In this Edition
- 2025 Assessment Update
- 2024-2029 Reclamation's Klamath Project Modeling Analysis
- Upcoming Events
- Your District in the News
- What We are Reading
- Opportunities
| |
2025 Budget for Klamath Irrigation District | |
$89.50 Per Acre (less than 2% increase) |
On 6 November 2024, the Directors of Klamath Irrigation District received the Executive Director's 2025 Budget Recommendations. The Directors analyzed and discussed numerous items related to the budget to include:
- Electricity Rates Tentatively to increase by 22.4% from 2024
- Concrete and Rock costs up 11%
- Insurance Costs up 12-15%
- Audit services to increase by 7-10%
- Waste Management up 14%
- IT services to increase by over 10% with a transition to a .gov domain
- Contracted Professional Services up by 7%
- CDL costs up 50%
- OWRD requested 135% increase in fees
- Grant Funding requested through 2025 is anticipated to be delayed
- Opportunities with the new federal administration in 2025
- Expenses related to political decisions are anticipated to increase by 300%, with Reclamation's new proposed action anticipated to go into effect at any time
On 15 November, Reclamation informed K.I.D. of budget adjustments for Reserved Works (Link River Dam and Station 48) significantly in excess of what the Directors had approved for a 2025 budget (in 2024, the Link River Dam was budgeted to cost the farmers in excess of $301,000). The Executive Director and DIstrict Manager will be engaging with Reclamation to attempt to mitigate these additional forecasted 2025 costs.
Farmers pay 100% of the Operation, Maintenance, and improvements to the Link River Dam to store water in Upper Klamath Lake for beneficial use as granted water rights by the State of Oregon. No other entity demanding lake elevations pays for these costs. Only those entities that submitted claims to stored water in Upper Klamath Lake are authorized to divert stored water under Oregon law, which Section 8 of the Reclamation Act infers is controlling of Reclamation actions. However, Reclamation's new proposed action writes in water rights outside of Reclamation's authority and provides storage for water for entities and purposes for which Reclamation does not have a water right for. This case, argued by K.I.D., is currently before the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals with supporting arguments by the Klamath Water Users Association.
Given that K.I.D.'s mission is to acquire, maintain, assure, and deliver an adequate water supply for beneficial use, the Directors, with much angst, approved the Executive Director's budget with a $2 per acre increase, raising rates less than 2% to $89.50 per acre with significantly increased costs to engage with the new administration. Funds were adjusted across budget line items and from the District reserve to prioritize the District's responsibility for federal administration engagement.
The K.I.D. staff is currently preparing these invoices to be mailed on 1 December according to the District Financial Policy.
| |
Reclamation's 2024-2029 Proposed Action Limiting Water to Family Farms for Inbred Whales that Eat Less than 3,000 Klamath River Chinook
On 14 June 2024, Reclamation submitted a Biological Assessment for Effects of the Klamath Reclamation Project to the US Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Marine Fisheries Service for their opinions on the action's effect to endangered and threatened species.
The documentation on the 33 inbred Southern Resident Killer Whales, which eat less than 3,000 Klamath River Chinook, can be found here.
To learn more about the whale pods and whale trails affecting Klamath farmers, click here...
Reclamation's plan, on median years, only allows for 166,000 acre-feet of water from Upper Klamath Lake to be delivered to family farms with a historical need of 402,000 acre-feet, with 304,000 acre-feet coming from Upper Klamath Lake during K.I.D.'s irrigation season. This volume is insufficient to meet Reclamation's non-discretionary legal and contractual obligations, let alone its additional discretionary obligations with the Secretary of Interior level of authority to exercise reductions in water supplies.
The 14 June 2024 Biological Assessment can be downloaded here.
*Note: It is a very dense document.
