CRA Member Newsletter

https://calretailers.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/png2.png

December 18, 2025 | CRA Member Newsletter Updates: Year in Review

Message from the President

Members,


On behalf of the California Retailers Association, I extend our warmest wishes for a joyful holiday season. As families and friends gather, retailers are proud to help make these moments possible by keeping shelves stocked, storefronts welcoming, and neighborhoods vibrant.


This past year brought both challenges and progress for California’s retail sector, from adapting to evolving consumer expectations to investing in safer, more sustainable, and innovative shopping experiences.


The CRA Team worked hard for our members throughout 2025 to deliver exceptional value, successfully defending against harmful legislation while securing critical regulatory relief. Through strategic advocacy, coalition building, and direct engagement with state leadership, CRA protected retailers from millions in potential increased costs while positioning the industry as an essential voice in California’s policy landscape. 


Read our end of year report HERE

A Year of Impact and Advocacy Excellence.


Looking ahead to the New Year, our association remains committed to advocating for policies that support jobs, strengthen local businesses, and keep California the best place in the nation to live, work, and shop.


To every retailer, employee, customer, and community partner, thank you for your resilience, collaboration, and trust. Wishing you a peaceful holiday season and a healthy, prosperous New Year.


Rachel

In This Newsletter Issue:

  • Support CRA's Textiles EPR PRO Application
  • Legislative Updates
  • Regulatory Updates
  • Federal and Local Updates
  • California Retail Law Summit Recap
  • New CRA Coalitions Launch
  • Member News
  • Outreach and Other Activities

SUPPORT CRA'S APPLICATION TO SERVE AS CA'S TEXTILES EPR PRO

DEADLINE: TOMORROW, DECEMBER 19!

Dear CRA Members,


This is a final reminder that we need your support by TOMORROW, DECEMBER 19 to make our application to serve as the Producer Responsibility Organization (PRO) for the implementation of California's Textiles Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) Program stand out beyond the rest.

California passed (SB 707-Newman) in 2024, which established the first-in-the nation EPR program for textiles. Under this law, producers are required to form and join a PRO, which will be responsible for developing and implementing a program plan that complies with the legislation.


CRA, in partnership with the American Apparel & Footwear Association (AAFA) and the National Retail Federation (NRF), is finalizing our application, which includes establishing an independent 501(c)(3) PRO to fulfill these obligations. To put our application over the top we need to show strong support from producers.


We are asking our member companies that fall under this law (which most of you do) to submit a letter of support for our application to CalRecycle to serve as the PRO by no later than TOMORROW.


The process is fast and easy. We’ve drafted a letter of support that can quickly be signed via DocuSign. Please use the link below to access and submit the letter. 


Click Here to Sign the Letter of Support


We appreciate your support and will keep our members updated as our PRO application is finalized and submitted to CalRecycle. For questions, please contact Sarah at sarah@calretailers.com.

Legislative Updates

Update on AI


US President Donald Trump issued an executive order meant to override state regulations on artificial intelligence. The order is intended to boost the AI industry, which has been eager for a national law rolling back state regulations governing the fast-moving technology.


States and lawmakers from both sides of the aisle tried to dissuade Trump from issuing the order, with some questioning its legality. Bonta didn’t immediately say whether he’d sue the White House over the order, but he hinted that legal action is possible.


CA Governor Gavin Newsom called it a “con job,” and Florida Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis suggested the order could be an illegal attempt to usurp states’ power.


CA Sen. Scott Wiener, whose landmark AI transparency bill was just signed into law this fall: “If the Trump Administration tries to enforce this ridiculous order, we will see them in court.


All 50 states, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands and the District of Columbia have introduced AI legislation. Roughly a quarter of those bills are concentrated in three states — California, New York and Illinois.


In addition to Trump's EO, Republican members of Congress are considering a provision in the National Defense Authorization Act, the annual legislation to fund the military, that would preempt state authority to regulate AI. The proposal prompted more than 200 state legislators, including six Democrats from California, to fire off a letter opposing the idea.


