It is clear that policy can play a role in accelerating the adoption of CCUS technologies: creating regulatory or government-backed incentives to adopt "circular CO2"-based products instead of ones based on virgin raw materials could make a big difference. In the best case, something like this would even create a spike in demand for sourcing more CO2 as feedstock to these new materials, thus helping scale up industries like Direct Air Capture.
What is your prediction for the field of CCU?
We predict that there will be more attention toward processes like mineralization (especially when combined with negative emissions). At the moment, most of the attention is on using CO2 to make fuels and chemicals, but these routes demand a lot of renewable energy, and the fuels/chemicals are eventually still burned, releasing the CO2 again. Mineralization, however, is permanent, requires less energy, and results in products that serve as a substitute for heavily emitting mineral products. Further, it includes industries which have only recently begun to realize net zero is also required for them (cement and paper just to name a few).
What inspires you all to keep going in the face of difficulties?
Wallace Broecker has a very inspirational quote.
"I am convinced that, in the long term, we must turn to solutions that involve chemical neutralization (immobilization) of CO2, as opposed to simply storing it in gaseous form. Hence I consider petroleum reservoirs and saline aquifers as interim storage solutions. Ultimately, we must learn to economically bind CO2 with the magnesium and calcium contained in silicate rocks, whether it be under in situ or ex situ conditions."
|