Reclamation then issued a fictional Environmental Assessment on 12 September. We assess it is fictional in that Reclamation claims that with dam removal and the Agency Barnes reconnection scheduled for this fall, water availability for farmers is greatly improved over the rules of the failed Interim Operations Plan (IOP). However, the "No Action Alternative" does not evaluate "No Action"...the action of dams out and the action of Agency Barnes reconnection are included. "No Action" also does not mean to a person of average intelligence that "if Reclamation had not invested in the Klamath Basin, then these are the conditions" as outlined by Congress in their "but for" language in the ESA. Nor does "No Action" mean that the exact model volumes available to farmers in 2023 are the same calculations in 2025. Nor does "No Action" mean operating the irrigation works as they were operated in 1977 prior to the passing of the ESA.
The fallacy of Reclamation's Environmental Assessment can be clearly seen by studying the table below.
| |
In simply comparing the numbers in "red" on the right side of the table with the numbers in "green" and "orange" on the left side of the table, a comparison of the changes in federal policy. The volumes of water in "purple" are uncertain to be available and require precipitation and decisions outside of Klamath Irrigation District's ability to influence K.I.D., a gravity flow system built to deliver water without pumps to 122,000 acres is mainly isolated to water directly from Upper Klamath Lake to meet our legal and contractual obligations. There is no guarantee nor expectation by K.I.D. that the volumes of purple water will be made available to K.I.D.'s infrastructure. Also note that the volumes in "purple" are only available after refuge managers determine how much of 43,000 acres of additional water not identified on this chart will be provided to the Tule Lake and Lower Klamath National Wildlife Refuges. Please note that K.I.D. acknowledges that the refugees have a water right, which is junior to many of the farmers who are assessed fees by the district for operations and maintenance costs, and K.I.D. will be expected by Reclamation to curtail water deliveries to these lands during this new federal administration between 2025-2029.
On 28 October, the National Marine Fisheries Service released its 365-page biological opinion on why the Klamath Reclamation Project is affecting the inbred whales.
On page 279, NMFS clearly states to Reclamation that NMFS requires Reclamation to put water into the Klamath National Wildlife Refuges to not create jeopardy for the future existence of the inbred whales or threatened coho salmon.
Also note that "NMFS anticipates incidental take of SONCC coho salmon and Southern Resident Killer Whales as a result of the proposed action" which denies small family farmers water needed to pay their mortgages.
This is in SHARP contrast to the NMFS position on dam removal in the FERC EIS, which found that the removal of four dams on the Klamath River, hundreds of millions of tons of sediment movement, known and expected fish kills, would have "less than significant, adverse effect."
The short version of the FERC EIS statement on the impact of dam removal is in the image below. Dam removal and millions of tons of sediment have a "LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT" effect on the inbred whales. However, by not allowing the water that naturally would have been retained and evaporated from Lower Klamath Lake to return to its natural location (estimated at a minimum to be 267,000-acre feet per year) will result in incidental take of whales under the opinion of the federal employees at NMFS. We are hoping that NMFS can explain this on 20 November. We have been asking for several years, but since they just published a new Biological Opinion, it should be easy for them to answer.
| |
As of the publishing of this newsletter the USFWS Biological Opinion is not yet released to the public.
What to expect for the 2025 irrigation season
- Costly Litigation
- Conflict
- Weather patterns align with 2016, which is a median year.
* Please look at the table above to see that a median year limits water from Upper Klamath Lake to farms to 165,000 acre-feet of water (much less than is needed to meet the demands of settlement contracts and repayment "A" contracts...let alone "B" water contracts or "C" surplus contracts served by K.I.D.
The K.I.D. Directors have not provided the Executive Director with authorization to pay the Reclamation for the second 2024 Reserved Works invoice in protest of this proposed action in direct conflict with K.I.D.'s 1954 Contract Section 13a.
| | |
Klamath Basin Improvement District 65th Annual Board Meeting 19 November |
The 65th Annual Meeting of the Klamath Basin Improvement District is scheduled for Tuesday, 19 November 2024, at 10am. Location: 6640 KID Lane, Klamath Falls Oregon, 97603 The public may call in to the meeting at 425-436-6347, Access Code 8826661# In accordance with ORS 192.630(1) all meetings of the governing
| | |
120th Annual Meeting of the Klamath Irrigation District - 9 January 2025 at 1pm
No December Board Meeting
The District office will be closed 28 & 29 November and 23-25 December to allow our staff to enjoy the holidays with their families.