California Attorney General Rob Bonta also urged congressional leaders to reject the proposed language, arguing that preemption would undermine states’ abilities to respond “swiftly and effectively to emerging technologies” and allow AI companies to “evade commonsense state law protections.” Thirty-two of the world’s top 50 AI companies reside in California, according to Bonta’s office.


The proposed executive order and bill language are the latest in a series of federal actions to prohibit states from regulating AI, following a failed effort earlier this year. In May Republicans from the U.S. House of Representatives advanced legislation that would have enacted a 10-year ban for states to enforce their AI laws, putting 20 state laws California passed in 2024 at risk. The U.S. Senate ultimately rejected that measure in July, after Democrats and a handful of Republicans arguing for state rights denounced the bill.


Newsom's Last State of the State Address


Gov. Newsom said he will deliver his final State of the State speech to the Legislature on Jan. 8. It would be his first in-person speech in nearly five years and comes as he prepares to launch a likely 2028 presidential campaign.


Newsom’s annual address to lawmakers has been a moving target in prior years, and he submitted his speech in writing this year. The state Constitution requires Newsom to update legislators annually on the state’s condition. But the format and timing of the address isn’t specified.


In a letter to CA Assembly Speaker Robert Rivas and the new Senate President Pro Tem Monique Limón, Newsom said he plans to talk about the state’s progress addressing some of its most significant problems — from combating homelessness to reforming mental health care and reducing crime — over the last seven years.


State Budget Update


The state faces a 2026-27 budget deficit of $18 billion, the Legislative Analyst’s Office projected November 19, even though revenue is running nearly $9 billion ahead of the expectations in the current budget. This gap is roughly $5 billion larger than the analyst’s June estimate. Looking further ahead, the state’s structural deficit – the difference between projected revenue and spending if no changes in law are made – is expected to reach approximately $35 billion annually starting in 2027-28. The analyst warned that ‘as it stands – with larger forecasted deficits and many fewer tools available to address them – California’s budget is undeniably less prepared for downturns.’ Many of the tools used to manage previous shortfalls, including withdrawing billions from reserves and using temporary solutions, are largely depleted, leaving fewer options to address future gaps, the analyst stated.

Regulatory Updates

CalRecycle Updates


BATTERIES AND ELECTRONICS


CRA Comments Submitted for SB 1215 CBEP Regs and Other Updates


The CRA Team submitted comments to The Office of Administrative Law (OAL) in response to CalRecycle's proposal to adopt emergency regulations for SB 1215 (Newman, Chapter 370, Statutes of 2022), California's Covered Battery-Embedded Products Program (CBEP). The proposed emergency regulations will amend the California Code of Regulations (CCR), commencing with Section 18660.5, Chapter 8.2, Division 7 of Title 14.


View CRA's letter HERE, also available on CRA's online member portal.


Notice of SB 1215 Covered Battery-Embedded Products Emergency Regulations Final OAL Approval


On December 11, 2025, the OAL approved the SB 1215 Covered Battery-Embedded Products (CBEP) emergency regulations. These regulations implement, make specific and clarify SB) 1215 (Newman, Chapter 370, Statutes of 2022).


The regulations clarify the SB 1215 statutory definition of “covered battery-embedded product” and include the following:


  • Approved cancellation method for dismantling battery-embedded covered electronic waste (CEW);  


  • Requirements for battery-embedded CEW recycling payment claims;  


  • Reporting and notifications requirements for manufacturers of covered battery-embedded products;  


  • Necessary revisions for CalRecycle to successfully implement California’s CEW Recycling Program, including updates to CEW Recycling Program procedures such as net cost reporting requirements, and establishing reinstatement procedures and payment claim review procedures.   


The proposed regulations also repeal requirements in Article 2.5 pertaining to manufacturer payments.


The effective date of these regulations is December 11, 2025. They will expire on December 12, 2027.


Click HERE for more information.


