letterhead

 
Since our focus has largely been about nuclear issues, I want to start by letting you know that today, 5/23/16, is the last day to register to vote in California's primary, (FYI - Bernie Sanders is the only candidate that is calling to phase out nuclear power). Please remind friends and family. It is quick and easy to do at http://registertovote.ca.gov/

Breaking NEWS...

The possibility of Southern California becoming a nuclear wasteland has just been confirmed in this article. In a highly regarded report released last Friday, experts said
enough is not being done to prevent a calamitous nuclear fuel fire. 

The 222 page report, written by 17 distinguished nuclear physicists, engineers, and other scientists, said the industry and the NRC calculations were too narrow. "In fact, a spent fuel pool accident can result in large radioactive material releases, extensive land contamination, and large-scale population dislocations," it said. Panel member Frank von Hippel, an emeritus professor and senior research physicist at Princeton University, said that in its "deeply-flawed" cost-benefit analysis, the NRC also excluded consideration of the consequences of property contamination more than 50 miles from a radiation release, even though a broader release is clearly possible.  "There were some important issues that were not considered," said Joseph E. Shepherd, a professor of aeronautics and mechanical engineering at the California Institute of Technology who chaired the Academies board that conducted the study.  Nuclear regulators say that since the destructive impact from a drained spent fuel pool is "unknowable", that it need not be considered,  (an outrageous case of denial from those we count on for our protection). 

This is the not-so impressive condition of San Onofre's lethal nuclear waste pool. 
Even to the layperson,  this looks like outdated technology in disarray.


As if that was not enough to be concerned about...

Last week I also got a detailed anonymous letter from a high level employee currently working at SONGS. As you probably know, this is how we got involved in nuclear issues in the first place, when we were warned about the steam generators two years before they leaked. T his letter concerns matters of  corruption, bad contracts, flawed waste storage containers and dangerous pools. 


Making matters even worse...

I also recently heard from David Lochbaum, nuclear expert at the Union of Concerned Scientists, that there is another reason why "irradiated fuel in spent fuel pools is an undue hazard", (the point being that dry storage is the lesser of two evils). He explained that " if water doesn't drain from the pool, a critical mass can occur anyway. The neutron absorbers installed in the racks have not aged well -- some has leached into the water and some has sagged to the bottom of the racks due to gravity leaving the upper portions of the fuel unprotected.  This protection is far from reliable ".

To put this matter into proper perspective, I did some more research on the possible outcome from reaching "critical mass". Both United States and Japanese governments have for decades allowed re-racking of the pools to reduce the originally-designed minimum safe distance between the assemblies so that more rods can be stored in each pool. Utilities complained they were running out of storage space on site at the reactors. The problem is if the spent fuel gets too close, they will produce a fission reaction and explode with a force much larger than any fission bomb given the total amount of fuel on the site.  All the fuel in the storage pools at San Onofre (over two million pounds) would be consumed in such a mega-explosion.  In comparison, Fat Man and Little Boy weapons dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki contained less than a hundred pounds each of fissile material. (from https://dcbureau.org/20110314781/natural-resources-news-service/fission-criticality-in-cooling-ponds-threaten-explosion-at-fukushima.html).


ALL THE MORE REASON TO ATTEND TWO UPCOMING EVENTS

The first one is on June 8, 6:00 PM at Laguna Beach City Hall. It will cover the side of the story that you won't hear from Edison's hand picked Community Engagement Panel, who will be holding their next CEP meeting on June 22 at 5:30 PM at the San Juan Capistrano Community Center. We are pleased that this meeting will be held in our vicinity this time and we hope lots of well informed and concerned citizens who go to the Laguna Beach meeting will show up for this one too. 

More details for the Laguna Beach event can be found here
CEP Meeting details can be found here.



Please consider making a contribution 
(perhaps the now familiar $27 figure).
Your level of support in this critical matter, 
determines just how far we can take this movement. 
Thank you! 

 
Donate