| The Klamath Irrigation District, described in Article 1, Section 1 of the By-Laws of the Klamath Water Users Association, was officially named in 1905. The District was formally established as a special government district after the popular vote in 1917. | | | |
Discover Events and Activities
Associated with Klamath Agriculture.
| | | |
Annual Conference - Oregon Water Resources Congress
|
OWRC Annual Conference
December 2-4, 2024 in Hood River, Oregon
| | | |
Reclamation ESA Consultation Management Team Meeting - 20 November | |
Register now for the 6th Annual Regenerative Agriculture Conference
| | | |
Your District In The News | |
Finding Refuge - By Gene Souza - Executive Director of K.I.D. | |
Ore. Water Rights Issues Grounded In State Law, 9th Circ. Told - Law360 |
The Klamath Irrigation District is asking the Ninth Circuit to certify two questions to the Oregon Supreme Court concerning the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation's authority to use and control the use of water under Oregon law.
In a motion filed on Thursday, the irrigation district said authoritative guidance from Oregon's highest court is critical, given that the federal issues in this case hinge on two essential questions: Whether the Bureau of Reclamation can divert stored water from the Upper Klamath Lake for instream use and whether it can decide how private water rights owned by Klamath Irrigation District landowners and other nonfederal parties are exercised.
"As explained in Pacheco v. United States, '[c]ertification is appropriate where a case presents complex issues of state law with significant policy implications.' Similarly, in this case, the federal questions involving the Endangered Species Act hinge on complex issues of Oregon property law, which courts have deemed appropriate for certification," the irrigation district said.
The dispute between the irrigation district and the Bureau of Reclamation stems from an order issued by the Oregon Water Resources Department in 2021 barring the bureau from releasing stored water in the Upper Klamath Lake for any purposes other than irrigation.
The lake was previously modified by the bureau in the early 1900s with the construction of the Link River Dam, which now provides the primary means of storage for the federal Klamath Project. That project provides water for the irrigation of up to approximately 230,000 acres in southern Oregon and northern California, according to the bureau.
The U.S. government, as well as the Yurok Tribe and fishing industry groups, which are plaintiffs in the suit, subsequently turned to California federal court, lodging motions for summary judgment in May 2022 that urged the court to declare the Oregon department's order preempted under the U.S. Constitution's supremacy clause because it conflicts with the Endangered Species Act.
Persuaded by their stance, U.S. District Judge William H. Orrick ruled in February 2023 that the Oregon department's order is barred by the ESA, given that if the bureau were to comply with the order by not releasing Upper Klamath Lake flows for any purposes other than irrigation, it would also jeopardize downstream coho salmon populations and the Southern Resident killer whales that prey on them.
Since turning to the Ninth Circuit, the irrigation district maintained in its opening brief that the district court's decision violates the Fifth Amendment's guarantee that the government will not take private property for public use without payment of just compensation or due process of law. The irrigation district subsequently urged the Ninth Circuit to certify its two questions to the Oregon Supreme Court during oral argument — a request it expanded upon in its Thursday motion.
"Resolving these questions regarding reclamation's authority under its water rights and Oregon law is essential, as it will establish a critical precedent for water rights across Oregon, particularly in the Klamath Basin," the irrigation district said in its motion. "This decision will affect the legal landscape for water rights throughout Oregon and directly impact the livelihoods of thousands of Oregonians in the Klamath Basin. Furthermore, it will shape how Reclamation achieves ESA compliance in the future."
Certification of the questions is also necessary to ensure that the Ninth Circuit's ruling on federal issues like the ESA are grounded in authoritative interpretations of Oregon law, the irrigation district added, noting that if the Ninth Circuit and the Oregon Supreme Court were to reach disparate conclusions with regard to the state law issues, it could undermine the Ninth Circuit's rulings on the ESA and create uncertainty for all parties.
