- "Rocket Man" from Trump and "dotard" from North Korea -- while Pyongyang said Washington's behavior will determine what "Christmas gift" it gets from Kim.
The commercial satellite image shows activity at the Sohae facility that includes what appears to be a newly arrived shipping container at the engine test stand, according to Jeffrey Lewis, director of the East Asia Nonproliferation Program at the Middlebury Institute of International Studies, who works with the U.S.-based imaging company Planet Labs.
"This isn't the Christmas gift that North Korea promises, but it is a lump of coal in Trump's stocking," said Lewis, a specialist in analyzing in satellite imagery. He added "this is one more sign that we've reached the end of diplomacy and a return to missile testing."
North Korea's deadline puts one of Trump's biggest foreign policy achievements on the line just as he gears up for re-election. Kim has demanded Trump ease up on sanctions choking his country's paltry economy and end what Pyongyang sees as Washington's "hostile intent" toward it.
South Korea's Defense Ministry didn't immediately respond to a request for comment on the satellite imagery. Engine testing helps North Korea develop weapons of a more threatening nature to the U.S. and regional allies including South Korea and Japan.
For more on North Korea:
Kim placed a moratorium about two years ago on the testing of nuclear weapons and intercontinental ballistic missiles that could deliver a warhead to the U.S. to help his talks with Trump.
But the bonhomie has been tested this week, with Trump reviving his derisive "Rocket Man" nickname for Kim and again threatening to use military force against North Korea. One of Pyongyang's top nuclear envoys, who once praised the  "mysteriously wonderful" chemistry between the leaders, slammed Trump for using words that had prompted "waves of hatred" among the North Korean people. She also dusted off an old insult the state has used for Trump.
"If any language and expressions stoking the atmosphere of confrontation are used once again on purpose at a crucial moment as now, that must really be diagnosed as the relapse of the dotage of a dotard," Choe Son Hui, first vice-minister of foreign affairs, was quoted Thursday as saying by the state's official Korean Central News Agency.

Return of Rocket Man

Missile tests under Kim Jong Un
Sources: South Korea Ministry of Defense and Center for Nonproliferation Studies
Any shift by Kim could come as soon as the North Korean leader's annual New Year's address, which he has previously used to ratchet tensions up and down. The ruling Workers' Party announced a rare meeting in Pyongyang later this month "to discuss and decide on crucial issues" due to the "changed situation at home and abroad."
While Trump and Kim have held three face-to-face meetings since June 2018 and lavished praise on each other over the past two years, they've achieved little beyond a vague promise to "work toward complete denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula." North Korea has continued to expand a nuclear weapons program that it sees as a vital deterrent against the threat of American invasion.
Still, North Korea may not want to push Trump too far even as they pressure him for more concessions, according to Yoo Hoyeol, who teaches North Korean studies at Korea University and formerly advised South Korea's unification ministry and defense ministry. He described the comments from Choe, the North Korean foreign ministry official, as "moderated."
"Trump may be the most favorable U.S. president for North Korea," Yoo said. "So the North probably doesn't intent to go further to the very extreme."
- With assistance by Kanga Kong
Bloomberg · by Jon Herskovitz · December 6, 2019


4. North Korea Threatens New 'Dotard' Insults if Trump Revives Name-Calling


Is Choe Son Hui trying to make POTUS walk back his remarks or trying to maintain some ambiguity to maintain some diplomatic space?

Excerpts:

She warned that North Korea could resume a war of insults against Mr. Trump.
 
"If Trump's remarks on use of force and metaphor were a mistake, it would be a relief, but if they were a calculated provocation intended against us, that makes things different," Ms. Choe said.




