"We the People" Are Losing Our Voice (and the US$)

Follow FREE Research at MATASII.com

PUBLIC EDITION

Any Problems? Notify: lcmgroupe2@comcast.net

Gordon T Long Research exclusively located at MATASII.com

RESEARCH MAILING CONTROLCHANGES / SIGNUP

MACRO ANALYTICS - NOVEMBER

"WE THE PEOPLE" ARE LOSING OUR VOICE

We are witnessing a moral collapse in the media. The news is no longer "balanced" since the media now makes their 'big bucks' by selling "Narrative". If you doubt that for one moment view any story as reported on Fox News versus CNN. 5 years ago the difference was not nearly as blatant. It has reached the point where if you are are a Democrat you can't stand Fox and if your are a Republican you won't tolerate listening to CNN! What has splintered Americans to such a degree?

It is called narrative.

MACRO ANALYTICS - 12-17-20 - Buying the Narrative

It comes in many forms, but one egregious example of where it is almost impossible to reconcile is evident in how we have been told to view our US President:

CNN & Mainstream Media's Narrative for President Trump:

President Trump is an illegitimate President, in power solely through Russia collusion. Trump is a far-right, authoritarian tyrant, seeking permanent rule; a buffoon, a fascist, racist, white supremacist, narcissist, lunatic, and incompetent, lacking in both empathy and presidential dignity. A disgrace to America that must be removed immediately at any cost.

Fox's Media's Narrative for President Trump:

President Trump is the patriotic upholder of the American Constitution, a man of legendary accomplishments in office -- four partners for peace in the Middle East (the UAE, Bahrain, Sudan and Morocco); producing and delivering a new vaccine in less than a year; expanding school choice to improve "equality"; preventing Iran from a nuclear breakout; protecting the US border from trafficking and drug smuggling, and unmasking and confronting China as a lawless, omnivorous threat. To this group, he is a Hercules, delivering for the people in spite of unrelenting attempts to undermine him, and by far the last best hope of saving the United States from an energized, appeasement-prone, increasingly socialist takeover.

You could become schizophrenic rationalizing a viewing choice between these two options! But maybe more importantly, what does it tell us about our beliefs that may be myths??

The media is no longer a source of truth aimed at informing the electorate and being the voice of "We the People".
The media is no longer the public's advocacy watchdog but rather an instrument of special interests in "selling" their desired "narrative"..
The media doesn't play fair as it is now engaged in the new form of News reporting called "Advocacy Journalism" or "Advocacy Positioning" which polarizes and segments markets, thereby effectively pitting Americans against each other on a multitude of social issues.
The polarization of segmented markets has been found to be a more profitable approach in attracting high paying special interest groups.

However, as a result of these shifts "We the People" are losing our voice. We are now being told what to believe versus the media informing us and listening to what "We the People" think and want ..... thereby uniting our voice before our elected representatives and government.

Charles Hugh Smith and I detail this profoundly important shift in this months Macro Analytic video (available below).

CONSENT OF THE GOVERNED

The US Constitution was created to enshrine the USA as a Republic where all power rested with "We the People". The Government was intended as a servant of the People's voice through a Democratic process, which entailed clear checks and balance of power through the "Separation of Power", The Electoral College and the Bill of Rights.

All three of these pillars are now under serious attack and none more than the First Amendment where Freedom of Speech is in fact being limited by the Media in the form of Censorship, Shadowbanning, De-Monitization and other forms of suppression of the news. Our elected officials (controlled by the news cycle & party bosses) and the media are now on the side of the "governing" versus those being "governed".

THE FIRST AMENDMENT

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

The question as clearly evidenced in the recent election, is whether the "Consent of the Governed" is now being taken from us in the form of Voter and Election Fraud with the media playing a culpable role in this! (See the Addendum for the evidence).

A mounting Crisis of Trust in our institutions is surging in America and will not be easily suppressed.

We encourage you to read the 2013 MATASII Thesis paper entitled "Statism" where we warned of this inevitable eventuality that was underway seven years ago (LINK).

if we don't stop it , to quote ALDOUS HUXLEY: then:

"LOVE YOUR SERVITUDE"

"As more and more news of the election fraud has comes to the attention of Americans, rallies have sprung up in support of honest elections. So far, still to be answered, is the question: If election officials can ignore legalities with impunity, how, going forward, can there be trustworthy elections?"

Leni Friedman Valenta with Jiri Valenta via The Gatestone Institute,

US DOLLAR - DXY - >>>> SUBSCRIBER LINK

DECEMBER - MACRO ANALYTICS Video

VIDEO: 36 Minutes with 34 supporting slides. >>> Buying the Narrative

ADDENDUM TO THE MACRO ANALYTICS VIDEO

EVIDENCE OF 2020 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION FRAUD

DR PETER NAVARRO REPORT

This report assesses the fairness and integrity of the 2020 Presidential Election by examining six dimensions of alleged election irregularities across six key battleground states. Evidence used to conduct this assessment includes more than 50 lawsuits and judicial rulings, thousands of affidavits and declarations, testimony in a variety of state venues, published analyses by think tanks and legal centers, videos and photos, public comments, and extensive press coverage.