Moreover, certification to the Oregon Supreme Court further ensures that these issues are "resolved in their proper context — focusing solely on the interpretation of Oregon's water rights system under state law," the irrigation district said.
Representatives for the parties did not immediately respond to requests for comment Friday.
The Yurok Tribe, Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations and Institute for Fisheries Resources are represented by Patti A. Goldman and Kristen Boyles of Earthjustice.
The Bureau of Reclamation is represented by Thomas K. Snodgrass, Robert P. Williams, Kevin McArdle and John L. Smeltzer of the U.S. Department of Justice's Environment and Natural Resources Division, Lance C. Wenger of the U.S. Department of the Interior and Megan J. Walline of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
Klamath Irrigation District is represented by Nathan R. Rietmann of Rietmann & Kim LLP.
The cases are Yurok Tribe et al. v. Klamath Water Users Association et al., case number 23-15499, and Yurok Tribe et al. v. Klamath Irrigation District et al., case number 23-15521, in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
--Additional reporting by Ali Sullivan and Joyce Hanson. Editing by Rich Mills.
Read more at: https://www.law360.com/nativeamerican/articles/1891501?nl_pk=6f6a28ec-3c22-487e-bc63-a655f24f7066&utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nativeamerican&utm_content=2024-10-21&read_main=1&nlsidx=0&nlaidx=3?copied=1
| | |
For decades, federal agencies have imposed drastic restrictions on water availability for irrigation and critical national wildlife refuges of the Pacific Flyway. Rather than addressing the problems of the entire ecosystem, they have hidden behind the Endangered Species Act and single-species management. | | |
In this issue:
- A Big Change this Month
- Revisiting the Kuchel Act of 1964
- Basics of Avian Botulism
- The Salmon Have Returned!
- Species Spotlight: American Avocet
| | | |
WEEKLY WATER NEWS DIGEST for Nov. 12-15: Ex-USBR leader calls on Trump to eliminate the agency; ... | “A progressive civil servant who led the Bureau of Reclamation under former President Clinton is now urging the incoming Trump administration to eliminate his former agency — an entity he has long deemed superfluous. Daniel Beard, who served as commissioner from 1993-95, said in a statement shared with The Hill that if the “administration is serious about reducing government bureaucracy, cutting wasteful expenditures and restructuring federal agencies, it should start by abolishing the Bureau of Reclamation.” Beard argued Congress only maintains the Bureau of Reclamation for political reasons, stressing that the agency’s every function could be overseen by the private sector or other federal, state, regional or local entities. … ” Read more from The Hill. | | | |
Klamath Basin Water Restoration Projects Receive $46 Million | Tribes, states, and ranchers are working to restore drought-resilient ecosystem. The Department of the Interior (DOI) announced $46 million in investments for Klamath Basin water restoration projects, a high-priority area in southern Oregon and northern California. The Western states have continued to face a water crisis as natural water sources are close to running out. | | | |
Keno Dam focus of study on fish passage |
“The fish ladder on the Keno Dam was not designed to pass anadromous fish,” said NOAA Research Fisheries Biologist Tommy Williams. “It was built after two downstream dams were in place when salmon were already blocked from migrating upstream.” Although he said “migratory fish will finally be able to reach the Keno Dam,” he cautioned that “they might have difficulty finding the fish ladder or passing this structure that anadromous salmon and steelhead have never tested.”
Alternatives for improving fish passage at the Keno Dam range from building a salmon-friendly fish ladder to removing and replacing the dam. According to ODFW, a future design would need to both provide fish passage and retain irrigation and other functions for nearby communities.