Notice of Covered Battery-Embedded Waste Recycling Fee Emergency Regulations Final OAL Approval


On December 1, 2025, the OAL approved the Covered Battery-Embedded Waste Recycling Fee emergency regulations which establish a covered battery-embedded waste recycling fee based on the reasonable regulatory costs to administer covered electronic waste recycling per Public Resources Code (PRC) section 42464(b)(3).


The effective date of these regulations is January 1, 2026, and they will expire on January 1, 2028.


Get more information HERE.


2026 Fee Adjustment Discussion with CalRecycle


As part of the strong working relationship the CRA Team has built with CalRecycle, we have been invited to be part of the Agency's potential 2026 fee adjustment discussions for the ongoing implementation of SB 1215. CalRecycle is looking into adjusting the CBEP fee in 2026 and is interested in CRA members' input on the data and methodology retailers plan to use to estimate CBEP sales.


We are working on setting up a meeting with CalRecycle before the end of the year. If you are interest in participating, please email sarah@calretailers.com.


It is important that our members continue to have a voice in the rulemaking process and we encourage your companies to join the conversation.


Updated Manufacturer Lists of Covered Battery-Embedded Products


CalRecycle has updated the manufacturer lists in response to new information from CBEP manufacturers. To assist regulated stakeholders, such as retailers, approved collectors, and approved recyclers, CalRecycle compiled two lists of CBEP covered products.


The first is an Excel spreadsheet that provides the manufacturer’s name, the UPC codes, and a description of the product. The second is an easy-to-read table that lists categories of products, manufacturers and brand names, and examples of products within each category.


Both lists are posted on CalRecycle’s Manufacturer Notice Guidance Page.


Get more information HERE.


New SB 1215 Guidance


CalRecycle developed a new webpage and a question and answer document.


The Manufacturer Notice Guidance webpage contains a decision tree to help manufacturers determine if their product is a CBEP, or if it is an excluded product such as a covered video display device.


The questions in the Q&A are from inquiries that CalRecycle received from stakeholders, and CalRecycle will continue to add to the list of Q&As.


Get more information HERE.


Revised CEW Participant Application Forms and Local Government Designations


Collectors, recyclers, and dual entities are required to notify CalRecycle in writing of changes to information contained in an approved application, including those related to covered battery embedded products.


The updated forms can be found on the CalRecycle Forms and Information Supporting Participation webpage.


CalRecycle also sent out a reminder of additionally requirements with regards to the expansion of the Program to include covered battery embedded products. Participants should be aware of the following (click HERE for the complete list).


Get more information HERE. 


PACKAGING


CalRecycle Sends SB 54 Final Regulations for Approval


CalRecycle officially submitted the SB 54 regulations to the Office of Administrative Law (OAL) for review.


Current Documents






Get more information HERE.


Attorney General Bonta Issues Reminder on EPS Foam Food Service Ware Ban in California


California Attorney General Rob Bonta issued an enforcement advisory letter to producers of expanded polystyrene (EPS) food service ware, reminding them that Senate Bill 54 (SB 54) bans the sale, offer for sale, distribution, or importation of EPS food service ware in California. The ban became effective on January 1, 2025, due to producers’ failure to demonstrate a 25% recycling rate for EPS food service ware. EPS is often used for single-use disposable food service ware, which is a major contributor to plastic pollution. The enforcement advisory urges prompt compliance with the ban. Read more.


Circular Action Alliance Webinars for Producers


The CRA Team continues to receive many questions on various aspects of the proposed SB 54 regulations, and the majority of these questions pertain to Circular Action Alliance (CAA), the Producer Responsibility Organization (PRO) tasked with implementing California's Packaging Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) Program.


We understand how complex this regulation is and as a member of the Advisory Board for both CalRecycle and CAA, CRA's President and CEO Rachel Michelin is communicating our members' concerns and questions on the myriad of calls and meetings she participates in. The CRA Team has also submitted numerous comment letters to CalRecycle on the proposed regulations. For access to all letters and regulatory updates our team has put out on SB 54, please visit the CRA SB 54 landing page we created, accessible to current members only.


