Industry Updates for Clients & Friends of Boyd Group International

Week Ending November 9, 2024

In This T&G:

  • Boeing: Is A Break-Up In The Cards?
  • Aviation Media: Raccoons More Important Than Boeing
  • A Word About Aviation Humpday Podcasts
  • DOT Secretary: Please, No More Swamp Dwellers!

Touch & Go Is Sponsored By



Is Boeing Going Bust?


Or Might It Be Just Busted Up?


Summary: The Boeing saga gets deeper and deeper. Last week, the company that builds 737 components - including the entire fuselages - announced that it needed cash right now to continue to be a "going concern." Funny thing is nobody in the aviation media seemed to get the gravity of the situation.



This week, Spirit Aerosystems reported that it may be in danger of not being able to be a “going concern.” Read: could go out of business. It needs substantial new cash investment to stay operating. Soon.


Now to be clear, a “going concern” statement is required SEC boilerplate when it appears that specific financial factors could align. It is not necessarily an announcement of immediate doom. But it does represent a corporation in very severe financial trouble.


Just Repeat It. Don’t Investigate. Most of the media simply described Spirit Aerosystems as a “Boeing supplier,” along with some veneer PR comments issued by the company.


This is like a reporter at the Hiroshima Daily News describing the flash they saw was just another routine 500-lb bomb.


Get this: Spirit is THE supplier to Boeing. In fact, it essentially IS Boeing, albeit an independent corporate entity.


So, one might think that a “going concern” statement about Spirit Aerosystems might be just a leeetle bit of interest. It would, if most of the aviation media had a clue. It is big news.


Until 20 years ago, when the Boeing board sold it off to “enhance shareholder value," Spirit was historically a main manufacturing plant for Boeing, not a “supplier.” We are talking about the roots of the company, from being the place where B-29s were cranked out in WW2, up to today, when it is the main – likely the only – facility making fuselages (hardly a minor part) for 737s.


While Boeing is in the glacial process of doing a $4.7 billion all-stock re-acquisition of Spirit by the middle of next year, Spirit is claiming it needs cash now to keep on operating. Guess where that will need to come from. Oh, and by the way, Boeing is also trying to build cash, too, with reported $19 billion financial offerings in the works.


So, if Spirit ends up sleeping with the fishes, and nobody jumps in to run the place, Boeing is kaput. They can’t shift that 737 work over to Fuselages-R-Us, or someplace else.


However, in the real world, with all the constituencies involved with Boeing, a Spirit factory shutdown is less than a million to one possibility. (We hope.) A deal will be arranged, whether it’s an accelerated buy-out or just more investment.


Or by some fundamental restructuring of what Boeing is today.


This will get worked out. But it will do nothing to alleviate the core problems that led to this.


Plus, because Spirit has been an independent company for the last two decades, it separately has large contracts from non-Boeing companies, including Airbus, which makes the acquisition even messier.


Not to be an alarmist, but the challenges at Boeing are not going to get solved overnight. The end of the IAM strike is just one of the challenges this company now faces.


Boeing May Not Be Able To Stand As-Is, Anymore. So, the bottom line is this: it would appear that Boeing in its traditional form simply cannot continue. A breakup of some kind, isolating the airliner and military sectors, may be in the cards.


For the USA air transportation market this is not inconsequential. It's one thing for airlines to get aircraft delivered a couple months late. It's quite another when the manufacturer has to delay them for years. Just look at the planning changes at airlines: those fleet delays will affect airline strategies.


Watch this carefully because if there is a big hiccup at Aerosystems it’s going to zap Boeing, and it's going to affect the entire USA economy.


This story is just starting.

________________________________

________________________________

Our Data Source & Sponsor

______________

______________



Aviation Humpday Podcasts.


A Revealing Success.



As a lot of T&G readers are aware, Bill Swelbar and I have decided to pull back on the weekly Humpday podcasts, done every Wednesday for the last ten weeks or so.


We are actually excited to find that the podcast established a strong following, and the many comments have been 100% positive and encouraging. Seems that just telling things as they are – like, the hard facts – has been very well received.


