Ahern news header
If you had more money ... you could do more good.
If you do better communications ... you will have more money.

Did someone forward this e-newsltr to you
... and you like it?

Join Our Mailing List
If you only read one blog post this year, make it this one....
Jonathon Grapsas reflects on a year's worth of what did & didn't work       

Among the "things learnt": Digital -- you don't have to do it. Jonathon is a high achieving Australian fundraising guru. Twelve months ago he started his own firm. Now he reveals in a single post what 12 months of front-line work has taught him. For me, what resonated were statements like "Facebook isn't a waste of time when it comes to recruitment." (He explains why.) Or "You're better off doing old school stuff well than trying to do digital poorly." Note: these are not his opinions. These are what a year of results have told him.  

My explosively smart and bottomlessly kind "donor-nation family": meet a new subscriber, joining you on the donor-centric voyage....
That Kinsey Institute  

Natalie Hall, Associate Director of Development, The Kinsey Institute for Research in Sex, Gender and Reproduction 

New on SOFII...
Does your fundraising have enough tension?   

That's the pregnant question Grizzard creative director James Read asks in his SOFII opinion piece, pointing out that many charities these days want "to appear hopeful and happy, as if everything is blissfully under control. This is a mistake." If I hadn't seen this problem myself in 3 major clients recently, I might have dismissed it. Too much happy face undercuts giving. Donors need a problem to solve. What's especially useful about Mr. Read's short article is his "4 building block" messaging recipe. 

From the "planned giving" front lines....
Rhymes w/ "zest" 

The "delicate art of asking for that final gift" isn't without its amusements. Fundraiser (and former fresh-water chemist), Claudia Swain, shared a poem that Eric Widmer, a legacy donor at her previous job, wrote and sent her. As Richard Radcliffe says a thousand times a year, "Bequests are life-driven, death-activated." They are made in joy, from a generous spirit. Enjoy the moment. 

 

We met at Claudia's request

To speak of my land trust bequest

Upon which she then said

I wish that you were dead

and dieing today would be best. 

Luggage is my life....

Where is Tom speaking? 

Go here to check the upcoming events on Tom's international speaking CALENDAR!

Work in progress....

Current clients incl:  

Drug Policy Alliance Training in donor-centricity. 

Houston Grand Opera Bunch of stuff. 

Humanities Rhode Island An existential battle to build a donor base before the feds shut off the money tap. 

Can you take the heat? Come into my kitchen...

Enter a gallery of frank critiques ... open solely for your error-avoiding, idea-stealing pleasure

NEW this issue: Nuns play donor-centered hardball in this charming newsletter from the Sisters of Charity of Our Lady Mother of the Church.

How critiquing works: Brave people send me samples of their donor comms, for a free, nitty-gritty - and public - critique.
From the incoming pool of submissions, I choose some of the more illustrative of best (or bad) practices. I'm sorry I can't respond to everyone. Right now, I have the time to critique about a quarter of the incoming items. If you're chosen, I'll post the critiqued materials on my website, as downloadable PDFs with pop-up comments the whole world can read (and I'll let you know it's happened). The fundraising world thanks you: these critiques are the most visited area on my website. 
NEW in the training line-up..

Elevator Speech Therapy: When your board doesn't know what to say 

Entirely fixable. Talking pts. R us. Ask about my work with boards at the New York Community Trust and the Maryland Humanities Council ... or with deans (tough crowd) at the University of Calgary.  

Capital campaign cases...
RU serious about  your big bucks campaign?   

I have just completed cases for two campaigns. One is for a world-class performing arts company. The other is for a state research university. One is for $150 million. One is for $1.5 billion. Neither case is available for public review at this time. But portions can be shared in confidence with serious inquirers who are in the market for campaign case writing. Call me in the US at 401-397-8104. 

Stats as of mid-May 2012....

JOIN

Donor Comm Nation

Linked In: 535 connections

Twitter: 398 followers

E-news: 5,344 subscribers

Facebook: 125 friends 

TA Blog
Blog

Luggage is My Life: Tom Ahern, Circuit Speaker: Cleaning up donor communications, one tough town at a time -- my WORK&travel-blog) 

Valros, France
Other places
France house/office  web

Ahern Communications web 

Joyaux Associates web  

In global fashion news: SOFII launches sleek, new look..
Once a week, visit this free site
SOFII offers you, for zero, zip, & free, examples of SUCCESSFUL donor communications from around the world that you can steal ... ahem,
learn ... from. I learn a new trick every time I visit. Like the giving string that increased average gifts $20. Don't be a stranger
Want back issues?
Enter the archives
 Back issues @... 
"Dear Thomas..."
or "Dear Tom..."