In addition to CRA's landing page, CAA has a web page that contains all upcoming and previous webinars the PRO has held for SB 54 producers and the regulated community. These webinars can also help answer many of your questions. 


Access the CAA Producer Webinars HERE.


CRA Resources for Members


The CRA Team has retained Former CalRecycle Director Rachel Wagoner who also previously served as CAA's California Executive Director. Wagoner has decades of experience on EPR and we can facilitate calls with her to answer your questions and utilize her knowledge as a resource.


In addition to Wagoner's hiring, CRA has launched our California Retailers for Environmental Innovation coalition, which will include working on future legislative fixes to California's EPR and product stewardship programs including SB 54 with the overall goal of ensuring these programs work for consumers, business and the environment. All current members of CRA have access to this coalition, but we require members to sign up and register their interest in being part of the coalition's activities and efforts.


Learn more and join CRA's environmental coalition HERE.


CARPET


Differential Assessments Plan Amendment Submitted


On November 24, 2025, CARE submitted a revised Differential Assessments Plan Amendment to CalRecycle for consideration. To mitigate PET-backing contamination and better reflect true recycling costs, CARE proposes replacing the current Broadloom-vs-Tile differential with a Commercial-vs-Residential structure.

 

The proposed structure is grounded in the fiber-specific cost modeling produced by CARE’s Blended Fiber Study Taskforce and the broader analysis of face-fiber characteristics. CalRecycle’s director has 60 days to review and approve, conditionally approve, or disapprove CARE’s Differential Assessments Plan Amendment by January 23, 2025. 


Access the proposal HERE.


BEVERAGE CONTAINERS


2026 Processing Payment and Processing Fee information


CalRecycle published the 2026 Processing Payments Notice and the 2026 Processing Fees Notice, both effective January 1, 2026.


Senate Bill 1013 (Atkins, Chapter 610, Statutes of 2022) and Senate Bill 353 (Dodd, Chapter 868, Statutes of 2023) amended PRC Section 14575(k), respectively, stipulating that the processing fee and processing payment for wine or distilled spirits contained in a beverage container that is a box, bladder, or pouch, or similar container be equal to the processing fee and processing payment for HDPE beverage containers.


PRC Section 14575(k) becomes inoperative on January 1, 2026; therefore, CalRecycle calculated a processing fee and processing payment for each of the new beverage containers (bag-in-box [BIB], multilayer pouch [MLP], and paperboard carton [PC]) effective January 1, 2026.


Click HERE for the 2026 Processing Payment Notice.


Click HERE for the 2026 Processing Fee Notice.


Circular CRV Association Submits Stewardship Plan Changes


On December 2, 2025, CalRecycle received notice from Circular CRV Association of changes to its Dealer Cooperative Stewardship Plan. The plan changes include updates to dealer members and redemption sites. These changes do not require CalRecycle approval.


View the revised plan HERE and view the change notice HERE.


MATTRESSES


Public Comments on MRC’s Used Mattress Recovery and Recycling Plan due January 9, 2026


On December 15, 2025, CalRecycle received Mattress Recycling Council's (MRC) Used Mattress Recovery and Recycling Plan. CalRecycle has begun its 30-day review to determine if MRC’s Used Mattress Recovery and Recycling Plan is complete. CalRecycle has 90 days from the date of receipt to approve, conditionally approve, or disapprove MRC's Used Mattress Recovery and Recycling Plan (by March 16, 2026).


Comments on MRC’s Used Mattress Recovery and Recycling Plan are due to CalRecycle by January 9, 2026. If you would like CRA to submit comments, please send to sarah@calretailers.com by Jan. 7, 2026.


Get more information HERE.


Mattress Recycling Organization Advisory Committee


The CRA team is applying for CalRecycle's mattress recycling organization (MRO) advisory committee. Pursuant to Public Resources Code section 42987(a)(3)(A), the Director of CalRecycle shall appoint members of an advisory committee to be part of the mattress recycling organization.


CalRecycle is reviewing the composition and needs of the MRO advisory committee and soliciting applications from interested parties that wish to be considered to serve on the MRO advisory committee, with a focus on members representing the environmental community or mattress manufacturers. Get more information HERE.


