July 18, 2017
AG Rejects Opposing Tort Measure
A proposed ballot measure that would compete with one submitted to voters by the Legislature was rejected this month after its popular name was deemed partisan.

The proposed constitutional amendment is similar to one members of the Arkansas Bar Association declined to support last month after a close vote.  Scott Trotter, a Little Rock attorney who wrote the measure considered by the association, revised the proposal and submitted the new version on his own.  

Among other things, the multi-pronged proposal seeks to: 
  • Create new campaign spending rules
  • Remove legislative authority over rules created by the Arkansas Ethics Commission
  • Prevent individual legislators from directing where appropriated funds are spent
  • Increase the legislative thresh hold for overriding a governor's veto
  • Limit how the legislature can affect court rules
  • Prohibit legislators from setting limits on how much money can be awarded in lawsuits 
  • Prohibit legislators from setting limits on how much attorneys are paid
Attorney General Leslie Rutledge rejected Trotter's proposal Friday, July 14, saying the proposed ballot issue's popular name was misleading and partisan. 

"Your proposed popular name refers to the measure as an amendment "preserving the right of juries to set damages." Although the amount of a damages award rests largely within the Jury's discretion, Arkansas courts have inherent power to reduce jury awards," the attorney general wrote in Opinion 2017-078. "It is therefore misleading, and potentially partisan, to suggest that juries have an absolute "right ... to set damages" and that your amendment, if adopted, will preserve such a right."

Rutledge cited several other phrases in the proposal's popular name as being misleading and partisan or vague. She also said sections of the ballot title were ambiguous. 

Trotter has revised the measure based on the attorney general's comments and plans to resubmit it soon.
 
"I do disagree with the substance of the attorney general's opinion," Trotter said. However, he revised his proposal based on her critiques. 

"You have to step back and think about it and reword things and see if you can get it approved" while addressing what supporters originally wanted to ask voters to consider, he said. 

A portion of Trotter's proposal would compete with an issue already on the November 2018 ballot. SJR8 seeks to establish limits on how much money can be awarded in some types of lawsuits and would give legislators with the authority to set court rules. 

Legislators referred the constitutional amendment to voters in the last legislative session. Ballot titles from the legislature are not reviewed by the Attorney General as ones from the public are.

Only after the title and name are approved can supporters collect signatures from voters to put the issue on the ballot. C onstitutional amendments require more than 84,000 voter signatures and initiated acts require more than 67,000 signatures. 

As of July, only one group has approval from the Attorney General to collect signatures for a potential 2018 ballot measure. It involves term limits.  The deadline for citizen-led proposals is not until next summer. 

Get Engaged. Get Informed.

The Public Policy Center has published nonpartisan fact sheets on Arkansas' statewide ballot issues since 2004.  We welcome your questions at  publicpolicycenter@uaex.edu . Follow us on Facebook and Twitter


Did you know?

Voters in Woodruff and Franklin County go to the polls Aug. 8, 2017. They are voting on sales tax proposals and associated bond issues to finance construction of a new county jail and law enforcement offices. Woodruff County voters are also voting on a sales tax earmarked for economic development. You can find Public Policy Center fact sheets about these two elections at https://uaex.edu/business-communities/voter-education/local-ballot-issues.aspx.
 

LegislatureLegislative Ballot Issues



Legislators are able to refer up to three constitutional amendments to the voters every general election. These two proposals will be on the Nov. 6, 2018 ballot.

          
SJR8 - An Amendment Concerning Civil Lawsuits and the Powers of the General Assembly and Supreme Court to Adopt Court Rules.

Read SJR8

Sponsor:  Sen. Missy Irvin
_____________________________________________________________________________________  

HJR1016 - A Constitutional Amendment Adding as a Qualification to Vote that a Voter Present Certain Valid Photographic Identification When Casting a Ballot In Person or Casting an Absentee Ballot.

Read  HJR1016



AGLooking Forward - Potential 2018 Ballot Issues from Citizens

Attorney General Opinions

The Attorney General is responsible for reviewing the language and titles of potential ballot issues submitted to voters by the public. Ballot issue groups can circulate petitions only after the Attorney General verifies that the ballot title and popular name honestly, intelligibly and fairly describe the purpose of a proposed constitutional amendment or act. The following are recent Attorney General opinions regarding potential ballot issues:

Ballot proposals rejected

July 14, 2017 - An Amendment Preserving the Right of Juries to Set Damages, Requiring Disclosures in Elections, Addressing Separate Powers of the Three Branches of Government, and Imposing Limits on the Legislature  - A multi-prong proposal involving campaign spending disclosures, legislative ethics, bans on limits of jury awards and how much attorneys are paid, and the governor's veto powers was rejected. According to Opinion No. 2017-078 said the proposal's popular name was misleading and partisan. Scott Trotter of Little Rock submitted the measure. 


July 7, 2017 -  The Arkansas Adult Recreation of Marijuana Amendment  - A proposal seeking to legalize the cultivation, production, distribution, sale, possession and use of marijuana, and which would release from incarceration people who were convicted of violating laws related to marijuana was rejected because of ambiguities in the text, according to Opinion No. 2017-076

This is the fourth time this proposal has been rejected. See Opinion No. 2017-073 (June 22, 2017),  Opinion No.2017-068 (June 7, 2017) and  Opinion No. 2017-060 (May 23, 2017). Mary L. Berry of Summit submitted the proposal.



Ballot proposals approved for signature gathering

Oct. 28, 2016 - Arkansas Term Limits Amendment - A proposal to reduce the number of years a state senator or representative can serve in office was certified for signature gathering, according to Opinion No. 2016-105. The proposal would institute six-year terms for representatives and eight-year terms for senators, with a maximum of 10 years total. The proposal would return Arkansas' term limits to what they were before a voter-approved change in 2014 that extended terms.  Thomas Steele of Little Rock submitted the measure.