August 2025


From The Certified Elder Law Attorney's Desk:



It Looks Like It's Actually Happening: Delaware's New Uniform Health-Care Decisions Act Takes Effect September 30, 2025




By:

Catherine B. Read Esquire, CELA*



Calendar of Events





Article of Interest:



Why 70-year-olds look better today than they ever have.


Remarkable advances in health and wealth mean baby boomers could be the healthiest generation yet. Younger cohorts may not be so lucky



Ben Spencer, Science Editor

August 2, 2025, The Sunday Times




Quote


From The Certified Elder Law

Attorney's Desk:


It Looks Like It’s Actually Happening:  

Delaware’s New Uniform Health-Care Decisions Act  

Takes Effect September 30, 2025 


By: Catherine B. Read Esquire, CELA*

Readers may recall from our March newsletter that the first major overhaul to Delaware’s health-care statutes was signed by the Governor on September 30, 2024, titled the Delaware Uniform Health-Care Decisions Act of 2023 (“DUHCDA”). It is a complete replacement to all of Title 16 Chapter 25, which is Delaware’s current Health-Care Decisions Act. By its terms, the DUHCDA takes effect one year from the date of enactment. That means it becomes effective on September 30, 2025.


The DUHCDA has caused quite a stir. Or, actually, lack of a stir, because most people – including in the health care industry - don’t know about it.


And of those who do know about, almost uniformly no one knows how it will be implemented.


Implementation is a real concern because the DUHCDA changes very practical things, such as who decides decision-making capacity (formerly a physician was required, but now a social worker without a medical degree is permitted).


Another practical difference is now there is an objection process – that is required by statute - for a person who is determined to lack capacity and wants to object. That objection must be lodged in the medical record, notices must be given, and a rebuttal process exists: in short, an incapacity decision isn’t final until that process is finished.


Another practical difference is that certain very important powers do not exist for a health-care agent unless those powers are spelled out in the health-care directive: big things such as “place me in a nursing home for more than 100 days even if my needs can be somewhere else, I am not terminally ill, and I object.” How on earth are facilities – and families - supposed to know how to follow that law?


Above are just three examples of actual, handbook-type changes healthcare systems and facilities are required, by law, to make to their written procedures and on which to train employees.


Implementing Regulations Were Promised:

Where Are They?


Stakeholders consulted prior to DUHCDA passage advocated for the State to promulgate regulations to implement the DUHCDA, precisely to give health-care institutions the guidance they need to change their procedures and train their procedures. The one-year delay in effectiveness was to give those affected time to prepare, and part of that preparation was time for the State to promulgate implementing regulations. Indeed, in the EMS context, the enacting bill provided the “Director of Public Health shall have the authority to promulgate rules for EMS provider recognition and compliance with an advance health-care directive that has become effective pursuant to … of this title …”.


Where are those implementing regulations?

As of the date of this writing: unknown to this author.


And I serve on the DMOST Steering Committee, which is a statutorily-created steering committee whose purpose is to increase use of the Delaware Medical Orders for Scope of Treatment Act, which is Delaware’s real end of life tool, a medical order signed by a physician for end-of-life directions. In the six months I have served on the Committee, the Committee has inquired repeatedly of its various sources and still not received an answer as to the status of the implementing regulations. The Committee’s inquiries do continue, and we actually expect a response soon.


Will the DUHCDA Actually Take Effect September 30, 2025?


In light of all of the foregoing, in the last year, followers of the DUHCDA have wondered, with real cause: will the law actually take effect on September 30, 2025? If many don’t know about it, and implementing regulations haven’t been promulgated, how can the legislation go into effect on September 30, 2025?


It Looks Like the DUHCDA Will Actually Take Effect September 30, 2025


Absent other indication, it looks like the DUHCDA will actually take effect on September 30, 2025. One reason I say this is on July 21, 2025 Governor Meyer signed into law changes to Delaware’s other statutes to correct terminology and cross-references to the old Health-Care Decisions Act to the new DUHCDA. Senate Bill No. 93’s Synopsis even states, “this Act takes effect on September 30, 2025, to coincide with when the Delaware Uniform Health-Care Decisions Act of 2023 (DUHCDA 2023) takes effect.”


What Comes Next?


For sure, attorneys are sharpening their pencils and considering how to change their client counseling, and how if at all to revise health-care directives they prepare after September 30, 2025, because of the new DUHCDA.


Those in the healthcare industry are, or should be, watching the legislation, and we on the DMOST Steering Committee sure are watching for implementing regulations.


Why It Matters?


Unlike some changes in the law that may or may not impact the general population, the impact of these changes is real and matters to every single one of us. By definition, an agent only makes a health-care decision for another if that other is found to lack capacity – the most vulnerable of us all. 


Why 70-year-olds look better today than they ever have.


Remarkable advances in health and wealth mean baby boomers could be the healthiest generation yet. Younger cohorts may not be so lucky


Ben Spencer, Science Editor

Saturday August 02, 2025, The Sunday Times



Five times a week, Fiona Wright gets out and trains. Monday is strength work, Tuesday is a 10km club run, Thursday she is on the athletics track and Saturday is a 5km park run. “Then I’ll get my plodding shoes on,” she says, setting out for an even longer run on the South Downs.


At the age of 70, Wright has a routine that someone half her age could be proud of. “I ran my first half-marathon in March,” says the retired headteacher from Lewes, East Sussex. “I read somewhere that once you’ve done a few half-marathons, you should try to get it under two hours. But I wasn’t sure I had a few in me, so I thought I had better do it the first time.” She completed the course in one hour, 59 minutes and 56 seconds.


Wright is unusual but hardly unique. Her generation, the baby boomers, aged between 61 and 79, born in the two decades after the Second World War, have lived through a revolution in medicine, science and nutrition. Those in their sixties and seventies now will live longer, on average, than any generation that came before. Eighty-nine per cent of people born in Britain in 1955 lived to see their 60th birthday, compared with about 63 per cent of those born in 1905.



Those statistics are backed up by the evidence of our own eyes. Many 75-year-olds today look like their parents did at 60. In the space of a single generation — those born before the war versus those born after it — there has been a remarkable transformation in health, longevity and wellbeing. This trend reaches well beyond tweaked and pampered Hollywood celebrities such as Meryl Streep (76) or Brad Pitt (somehow 61).


Browse through an old family photo album and you may find that a 60-year-old today, still in the prime of middle age, looks far younger than their parents or grandparents did at the same age, back when 60 was considered to be firmly in the twilight years.


Why did the boomers race ahead so fast? In Britain, at least, as children they were the first to access the fledgling NHS and its expanding vaccination programme and mass production of antibiotics. In adulthood they avoided National Service, which ended in 1960, and took advantage of burgeoning university places, soaring living standards and less manual work.

If Wright’s example is anything to go by, as they enter retirement, they are making the most of their newfound free time and living not just longer but more active lives.

*By the National Elder Law Foundation

Accredited by the American Bar Association


www.eaels.com

Facebook  Instagram