ENT E-Update masthead
MUSC Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery E-Update                 May 2016 
Greetings Colleagues,
 
In our May article, Samuel L. Oyer, M.D. describes surgical options for re-animating the smile in patients with facial paralysis. Dr. Oyer joined our faculty in 2015 in the division of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 
 
These newsletters are designed to provide brief, practical, clinical updates in areas where we all struggle in managing our patients. Your feedback or questions about the E-Update articles, your patients, or any other ENT issue are always welcome. Write to us at [email protected] - And please forward this E-Update to your colleagues who may also benefit from sharing the latest ENT topics. As always, your support is deeply appreciated.
 
Yours sincerely,
Paul R. Lambert, M.D.
Professor and Department Chair
Dynamic Smile Re-animation Options
for Facial Paralysis
Samuel L. Oyer, M.D. 
 
Facial paralysis is a devastating condition arising from a variety of causes. While some patients with facial paralysis demonstrate spontaneous recovery to normal or near-normal status, others are left with persistent facial weakness and its associated sequelae. In addition to impaired facial function and facial asymmetry, one of the most devastating effects of facial paralysis for many patients is the loss of a meaningful smile. The smile is an integral part of a person's identity and plays a critical role in social interaction, emotional expression, and interpersonal communication. Smiling is meant to portray a positive emotion, but for patients affected by facial paralysis, 59% are perceived as expressing a negative emotion even when smiling.1 This creates a negative feedback loop that further decreases a person's willingness to smile and augments the sense of deformity. 
facial nerve and muscles
Arguably the best option to restore a smile in facial paralysis is to re-establish an intact neural connection through the patient's native facial nerve to the native facial muscles. This is what is accomplished through immediate nerve repair or cable grafting following facial nerve trauma or resection. This reconstruction is not perfect, and patients are at risk of developing synkinesis and sub-maximal facial excursion, but the intricate natural connections between the native facial muscles and skin are preserved.
When the proximal facial nerve is not available but distal nerve fibers remain, an alternative neural input can be transferred to the intact distal facial nerve. Traditionally, a separate cranial nerve such as the hypoglossal or accessory nerve have been used for this purpose. Recently there has been increased interest in transferring the masseteric nerve to restore oral commissure and smile movement. The masseteric nerve is a terminal motor branch of the third division of the trigeminal nerve (V3) that supplies the masseter muscle. This nerve passes through the sigmoid notch of the mandible to run within the substance of the masseter muscle and can consistently be found in a triangle formed by the zygomatic arch, mandibular condyle and frontal branch of the facial nerve. 2 The masseteric nerve can be transected distally enough to reliably reach individual branches of the facial nerve for direct neural coaptation without the need for an interposition graft. Typically the largest buccal branch of the facial nerve that drives smile production is targeted for coaptation with the masseteric nerve, in some cases this selection can be aided intraoperative by direct electrical stimulation of the facial nerve branches. This targeted nerve transfer focuses all the axons of the masseteric nerve toward smile production and limits the development of synkinesis and mass movement that can be seen with coaptation to the main facial nerve trunk. Once neural ingrowth is complete, a smile can be produced when the patient clenches his or her jaw. The resulting smile can have quite strong excursion and with training can become very natural for patients to produce without consciously biting down, although it is never truly spontaneous. There is little to no morbidity or functional deficit seen with sacrifice of the masseteric nerve.
When denervation exists for a period of over two years, there is considerable motor endplate fibrosis that occurs and re-innervation via nerve grafting or nerve transfer is much less successful. In these cases, smile restoration is best accomplished via dynamic muscle or tendon transfer. Temporalis muscle transfer has been utilized for facial reanimation for decades, but more recently has undergone progressive changes and is now accomplished through a less invasive, orthodromic, temporalis tendon transfer without need for muscle mobilization. 3 In this procedure, the temporalis tendon is released from the mandibular ramus and mobilized along with the coronoid process. This can be accomplished via an intraoral incision or a direct incision in the nasolabial fold. Once mobilized, the tendon is transposed to dynamically suspend the oral commissure and inset directly with sutures or with an intervening fascia lata extension depending on available reach. The location of inset can be optimized intraoperatively with direct stimulation of the temporalis muscle to assure optimal tension of the muscle tendon unit. 4 This procedure allows for suspension of the paralyzed oral commissure along with a method of immediate dynamic movement produced with jaw clench.  Post surgical re-training is very beneficial to allow patients to achieve a more natural smile without the need to consciously clench the jaw.
An alternative to temporalis tendon transfer is neurotized free muscle transfer. While many donor muscles have been utilized for this purpose, the most commonly used is the gracilis muscle from the inner thigh. A partial thickness flap of gracilis muscle is harvested along with its neurovascular pedicle. The muscle is transferred to the face with one end inset around the oral commissure and the other in the pre-auricular region around the zygoma. The vector of muscle inset can be varied to match the contralateral smile pattern. The muscle is re-vascularized most commonly to the facial vessels or superficial temporal vessels and the nerve supply to the muscle is provided by the ipsilateral masseteric nerve or the contralateral facial nerve via a previously placed cross facial nerve graft. After a several month period of re-innervation a dynamic smile is produced that can be further refined with post-operative facial retraining. Utilizing a cross facial nerve graft allows for a truly spontaneous smile triggered by the buccal branch of the facial nerve on the opposite side, while a masseteric nerve input allows for a single stage procedure and slightly stronger smile excursion that is less spontaneous. Success rates of this surgery are high, and this is an excellent re-animation option for children with congenital forms of facial paralysis.
Facial paralysis affects every patient in a unique way, so no single method of facial reanimation can be successfully applied to all patients. The optimal reanimation technique performed must be individualized based on specific patient circumstances. While no technique can completely re-create the original intricate pattern of facial movements, a thoughtfully selected combination of techniques can often go a long way toward restoring a patient's facial function and ability for social interaction to a much more meaningful state.
References
  1. Ishii L, Godoy A, Encarnacion C, et al. What faces reveal: impaired affect display in facial paralysis. Laryngoscope. 2011;121:1138-1143.
  2. Collar RM, Byrne PJ, Boahene KDO. The subzygomatic triangle: rapid, minimally invasive identification of the masseteric nerve for facial reanimation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132:183-188.
  3. Boahene KD, Farrag TY, Ishii L, Byrne PJ. Minimally invasive temporalis tendon transposition. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2011;13:8-13.
  4. Boahene KD, Ishii L, Byrne PJ. In vivo excursion of the temporalis muscle-tendon unit using electrical stimulation. Application in the design of smile restoration surgery following facial paralysis. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2014;16:15-19.
Samuel L. Oyer, M.D.

Assistant Professor, FPRS
M.D.: Indiana University School of Medicine
Residency: Medical University of South Carolina
Fellowship: Johns Hopkins University
Special Interests: Facial paralysis, facial reconstruction, nasal surgery, mohs reconstruction, rhinoplasty, scar revision/keloid, botox and facial fillers, brow lift, blepharoplasty
facelift

Email: [email protected]

E-Update Articles 
Look for these articles in upcoming issues!
   
June: Is Meniere's Disease a Migraine of the Inner Ear?

July: Contemporary Management of Recurrent Respiratory Papilloma


August: Effects of
USP 797 Compounding Guidelines on the Administration of Allergen Immunotherapy


To view any of our past E-Updates visit our
Continuing Education
MUSC Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery | WEBSITE | EMAIL