North Korea Threatens New 'Dotard' Insults if Trump Revives Name-Calling

The New York Times · by Choe Sang-Hun · December 5, 2019
North Korea threatened to resume tit-for-tat insults against President Trump two days after he called its leader, Kim Jong-un, a "Rocket Man."
President Trump with North Korea's leader, Kim Jung-un, on the South Korean side of the Demilitarized Zone between North and South Korea in June. Credit...Erin Schaff/The New York Times
SEOUL, South Korea - North Korea on Thursday threatened to resume calling President Trump bad names, including  a "dotard," two days after he again called its leader "Rocket Man" and raised the possibility of using military force.
North Korea's first vice foreign minister, Choe Son-hui, said that if Mr. Trump deliberately stoked "the atmosphere of confrontation" once again, then that "must really be diagnosed as the relapse of the dotage of a dotard."
Ms. Choe issued her statement, which was carried by the official Korean Central News Agency, in response to  remarks Mr. Trump made in London on Tuesday, on the sidelines of his meetings with NATO leaders.
"We're by far the most powerful country in the world," Mr. Trump said, urging North Korea's leader, Kim Jong-un, to honor his promise to denuclearize. "And, hopefully, we don't have to use it, but if we do, we'll use it."
Although he said he still had "a good relationship" and "confidence" in Mr. Kim, Mr. Trump also employed the mocking nickname he had used against the North Korean leader when and Mr. Kim traded threats of war and personal insults two years ago.
"He definitely likes sending rockets up, doesn't he?" Mr. Trump said, referring to  the recent series of short-range ballistic and rocket tests by North Korea. "That's why I call him 'Rocket Man.'"
On Wednesday, the North Korean military vowed to retaliate if the United States used military force. But on Thursday, Ms. Choe said her government was more upset by Mr. Trump's name-calling against its leader than his threat to use military force.

She warned that North Korea could resume a war of insults against Mr. Trump.
"If Trump's remarks on use of force and metaphor were a mistake, it would be a relief, but if they were a calculated provocation intended against us, that makes things different," Ms. Choe said.
In  his United Nations speech in September 2017, Mr. Trump threatened to "totally destroy" North Korea and famously called Mr. Kim a "Rocket Man" on a "suicide mission."
Mr. Trump issued his 2017 threat after North Korea flight-tested two intercontinental ballistic missiles and detonated missiles  what it called a hydrogen bomb in its sixth and most powerful underground nuclear test.
Mr. Kim delivered  an equally famous rejoinder.
"A frightened dog barks louder," Mr. Kim said, referring to Mr. Trump. "I will surely and definitely tame the mentally deranged U.S. dotard with fire."
Two months later, North Korea launched its most powerful international ballistic missile,  the Hwasong-15, which demonstrated the potential to reach the mainland United States.
In a dramatic shift, however, Mr. Kim and Mr. Trump started engaging in diplomacy in 2018, with Mr. Trump going so far as to say that he and Mr. Kim  "fell in love."
In June 2018, they held  their first summit meeting in Singapore, during which Mr. Kim promised to "work toward complete denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula" in return for "new" relations and security guarantees from Washington.
But subsequent negotiations have stalled over how to implement the broadly worded agreement, and North Korea has sounded increasingly frustrated about negotiating with Washington in recent months.
It has resumed short-range missile tests this year, warning that it would formally end diplomacy unless Washington made more concessions  by the end of December.
The New York Times · by Choe Sang-Hun · December 5, 2019

5. Defense cost-sharing talks fail to yield concrete result amid U.S. demand for hefty rise: Seoul negotiator
We have two December 31 deadlines, one with north Korea  -change our hostile policy and one with South Korea - burden sharing.


Defense cost-sharing talks fail to yield concrete result amid U.S. demand for hefty rise: Seoul negotiator | Yonhap News Agency

en.yna.co.kr · by 송상호 · December 6, 2019
WASHINGTON/SEOUL, Dec. 6 (Yonhap) -- South Korea's top negotiator in defense cost-sharing talks with the United States has said the allies have failed to produce a concrete result in this week's negotiations as Washington's demand for a sharp increase in Seoul's share remains unchanged.
Jeong Eun-bo made the remarks Thursday following the fourth round of talks in Washington on Tuesday and Wednesday over how to share the cost of stationing the 28,500-strong U.S. Forces Korea under the cost-sharing accord, called the Special Measures Agreement (SMA).
"At this point, we are in a situation where we need to continue to narrow our differences. It is not that we have reached a concrete result," Jeong told reporters at Dulles International Airport.
"It is right to say that the U.S. maintains its position," he added.
The U.S. has reportedly demanded a fivefold increase in Seoul's financial contributions to US$5 billion next year to cover expenditures related to the allies' combined military exercises and support for the USFK troops' families.
Under this year's SMA, which is set to expire at the end of the year, Seoul agreed to pay about $870 million.
Jeong reiterated Seoul's position that the negotiations should proceed strictly within the SMA framework, which calls for Seoul to pay partial costs for South Korean employees in USFK installations, the construction of some military facilities and logistical support.
Asked whether it would be difficult to strike a deal before the end of the year, Jeong simply said, "We will try hard to conclude the negotiations by the year's end."
After the two-day negotiations, Jeong agreed to meet with his U.S. counterpart James DeHart again in Seoul this month to continue the negotiations.
en.yna.co.kr · by 송상호 · December 6, 2019


