Living with Wolves
Alert: Section 1709
March 4, 2011

DONATE

Visit our website

Our Report to Congress

 

 
Send us an email


A NEW CONTINUING RESOLUTION
WITH THE SAME LANGUAGE SEEKING
TO DELIST WOLVES
-
THIS TIME FROM THE SENATE

 

Our hope that the U. S. Congress would move to protect endangered wolves was short-lived, lasting only a few days. As we warned in our last email, bad anti-wolf bills continue to wait their turn, bearing deadly consequences for all wildlife. Once again, we need your best effort to contact Senators who hold the fate of wolves, and the Endangered Species Act, in their hands.

 

In the final hours of Friday, U.S. Senator Daniel Inouye of Hawaii introduced the Senate version of the Continuing Resolution (CR) to fund the nation's budget. Sadly, this new version carries the same deadly news for wolves that was contained in the House of Representatives budget bill. It appears that this new wolf rider (Section 1709), promoted by Senator Jon Tester of Montana, is the only anti-environmental rider to resurface in the Senate version of the CR. It contains exactly the same sad language as a rider in the House version of the bill, introduced there by Representative Mike Simpson of Idaho. It is important that our Senators be reminded that the wildlife of this nation belongs to each and every citizen, not to individuals in any one state.   

If you believe, as we do, that the protection of wolves should be determined by sound science and biology, and that wolves should not be treated like a political football, please pick up your phone and call as many Senators as you can.

 

If vulnerable animals, fish and birds can be killed by the whim of anyone who finds them inconvenient, where will this end? Certainly not with wolves, who are in the sad position of being first in line.

 

Wildlife protection is not a budget priority. A matter of this importance to our nation, overturning a generation of soundly considered protection for wildlife, without adequate discussion, has no place tacked onto a budget bill and being fast-tracked through the Senate.

 

Will Senators be there over the weekend to receive your call? Some offices may have message services active, or staff on the ground. If you can't get through, please make every effort to call on Monday, as early as possible, since we hear that this bill may move forward in the Senate as early as Tuesday.     

 

Section 1709 seeks to remove wolves from the protections of the Endangered Species Act (ESA). It calls for the reissuance of the April 2, 2009 decision by Interior Secretary Salazar to delist wolves as an endangered species. That decision was found to not be in compliance with the ESA and was rightfully overruled by a federal court.

 

Disturbingly, the Section also prohibits any future "judicial review." This proposed legislation actually excludes one of our three branches of government, the judicial branch, from any future involvement. If passed, it cannot be challenged in our federal courts.

 

Until wolves are ready to be delisted based on the guidelines set by the ESA they should remain protected.

 

When you call, tell them that it is Section 1709 of the Continuing Resolution that you are concerned about. We are providing below a list of the members the U.S. Senate that may be willing to fight for this issue or that we feel should hear from you.

 

You can remind them that during the lame duck session in December, Senator Cardin of Maryland rightfully objected to and stopped an effort by Idaho Senators Risch and Crapo to seek a last-minute unanimous consent vote to delist wolves. Senator Cardin called this earlier attempt an effort "to solve politically what should be done by good science," and said that such legislation would undermine the ESA. He was right and those concerns are still as valid today as they were then.

 

Please take a moment to look over this list and call the office of any or all Senators you can, especially if you live in a state they represent. Give their offices a call and politely state your opinion.  An effort on your part can lead to big results, but if you want to have your position heard, you must do it Monday morning.

 

Thank you for your on-going support and diligence. Your voice does matter.

 

 -LIVING WITH WOLVES-

 

___________________________________________________________

 

 

SENATORS YOU SHOULD CALL 

 

Please note there are Senators who are already on our side on this issue and others that should be.

 

Call Monday morning or leave a message over the weekend or do both.  

 

If you wish to find a Senator not on this list, you can find them here. 

 

Barbara Boxer  

California  

Phone: 202/224-3553  

 

Max Baucus  

Montana  

Phone: 202/224-2651  

 

Benjamin Cardin  

Maryland  

Phone: 202/224-4524

 

Thomas Carper  

Delaware  

Phone: 202/224-2441  

 

Kirsten Gillibrand  

New York  

Phone: 202/224-4451  

 

Frank Lautenberg  

New Jersey  

Phone: 202/224-3224

 

Jeff Merkley  

Oregon  

Phone: 202/224-3753 

 

Bernard Sanders  

Vermont  

Phone: 202/224-5141  

 

Tom Udall

New Mexico

Phone: 202/224-6621

 

Sheldon Whitehouse

Rhode Island

Phone: 202/224-2921

 

Michael Bennet

Colorado

Phone: 202/224-5852

 

Jeff Bingaman

New Mexico

Phone: 202/224-5521

 

Maria Cantwell

Washington

Phone: 202/224-3441

 

Richard Durbin

Illinois

Phone: 202/224-2152

 

Al Franken

Minnesota

Phone: 202/224-5641

 

Daniel Inouye

Hawaii

Phone: 202/224-3934

 

Tim Johnson

South Dakota

Phone: 202/224-5842

 

Mark Kirk

Illinois

Phone: 202/224-2854

 

Amy Klobuchar

Minnesota

Phone: 202/224-3244

 

Mark Pryor

Arkansas

Phone: 202/224-2353

 

Harry Reid  

Nevada

Phone: 202/224-3542 

 

Debbie Stabenow

Michigan

Phone: 202/224-4822

 

Mark Warner

Virginia

Phone: 202/224-2023

 

Ron Wyden

Oregon

Phone: 202/224-5244

 

 

___________________________________________________________

 

 

Section 1709. Before the end of the 60-day period beginning on the date of enactment of this division, the Secretary of the Interior shall reissue the final rule published on April 2, 2009 (74 Fed. Reg. 15123 et seq.) without regard to any other provision of statute or regulation that applies to issuance of such rule. Such reissuance (including this section) shall not be subject to judicial review.