The matrix below indicates that significant irregularities occurred across all six battleground states and across all six dimensions of election irregularities. This finding lends credence to the claim that the election may well have been stolen from President Donald J. Trump.

Report Link

From the findings of this report, it is possible to infer what may well have been a coordinated strategy to effectively stack the election deck against the Trump-Pence ticket. Indeed, the observed patterns of election irregularities are so consistent across the six battleground states that they suggest a coordinated strategy to, if not steal the election outright, strategically game the election process in such a way as to “stuff the ballot box” and unfairly tilt the playing field in favor of the Biden-Harris ticket.

AMISTAD REPORT

The 2020 presidential election witnessed an unprecedented and coordinated public-private partnership to improperly influence the 2020 presidential election on behalf of one particular candidate and party.

Funded by hundreds of millions of dollars from Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg and other high-tech interests, activist organizations created a two-tiered election system that treated voters differently depending on whether they lived in Democrat or Republican strongholds.

Private monies dictated city and county election management contrary to both federal law and state election plans endorsed and developed by state legislatures with authority granted by the United States Constitution

Report Link

ORGANIZATION CHART OF MARK ZUCKERMAN'S DEPLOYMENT OF $500M INTO ELECTIONEERING PROCESS

NEW: PRESIDENT TRUMP'S PETITION OF THE SUPREME COURT (267 Pages)

Article II of the Constitution provides that “Each State shall appoint [electors for President and Vice President] in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct.” U.S. Const. art. II, § 1, cl. 2 (emphasis added). That power is “plenary,” and the statutory provisions enacted by the legislature in the furtherance of that constitutionally-assigned duty may not be ignored by state election officials or changed by state courts. Bush v. Gore (“Bush II”), 531 U.S. 98, 104-05 (2000).

Yet, during the 2020 presidential election, that is what the Pennsylvania Supreme Court did in four cases – three at issue in this Petition, and one already before the Court. Statutory requirements were eliminated regarding signature verification, the right of campaigns to challenge invalid mail ballots, mandates that mail voters fill in, date, and sign mail ballot declarations, and even the right of campaigns to observe the mail ballot canvassing process in a meaningful way.

Collectively, these three decisions resulted in counting approximately 2.6 million mail ballots in violation of the law as enacted by the Pennsylvania Legislature.

According to public reports, without these protections, the resulting disqualification rate of invalid ballots was anemic—meaning over 110,000 invalid ballots were illegally counted—more than enough to have affected the outcome of the election, where the margin between the two principal candidates for President currently stands at 80,558.

The questions presented are therefore:

1. Whether the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s alteration or suspension of state ii election law through its three decisions before and after the November 2020 general election usurped the Pennsylvania Legislature’s plenary authority to “direct [the] Manner” for appointing electors for President and Vice-President, in violation of Article II, Section 1, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution?

2. Whether the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s three decisions usurping the Pennsylvania Legislature’s plenary authority to “direct [the] Manner” for appointing presidential electors, by changing the law, including eviscerating protections against mail ballot fraud, violated the Due Process Clause of the Constitution, and whether Pennsylvania applying the new rules promulgated by the Court during the election in only select counties where mail ballots heavily favored one candidate over the other violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution?

3. Whether this Court has the power to provide a meaningful remedy to Petitioner in advance of the January 6, 2021 Joint Session of Congress, at which electoral votes will be opened and counted, or before the January 20, 2021 inauguration date specified by the Constitution?

267 Report Link

PROPAGANDA, ELECTION FRAUD, & THE DEATH OF JOURNALISM

Authored by Frank Miele via RealClearPolitics.com,

Easy question: Is it illegal to steal an election or not?

You would have to assume that it is no big deal based on the response to claims of widespread fraud in the contest between President Trump and Joe Biden. Big Media says the evidence just doesn’t exist, and most Americans seem to be lost in a blue haze of blind acceptance that whatever they are told by the talking heads on TV must be true.

This kind of unthinking obedience to authority is a frightening harbinger of an America that is no longer a nation of laws, but rather a nation of edicts. You can already see that unfolding in the sheep-like acceptance of COVID-19 restrictions that blatantly ignore the Constitution. But if you dare do your own independent assessment of facts -- whether regarding the efficacy of mask use in preventing spread of coronavirus or regarding the security of electronic voting -- you will quickly come to a different conclusion than that which is approved by Big Tech, Big Media and Big Money.

Unfortunately, most people don’t take the time to do their own research. They simply believe whatever is told to them. For those in thrall to the establishment media, that means they believe that Trump’s allegations of election fraud are “baseless.” Remember, the media made that declaration within hours of the election, long before any evidence had been presented in a court of law and before analysis had begun on the raw vote totals. Once that narrative was established, it didn’t matter how many affidavits were presented, how many witnesses came forward, or how much analysis suggested that the vote count may have been manipulated. The jury of the American people had already been tainted by Big Media to believe the narrative that Trump is a sore loser.

read more .....( and the report links above for proof)