6. US Analysts See Risks in Military Spending Showdown With Seoul
My comments are below.

US Analysts See Risks in Military Spending Showdown With Seoul

voanews.com · By Natalie Liu
Washington-based Korea experts will be closely watching the next round of defense cost-sharing talks between the United States and South Korea, concerned that the strains being placed on the alliance could prove to be a windfall for America's adversaries.
The negotiations are scheduled to resume in the South Korean capital this month, with Seoul so far showing little willingness to accept U.S. demands for a fivefold increase in what it pays toward the cost of maintaining 28,500 American troops on its territory - from roughly $1 billion to $5 billion annually. A fourth round of talks ended Wednesday in Washington with no sign the two sides have inched closer to an agreement.
"Any friction between Washington and Seoul will be welcome in Pyongyang, Beijing and Moscow," said David Maxwell, a senior fellow with the Foundation for Defense of Democracies and longtime observer of U.S.-Korean affairs. Those countries, he said, need merely to "follow the dictum of Napoleon: Do not interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake."
The concern is compounded by the possibility of closer relations between South Korea and China. Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi was in Seoul this week for high-level talks seen as paving the way for a possible visit to South Korea by Chinese President Xi Jinping.
FILE - Protesters march to oppose the United States' demand for raising costs to station U.S. troops in South Korea, in Seoul, Nov. 16, 2019.
Break from past
U.S. President Donald Trump's demand that South Korea pay much more for U.S. protection is seen by many in policy circles as a break from long-standing U.S. policy, which saw strategic benefits from maintaining a troop presence on the Korean Peninsula.
Maxwell suggested that Washington is driving a hard bargain in hopes of establishing a precedent for burden-sharing negotiations with other countries. He told VOA that U.S. negotiators would continue to demand the highest level of funding possible from Seoul "as a way to influence the follow-on negotiations with Japan and Germany."
But, he said, South Korea will be "hard pressed" to increase its contribution because of domestic political considerations. "While the vast majority of South Koreans support the alliance, a great majority do not want South Korea to increase funds for burden sharing," he said, citing polls that show this view is held by as many as 96 percent of South Koreans.
Joseph R. DeTrani, a former U.S. special envoy for North Korea, told VOA at a Korea Foundation event this week that he remained hopeful that the sides would reach a cost-sharing agreement. "Perhaps not five times, maybe two times, or two and a half times" the current figure, he said.
FILE - Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi talks with South Korean President Moon Jae-in during their meeting at the Presidential Blue House in Seoul, Dec. 5, 2019.
Closer Beijing-Seoul ties?

Gilbert Rozman, an academic and author of several publications on Northeast Asia, was asked whether he worried that the U.S.-South Korea dispute could push Seoul closer to China.
"Not easily, because China has treated [South Korea] pretty badly," he said. "They're not inclined to go closer to China. But they feel [the U.S. demand] has been a big mistake."
In any case, he said, Beijing will likely push to improve regional economic ties at a coming summit in China's southwestern city of Chengdu this month with the leaders of China, Japan and South Korea - an event he referred to as the "CJK" summit.
South Korean media reports have said President Moon Jae-in will travel to Beijing after the summit and is expected to invite Xi to visit Seoul, possibly in the spring.
Rozman said Xi would probably place conditions on any visit to the South Korean capital. It has been widely reported that Beijing issued three demands ahead of a visit by Moon to Beijing in 2017, including limits on new South Korean missile defenses and on any trilateral South Korean alliance with the United States and Japan.
voanews.com · By Natalie Liu



7. Trump once suggested all of Seoul's 10 million residents move to avoid North Korean threat
From Vox News.  Sometimes I think we should not take everything we read about POTUS' remarks too seriously. And of course there are some 25 million Koreans in the Greater Seoul Metropolitan Area (GSMA) so the problem is even bigger.

