IN THE OLD DOMINION
Union Presbyterian Seminary demolished the McGuire Cottage, a historic country home once owned by the Confederate surgeon who attended to Stonewall Jackson in his final days.
IN THE SUNSHINE STATE
Democratic Sen. Lauren Book is renewing her years-long quest to remove three Confederate celebrations from the list of state-recognized holidays. During the upcoming Session, her newest bill (SB 1116) will serve as a companion measure to legislation filed by Democratic Rep. Michael Grieco in the House.
ALSO IN FLORIDA
Today in Brooksville, we have an IMPORTANT opportunity to advance our agenda of protecting Florida's historical monuments and memorials and we invite you to participate!
At 1 p.m., the Hernando County Legislative Delegation will convene and listen to the public about their concerns at the Government Center.
Would you be willing to attend this meeting?
IN THE TAR HEEL STATE
The Charlotte City Council voted on unanimously Monday to rename 9 streets that honor Confederate leaders.
Mayor Vi Lyles and her "Legacy Commission" say that is NOT enough. They want all streets named before 1898 renamed claiming that over 70 streets in the City are named for slaveholders, "white supremists," or people who were "related to a slaveholding family."
IN THE PEACH STATE
Two Confederate statues were removed from public locations in the state of Georgia this week. One in Lawrenceville and the other in Dalton.
IN THE COTTON STATE
Alabama politicians punted Wednesday on a proposal to repeal protections for Confederate monuments and instead let cities give the statues to the state archives or another entity for preservation.
The House Judiciary Committee sent the bill to a subcommittee for study. It is unclear when the bill would return for a vote.
The bill by Democratic Rep. Juandalynn Givan of Birmingham would repeal the 2017 Alabama Memorial Preservation Act and allow local governments to donate unwanted statues and monuments to the state archives for "preservation."
Violations of the 2017 law carry a $25,000 fine. Some cities have opted to take down Confederate monuments and just pay the $25,000 fine. So Rep. Mike Holmes of Wetumpka filed an alternate bill that would increase the fine from a flat $25,000 to $10,000 a day.
IN THE LONE STAR STATE
On Monday, the Bastrop County Commissioners Court approved removing two Confederate monuments by a 3-2 vote, with commissioners Donna Snowden and Mark Meuth dissenting.
The monuments — an obelisk erected in 1910 by a local chapter of the United Daughters of the Confederacy and a granite headstone erected in 1964 by the State of Texas commemorating Joseph D. Sayers, a major in the Confederate army and Texas’ 22nd Governor.
IN THE ROUGHRIDER STATE
Marianna Miller, 16, who is Black, told school board members at a Jan. 25 meeting that the Confederate Flag should be banned.
On Monday, Superintendent Jason Hornbacher told the Bismarck Public School Board he had reworded the District policy that already existed to give teachers and staff the ability to be proactive about removing offensive items and clothing. The policy still does not mentioned Confederate symbols by name but pretty much includes anything a teacher choses to deem "offensive."
|
|
NON-HERITAGE NEWS:
Facebook has announced that it will remove all posts that are in any way critical of vaccines.
Add it to the laundry list of reasons why Dixie Heritage has LEFT fACEBOOK! Maybe you noticed that, last week, the Dixie Heritage Letter was not posted to fACEBOOK?
Dixie Heritage is strongly opposed to censorship in ALL forms.
And so should you!
|
|
IS THE "ELECTION" STILL UNSETTLED?
The United States Supreme Court has scheduled February 19 as a conference of hearings for the Pennsylvania Election Case, Sidney Powell’s Michigan Case and Lin Wood’s Georgia Case.
Why is POTUS suddenly wanting to hear these cases? Because all 9 of the justices saw the documentary film Absolute Proof. What was in this film to get their attention? Dr. Ed explains in his FROM THE EDITOR'S DESK column below....
WEIRDEST RULING YET
Last week Friday, POTUS exempted churches from California’s public-health coronavirus order banning indoor gatherings and then banned those same churches from singing and chanting at their worship services.
