Public Policy Center | uaex.uada.edu/ballot

Facebook  Instagram  LinkedIn

July 2025

Photo ID Now Required to Sign Petitions

What IDs Satisfy New Law?

Summer festivals and events are typically where citizen-led ballot issue groups reach large numbers of voters with their petitions. Canvassers have new rules to follow this summer when they ask you to sign a petition and you, the voter, have new responsibilities, too.


Arkansas Act 240 of 2025 requires voters to show photo identification before signing a ballot issue petition. The law says the same types of photo ID people use to vote on Election Day would be required to sign petitions for access to the statewide ballot.


Allowed forms of ID include but are not limited to:

  • Driver’s license*
  • Photo identification card*
  • Concealed handgun carry license
  • U.S. passport
  • An employee badge or identification document issued by an Arkansas accredited postsecondary educational institution
  • U.S. Armed Forces identification document
  • Public assistance identification card if the card shows a photograph of the voter
  • Voter verification card issued by county clerks under Arkansas law § 7-5-324


*Mobile IDs, or digital versions of Arkansas driver’s licenses and state identification cards, are included. The State Board of Election Commissioners provides more information about the process for verifying an Arkansan's voter registration in this document.


Act 240 is being challenged in court but at the moment the requirement to show canvassers an ID is in effect.


For the 2026 ballot, ballot issue campaigns need at least 90,704 signatures from voters in at least 50 counties to qualify constitutional amendments for the statewide ballot and at least 72,563 voter signatures for state laws.

Ballot Issue Groups Ask Federal Judge to Pause New Laws


A federal judge now has two requests pending before him that seek to pause Arkansas laws regulating the citizen initiative process.


On July 15, sponsors of a citizen-led ballot issue campaign asked U.S. District Court Judge Timothy Brooks for an injunction on a series of laws (see lawsuit section below) as their lawsuit to overturn the regulations proceeds in court. They submitted testimony from paid and volunteer signature collectors explaining how the new laws negatively affected their role in qualifying proposed constitutional amendments for the statewide ballot.


Save AR Democracy, which is made of up of the League of Women Voters of Arkansas and affiliates from across the state, is collecting voter signatures for a proposal to clarify the impact of the citizen initiative process. They're wanting voters to consider a constitutional amendment that would among other things enact a deadline for challenging ballot titles, prevent lawmakers from changing the Arkansas Constitution, and require a statewide vote on any laws affecting the citizen initiative process.


"But the unconstitutional acts, individually and collectively, so significantly impair plaintiff's ability to gather signatures that the July 6 [2026] deadline will likely be impossible to meet," the July 15 court filing states.


On July 24, Protect AR Rights and For AR Kids filed a second injunction request with Brooks seeking to pause even more laws, including Act 602 of 2025. This law requires citizen-initiated ballot titles to be written at an 8th grade reading level. Arkansas Attorney General Tim Griffin has twice rejected Protect AR Rights' proposed ballot title related to the citizen initiative process because the submissions scored at a high school reading level. A third submission is under review.


The request also seeks to pause a requirement that campaigns collect voter signatures in 50 counties rather than the 15 counties mentioned in the Arkansas Constitution. The geographic requirement is currently part of a lawsuit at the Pulaski County Circuit Court.


The request for an injunction came a day after Brooks approved letting Protect AR Rights and For AR Kids join Save AR Democracy's lawsuit despite the group's objection. Attorneys also filed filed their main complaint addressing the original lawsuit on July 24.


Save AR Democracy Request

The July 15 request for an injunction documented how recent laws make it more difficult for canvassers to collect voter signatures. A 2021 law created a list of disqualifying offenses that prohibit people from being a paid canvasser, including all felonies, drug offenses, vandalism, a crime of violence and more. Ballot issue canvassers must now be Arkansas residents and they can not collect signatures before their personal information is submitted to the Arkansas Secretary of State's Office. Canvassers must also now wait to collect additional signatures until the Secretary of State's Office determines whether the campaign qualified for the ballot.


"Each of these restrictions has made it harder for citizens to place paramount issues directly before the citizens of this state," the court filing states. Attorneys for the campaign also submitted statements from past canvassers who say the new laws have deterred them from being part of 2026 campaigns.


The statements include people prevented from being paid to collect voter signatures for statewide ballot measures because of 30-year-old felony convictions or "volunteering as a canvasser feels legally risky and personally intimidating." One testimony included how a person convicted of a misdemeanor in 1998 can be employed to collect signatures for candidates but not statewide ballot issues.


The state has not filed a response yet in court to the request. In a June 20 response to the overall lawsuit, Secretary of State Cole Jester denied that the laws were unconstitutional.


Protect AR Rights and For AR Kids Request

The July 24 request for an injunction mentions how For AR Kids is the sponsor of the Arkansas Education Rights Amendment of 2026, a proposal the Attorney General's Office approved for signature gathering before the legislature passed many of the new laws regulating the citizen initiative process. The group tried to put a similar proposal on the 2024 ballot but didn't qualify.