Trump once suggested all of Seoul's 10 million residents move to avoid North Korean threat

Vox · by Alex Ward · December 5, 2019
A handout photo provided by Dong-A Ilbo of President Donald Trump with South Korean President Moon Jae-in at the Observation Post Ouellette at Camp Bonifas on June 30, 2019, in Panmunjom, South Korea.Getty Images
Long before President Donald Trump called North Korean leader Kim Jong Un  "Little Rocket Man" or met him in person, Trump had an idea to safeguard millions of South Koreans from the dictator's wrath: Move them. Move them all.
According to an excerpt from Peter Bergen's new book  Trump and His Generals: The Cost of Chaos posted by  Time on Thursday morning, the president made a startling comment during a mid-April 2017 briefing on North Korea.
After seeing a satellite image showing that Seoul - South Korea's capital, home to 10 million inhabitants - sits just 15 miles south of the country's heavily militarized border with the North, Trump asked, "Why is Seoul so close to the North Korean border?"
He then made a rather unorthodox suggestion: "They have to move," Trump said, referring to the city's residents. "They have to move!" he repeated. Those in attendance at the Oval Office briefing were uncertain whether or not Trump was joking, Bergen writes.
Trump, Bergen notes, had already been briefed numerous times on the danger Seoul faces every day. The city is in direct firing range of  thousands of pieces of North Korean artillery that are already lined up along the border between the two countries, also known as the demilitarized zone (DMZ). Around  70 percent of North Korea's ground forces are within 90 miles of the DMZ, presumably ready to move south at a moment's notice.
Simulations of a large-scale artillery fight between the North and South produce pretty bleak results. One war game convened by the Atlantic magazine back in 2005 predicted that a North Korean attack would kill  100,000 people in Seoul in the first few days alone.  Others put the estimate even higher. A war game  mentioned by the National Interest predicted Seoul could  "be hit by over half-a-million shells in under an hour."
Evidently, Trump hadn't realized just how vulnerable the city's 10 million citizens were until he saw that satellite photo. So his alarm is understandable. And sure, perhaps he was kidding. But given Trump's history of suggesting  wildly infeasible or  downright illegal policy ideas, it's also entirely possible he was serious.

Moving a city of 10 million people is not exactly easy (or even possible)

Pushing 10 million people - roughly the population of the entire country of  Sweden - further south on the peninsula would be a nearly impossible exercise. It's just too many people to move and would cost a fortune in both transportation and relocation, and of course North Korea would notice such a mass migration.
What's more, North Korea has weapons that can reach all of South Korea, meaning Seoul's dwellers would need to leave the country entirely to be safer. Now that North Korea has shown it has a missile that could  reach the US - potentially carrying a nuclear bomb - it's hard to fathom where those millions could go to avoid any danger.
While there's no question Seoul remains a major target and could be decimated in a war with North Korea, the city's location remains a sticky reality.
The comment is "uniquely Trumpy," says Catholic University US foreign policy expert Justin Logan, "but it's a reminder that the nuclear issue, which is all we talk about, is one part of a larger security problem on the [Korean] Peninsula. A nuclear deal wouldn't deal with the geography or artillery."
It's a problem that even  Steve Bannon, Trump's former lead strategist, lamented in an August 2017 interview with the American Prospect. "Forget it," he said. "Until somebody solves the part of the equation that shows me that ten million people in Seoul don't die in the first 30 minutes from conventional weapons, I don't know what you're talking about, there's no military solution here, they got us."
Trump has changed his tune since the early days of his presidency. He no longer calls for drastic measures like a mass movement of civilians, instead preferring to engage Kim directly to convince him to dismantle his nuclear program. That effort has sputtered, and it appears that unless real progress is made soon,  North Korea will abandon diplomacy in favor of further ramping up its weapons development.
"The dialogue touted by the US is, in essence, nothing but a foolish trick hatched to keep the DPRK bound to dialogue and use it in favor of the political situation and election in the US," Ri Thae Song, vice minister in charge of US affairs, told the state-run  Korean Central News Agency this week, using the initials for North Korea's official name.
"The DPRK has heard more than enough dialogue rhetoric raised by the US whenever it is driven into a tight corner," Ri continued. "So, no one will lend an ear to the US any longer."
So if Trump wants to avoid a turbulent 2020, he'll have to come up with a new idea - and fast.
Vox · by Alex Ward · December 5, 2019



8. No Free Pass for North Korea's Abuses: UN Security Council Should Confront Atrocious Rights Record
Human rights is a national security issue as well as a moral imperative.  We must hold the Kim family regime accountable.  And the focus on human rights is a threat to the regime.

Excerpt:

Inaction and silence would be reckless.The totalitarianism of North Korea and its human rights abuses are inextricably  linked to the government's weapons proliferation. Furthermore, most council members agree that North Korea represents an ongoing threat of instability that undermines international peace and security. As the UN special rapporteur on human rights in North Korea, Tomas Ojea Quintana, recently  told the UN General Assembly: "This is not an agenda that can be deferred."