TURNABOUT IS FAIR PLAY?
Mr. Biden said he would bar President Trump from receiving the intelligence briefings traditionally given to former Presidents, citing his “erratic behavior.”
HOW BAD IS IT?
A study by the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia showed that tenants who lost jobs during the Covid-19 crisis had amassed $11 billion in rental arrears; a broader measure estimated that as of January, renters owed $53 billion in missed rent, utility payments and late fees.
ANOTHER REASON TO DROP FAUX NEWS
AMERICAN FREE PRESS REPORTS
In a recent case that can only be described as bizarre, the Department of Justice (DOJ) has reportedly opened an investigation into Elon Musk’s SpaceX rocket company for allegedly preferring to hire American citizens over non-citizens.
According to the DOJ, in March 2020, a non-U.S. citizen looking into a technology job at SpaceX was asked about his citizenship status.
DOJ attorney Lisa Sandoval said in the DOJ press release that SpaceX “ultimately failed to hire him for the position because he is not a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident.”
Musk has been taking a lot of heat from liberals lately because he isn’t “woke” and doesn’t play their game. He recently moved his company from liberal Silicon Valley to Texas to get out from under California’s onerous regulations.
MORE ON WHATS GOING ON IN BURMA
The new reality in Myanmar includes arrests, beatings by mysterious thugs and communications blackouts. But civil disobedience defiantly persists.
On Saturday, thousands of people in hard hats and face masks marched in Yangon, the largest rallies since the coup on last week Monday that ousted the civilian leader Daw Aung San Suu Kyi. But the world could not watch. Live social-media feeds of the protests were abruptly shut off.
Subtler forms of protests have appeared: Balloons showed support for Ms. Aung San Suu Kyi, and cities have resounded with the clanging of pots and pans, a traditional send-off for the devil.
WE ARE ALSO WATCHING HAITI
|
|
Politically Correct History for Oklahoma |
|
|
|
Al Benson, Jr., is the Editor of the Copperhead Chronicle.
In addition to writing for Southern Patriot and other publications, he is a member of the Confederate Society of America and the League of the South.
|
|
Way back before I was married I lived for part of one year in Oklahoma, in addition to having spent quite a bit of time over the years in and out of the state. Oklahoma has always been one of my favorite spots in the country. I always found the folks there warm and friendly.
The year we lived there my Dad and I went down to Oklahoma City to find out about getting work in the state park system. That didn’t work out for us and it’s probably good that it didn’t, for had it done so I would not have gone back east and ended up marrying my wife. So the Lord had a plan for us in leaving Oklahoma. That being said, I still remember Oklahoma with fondness and my wife and I have visited it on more than one occasion as I wanted her to see one of the places in the West that I had learned to love.
So it was with a certain degree of sadness that I recently read an article by Allan Wall on https://vdare.com/writers/allan-wall abolishing the Oklahoma Land Run Monument from the community college in Oklahoma City.
Mr. Wall observed: “The land runs, which were actual races for land, are part of Oklahoma history. It’s how a significant portion of the state was settled. The first land run was in 1889, settling an area of central Oklahoma called ‘the unassigned lands’ which was uninhabited and not belonging to any Indian tribe. that’s the land run in which Oklahoma City was founded, jumping the population from zero to 10,000 in one day. In this era of Heritage Haters, the Land Runs are under attack.
Now a monument at the Oklahoma City college has been removed…The large concrete slab, visible outside the main building on campus, depicted those who came to Oklahoma for the Land Run of 1889 as heroes and innovators, OCCC officials said. Executive Vice President Danita Rose, whose maternal grandfather was of Cherokee descent, said that the decision to remove the monument was a top priority for the executive leadership team.” In other words, the politically correct element at the college wanted this monument gone regardless of its value to the heritage of the state.
Some noted that it was the old “I’m Cherokee” argument but Mr. Wall gives the lie to that foolishness when he notes: “The land settled in the 1889 land run was not Cherokee land, had never been Cherokee l land and was never settled by the Cherokee.” And, interestingly enough, it had been a Cherokee who, in 1879,suggested that these unassigned lands be opened up to white settlement!
