|
American Immigrant Policy Portal
Newsletter
|
Research to Inform Policy and Practice
on
Migration-Related Issues
|
Policy-related reports, studies, and information about the challenge and promise of immigrant integration. Materials organized by collection topic.
|
CMS study reports that the undocumented population in the U.S. fell by nearly 1 million from 2010 to 2016
Center for Migration Studies, February 22, 2018, 16 pp.
Author: Robert Warren
The undocumented immigrant population in the United States fell by nearly 1 million persons between the years 2010 and 2016 -- from 11.7 million to 10.8 million. The number of undocumented is at its lowest level since 2003.The largest undocumented group, persons from Mexico, has declined sharply. Undocumented Mexicans numbered 6.6 million in 2010 but fell to 5.7 million in 2016. Populations from South America (Brazil, Colombia, Ecuador and Peru) and Europe (Poland) also fell between 2010 and 2016. Three groups from Central America (El Salvador, Guatemala and Honduras) have increased in number in recent years, as have persons from Asian nations including India and China. Their growth, however, has not offset the decline of other groups. Only two U.S. states, Texas and Nebraska, registered an increase of 10,000 or more undocumented immigrants between 2010 and 2016. Nine of the ten largest states lost population including California (-367,000), Illinois (-118,000) and New York (-115,000). The greatest percentage declines were in Alabama (-37 percent), Mississippi (-32 percent) and New Mexico (-30 percent). Undocumented immigration rose in the 1990s by 145 percent and during the 2000s by 36 percent. The ongoing decline has been occurring across several administrations in Washington. Report author Robert Warren employs a methodology in which respondents to the American Community Survey are assigned immigration status based on key characteristics such as their period of entry, occupation, and likelihood of being immediate relatives of U.S. citizens
(Rob Paral, Rob Paral and Associates)
Legal scholar suggests that cities and the federal government
have increasingly
divergent views of citizenship in the
modern world
Harvard Law Review Blog, January 19, 2018, 3 pp.
Author: Kenneth Stahl
Adapted from his forthcoming book,
The Democratic City: Local Citizenship in the Time of Globalization
, this blog post by Kenneth Stahl examines how differing rules regarding suffrage at the local and federal level suggest the existence of different models of citizenship. For example, while San Francisco, Chicago and a few municipalities in Maryland grant non-citizens the right to vote in certain local elections, these individuals are barred from voting in state and federal elections. The author suggests residency and a sense of commonly shared interest are at the heart of local understandings of citizenship, in contrast to the federal level which grounds citizenship in birth or lineage. He suggests that cities, open to and dependent upon foreign capital and immigrant workers, have developed this approach in order to survive and prosper in a globalized economy. Narrowly defining citizenship at the local level may dissuade people and capital from locating in a particular city. To be competitive, cities must expand opportunities for civic participation to all who reside there. At the federal level, however, citizenship is connected to territory, and therefore limiting the right to vote can be seen as part of an effort to control a nation's borders. The author believes these two conceptions of citizenship had historically complemented each other, but that they are now increasingly in conflict. He also suggests that fluid conceptions of citizenship are alarming to those who are not as mobile as those making choices about which city or country to reside in. He concludes that competing visions of citizenship and the nature of cities in a globalized economy will continue to be flashpoints for conflict
(Erik Jacobson, Montclair State University).
|
New Public Policy Research and Reports
Adult Education and Workforce Training
a
a
Economic and Fiscal Impacts of Immigration
Immigrant Employment and Labor Issues
Immigrant Communities
Law Enforcement
x
x
Refugee Resettlement
State Government
State-Specific Studies
National Perspectives/Immigration Policy
x
x
x
x
|
Latest Commentary
A selection of recent Op-Eds from immigration researchers and major opinion leaders
March 19, 2018 How America Fell Behind the World on Immigration
Justin Gest, Politico Read More
March 17, 2018 Debunking a Myth: The Irish Were Not Slaves, Too
Liam Stack, The New York Times Read More
March 15, 2018 For Trump, Cruelty Is the Point
Julianne Hing, The Nation Read More
March 7, 2018 Restricting legal immigration to America won't help our economy
Jacqueline Varas, The Hill Read More
February 27, 2018 Serpents At The Gates? Today's Immigrants Are Tomorrow's Entrepreneurs
Robb Mandelbaum, Forbes
Read More
February 27, 2018 One Simple Way Trump Can Get the Economic Growth He Wants...It's more immigration
Derek Thompson, The Atlantic Read More
February 26, 2018 I ran USCIS. This is a nation of immigrants, no matter what mission statements say
Leon Rodriguez, The Washington Post Read More
February 22, 2018 Trump wants to cut immigration and foreign aid. Here's how they're connected
Sarah Bermeo & David Leblang, The Washington Post Read More
February 22, 2018 New U.S. Immigrants Are as Educated as New Canadian Immigrants
David Bier, CATO
|
|
Immigration Futures: Marking 20 Years of the National Metropolis Conference, Canadian Metropolis Project, Calgary, Canada, March 22-24, 2018 Pinning Resources: Mapping the Field of Immigrant Professional Integration, WES Global Talent Bridge, Webinar, 2:00-3:00 pm EDT, March 29, 2018 Symposium on Refugee Responsibility-Sharing, Institute for the Study of International Migration, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, April 16, 2013 North American Refugee Health Conference, Society of Refugee Healthcare Providers, Portland, OR, June 7-9, 2018
|
|
|
The Portal is a project of Diversity Dynamics, LLC, in association with the Center for International Social Work, School of Social Work, Rutgers University, and the Immigrant Learning Center, Inc., Public Education Institute, Malden, MA. Please send content suggestions for the Portal, including events of interest, to: mail@usdiversitydynamics.com. No endorsements implied for research, opinions, resources or events featured on the Portal.
|
|
|
|
|