No Free Pass for North Korea's Abuses

UN Security Council Should Confront Atrocious Rights Record
hrw.org · by John Sifton Asia Advocacy Director johnsifton · December 5, 2019
Expand
Kim Jong-Un watches a performance in Pyongyang, North Korea, on February 23, 2017.
© 2017 Reuters/KCNA
The United Nations Security Council has an opportunity this month to refocus attention on  North Korea's abysmal human rights record after giving it a pass last year.
If all goes according to plan, on December 10 - Human Rights Day - at least 9 of the council's 15 members will vote to hold a debate to discuss the regime's abuses.
Last year, when a similar debate was under consideration,  the council dropped the ball. This may have been due, in part, to summits in 2017 and 2018 between North Korean leader Kim Jong Un and the presidents of the United States and South Korea, which focused on weapons proliferation issues, not human rights. The council's inaction sent a message to North Korea's leadership that rights had reverted to a second-tier issue, which was probably music to Kim Jong Un's ears.
It's time to correct that mistake. In the years since a historic UN Commission of Inquiry (COI)  report in 2014, which documented a litany of North Korea's crimes against humanity and other serious rights violations, the UN system has been intensifying its attention to the regime's record. The UN Human Rights Council has mandated a UN office to collect evidence of abuses for possible use in future prosecutions. And in Security Council debates in December 2014, 2015, and 2016, the council considered proposals by member states -unfortunately blocked by China - to refer North Korea to the International Criminal Court in the Hague.
This December 10, it is crucial that the council sends Kim Jong Un the message that most of the world is appalled by his government's abuses and will continue to seek justice.
Inaction and silence would be reckless. The totalitarianism of North Korea and its human rights abuses are inextricably  linked to the government's weapons proliferation. Furthermore, most council members agree that North Korea represents an ongoing threat of instability that undermines international peace and security. As the UN special rapporteur on human rights in North Korea, Tomas Ojea Quintana, recently  told the UN General Assembly: "This is not an agenda that can be deferred."


hrw.org · by John Sifton Asia Advocacy Director johnsifton · December 5, 2019

9. Amid increasing crisis on Korean Peninsula, S. Korea's diplomacy remains lost

I recommend South Korea join us for a Plan B and maximum pressure 2.0 campaign against the north.

Conclusion:

Meanwhile, South Korea's diplomacy has lost all of its presence in the current situation on the Korean Peninsula. It's been long since the country lost its right to voice opinions as a mediator and conversation facilitator between the North and the U.S. South Korea has been completely ignored by North Korea while trying to please the North and ended up increasing the U.S.' bill for military cost share while being stubborn. South Korea's diplomacy cannot be found anywhere. Are we going to simply talk about how "there's nothing we can do" and insist on a narrative about "peace," to which nobody pays attention, while just waiting around for a fluke? I cannot help but wonder if there is any contingency plan in place.

Amid increasing crisis on Korean Peninsula, S. Korea's diplomacy remains lost

donga.com
Posted December. 05, 2019 07:40,
Updated December. 05, 2019 07:40
Amid increasing crisis on Korean Peninsula, S. Korea's diplomacy remains lost. December. 05, 2019 07:40. .
"We are by far the most powerful country in the world and hopefully we don't have to use it," said U.S. President Donald Trump on Tuesday. "But if we do, we will use it. If we have to, we will do it." This is a warning message to North Korea, which is increasing the level of its provocations with the year-end deadline. North Korea leader Kim Jong Un propagated his climbing of Paektu Mountain and announced that a plenary meeting of the North Korean Workers' Party Central Committee will be convened at the end of this month. President Trump is determined to transition to the "new path," rather than engaging in negotiation.

North Korea and the U.S. seem to be quickly heading towards a collision. North Korea is showing suspicious movements in the Tongchang-ri missile test site and the Yongbyon nuclear facilities while installing launch pads for intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) in various locations. Kim Jong Un even forewarned a "major decision." Meanwhile, the U.S. has been conducting surveillance with a number of reconnaissance planes over the Korean Peninsula day after day while President Trump went as far as to call Kim Jong Un "Rocket Man" again and implied the possibility of using military force.