Danita Rose commented that: “If our goal is to create a community that is inclusive and welcoming to everyone, a monument that depicts cruelty and oppression can’t be on display here.” Frankly, I am at a loss to see how a monument to a land rush for land that was uninhabited contributes to cruelty and oppression, but then that’s just me. I’m sure the politically correct leftists among us can point to how any monument, anywhere, that they don’t particularly like contributes to cruelty and oppression in their narrow minds. I suppose they’d like to see the Land Rush monument replaced with a statue of either Marx or Lenin, those compassionate champions of humanity whose followers killed millions. Now wouldn’t such be a major contribution to “diversity”?
Actually what it all comes down to is that, when it comes to monuments “no white folks need apply.” In this day and age the definition of diversity means everybody except white folks. We are simply beyond the pale when it comes to diversity.
The Land Run of 1889 did not create oppression and/or cruelty but that doesn’t matter. The leftists claim it did and that’s all that matters. If you dare to question their historical knowledge or perspective then you are nothing but a racist bigot–so sit down and shut up!
It would seem that the Community College of Oklahoma City has succumbed to the thrall of leftist dogma so prevalent on most campuses today. Now, even with community colleges you have to be careful where you send your kids as there are fewer and fewer places where they won’t be bombarded with socialist doctrines. I wonder, with all that is going on today, how much Communist China has to do with what is being taught in many colleges.
|
|
We’ve been losing the the war for over 200 years. Time for a RETHINK! |
|
|
|
Mark C. Atkins is a 6th generation native of Henry County, Tennessee. He and his wife of thirty years have six children and direct a small K-12 classical Christian school.
He is the author of Women in Combat, Feminism Goes To War, with foreword by Major General Patrick Henry Brady, USA (Ret), recipient of the Congressional Medal of Honor.
|
|
2020’s greatest gift to us will be the great awakening on the right that is occurring before our eyes. It is similar to the awakening of the 1960’s but with the impossible to underestimate benefit of 50 years of hindsight. That is, we can now see that those Americans that were warning us about Progressivism in the early days of the Cultural Revolution were in fact right, though only the most sagacious would have predicted abortion, women in combat, and so called gay marriage.
Now after fifty years of almost continuous victory our enemy has not only felt strong enough to reveal himself in 2020 but to also show us the degree to which he hates the country that we love.
Since the Cultural Revolution we have been too slow to react as were our ancestors that did not see the 1960’s coming and allowed it happen.
But the roots of the problems we face today in 2020-21 began far before the 1960’s, which was but the fruit of a work that put too simply may be said to have begun in the 1700’s and is known as the Enlightenment. The walls of common sense that gave way so rapidly 50 years ago did not do so because of the weight of the Left’s assault, but rather because they had for generations been undermined. They were ready to collapse.
What Conservatives must understand now is that since the conception the Republic we have contributed to the collapse of the 1960’s and the gilded dystopia that has emerged since. Our ancestors and we have aided in our own destruction because we have embraced the fundamental assumptions of the Enlightenment, namely an adoration of ideas such as Freedom, Equality, Individuality, Perfectibility, etc.
We so called Conservatives have just prepared and mixed the ingredients differently.
Thus we inevitably lose or find ourselves on the defensive because where Freedom, Equality, and, Individuality are worshipped by all to one degree or another, the Left will always have in its hand two unbeatable trump cards: Bread and Circuses.
We all to one extent or another are fighting in the ranks of the Left. Think how otherwise Conservative women give such a pass to Feminism, the evilest of all post-Enlightenment ideologies.
If we are going to stop Progressivism, we need to get off defence and get on offence. But we also need to fight to destroy it and can only do this if we acknowledge that we have not just lost a battle in 2020, but rather over the last 200 years, we have lost the war.
Time for a major rethink, reset, and new war… so to speak.
|
|
Video submitted by our readers:
|
|
Guess Who They're Mad About Now!
|
Top 10 Untold Truths of How SPAM Is Really Made
|
Each week the Dixie Heritage Letter reaches thousands. And GROWING! Our 2021 banner insertion is $17 an issue.