MEDS/SHARPS


Public Comments on MED-Project’s Proposed Changes to its Sharps Plan due January 9, 2026


On December 11, 2025, MED-Project notified CalRecycle of proposed changes to its stewardship plan for home-generated sharps waste regarding providing sharps waste containers and mail-back materials at the point of sale. CalRecycle is reviewing the proposal as a significant change pursuant to Public Resources Code section 42032(e) and Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations section 18973.1(i). 

 

The proposed changes are linked in the public notice HERE.

DTSC Updates


Microplastics


DTSC's Workshop on Microplastics in Consumer Products Research

Please send feedback to the CRA Team by Wednesday, January 14, 2026 for the written comment period. Send to sarah@calretailers.com.


The California Department of Toxic Substance Control’s (DTSC) Safer Consumer Products (SCP) Program released a Background Document on DTSC’s Microplastics in Consumer Products Research for public comment. This document summarizes DTSC SCP's initial scientific evaluation of microplastics in consumer products. The release of this background document is part of DTSC’s early engagement efforts. Feedback from the public will help DTSC to identify additional areas of research and/or product-chemical combinations that may inform future actions to protect public health and the environment.


DTSC also hosted a virtual, public workshop on microplastics in consumer products research earlier this month where DTSC presented preliminary research, answered clarifying questions, and provided an opportunity for public comment. 


View CRA's recap HERE.


CRA is part of a coalition that has submitted feedback on DTSC's work around defining Microplastics and had a debrief call following DTSC's above mentioned workshop. Click HERE to view the notes from that meeting and please reach out to sarah@calretailers.com with feedback and/or questions.


In Case You Missed It:


Plastics Today: Studies Showing Impact of Microplastics on Human Health Often Rely on Shoddy Science


CERS NextGen Hazardous Waste Reporting System Townhall Recap

The company DTSC hired to build out and host the CERS NextGen system held another townhall and answered questions from the regulated community. View CRA's recap HERE, which includes a helpful Questions and Answers portion providing details on the new system buildout.


For questions on the system that you would like CRA to submit on your company's behalf, please reach out to sarah@calretailers.com.

Regulatory Appointments


Jane Sadler, of Sacramento, has been appointed Senior Policy Advisor at the California Air Resources Board. Sadler has been Senior Associate of State Policy at Rocky Mountain Institute since 2024, where she was Associate from 2022 to 2024. Read more.


Dr. Cedric “Jamie” Rutland, of Lake Forest, has been appointed to the South Coast Air Quality Management District Board. Dr. Rutland has been Medical Director and Chief Executive Officer at West Coast Lung – Rutland Medical Group since 2019.... Read more.

CARB Updates


CA Climate Disclosure Laws


Please send feedback on the draft rules to sarah@calretailers.com by Wednesday, February 4, 2025


The California Air Resources Board (CARB) released their initial draft rules for the state’s climate disclosure laws, but there’s still a long way to go before the regulations are ready for prime time.


CARB published narrow rules that would require corporations with at least $1 billion in annual revenue to start reporting carbon emissions linked directly to their operations and energy purchases by Aug. 10, 2026.


The draft also includes a proposed flat fee that would be divided evenly among businesses subject to SB 253 — the emissions reporting law — and SB 261, which requires companies with at least $500 million in global revenue to publish their climate-related financial risks.


CARB estimates it will cost $14 million annually to enforce the two laws, which have garnered national attention after the Trump administration revoked a Biden-era federal climate disclosure rule.


The draft rule, however, stopped short of finalizing broader reporting rules and a list of companies that will be subject to them. (CARB previously published a preliminary draft list of 4,159 companies that may be subject to the laws.)


And they come as CARB is fighting a lawsuit led by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, which argues the two laws violate businesses' First Amendment rights. A federal appeals court issued a preliminary injunction last month, temporarily halting SB 261, which would have taken effect on Jan. 1.