Over the next three years, ODFW will “Identify fish passage options in coordination with partners, tribes and community members; study the feasibility of the most viable fish passage options; develop cost estimates; and create a 30-percent engineering design for the chosen option.”
| | | |
State Awards $3.1 Million to Yurok Tribe for Prairie Creek Floodplain Restoration Project | | |
Congress plans patch for farm bill, punting long-term measure | Agriculture Committee leaders are looking to extend the 2018 bill into next year, but a new farm bill may not be any easier then, either. | | |
More than half of U.S. winter wheat throttled by drought | About 52% of the U.S. winter wheat crop is in drought, with similarly dry conditions across most wheat-exporting countries, according to U.S. Wheat Associates. "We've got to keep watching the weather throughout the world," said Steve Mercer, vice president of communications. "We're in a very dry period again, which is discouraging in terms of production. | | |
Oregon Supreme Court weighs irrigation dam's impacts on in-stream water rights | An irrigation district hopes to persuade the Oregon Supreme Court its planned reservoir was wrongly blocked due to a misinterpretation of in-stream water rights law. The court is considering whether | | | |
2024 Election Results Overview | President-elect Donald Trump, alongside Vice President-elect J.D. Vance, secured a decisive victory with an electoral college result of 312-226. Trump is set to be the first Republican since George W. Bush in 2004 to win the popular vote. The administration is actively filling Cabinet positions and White House roles, with key appointees such as Susie Wiles, who will serve as Chief of Staff, and potential selections like Marco Rubio for Secretary of State and Pete Hegseth for Secretary of Defense. This leadership is expected to set a new conservative tone, particularly impacting policies on energy, the environment, and federal regulatory oversight which the Alliance will be monitoring closely for opportunities to improve the climate for Western agricultural wate | | |
What's Current? Issue #68: Quantifying the Footprint of "Low Carbon" Fuel |
Anyone with the fortitude to navigate CARB's "The current yield of ethanol from a corn crop stands at not quite To put this in perspective, California's If corn is the primary feedstock for ethanol, soybeans are a common source of biodiesel. And here, the numbers bode even worse for "carbon neutral" fuel.
| | | |
A Path Forward for America's Best Idea | PERC |
Lessons Learned for Our National Parks From the Great American Outdoors Act
Since Congress passed the Great American Outdoors Act in 2020, billions of dollars have been devoted to repairing, restoring, and replacing critical assets at national parks.
| | | |
Air quality impacts of farm practices studied | A new study looks at the air quality implications of farming practices that conserve water, reduce erosion and improve sustainability. | | | |
Trump Taps Lee Zeldin to Lead EPA; What Does It Signal for Agriculture? | Trump stated that Zeldin would "ensure fair and swift deregulatory decisions" to "unleash the power of American businesses." The administration aims to maintain "the highest environmental standards, including the cleanest air and water on the planet" while pursuing deregulation. | | | |
Second Trump administration threatens USDA conservation and insurance programs - Investigate Midwest | This story was originally published by Barn Raiser. In the mid 1980s, Thomas Eich's grandparents, who farmed corn and soybeans, enrolled in the newly established Conservation Reserve Program, administered via the U.S. Department of Agriculture to incentivize farmers to cease farming on environmentally sensitive land. | | |
Trump victory met with mostly positive reactions from Western ag leaders | Donald Trump's election to a second term as President of the U.S. drew mostly positive but mixed reactions from Northwest agriculture leaders. "It's a two edged sword," said Mac Riggan, vice president of sales and business development for Chelan Fresh, a major Washington fruit grower. | | | |
What a second Trump trade war would mean for farmers | The president-elect has threatened 60% tariffs on goods from China at a time when U.S. producers are already struggling with slowing exports and falling prices. | | |
Farm groups congratulate Trump, ask him to get to work | Farm group leaders Wednesday congratulated Donald Trump and immediately had suggestions for what he could accomplish in his second term for agriculture. American Farm Bureau President Zippy Duvall said the Trump administration must head off tax hikes and push through Congress a Farm Bill. | | | |
National Drought Mitigation Center |
DroughtScape Fall 2024 NDMC plays major role in Drought Resilience +10 conference in Geneva Workshop shows behind-the-scenes process of making U.S. Drought Monitor Abnormal dryness and drought increases across much of U.S. in August and September
The Drought Center helps people, organizations and institutions build resilience to drought through monitoring and planning, and we are the academic partner and web host of the U.S. Drought Monitor. Our capabilities include climatology, social science and public engagement, and we work at all scales, from individual ranches to local, state and tribal government, and countries around the world.
| | | | | | |