But now, for a limited time, we have a special, allowing you to purchase a weekly insertion for the reduced rate of just $15.
If you do not already have a banner we can design one for you!
|
|
If you want to support the cause and give these great shirts to your friends and neighbors we will send you 10 shirts when you donate $500. Donate $1,000 and we will send 25 shirts.
When your donation is received we will reach out to you to ask for your shirt size(s) and if you want long or short sleeve.
|
|
Click the image below for all five books in the Southern History series:
|
|
The Origins of White Guilt
|
|
|
|
Tomislav Sunić, was born in Zagreb, Croatia in 1953. An activist and a former professor, he holds a doctorate in Political Science from the University of California at Santa Barbara.
He is a Director of the American Freedom Party.
|
|
There are several different approaches to the study of the pathology of White guilt, including linguistic, historical and religious. One needs, however, to critically look at this faulty verbal construct first, a construct which first appeared in America several decades ago, and which has been championed in the media and academia ever since.
At first look, the expression “White guilt” defies lexical rules of Standard English. Should one accept this expression as a valid tool in social and political communication, one might just as well substitute the adjective “white” with the adjectives “brown,” “yellow,” or “black.”
So far, however, no scholar, no journalist has ever ventured to use the expressions Black Guilt or Brown Guilt, for the simple reason that from the semantic point of view these colorful expressions sound silly in the standard English language. The same lexical rule, however, does not apply to White guilt, an expression that has become by now part of the everyday language. In addition, seen from the educational perspective, the expression “White Guilt” is designed to serve as a guidebook for reeducating and reprograming Whites, or short of that for having Whites expiate their real or alleged sins of racism. Conversely, all other non-White racial categories are automatically exonerated from any guilt feelings and thusly from any need for political penitence.
The difficulty in dealing with the concept of “White guilt” is further exacerbated by the impossibility of having it properly translated into non-English languages in Europe. Over the last eighty years US college social science departments, mostly controlled by crypto-communist scholars, have been in the forefront of crafting outlandish political terms and creating new political concepts which, when translated and transposed into the European media and school curricula sound odd. Moreover, ill-defined American verbal constructs, such as “hate speech,” “ethnic sensitivity training,”” diversity,” “white supremacists,” “affirmative action,” have by now become a linchpin in the US education and legislation. These expressions, when used in other European languages often produce unintelligible verbal and legal equivalents.
Of course Europe has concocted its own bizarre expressions, especially when used during legal proceedings against nationalist dissidents at local courts of justice. A case in point is the German highly obtrusive, abstract compound noun that figures prominently in the German Criminal code, e.g., Paragraph # 130, bearing the demonizing subtitle “Volksverhetzung.” This heavy-handed German compound noun is a clear-cut case of linguistic barbarism, having given birth by now to dozens of faulty English translations (popular incitement, sedition, etc.). It is also a word that during court hearings never ever explicitly denotes the defendant’s ethnicity. This word, which German prosecuting attorneys have been tossing around since the early 1990s when pressing charges against social undesirables, has thus far dispatched thousands of Germans to prison for varying durations.
The sticky issue for many citizens in the US and Europe, regardless of their political beliefs is that they often take these expressions as a sign of erudite learning, never bothering to examine their etymology. Or worse, never scrutinizing those individuals who first put those words in circulation. The expression “White guilt,” along with hundreds of similarly ill-defined terms that have sprung up in the USA over the last fifty years, is just an embellished follow-up term of the now defunct Soviet-Speak, which likewise contained a myriad of similar surreal nouns and convoluted phrases, such as “democratization,” “domestic fascist terrorists,” “antifascist struggle,” “socialist fight against counterrevolutionary bourgeois tendencies,” “economic self-management,” “peaceful coexistence,” “interethnic tolerance,” etc. The Liberal System in the US and EU, along with its legal and academic apparatchiks, is now in the belated process of updating this old Bolshevik language.