According to a supplemental filing, the campaign contacted previous canvassers to help with the 2026 campaign.


"Many canvassers indicated that they are less willing to participate this cycle and cited the new laws as a reason," the filing states.


For AR Kids representatives started collecting signatures for their 2026 proposal and found that they could collect far fewer signatures in an hour than they did in 2024 because of the new laws.


"The canvassing regulations hijack that time by forcing canvassers to share the state’s preferred messaging rather than their own, and to take more of a potential signatory’s time than they are often willing to share. Whereas in previous years canvassers would typically spend two to three minutes with a signer, this year canvassers have required at least six to ten minutes to obtain a signature, if not more, as a result of the new requirements," the filing states.


The federal court system uses an online record system that is behind a paywall. Some lawsuit documents that have already been "purchased" are publicly available at https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69919853/league-of-women-voters-of-arkansas-v-jester/.

Status Update - Arkansas Ballot Issue Lawsuits

Name: League of Women Voters of Arkansas, Save AR Democracy, Bonnie Heather Miller and Danielle Quesnell vs. Secretary of State Cole Jester (5:25-cv-05087)


Intervening Plaintiffs: Protect AR Rights and For AR Kids


Date Filed: April 21, 2025


Court: Judge Timothy L. Brooks, U.S. District Court for the Western District of Arkansas in Fayetteville


Complaint: The lawsuit challenges Act 218, Act 240, Act 241 and Act 274 of 2025. The complaint also lists specific state laws, including § 7-9-601, § 7-9-103(a)(6), § 7-9-126(4), and § 7-9-113(a)(2)(A).


Intervenors are also challenging: Act 602 of 2025, § 7-9-126(e), and § 7-9- 601(a)(2)(C).


Status: Judge Brooks on July 23, 2025, issued a ruling allowing Protect AR Rights and For AR Kids to intervene and join this lawsuit. The judge has not decided yet whether to pause the laws for the duration of the lawsuit.

Name: Bryan King and The League of Women Voters of Arkansas vs. Secretary of State John Thurston (presumably now Cole Jester) (60CV-23-1816)


Date Filed: March 10, 2023


Court: Circuit Court Judge Shawn Johnson, Pulaski County Circuit Court


Complaint: The lawsuit challenges Act 236 of 2023, which increased the number of counties that citizens needed to collect voter signatures from to qualify constitutional amendments and state laws for the statewide ballotfrom 15 counties to 50 counties.


Status: After attorneys for both sides of the case this summer requested Circuit Court Judge Shawn Johnson make a decision in the two-year-old lawsuit, Johnson set a Sept. 3 court date for a judgement hearing. The original judge in the lawsuit held a final hearing on the lawsuit on Oct. 24, 2024, but did not issue any ruling. Judge Herbert Wright left the circuit court after being elected in November 2024 to Little Rock traffic court judge. The attorney representing King and the League of Women Voters asked Johnson on June 30 to make a ruling without any new hearings while state attorney's for Jester on July 2 requested a hearing to present their arguments.

Name: State of Arkansas vs. Good Day Farm (CV-24-704)


Date Filed: Oct. 21, 2024


Court: Arkansas Supreme Court


Complaint: The state appealed a Pulaski County Circuit Court judge's 2023 decision that Arkansas legislators did not have the authority to make changes to the constitutional amendment voters approved in 2016 that allowed medical marijuana sales and possession in Arkansas. Good Day Farm and Capital City successfully argued that legislators were required to ask voters through the statewide ballot to make changes to Amendment 98. They based their claim on a 1951 Arkansas Supreme Court decision that said it was "inconceivable" that Arkansans meant to give legislators the ability to repeal or change constitutional amendments in the very amendment that allowed citizens to refer measures to the voters to decide. Amendment 98 allowed legislators to make limited changes without voter approval but the two licensed marijuana businesses said the legislature went beyond that scope. The legislature has made 28 changes to the medical marijuana amendment since 2016.


Status: On July 17, the Arkansas Supreme Court allowed the Arkansas State Chamber of Commerce to file a brief in support of Good Day Farm's argument on the 1951 court decision. The Arkansas Chamber of Commerce filed its brief 11 minutes after the ruling was published.

On the 2026 Ballot - From the Legislature

Arkansas voters will see three proposed constitutional amendments from the legislature on their November 2026 statewide ballot along with one bond issue question. The Arkansas Secretary of State will assign ballot issue numbers to the three amendments in 2026.


HJR1018 - The Citizens Only Voting Amendment


SJR11 - A Constitutional Amendment to amend Arkansas Constitution, Article 2, § 5, to protect the right to keep and bear arms.


SJR15 - A Constitutional Amendment concerning economic development in the state of Arkansas; and authorizing the General Assembly to provide for the creation of economic development districts to promote economic development.


Question 1 - Arkansas Water, Waste Disposal, and Pollution Abatement Facilities Financing Act of 2025

Citizen Proposals for the 2026 Ballot

Arkansas is one of 15 states where citizens have the right to put constitutional amendments, state laws and referendums on the ballot for voters to decide.