There is a 45-day public comment period for the draft rules ahead of a scheduled vote at the agency’s Feb. 26 meeting. 


Get more information HERE.


The CRA team created a document that contains comprehensive information on the CA Corporate Climate laws and rulemaking available HERE.


CARB Posts New Enforcement Advisory and Voluntary Public Docket for SB 261


On November 18, 2025, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued an order in Chamber of Commerce v. Sanchez, Case No. 25-5327 (9th Cir. 2025), granting an injunction against the enforcement of SB 261 (Stern, Stats. 2023, ch. 383, codified in Health and Safety Code section 38533) during the pendency of appellate proceedings in that matter. Argument in that appeal is set for January 9, 2026, after the January 1, 2026, reporting deadline set by section 38533. 


In light of the Court’s order, CARB will not enforce Health and Safety Code section 38533 against covered entities for failing to post and submit reports by the January 1, 2026, statutory deadline. CARB will provide further information—including an alternate date for reporting, as appropriate—after the appeal is resolved. For entities that may choose to report voluntarily at this time, CARB will open a docket starting December 1, 2025, as CARB indicated in its November 18, 2025, workshop


Click HERE to access the Climate-Related Financial Risk Reporting (SB 261) Enforcement Advisory


Click HERE for the Climate-Related Financial Risk Reports (SB 261) Docket, which is VOLUNTARY.


Get more info. on the public docket HERE.


Please reach out with questions.


Trucks and Cars


California is looking to the past for a path forward after the Trump administration axed its electric vehicle sales mandates. A decade-old rule could hold the key to the state’s regulatory future.


State air quality officials will start putting together new rules for heavy-duty truck emissions regulations. The deliberations come after the state announced plans to finalize standards for light-duty car manufacturers by summer 2027 — collectively representing their counter-move after Republicans used the Congressional Review Act to nullify California’s plan to ban gas vehicles over the next decade.


Those forthcoming rules will signal how aggressively the state plans to push the automotive industry to phase out gas-powered vehicles. But they could be rendered moot if CARB loses a simmering regulatory fight over its bid to reinstate 2012 emissions standards as a stopgap measure.


The 2012 rules, which state officials resurrected last month as a fallback to the regulations the Trump administration nixed, require car companies to hit a target of electric and plug-in hybrid vehicles accounting for around 8% of sales annually.


While that’s a mark the industry has largely already exceeded, the Trump administration nonetheless has made clear it believes it has the power to approve or reject all emission rules, new or old — and is not inclined to give the green light to California.


On its face, the move to bring back an old regulation that auto manufacturers have largely already surpassed may seem pointless. But the fight now isn’t over actual emission levels, but whether CARB can protect its authority to regulate cars sold within its borders. For decades, California has been the only state with this power, which is the linchpin to its climate goals.


Under the Trump administration’s legal theory that it maintains the right to revoke a previous emission rule, California essentially would cede its regulatory authority to the federal government.


EPA hasn’t sued over the reemergence of the 2012 rules, but at least some environmental groups anticipate a lawsuit is on the horizon.


Vehicle makers and trucking groups aren’t doing CARB any favors. Four truck manufacturers — Daimler Truck North America, International Motors, Paccar and Volvo North America — sided with EPA, arguing in public letters that reverting to older standards is illegal. The same companies sued CARB earlier this year to dissolve a 2023 voluntary agreement, in which they had pledged to follow the state’s sales mandate in exchange for regulatory flexibility.


“Unreasonable California-only standards and lack of regulatory clarity has resulted in truck sales falling by over 80%, hurting our dealer members and creating confusion among fleets,” said Eric Sauer, CEO of the California Trucking Association.


The auto industry, meanwhile, argues it should be allowed to sell cars in California that meet federal standards that are stronger than California’s 2012 rules, without needing state approval.


For their part, EV advocates say it would be foolish for state officials not to put in place a backstop and simply trust the Trump administration will adhere to current federal standards.

Cal/OSHA Updates


Workplace Violence


Cal/OSHA held an advisory committee on potential revisions to our already-in-place workplace violence standard. The advisory committee discussed the draft for title 8 section 3343, workplace violence prevention (WPV) in general industry, posted on May 13, 2025.