Historical Framework of White Guilt
TOO has previously documented the timespan and major architects of this new verbal overhaul whose final objective is the dispossession of White peoples. One must look firstly at the period starting with 1945 and after, a period which brought about not just a new political order, but also marked the beginning of the use of a new sanitized, demonizing political vocabulary. Defeated Germany bore the brunt of the new notion of the political, although citizens in the victorious US and the UK swiftly followed suit with their own self-flagellating rhetoric. Words such as “colonialism,” “segregation,” “racial distancing,” “apartheid,” and “fascism,” soon became the metaphors for the absolute evil, with “fascism” now denoting pretty much anything to the right of center. Over the last seventy-five years, the West has embarked on a penitential passion play whose effects can be observed today in most media outlets. Incidentally, the System’s removal of president Donald Trump from office was in large part due to the fact that Trump’s rhetoric on “fake news” was incompatible with the media’s message of universal love that has inspired the post-World War II narrative as preached by the System.
What is frequently overlooked, however, is that guilt-tripping Whites in the realm of politics has been unfolding hand in hand with a gradual criminalization of the White cultural heritage. The destructive role of the Frankfurt school and its mostly Jewish-Marxist scholars in instilling the concept of White guilt has been amply demonstrated (here), although the postwar brainwashing of Whites can by no means be attributed to Jewish scholars and activists only. I tried, quite some time ago, to summarize the history of intellectual purges in Europe, starting immediately after the end of World War, which gradually resulted in the growth of the language of guilt, leading subsequently to suicidal self-denial of millions of White students and politicians in Europe and the US. As I noted in Homo Americanus,
Particularly harsh was the Allied treatment of German teachers and academics. Since National- Socialist Germany had significant support among German teachers and university professors, it was to be expected that the US reeducational authorities would start screening German intellectuals, writers, journalists and film makers. Having destroyed dozens of major libraries in Germany, with millions of volumes gone up in flames, the American occupying powers resorted to improvising measures in order to give some semblance of normalcy to what later would become “the democratic Germany.”
Likewise, French intellectual life from 1944–1950 was similarly depleted of hundreds of anticommunist and nationalist intellectuals suspected of fascist collaboration, with many becoming objects of public shaming. Dominique Venner:
Of all professional categories, journalists and writers were hit the hardest. This underlines the ideological character of the conflict and the ensuing purges. The proportion of writers and journalists who were shot, imprisoned, and barred from their profession surpasses all other professional categories. Do we need to be reminded of the assassination of Albert Clément, Philippe Henriot, Robert Denoël, of the suicide of Drieu La Rochelle, of the death of Paul Allard in prison prior to court hearings and of the executions of Georges Suarez, Robert Brasillach, Jean Luchaire […] [or] the death sentence pronounced in absentia or a commuted prison sentence for Lucien Rebatet, Pierre-Antoine Cousteau, etc.?”
Ironically, it was thanks to the threat of Soviet communism during the Cold War that many previously banned European thinkers and academics managed to resurrect their career. It didn’t last long. From 1950–1990, Western intelligence agencies, with the USA at the helm, had to rely heavily on skills of prominent anticommunist and White nationalist academics and scientists in an effort to contain the perceived Soviet threat. With the Cold War over, with the Soviet Union dead by 1990, the System, i.e., the Deep State, began to recuperate again its own crypto-communist repressive, albeit Covid-covered face, the grand finale of which was seen on January 20, 2021, during the System’s staged palace coup in Washington DC.
The religious framework of White guilt
Putting solely the blame on the liberal media and crypto-communist college professors for generating the culture of White guilt is only partially correct. In order to tentatively elicit a convincing answer regarding the pathology of White guilt one needs to raise some rhetorical questions about Christian teachings. Why are White Christian peoples, in contrast to other peoples of other races and other religions on Earth, more prone to excessive altruism toward non-White out-groups? Why are guilt feelings practically nonexistent among non-White peoples?
