As you may recall,
NAPBS filed an amicus brief
in the matter of CFPB vs Source for Public Data in support of Source for Public Data. Earlier today, September 6, 2018, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit announced its decision in CFPB v. Source for Public Data, No. 17-10732. For only the second time in the Bureau's seven-year history, a court rejected the CFPB's petition to enforce its Civil Investigative Demand (CID).
The Bureau's authorizing statute allows it to conduct investigations through CIDs, which compel the production of information, but it also requires that CIDs describe the laws violated and conduct that caused the suspected violations in a "Notification of Purpose." Here the Bureau's Notification of Purpose essentially stated that the Bureau sought to investigate whether any person who procured or used a consumer report had violated any law enforced by the Bureau. Source for Public Data challenged the CID, primarily arguing that the CID's vague Notification of Purpose rendered it defective.
The Fifth Circuit agreed with Source for Public Data. While the Bureau has broad authority to conduct investigations, the court held that the Bureau "does not have unfettered authority to cast about for potential wrongdoing." CID recipients should know what conduct is under investigation, what laws have potentially been violated, and whether the recipient is a third-party or a "target" of an investigation.
Read the decision here
This communication is for NAPBS Members Only and may not be forwarded outside of NAPBS, posted online, or otherwise reprinted in whole or in part. Except where otherwise indicated, articles are copyright (c) by NAPBS 2018. All rights reserved.