The citizen initiative process involves filing a ballot title with the Attorney General's Office, collecting voter signatures across the state and submitting the petitions to the Secretary of State's Office for verification.


Referendums require voter signatures equaling 6% of the number of people who voted in the last governor's election. State laws require 8%, and constitutional amendments require 10%


Attorney General Opinions

The Attorney General is responsible for reviewing the language and titles of potential ballot issues submitted to voters by the public. Ballot issue groups can circulate petitions only after the Attorney General verifies that the ballot title and popular name honestly, intelligibly and fairly describe the purpose of a proposed constitutional amendment or act, and that the wording of ballot titles scores at an eighth grade reading level on the Flesch-Kincaid test.


Find the full list: Tracking Arkansas 2026 Ballot Issues


Ballot Proposals Rejected



July 1, 2025 - The Arkansas Ballot Measure Rights Amendment A proposed constitutional amendment regarding the citizen initiative process was rejected in part because the ballot title scored higher than an eighth grade reading level, a new requirement under Act 602 of 2025, according to Opinion No. 2025-046. The measure also had ambiguity in the text, according to the AG's Office. Jennifer Waymack Standerfer with Protect AR Rights submitted the proposed amendment. This was the second time the AG rejected this proposal. See Opinion No. 2025-037 issued on June 2, 2025.


Ballot Proposals Approved for Signature Gathering


May 21, 2025 - An Amendment Concerning Constitutional Amendments, Initiated Acts, and Referendums

A proposed constitutional amendment regarding changes to the citizen initiative process was approved for signature gathering, according to Opinion No. 2025-033. David Couch of Little Rock submitted the proposed amendment. 


Feb. 26, 2025 - The Arkansas Educational Rights Amendment of 2026

A proposal to require identical academic and accreditation standards for schools receiving state or local funds was approved for signature gathering, according to Opinion No. 2025-016. April Reisma and Kwami Abdul-Bey of Little Rock submitted the proposed amendment. Note: This proposal is identical to the ballot title approved Sept. 19, 2024.


July 18, 2024 - The Arkansas Government Disclosure Amendment of 2026

A proposal establishing government's obligation to share and deliver information to citizens as a right was approved for signature gathering, according to Opinion No. 2024-070. Robert Steinbuch submitted the proposed amendment.


July 18, 2024 - An Act to Exempt Feminine Hygiene Products and Diapers from Sales and Use Tax

A proposal to exempt period products and diapers from local and state sales tax was approved, according to Opinion No. 2024-068. David Couch of Little Rock submitted the proposed law.

PPC In the Community

Cooperative Extension Service agents in Montgomery and Pike counties hosted the Arkansas Re-Entry Simulation on July 17. Facilitated by the Public Policy Center, the simulation aims to raise awareness about the immediate challenges Arkansans experience when they come home from prison. The simulation involves 14 stations and participants have specific tasks to accomplish over four 15-minute weeks.


Simulation Information


New Publications and On Our Blog

The Public Policy Center is part of the Community, Professional and Economic Development unit at the Arkansas Cooperative Extension Service in Little Rock. As the blog's editor, we wanted to share recent publications.




We use #ARballot on Social Media

Voter Education Resources


State Ballot Issues

Access Our Information

Learn About Arkansas Process


Voter Resources

Link to Arkansas Election Resources & Handouts


Local Ballot Issues

Access Local Election

Fact Sheets


Blog

Read our department blog at Strengthening Arkansas Communities


Ballot Issue Tracker

Links to AG Opinions for 2026 ballot

Approved & Rejected Ballot Titles

Archive

Research past Arkansas ballot issues in our Archive


Did someone share this email with you? 

Subscribe to find Arkansas Ballot Issues News & Notes in your inbox every month.


The Public Policy Center was established in 2004 to provide Arkansans with timely, credible, unaligned and research-based information and education about public issues. Public issues are defined as pressing and emerging issues that involve multiple points of view and have widespread consequences.


Our goals are to:

  • Increase citizen knowledge, awareness and understanding of public issues;
  • Enhance public participation in decisions regarding public issues, and
  • Help citizens craft, evaluate and implement alternative solutions to public issues.


We are part of the Community, Professional and Economic Development unit at the University of Arkansas System Division of Agriculture, Cooperative Extension Service in Little Rock.


News & Notes Volume 12, Issue 7. This e-mail newsletter is shared with Cooperative Extension Service agents, subscribers from the general public and election officials or educators identified by the Public Policy Center. To unsubscribe, click below on "instant removal with SafeUnsubscribe."


Pursuant to 7 CFR § 15.3, the University of Arkansas System Division of Agriculture offers all its Extension and Research programs and services (including employment) without regard to race, color, sex, national origin, religion, age, disability, marital or veteran status, genetic information, sexual preference, pregnancy or any other legally protected status, and is an equal opportunity institution.