Matthew Akiba, Barakat + Bossa, PLLC

“[B]ankruptcy itself is a form of alternative dispute resolution.”[1] One would think that alternative dispute resolution (“ADR”), more specifically, mediation, would be regularly employed by all Bankruptcy courts given the cost and time constraints imposed on debtors who have resorted to Bankruptcy in the first place. Indeed, the main goal of a Chapter 7 proceeding is “to provide certain debtors who are facing severe hardship with the ability to obtain a ‘fresh start,’ free of creditor harassment, the threat of lawsuits, and overwhelming debt.”[2]

The success of many Chapter 11 proceedings on the other hand, depends on the interested parties’ willingness to reach a negotiated settlement of their claims against the debtor.[3] Why then, do only 51 out of the 94 Bankruptcy courts in the United States authorize the use of mediation,[4] and why is ADR only permitted through the promulgation of local rules[5] as opposed to a uniform rule in the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure? This article will explore the use of mediation through the lens of Chapter 11 proceedings and seek to explain why a uniform rule would bolster the use of ADR in bankruptcy proceedings in the United States.