John Longenecker
Safer Streets Going armed with thought
and knowledge
I've written about critical
thinking or critical analysis as a survival skill. It is something
you must master if you expect to be independent and teach
independence. It is to be armed with thought and
knowledge.
Critical thinking is the ability to discern
empty-headed sloganeering from truths which apply to you; it is the
ability to know whether you are being treated fairly or being
deceived with weasel words. It is discernment coupled with an
undeterred probing for clarification and accurate
understanding.
Let's use the First Amendment as an
example. My generation uses the
Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.'s dictum [Schenk v. United
States] that you do not falsely yell "Fire!" in a
crowded theatre. Some people accept this cliche as an example of
exceptions to our freedom of speech, but, incomplete often, it is
misleading: for, you do yell "Fire!" in a crowded
theatre if the place is on fire; you are not creating a problem,
you are part of the solution. Cliches have a funny habit of
clinging as stiflers of critical thinking, and that stifles a
spirit of independence.
[On this topic, I want to recommend a book
which moves on silly maxims, cliches and slogans of leftist thought
or absence of it in forming American attitudes. I recommend
Poor Lenin's Almanac - Perverse leftist proverbs for modern
life by liberty writer Bruce Walker. Go to Outskirtspress.com]
Another is the idea of 50% of all marriages
ending in divorce. In the middle seventies, our statistics
instructor pointed out how to investigate such a statement. We
students then fulfilled the aassignment and discovered that the 50%
figure applied to newlyweds in the first two years, and that if you
survive your first two years, you can then move into another
demographic which offers greater hope for your marriage. I was made
to think of that class this week when Beck added that the divorce
rate was largely dependent on maturity and age, too, as
factors, before it was approaching anything like 50%.
Critical thinking is a safeguard of our
freedoms.
Other examples of critical analysis are
these: 1. You cannot lie under oath and claim free speech; 2. You
cannot falsely advertise and hide behind the first amendment; 3.
You can't defame others and claim freedom of speech; 4. You cannot
issue public statements for the purpose of stock manipulation and
claim freedom of speech ... You get the idea. You certainly
can yell in a crowded theatre, if the place is really on
fire. In fact, you'd better.
What does this have to do with our second
amendment?
Critical analysis of why one would want to
own a gun; how non-gun owners ask why anyone would falls
into the trap of not immediately seeing an insightful answer and
assuming the answer must be unknowable.
But the kind of adult citizen who thinks it
through and elects to be armed is likely a critical thinker in
other areas. And you know something: this is the kind of citizen
many, many of us are as the sovereign in our system. It is not that
people are thoughtful or not, it is a survival skill which can be
taught.
It better be. Critical analysis finds
that - unlike the First Amendment - the Second Amendment is
absolute.
The health of the second amendment is the
primary indicator of the overall health of the nation.
_________________________________________________
|