SHARE:  
Senate BadgeHouse Dem Caucus Logo
PRESS RELEASE
December 23, 2011
For Immediate Release

Contact:

Liz Flowers
House Democratic Caucus
Senate Democratic Caucus
404-291-4755
flowersliz123@gmail.com



GA DEMS DISAPPOINTED IN ROUND ONE OF RESTRICTING DECISION 

Leaders optimistic maps will be struck down by courts 

Atlanta, Ga. - December 23, 2011 - Georgia's Democrats expressed disappointment today in round one of the redistricting fight with Department of Justice's (DOJ) ruling that granted pre-clearance for the state redistricting maps. However, they expressed optimism for the continued judicial process the maps will undergo.

 

In previous years, the DOJ has pre-cleared Georgia's maps only to have the courts intervene following additional litigation and demand new maps be drawn under their supervision.

With pre-clearance, the maps will immediately take effect because the Governor has already signed them into law.

 

The 2012 elections will be run using these pre-cleared maps unless the courts intervene. It becomes a matter of litigation to enjoin them from being utilized.

 

"Republicans are attempting to use the Voting Rights Act to resegregate Georgia. The Voting Rights Act prohibits racial discrimination of any kind. The GOP-approved maps appear to be systematic in their targeting of White Democrats and harmful in their outcome," said Sen. Horacena Tate, chair of the Senate Democratic Reapportionment Committee.

 

Reducing the minority population in numerous districts violates the intent of the Voting Rights Act and potentially reduces the ability of African Americans and Latinos and all other voters to build coalitions and elect the candidates of their choice.

 

"We could have taken a different path during the special reapportionment session. Instead, Republican partisanship prevailed and now we will be forced to revisit this matter in litigation and the courts, taking time away from the real issues that matter to Georgians," said Rep. Billy Mitchell, assistant whip for the House Democrats.

 

Democrats support maps that are fair and do not polarize communities that have been successfully integrated through the Voting Rights Act.

 

"The proposed maps unfairly isolate minority voters from their coalition partners, violating the spirit of the Voting Rights Act. These maps attempt to erode the multi-racial coalitions that Georgia has been so successful in building.  And it is clear that the purpose of these maps is to discriminate against certain voters because of their political views. That is unconstitutional, " said Sen. Jason Carter (D-Decatur).

 

The effect of creating a Republican super-majority would be devastating to Georgia citizens and will potentially silence the voices of many for the next decade. Democrats said the focus of Georgia should be rebuilding the economy and creating real jobs.

 

"Creating a prosperous and strong Georgia that focuses on families and small businesses is essential to rebuilding our state's economy. Silencing such a significant portion of our population through gerrymandering is harmful to building communities that work," said Sen. Steve Henson, leader of the Senate Democratic Caucus. "Our priority of rebuilding the state's economy requires the best ideas Democrats, Republicans, conservatives and liberals have to offer. Anything less, starves our state from recovery."

 

"Georgians want transparent and honest government. When people are struggling to pay their bills and are trying to find jobs that pay well, redistricting may seem like a useless government function. But when citizens understand that their voice in government is at stake, it changes the dialogue. In the current environment, Democrats are the watchdog for the regular person," said Rep. Stacey Abrams, leader of the House Democratic Caucus. "In an era of tax hikes on working families by Republicans who promised fiscal responsibility, who voters elect matters."

The Georgia Legislative Black Caucus, GALEO, and other like-minded organizations and individuals have demonstrated that they are willing to be involved in the litigation of these maps.

###