While these large facility-based programs feel "safe", the reality is that research has shown that institutional settings are less safe than community settings. CLI always ran a happy & productive workshop. However, even the best segregated models often hold back many people back because they are so "safe". Personal development requires challenging yourself, which almost never feels "safe".
This large cafeteria-style, take-it-all-or-leave it model has three problems. First, we all live up to expectations and I'm extremely grateful that there is no ISP committee armchair quarterbacking my own 3 steps forward 2 steps back progress toward old age. Second, this approach will cost taxpayers more in the long run because it provides constant supervision in a 1:12 ratio for everyone, regardless of actual need. Some people need much less, while others need an heftier initial investment up front to enable them to be more independent later on. Full disclosure, there will be people that need constant assistance for most or all of their life. But the number of people that will need that life-long constant help is way less than 100%. COVID has given us the chance to rebuild our system to be better for every individual served-- and a better value for the taxpayer. Opportunities like this are rare.
CLI believes that true person-centered planning, customized to each person's life, should be a state-wide best practice. We believe that this will yield consistently better outcomes--and will be more cost-effective for the DD community as a whole. We also believe that whenever possible, we should spend money so that it benefits the whole community.
Thanks (and wash your hands).