The Humpday project was essentially a beta-test. It takes a lot of time to produce these podcasts, even in as rudimentary form as they were. We were careful to try to bring in new perspectives and viewpoints with illustrations that often were iconoclastic and irreverent to consensus thinking.


We discovered that there is a demand for this type of approach - a real gap for straight talk without any pre-scripting or saccharine, professionally voiced introductions. Just us and the facts and occasionally a guest to join us. The podcasts with Greg Donovan of MLB and Marty Lenss of CDR were hits. Bringing on fellow travelers was instructive.


As you may guess, both Bill Swelbar and I still honor the spiritual non-compete we had with Mother Theresa. She apparently agreed not to do aviation consulting, and we agreed not to do charity work for free.


So, we are exploring the potential for a wider set of channels for early next year, and if we decide to go ahead, we will be bringing in sponsors to join us.


We are all ears, and any suggestions are welcome. Any interest in a sponsorship, let us know.


In the meantime, thanks to all the folks who joined us and our camel manager, Gaylord, over the last few months.That include our sponsor, Airline Data, too.


We’ll be on the sidelines. For now.

________________________

________________________

___________________________________________________________



The New DOT Secretary:



We Need A Transportation Expert.


Please! No More Swamp Creatures!


Summary: Historically the selectee for DOT Secretary has been chosen for his or her political characteristics, with Transportation knowledge not being considered. With all that's on the table in regard to air, rail, ground and other infrastructure, the nation needs an expert, not a political retread.


Historically, the Department of Transportation was saddled with secretaries who were functionally inept, had no transportation experience, and were “qualified” only by political connections.


Crocodile Kudos From The Industry. The airline and other transportation industries were expected to go into swooning approval after the president would appoint a DOT Secretary. Even when a semi-literate high school drop out could see that the individual was just another swamp-dweller. That has to stop. The industry has the responsibility to its customers and shareholders to speak out.


Quite the history. None of it positive.


Most recently, Elaine Chao was there simply because it was expedient to pander to her hubby, the Republican Senate leader. She was an inert twit with zero to show for her time there.


Before that we had Ray LaHood, who took the industry nowhere, beyond impassioned press releases urging consumers to change batteries when they changed clocks for daylight savings time. (True.)


Norman Mineta was a professional cabinet selectee. Useless after 9/11.


Earlier, Elizabeth Dole, another roving cabinet sitter, previously of Labor, was responsible for dishonestly changing the conclusions of the initial DOT study on the effects of code-sharing.


Buttigieg has been a great political player, but as for leadership and decision ability, he couldn’t organize a Tupperware party. The rejections of the B6/NK deal and the AA/B6 agreement were just examples of not having a clue. That Kabuki Theater press conference about nasty airlines that he and Biden pulled off last year showcased how doctoring facts was really okay.


A Grasp of Transportation Systems, And A Plan. This time around, the job needs to go to an individual who knows transportation.


One who understands the needs and vulnerabilities of our highway system. One who Isn’t a part of the flower children pushing high-speed rail where it makes no sense. Has a vision for metro transit systems. Has a clue regarding the air transportation industry and can revise or eliminate now-nonsense programs like SCASD and EAS. And can get some clarity to the wholesale tumble toward AAM.


As for air transportation, the new DOT leader must be able to stand up to congressional pork-planning. “No, senator, we’re not going waste EAS money on small community air service that your own consumers won’t or can’t use. It’s your job, not mine, to keep your constituents informed about reality.”


Maybe it’s asking too much to find such an individual. But putting some random, influence-connected politician into the job would be an outrage. That trend defines the swamp.


By the way, what are your suggestions for candidates? Click here and drop us an email.

______________

______________

Finally. Remembering Ben Baldanza


We mourn the passing of Ben Baldanza last week. A wonderful gentleman.


As with thousands of others in aviation, Marian and I were honored being able to work with Ben Baldanza at several levels and at more than one airline over the years. His joining us at our International Aviation Forecast Summits always made attendees feel better and more confident about the future. An honest sense of humor and putting things in actual context was a gift unique to Ben.


Our thoughts go out to his family. And so does our appreciation of the contribution to our industry.

_______________

_______________

Thanks for joining us!

Be sure to log on to our other aviation intelligence portals