So far it remains at the psychological warfare level. North Korea is intentionally exposing its provocations to the U.S.' satellite surveillance system. The U.S. is also conducting surveillance flight publicly without turning the location tracking system of aircraft. Such tensions between the two sides will only increase as the end of the year reaches closer. The bilateral relations may go back to the menacing situation two years ago when the Washington and Pyongyang shared quite harsh words if North Korea directly confronts President Trump's warning of using military power. The possibility of an extreme confrontation, in which North Korea senselessly conducts nuclear tests, launches ICBMs and makes local provocations in the Yellow Sea while the U.S. contemplates military options, cannot be excluded.

Driving up tensions as much as possible to obtain compensation has been North Korea's long-standing tactic. What the regime wants is dramatic compromise right before the collapse, however, President Trump is used to this sort of a game. The U.S. president warned North Korea of the use of military power while putting pressure on South Korea to increase its military cost share hinting the possibility of the withdrawal of the United States Forces Korea. People may shake their heads at Trump's plan to deal with Seoul and Pyongyang, but the risks related to the U.S. president will only grow as tensions rise.

Meanwhile, South Korea's diplomacy has lost all of its presence in the current situation on the Korean Peninsula. It's been long since the country lost its right to voice opinions as a mediator and conversation facilitator between the North and the U.S. South Korea has been completely ignored by North Korea while trying to please the North and ended up increasing the U.S.' bill for military cost share while being stubborn. South Korea's diplomacy cannot be found anywhere. Are we going to simply talk about how "there's nothing we can do" and insist on a narrative about "peace," to which nobody pays attention, while just waiting around for a fluke? I cannot help but wonder if there is any contingency plan in place.
한국어
donga.com

10. N. Korea's toned-down criticism signals willingness for talks: experts 

Some wishful thinking but I do think north Korea may be leaving some diplomatic space open. The door has not completely slammed shut - paradoxically Kim really cannot close off diplomacy until he gets sanctions relief. But once we give in on sanctions relief it is game over, we will have failed again as we have over the past 25 years when we give concessions with nothing substantive in return from the KFR.  And if we concede it will only embolden KJU because he will believe his strategy is sound and he can always get something for nothing by conducting political warfare with Juche characteristics.  He will believe his long con is on track.

(News Focus) N. Korea's toned-down criticism signals willingness for talks: experts | Yonhap News Agency

en.yna.co.kr · by 고병준 · December 6, 2019
By Koh Byung-joon
SEOUL, Dec. 6 (Yonhap) -- A recent series of statements from North Korea appear intended to warn the United States against making further provocative remarks, but Pyongyang apparently toned its criticism down, signaling a willingness to keep nuclear negotiations alive, experts said Friday.
On Thursday, North Korean First Vice Foreign Minister Choe Son-hui issued a statement, warning that Pyongyang could resume a war of words with Washington if it continues to make provocative remarks and insult its leader Kim Jong-un.
The warning came in response to U.S. President Donald Trump's remarks earlier this week during a NATO summit in Britain that he could use force against Pyongyang, if necessary, calling Kim "Rocket Man," a nickname he coined during the exchange of war threats between the two countries years ago.
"It would be fortunate if the utterances of the use of military force and the title of figurative style made by President Trump were an instantaneous verbal lapse, but matter becomes different if they were a planned provocation that deliberately targeted us," Choe said, according to the Korean Central News Agency in English.
"If such phrases emerge once again and they are once again confirmed to be a calculated provocation of the U.S. against us, we will also start harsh language against the U.S. to counter it," she said.
The warning of "harsh language" contrasts sharply with the usually strong way the North has reacted to any perceived attempts to ridicule or insult its leader.
When former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden called Kim a dictator and tyrant, the North's official news agency vowed the country "will never pardon anyone who dare provoke the supreme leadership of the DPRK but will certainly make them pay for it."
A day earlier, Pak Jong-chon, chief of the General Staff of the North Korean People's Army, issued a relatively stronger statement, saying that Pyongyang will take "prompt corresponding action at any level" if the U.S. uses force against the North.
He, however, emphasized that Kim and Trump are still maintaining close relations that he said is deterring any physical conflict from taking place.
Experts saw this week's statements carry tough words and warnings against provocations but appear to be well coordinated not to go as far as to jeopardize the whole negotiation process.
"The latest statements appear to contain a warning against the U.S. not to threaten its regime security and the dignity of its leader, but they did not have harsh words directly targeted at Trump," Yang Moo-jin, a senior expert at the University of North Korean Studies, said.
"To be sure, there is a warning message there, but they seem to be toned-down in order to demonstrate its willingness to wait until the end of the year based on mutual trust between the leaders of the two countries," he added.
Nuclear talks have been stalled since the summit between Kim and Trump in February broke down in February as they remained far apart over how to match Pyongyang's denuclearization steps with Washington's sanctions relief and other concessions.
In April, leader Kim demanded Washington come up with acceptable proposals in their denuclearization negotiations before the end of this year. He said that he could take a "new way" if Washington fails to do so.
With its self-imposed deadline coming closer, North Korea has issued a series of strong-worded statements in the names of former and current nuclear negotiators and high-ranking officials to urge Washington to drop all hostile acts and take first action to move talks forward again.
What is noteworthy is that most of the recent statements have been issued at night here to target American audiences early in the morning across the Pacific. They have also been mostly published through the official Korean Central News Agency, a major news outlet closely being monitored by the outside world.
They, however, have not been carried out by other media outlets, including the Rodong Sinmun, the organ of the North's ruling party and a major news provider for its own people.
The paper has, instead, highlighted Kim's recent trip to Mount Paekdu, the highest peak on the Korean Peninsula considered the birthplace of his late father, and the importance of "self reliance" and fighting against imperialists.
This comes in stark contrast with years ago when the North was locked in a war of words with the U.S., issuing statements full of insults and threats, and the newspaper carried almost all of them, a move seen as intended to rally public support against Washington.
Experts said that issuing those statements through the KCNA but not through the newspaper means that the North might be thinking that it is too early to disclose the latest tense situations with Washington in the hope that there could be a last-minute breakthrough before the end of this year.
"It appears that those statements are not for the North's domestic audience but aimed at pressuring Washington ahead of the year-end deadline," said Kim Yong-hyun, a North Korean studies professor at Dongguk University. "Ironically, this could be understood as a move to express its active intent to keep talks alive."
en.yna.co.kr · by 고병준 · December 6, 2019
11. Time to End the N.Korean Denuclearization Charade
We have to assume Kim will never give up his nuclear weapons as long as he is in power in Pyongyang (unless internal pressure forces him to).