One answer to these questions may be found in Christian teachings that have made up an important pillar of Western civilization over the centuries. Over the last one hundred years, modern Liberal and Communist elites have aggressively promoted those same feeling of White guilt, albeit in their own atheistic, secular and “multicultural” modalities. One must rightfully reject the Liberal or Antifa palaver about White guilt, yet the fact remains that the Vatican, the US Conference of Catholic Bishops, the German Bishops’ conference, along with all other Christian denominations in Europe and the US today are the loudest sponsors of non-White immigration to Europe and America, as well as the strongest advocates of White guilt (here). The Church’s ecumenical preaching about a global city under one god with all of humanity is fully in accordance with the early Christian dogma on man’s fall and his eventual redemption.
It must be pointed out that early Christian apostles, evangelists and theologians who foisted the dogma of man’s guilt were all by birth and without any exception non-Europeans (St. Augustine, Tertullian, St. Paul, Cyprian, etc.) from North Africa, Syria, Asia Minor and Judea. Having this in mind, lambasting Islam or Judaism in the present as the sole carriers of aggressive non-European anti-White ideology, as many White nationalists do, while downplaying the Middle-Eastern birthplace of Christianity, cannot be a sign of neither moral nor intellectual consistency. The Roman poet Juvenal, describes graphically in his satires the Rome of the late first century, a time when the city was swarming with multitudes of Syrian lowlifes, Chaldean star worshippers, Jewish conmen, and Ethiopian hustlers, all of them offering a quick ride to eternal salvation for some and eternal damnation for others (here). Similar messianic, redemptive beliefs about the shining future, under the guidance of prominent early Bolshevik agitators, most of them of Jewish origin, have found their new location, two millennia later, among credulous intellectuals and equality-hungry masses. After the fall of Communism, the same messianic drive to punish the guilty ones who defy modern Liberal and multicultural scholasticism found its loudest mouthpiece among US neocons and antifa inquisitors.
This is not the place to rehash Friedrich Nietzsche’s own emotional ravings at Christians, nor quote dozens of thinkers and scholars who had earlier described the psychological link between early Jewish and Christian zealots of first-century Rome and communist commissars of the early twentieth century. Times have changed but the obsession as to how extirpate or reeducate those who doubt the myths of the System haven’t changed a bit. The psychological profile of US modern-day Antifa zealots and their college professor supporters bears a close resemblance with early uprooted, largely miscegenated, effeminate Christian masses in the late Roman empire. The Jew St. Paul and later on the North African St. Augustin — judging by their own convulsive contrition — suggest that they suffered from bipolar disorder. Paul’s Epistle to the Romans (7:18) may be the key to grasping the modern version of neurotic White self-haters put on display by prominent news anchors and humanities professors today: “And I know that nothing good lives in me, that is, in my sinful nature. I want to do what is right, but I can’t. I want to do what is good, but I don’t. I don’t want to do what is wrong, but I do it anyway.”
Walter F. Otto, a renowned author on ancient Greek gods and one of the most quoted Hellenistic scholars, describes the differences between the ancient Greek vs. Christian notion of the sacred. He notes that ancient pagan Greeks laid emphasis on the feelings of shame, unaware of the meaning of feelings of guilt. In his still untranslated book dealing with Christian vs ancient Greek spirituality, he writes:
Mentally sick were their leaders; the weaklings only followed them. The impetus to this large (Christian) movement came from Paul the Apostle, i.e., from one of those tormented souls who carry an incurable wound within themselves. His furious, bloodthirsty hatred of the new (Christian) faith, his just as furious commitment to it, his ecstatic experience turning him at a single blow from the executioner of Christians into their most fanatical champion — this all tells how terrible [Christianity] basically stood and what was to be expected from its spirituality.
At some point Whites will need to realize that a successful healing of their feelings of guilt presupposes a critical reassessment of their Judeo-Christian-inspired origins. If Whites in Europe and the US were once upon a time all eager to embrace the Semitic notion of original sin, no wonder that two thousand years later they could likewise be well programmed to put up with a variety of World War II necrophiliac victimhoods, as well as tune in to fake news delivered by their politicians. Eventually Whites will need to make a decision about where to choose the location of their identity. In Athens or in Jerusalem.
|
|
The DHS is targeting ‘libertarian terrorists’ now? |
|
|
|
Ron Paul is an American physician, author, and former 10-term Republican congressman.
