Project taps vegetative buffers to reduce pathogen transmission

Key Take-Aways
* Small-scale diversified farms may raise animals and crops in close proximity.
* Because of their small acreage, operators may not be able to create enough separation between animals and produce production.
* Project involves planting a vegetative buffer between animal operations and a produce field.
* Research seeks to quantify role the vegetative buffer plays in potentially reducing pathogen transmission from animals to produce.
April 16, 2019 - Small-scale diversified farms, which may produce everything from eggs and dairy products to fresh produce on limited acreage, are gaining popularity across the nation. But the close proximity of animals to fresh produce also increases the potential transmission risk of foodborne pathogens.

"When you talk to these farmers, the health of the consumer is very important to them, but their challenge is a lack of science-based information," said Siddhartha Thakur, Ph.D. , and principle investigator with North Carolina State University (NCSU).

Because of their small acreage, many operators may not be able to create enough separation between their animal and produce production.
That got the NCSU team thinking. What if these producers could plant a vegetative buffer zone between the animals and produce? The buffer would theoretically trap airborne pathogens from the animals and significantly reduce the transmission risk to nearby produce fields.

The research project, titled "Establishment of vegetative buffer zones to reduce the risk of STEC and Salmonella transmission from animal operations to fresh produce on co-managed farms," builds on Thakur's earlier CPS-funded project that examined pathogen movement on diversified farms.
Siddhartha Thakur, Ph.D.
 North Carolina State University 
"We were able to find transmission of pathogens happening across 400 feet," Thakur said of the earlier project. "What did we learn - maybe the 400-foot distance isn't enough. Maybe there's a way we can possibly reduce the distance because not every farm can afford 400 feet."

Joining him once again are co-principle investigators Eduardo Gutierrez Rodriguez, Ph.D., and Chris Gunter, Ph.D., both with NCSU.

The previous study examined pathogen transmission at NCSU's Piedmont Research Station as well as on three small-scale farms in North Carolina and two in Tennessee. The current project will be conducted exclusively at the Piedmont Research Station to give them more control over the experiment. Using the university's facility, a 2,500-acre working farm, also allows the researchers to collect enough produce samples to develop a substantial dataset.

They began by planting a 100-foot-by-160-foot vegetative buffer zone between each animal operation (chicken house and dairy unit) and the adjacent produce field. Each vegetative buffer zone has five different layers, based on plant height, and includes poplar, loblolly pipe, shrubs and different types of grasses. Depending on the season, each produce field is planted with lettuce or tomatoes.
Throughout the growing season, researchers will collect produce samples and assay them for the presence of STEC and Salmonella. They also will sample the vegetative buffer zones as well as the manure from the chicken house and dairy unit and test them for STEC and Salmonella.

Later this year, Thakur said they plan to remove each vegetative buffer zone in phases, collecting samples along the way to gauge its impact on reducing pathogen transmission between the animal operations and the produce field.

The researchers are taking testing a step further and using whole genome sequencing to identify the pathogen strains present in each sample. This will allow them to determine whether any of the pathogen strains found in the animal manure became airborne and were trapped by the buffer or transmitted to the produce.

"There are different strains from different sources," Thakur said, adding they've identified 30 strains of Salmonella just from the cattle and chickens. "This is where we have to look to see if it's the same strain or a different strain when we compare samples. Then I think it will become clearer.
"Further, it's evident that when soil is contaminated, we have few tools to remediate the presence of these pathogens, and transmission may be occurring directly from soil to produce instead of from the animal operations. Our research indicates there is a significant need for soil remediation tools that farmers can implement in addition to reducing transmission by implementing a vegetative buffer zone."

Although the researchers still have more crops to plant and sample, Thakur said he's hopeful they can develop a viable and economical system that will help these small-scale operations reduce the risk of airborne transmission of pathogens from animals to nearby produce. If the research is successful, he said the results should be applicable to farms of all sizes.

"Our hope is it will reduce the contamination, but we have to understand that we cannot absolutely prevent it," he said. "But this could also help us better use the land that is available to us."

  Project abstract may be found on the Center for Produce Safety website:
Fund the science, find solutions and fuel the change.

Register now for the 2019 CPS Research Symposium
  About CPS
The Center for Produce Safety (CPS) is a 501(c)(3), U.S. tax-exempt, charitable organization focused exclusively on providing the produce industry and government with open access to the actionable information needed to continually enhance the safety of produce.   
For more information:
Email: [email protected] . Phone:  530-554-9706