Excerpt: 

In short, signals from both the U.S. and North Korea show that the denuclearization charade has dragged on long enough. There are two possibilities. Kim never intended to scrap his nuclear weapons, and he will show his true face soon. He will probably resume full-fledged provocations and force the U.S. to respond with tougher sanctions. There is no telling what Trump will do then.

This is a troubling conclusion.  South Korea will need to get on board with a Plan B.
There is therefore always a chance of Trump accepting Kim's pretense and ease sanctions to package the whole thing as an achievement. This would end up virtually acknowledging North Korea as a nuclear power. It would be far better for this charade to end so that the world can prepare for what comes next. South Korea faces mountains of diplomatic and defense-related tasks that need to be addressed.
Trump seems to have no concerns for the security of South Korea and views everything from the perspective of his own political interests. He said discussions of the value of keeping U.S. troops in South Korea "can go either way," presumably depending on how much more the South is willing to pay for them. A major crisis is approaching.

Time to End the N.Korean Denuclearization Charade

english.chosun.com
U.S. President Donald Trump threatened North Korea with military force on Monday. "We have the most powerful military we have ever had and we are by far the most powerful country in the world, and hopefully we do not have to use it," he told reporters. Until now, the U.S. president supported Kim even though the North has conducted more than a dozen multiple launch rocket and short-range missile launches. But when North Korea threatened to escalate its provocations, Trump raised the possibility of using a military option against it. Although the U.S. leader still claimed he has a "good relationship" with Kim, the comments suggest that his attention is wandering to other achievements he could tout in next year's presidential election.
In response, Kim once again climbed Mt. Baekdu on horseback, flanked this time by his top military brass. The photo ops on the mountain, which is considered sacred in the North, are often staged as a preliminary to momentous decisions, including the execution of his uncle and eminence grise Jang Song-thek early in Kim's tenure. This time, Kim stressed the importance of "unbending will" in the face of sanctions. He also ordered an extraordinary Workers Party Central Committee meeting to convene. There is a strong chance that Kim will announce an even more hardcore path now the U.S. looks unlikely to meet his year-end deadline for fresh talks and the lifting of sanctions. Satellite images show that North Korea has been building concert platforms for mobile missile launchers at scores of locations.
In short, signals from both the U.S. and North Korea show that the denuclearization charade has dragged on long enough. There are two possibilities. Kim never intended to scrap his nuclear weapons, and he will show his true face soon. He will probably resume full-fledged provocations and force the U.S. to respond with tougher sanctions. There is no telling what Trump will do then.
Still, it cannot be ruled out that Trump and Kim will indulge in more photo ops. The U.S. leader knows Kim has no real intention of relinquishing his nuclear weapons, but he needs a diplomatic achievement he can take credit for.
There is therefore always a chance of Trump accepting Kim's pretense and ease sanctions to package the whole thing as an achievement. This would end up virtually acknowledging North Korea as a nuclear power. It would be far better for this charade to end so that the world can prepare for what comes next. South Korea faces mountains of diplomatic and defense-related tasks that need to be addressed.
Trump seems to have no concerns for the security of South Korea and views everything from the perspective of his own political interests. He said discussions of the value of keeping U.S. troops in South Korea "can go either way," presumably depending on how much more the South is willing to pay for them. A major crisis is approaching.
english.chosun.com
12. Tensions across Korean Peninsula increase as year-end reaches closer
Excerpt:

Against this backdrop, if the next plenary meeting is held eight months after the previous one without any progress on the working-level negotiations between the U.S. and the North, harsh criticism as well as provocations against South Korea and the U.S. are expected to be raised during the meeting. "North Korea is highly likely to strongly condemn the U.S.' attitude to negotiations and South Korea's attitude towards the North while publicly announcing the suspension of denuclearization talks and its stance to strengthen its position as a nuclear state," said Jung Sung-jang, head of Research and Planning Department at Sejong Institute.

Tensions across Korean Peninsula increase as year-end reaches closer

donga.com
Posted December. 05, 2019 07:41,
Updated December. 05, 2019 07:50
Tensions across Korean Peninsula increase as year-end reaches closer. December. 05, 2019 07:41. by In-Chan Hwang, Hyo-Ju Son [email protected], [email protected].
As U.S. President Donald Trump and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un who used to show off their close relationship even after the breakdown of the Hanoi negotiation in February this year imply the possibility of using military force against each other, tensions across the Korean Peninsula are on the rise. Depending on the level of "major steps" to be taken by North Korea in the event that the resumed negotiations between the U.S. and North Korea come to a breakdown this year, it will be decided whether the negotiations between the two will continue or be terminated.

As President Trump called Kim "Rocket Man" again on Tuesday (local time) for the first time in two years and three months and mentioned the possibility of using military power against North Korea, the socialist country immediately confronted Trump's statement. Kim Jong Un implied Wednesday that he will take a tougher stance in the case that the U.S. does not make any concessions by the end of this year during the broadcasting of his 49-day climbing of Paektu Mountain on a white horse.

In addition, Kim also announced on the same day that the fifth plenary meeting of the seventh Central Committee of the North Korean Workers' Party will be convened at the end of this month. During the fourth plenary meeting held on April 10, Kim emphasized self-reliance 25 times by saying that self-reliance should be obtained as a tool for prosperity. "We will remain patient until the end of this year and wait for the U.S.' decision," Kim said during his administrative policy speech during the first meeting of the 14th Supreme People's Assembly on April 12.

Against this backdrop, if the next plenary meeting is held eight months after the previous one without any progress on the working-level negotiations between the U.S. and the North, harsh criticism as well as provocations against South Korea and the U.S. are expected to be raised during the meeting. "North Korea is highly likely to strongly condemn the U.S.' attitude to negotiations and South Korea's attitude towards the North while publicly announcing the suspension of denuclearization talks and its stance to strengthen its position as a nuclear state," said Jung Sung-jang, head of Research and Planning Department at Sejong Institute.
한국어
donga.com

De Oppresso Liber,

David Maxwell
Senior Fellow
Foundation for Defense of Democracies
Personal Email: d[email protected]
Phone: 202-573-8647
Web Site:  www.fdd.org
Twitter: @davidmaxwell161
Subscribe to FDD's new podcastForeign Podicy
 
FDD is a Washington-based nonpartisan research institute focusing on national security and foreign policy.


If you do not read anything else in the 2017 National Security Strategy read this on page 14:

"A democracy is only as resilient as its people. An informed and engaged citizenry is the fundamental requirement for a free and resilient nation. For generations, our society has protected free press, free speech, and free thought. Today, actors such as Russia are using information tools in an attempt to undermine the legitimacy of democracies. Adversaries target media, political processes, financial networks, and personal data. The American public and private sectors must recognize this and work together to defend our way of life. No external threat can be allowed to shake our shared commitment to our values, undermine our system of government, or divide our Nation."