In 2008 and 2012 he was a Republican presidential candidate. He was the presidential nominee of the Libertarian Party in the 1988 U.S. Presidential Election.
|
|
The Department of Homeland Security issued on Wednesday a nationwide terror alert lasting until April 30. The alert warns of potential terrorist attacks from Americans who are “ideologically motivated” and have “objections to the exercise of government authority and the presidential transition, as well as other perceived grievances fueled by false narratives.”
The language used in this alert suggests that millions of Americans are potential terrorists. Second Amendment–supporting, antiwar, antitax, antipolitics, antimilitarization, pro-life, and anti–Federal Reserve activists certainly have “objections to the exercise of government authority.”
They are certainly viewed by the political class and its handmaidens in Big Tech and the mainstream media as ideological extremists. Anyone who gets his news from sources other than mainstream media or Big Tech, or who uses certain “unapproved” social media platforms, is considered to have had his grievances “fueled by false narratives.” For something to be considered a false narrative, it need only contradict the “official” narrative.
The “domestic terrorist” alert is the latest sign that the activities on January 6 on Capitol Hill, like the attacks of September 11, 2001, are being used to advance a long-standing antiliberty agenda. Legislation expanding the federal government’s authority to use its surveillance and other unconstitutional powers against “domestic terrorists” is likely to soon be considered by Congress. Just as the PATRIOT Act was written years before 2001, this legislation was written long before January 6. The bill’s proponents are simply taking advantage of the hysteria following the so-called insurrection to push the bill onto the congressional agenda.
Former CIA director John Brennan recently singled out libertarians as among the people the government should go after. This is not the first time libertarians have been smeared. In 2009, a federally funded fusion center identified people who supported my presidential campaign, my Campaign for Liberty, or certain Libertarian and Constitution Parties’ candidates as potentially violent extremists.
The idea that libertarianism creates terrorists is absurd. Libertarians support the nonaggression principle, so they reject using force to advance their political goals. They rely instead on peaceful persuasion.
Libertarianism is being attacked because it does not support just reforming a few government policies. Instead, it presents a formidable intellectual challenge to the entire welfare-warfare state.
The ultimate goal of those pushing for a crackdown on “domestic terrorism” is to make people unwilling to even consider “radical” ideas—to make people so afraid of certain ideas that they refuse to even give those ideas a fair hearing.
Progressives who are tempted to support what is being promoted as a crackdown on right-wing violence should consider the history of government harassment of progressive movements and leaders such as Martin Luther King Jr. What do they think a future right-wing authoritarian would do if given power to go after “ideological extremists”?
All Americans who cherish the Bill of Rights should come together to stop this latest crackdown on liberty. My Campaign for Liberty will be mobilizing Americans to stop passage of any domestic terrorism legislation, while my Institute for Peace and Prosperity and my Liberty Report will provide Americans with the most up-to-date information about the continuing attempts to smear those who speak the truth about government lies.
|
|
The Old Camp Meeting Time continues to air on missionary-operated radio stations in Central America, Africa, and The Philippines.
|
|
There are two congregational numbers, two Southern Gospel numbers and two sermons by Dr. Ed and Dr. Don Porter packed into a single hour in this week's Old Camp Meeting Time radio show, brought to you by www.bibleschool.edu
We are happy to make these messages freely available to missionary radio stations and micro-broadcasters world-wide.
|
|
In this week's TBR Radio Presents: The Dixie Heritage Show, Its not "racist" when a black man says it. So Dr. Ed plays a segment of the 1987 Senate confirmation hearing of Judge Robert Bork where Professor Thomas Sowell "schools" then Senator Joe Biden.
Professor Sowell then comments on the segment and explains why he wanted to testify on Judge Bork's behalf.
