Mary Margaret Oliver
Email Newsletter
November 15, 2015

 
Friends,

Following the November 3 election, I share with you below my thoughts on the defeat of the proposed city of LaVista Hills. Before I do that, I  want to share some of the fun things I get to do as a Legislator.

This week the bipartisan Legislative Women's Caucus met at Lake Lanier and we were treated to a boat trip and update on the water issues - The Water Wars!


And I was honored to speak to Professor Sharon Hill's Policy Leadership class at GSU's Andrew Young School.


For any of us who have been privileged to visit Paris, it is a sad weekend. Please  click here to experience Ella Fitzgerald singing "I love Paris". Sad, and reflects the many failures of traditional politics.

Happy Thanksgiving--I hope you and your family enjoy the holiday and restful time together.

Mary Margaret

 
  


     
  
Thoughts on the Defeat of the Proposed City of LaVista Hills 
 
 

     Although there continues to be controversy over the close vote against incorporation of the new city of LaVista Hills, I am hopeful the very divided citizens inside the "map" will pause and consider some positive next steps.   I want to share some thoughts, and as always, I am interested in your views and response.

 

1.   I do not think the November 3 election could be overturned based on the limited facts we now know, and nor do I think any more recounts will change the result. And, I understand that the LaVista Hills Alliance this week has decided not to pursue litigation to overturn the election results, and allow the Secretary of State to proceed with his investigation.  

 

 The certification process and recounts resulted in three more "no" votes, totaling a 139 vote margin, and the Georgia Code Sec. 21-2-522 provides narrow grounds to contest an election.   There must be evidence of fraud or misconduct that relate to enough votes to change the election result, and that is a high standard.  But, the advocates for a new City of LaVista Hills have every right to explore and act on any facts they may discover.   And, as a practicing litigation attorney for decades, I tend to be conservative on the decision to initiate litigation.

 

2.  The LaVista Hills cityhood election was based on too many negative messages, and some of the language and mailers were harsh.  All political consultants (almost all) will advise negative literature as the winning strategy, and this strategy accelerated the conflict between the pro and con advocates, and  made the undecided voters leery, perhaps turned off.   The tone of elections matter, particularly when they are close to home, or neighbor vs. neighbor.  There did not seem to be enough happy or positive advocates for either side.

 

3.  There is not presently a consensus for a new city of LaVista Hills, and perhaps there needs to be more buy-in before new campaigns are initiated.  Very few states create new cities through the state legislatures, and many states requires a petition process that calls for between 10% and 40% of the voters to ask for an election for a new city before the process of actual city creation moves forward.  I am recommending some form of a petition process to the House study committee, on which I serve, for our final report.  When the study committee issues its report, I will update you on any recommendations.

 

4.  Most of the voters in the map of LaVista Hills who are also in the  82nd House District voted No at a higher rate than the overall No vote.  There was too much division between the neighborhoods -- some  strongly for and some strongly against a new city which is unusual, I think.

 

These thoughts may not be your views, and I am respectful of the strongly held wishes for new cities in general.  As we move forward, I hope the process will be more transparent and there will be a more cooperative approach to achieve consensus.   Thank you!  I am happy to hear your  ideas for the future. 

 

 

Survey on Changing DeKalb CEO type Government  

 

In my last newsletter, I asked the question: "Would you vote to replace the current CEO form of government with an elected County Commission and a county manager?"

 

             YES        88%

             NO        12%

 

Sample comments:

 

"A county manager would bring professional decision making to DeKalb and less politics."

 

"Who can expect anything but disaster  when an elected official with no management experience is put in charge of an organization the size of DeKalb? Doesn't even know the right questions to ask."

 

"The problem exists with elected officials, not the form of government." 

 

 

Child Welfare Reform Council
 
I serve on the Governor's Child Welfare Reform Council and am working on legislation and support for teenagers in foster care to take driver's education and obtain driver's licenses.   Does the state have an obligation to provide foster care children with opportunity to have a driver's license?    Who should pay?  Who may authorize the child to apply for a license? 

There are many other issues the Council is considering, and I will report to you on the final recommendations.



 

 

 
 



Please contact me anytime with your questions or comments and visit our website at the link below and  follow me on Facebook and Twitter by clicking the links below.  I look forward to working with you during the  2016 Georgia General Assembly, and I need your help!!  In the meantime, I will continue to report on issues that may interest you, and welcome your suggestions on how this newsletter may better serve you.
  


Mary Margaret

mmo@mmolaw.com
Law Office (404) 377-0485
Legislative Office (404) 656-0265
http://marymargaretoliver.org/
Like us on Facebook 
Follow us on Twitter