------

How would you like to be addressed? Does your favorite charity's database know the difference? Probably not. 

------

 

Dear Thomas

 


See above. What's wrong with this picture?

 

Hint #1: it's not obvious. I.e., all you smarty-pants: it's not because my screen grab lacks a right side. 

 

Even so ... something is terribly wrong with this thank-you note from a grateful (& well known) charity.

 

Hint #2: it's a data entry problem.

 

OK, I'm tormenting you. You can't guess.

 

Because what's wrong with this thank-you note is extremely personal. To me.

 

See, when I was in graduate school, a small literary press published my first book of poems. It was called, as such  things go, The Sinister Pinafore. And for the publication of that book I had to choose, finally, my pen name. My nom de plume. Big decision: "What would Hemingway do?" The book would be registered with the Library of Congress. Would my authorial name be Thomas Ahern? Or would it be Tom Ahern? 

 

Nobody ever called me Thomas really in my daily life, so I chose the less formal: Tom.

 

Not Thomas.

 

The only places you will see Thomas are on my driver's license, my passport, my credit cards.

 

I am Thomas to systems.

 

I am Tom to my friends. 

 

I have an official name: Thomas.

 

I have a name by which I am far more commonly known: Tom

 

But here's the rub, and it's a common rub: there was NO way for me to conveniently register my naming preference with Smile Train.

 

Smile Train did not ask. (Their mistake.)  

 

The Smile Train website gave me a form. At the end of the form I was expected to enter my credit card information. So, to avoid potential problems, I entered my full official name: Thomas.

 

Which led to a thank you note that began (awkwardly and inappropriately) with "Dear Thomas."

 

Do I think anything less of the Smile Train mission because they called me 'Thomas' instead of 'Tom'?

 

Not a bit. I love the work they do. They turn kids born with facial deformities from the "village monster" to just another face. 

 

Do I still think they are one of most "worth studying" charity marketers around?

 

I surely do ... although now not 100%. Now, it is more like 98%. They missed an important step. They did not ask a simple question that would help them raise far more money over the long haul.

 

That simple question is: "How would you prefer to be addressed? Would you prefer, for instance, 'James' or 'Jim' or 'Jimmy'? 'Ms.' or 'Mrs.'? 'Sue' or 'Susan'? Tell us, please! You're the newest member of the [charity name here] family. What should the rest of your family call you? What would please you most?" 

 

"What would please you most?"

 

Had they asked that question, Smile Train would have gathered important data.

 

They would have learned MY PREFERENCE.

 

They could have perfected their first-name addressing of a donor ... which is a very cool - or, I should say, very profitable - thing to do.

 

And from that point on, every personalized communication from Smile Train to me would have sounded truly personal and not (as they do, alas, currently) wrong and robotically-generated. "Dear Thomas..... Ennnhhh. Please, Dear One, Thomas, pay attention.... Enhhhh! Screeeech! Bayhhh! This message will repeat in three, two, one seconds....." 

 

Dear Geeks, semi-geeks, wanna-be geeks, fundraisers: It simply requires asking just ONE additional question of your donors, old and new:

 

"How would you prefer to be addressed? If you've been called 'Sue' all your life, do you really want us to call you 'Susan'? Probably not. Tell us how you'd like to be addressed. We want to earn your friendship."

 

The answers to that so-simple-yet-profound question will create EXACTLY one more field - that's all (OK, maybe 2) - in your database.

 

And that field might well be the most profitable field on your form. 

 

------

 

Incidentally, if you would like to start your very own collection of terrific thank-you notes (except for that little Tom/Thomas problem), donate to SmileTrain.

 

Is it worth it? Think for a moment. How have you spent $250 lately?

 

That same $250 you spent (perhaps) on some transitory vanity could ALSO repair a real child's face forever -- turning what is now "the village monster" into just another kid.

 

Do it. Just do it. Do it for yourself. Do it for a deeply unfortunate child who desperately needs your help. 

writerwork T

Wear your heart on (or near) your sleeve
Let your clothes do the talking. You can pick your OWN colors and styles! Comfort food for the torso. T-shirts for the wordy wise ... and smarty pants.
Ahern_case_book
How to write a case for support. Read the Kool-Aid.
Chapter 17: [the oft-quoted] Dance of the Four Veils
See what Amazon reviewers say...