Later in the show, Bernie Sanders does his impression of Arnold Horshack and Dr. Ed talks with his personal physician, Dr. William G. von Peters.
|
|
We are offering a special for subscribers who would like to advertise on the show.
eMail me by clicking below and ask for the AD special:
|
|
Rachel explains that despite the fact that almost all heritage organizations are branded as "hate groups" - loving your folks does not require hating anyone else. Nor does promoting the history and heritage of any group require violence of any kind.
Rachel's dad preached TBR founder Willis Carto's funeral. At that time she was given Willis' personal Bible which will be placed in a new museum being built in Arkansas.
|
|
We are offering a special for subscribers who would like to advertise on the show.
eMail me by clicking below and ask for the AD special:
|
|
|
|
Dr. Ed is a pastor, college president, historian, the author of over 40 books, an in-demand public speaker, and the host of three radio shows.
He is an active lobbyist, tirelessly petitioning city, county, state, and federal officials on behalf of our Southern monuments and heritage.
He started Dixie Heritage in March of 2015.
|
|
As last week's Dixie Heritage Letter was hitting your inbox a new documentary film was being released. The film, titled Absolute Proof, was financed by Mike Lindell. It was not the first film that Lindell paid for. He had bankrolled some Christian movies in the past. But Absolute Proof was the first to be censored.
Within minutes the film was taken down from fACEBOOK, YouTube, Vimeo, and other social platforms. NewsMax did not fulfill their promise to run the film. OAN (One America News - a cable network that many providers do not carry) did show the film with a massive disclaimer on the screen.
So if the My Pillow guy wants to spend a few hundred thousand dollars and make a fool of himself dancing around in a tinfoil hat and screaming conspiracy theories then why not just let him do it? After all, we could all use a good laugh. Why not get it at Lindell's expense?
Why did crazy man Mike Lindell have to be kicked off NewMax? And why were he and his companies social media accounts suspended? Because he was attempting to announce the release of his film - Absolute Proof.
Why did the film Absolute Proof need to be purged from the internet?
Because Lindell is NOT crazy!
In Absolute proof, Lindell linked the ownership of Dominion voting machines to a Chinese equity firm.
He also had some retired generals explaining how the United States military has been using the same machines and software to manipulate the outcomes of elections all over the world. If the evidence were allowed to see the light of day, i.e. had there been court cases that actually heard the evidence, it would not only reveal how the 2020 US election was stolen, it would also reveal that the United States has stolen hundreds of elections world-wide by using the same equipment and software in other countries.
Also on the program were cyber security experts. What they had to say was very interesting. Too bad you were NOT able to see this powerful film because fACEBOOK and all of the other internet outlets said you are not allowed to.
Dixie Heritage to the rescue. Click the button below. Make a donation to Dixie Heritage. When you do, we will say thank you by sending you a copy of Mike Lindell's documentary film, Absolute Proof.
|
|
MeWe is a social media platform very much like fACEBOOK. But unlike fACEBOOK, MeWe does not censor and delete the posts it does not like.
Deo Vindice!
Dr. Ed
|
|
SUPPORT THE CAUSE!
If everyone on this eMail list contributed just $1 dollar a month, we would be able to fully fund all of our activities for the year and expand our web presence, programs, and educational opportunities.
That is far less than one cup of coffee or most phone apps per month.
|
If everyone on this eMail list contributed just $7 dollars a month, we would be able to do everything listed above and also fund a Southern Political Party with FIVE full-time employees.
|
Would it be easier to just donate $84 and cover the year?
|
ADD DIXIE HERITAGE TO YOUR ADDRESS BOOK
This will ensure that your weekly Dixie Heritage newsletter does not end up in a SPAM folder by accident.
|
|
If you have not already done so please take the quick moment to follow our Dixie Heritage Page on MeWe:
|
|
When you are there request a free copy of my book The Truth About the Confederate Battle Flag. When you do, not only will you receive a copy of the book - you will also be subscribed to receive this weekly Dixie Heritage Letter by eMail. This will ensure that you never miss an issue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