HERE is the draft coalition letter CRA signed onto. During the meeting CRA took notes and provided comments. For a recap of the meeting, please see HERE.


A major issue CRA raised was the newly included language in (c)(10)(B) that states:


The employer shall not retaliate against an employee involved in a lawful act of self-defense or defense of others.


CRA challenged the inclusion of this language because it will open a floodgate of litigation against retailers should they take action against an employee who violated internal company policy of not engaging with shoplifters, for example. This language relies on a penal code definition and retailers nor Cal/OSHA instectors are suited to interpret criminal law, leading to potential misinterpretations. Unfortunately, this language open up retailers to civil litigation should an employee harm someone in what they deem as lawful self-defense.


As a refresher: This rulemaking is proceeding to revise the existing WPV standard, which was put into place statutorily by legislation (SB 553 – Cortese – 2023). This revision is supposed to move to formal rulemaking in December of 2025, however Cal/OSHA staff said during the advisory meeting that they will likely have a new draft posted in mid-January 2026 followed by a month long comment period. 


Additionally, Cal/OSHA will host a small group virtual meeting for those engaged in the process. CRA will continue to be engaged. Once it enters formal rulemaking, the Board usually will not change text, and it will pass within 12 months. The May 13 draft is available HERE.


If you have any questions please contact Ryan (Ryan@calretailers.com).

Privacy Updates


Court Allows CIPA Claim Involving Third-Party Pixels to Proceed, Ignores Contrary Case Law: What Your Business Needs to Know


Businesses may be feeling a bit of whiplash from a recent federal court ruling on California’s wiretapping law and should be on alert for whether their website tracking technology could be used to file a viable lawsuit.


On November 18, the Southern District of California greenlit a lawsuit against sportswear company Adidas, alleging its use of pixels to collect private information violated the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA). The company’s disclosure of the data collection wasn’t sufficient, the court found, because it failed to get affirmative consent from website visitors.


The decision conflicts with other district courts that have reached the opposite conclusion when it comes to website tracking technology: that there is no reasonable expectation of privacy in IP addresses, browsing activity, and other device identifiers.


Read more.


Calif. Privacy Agency Targets Data Brokers With 'Strike Force'


The California Privacy Protection Agency (CalPrivacy) is creating a Data Broker Enforcement Strike Force within its Enforcement Division to investigate privacy violations by the data broker industry. The Enforcement Division will be reviewing the industry for compliance with the data broker registration requirement in the Delete Act, as well as for compliance with the state’s comprehensive privacy law, the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA). Read more.


CA Board of Pharmacy Updates


Central Fill Comments Submitted to BoP


The CRA Team submitted comments to the California Board of Pharmacy regarding their Proposed Action for Central Fill Pharmacies to add Title 16 CCR § 1707.4.


Read the letter HERE (also available via CRA's online member portal).


Get more information on the proposed amendments to the regulation in CRA's previous member update HERE.


New Requirements for Nonresident Pharmacies


Effective July 1, 2026, nonresident pharmacies (i.e., pharmacies located outside California that ship, mail, deliver, or otherwise dispense prescription medications or devices into California) must: Identify a California-licensed pharmacist employed and working at the nonresident pharmacy to be proposed to serve as Pharmacist-in-Charge (PIC) over the nonresident pharmacy’s California operations, and submit the proposed PIC’s name, license number, and effective date to the Board within 90 days of designation.


Get more information on the requirements including next steps for compliance, licensure application and CPJE test dates the Board of Pharmacy (BoP) sent out HERE.


First BoP Meetings in the New Year


The BoP posted the first meeting dates for 2026. Save the date for the following, all of which CRA will be covering. Meeting details including times, agendas and access information are forthcoming. The BoP has not yet posted this information, but when they do, the CRA team will share it out and ask for feedback on relevant items.


  • January 7, 2026: Enforcement and Compounding
  • January 8, 2026: Licensing
  • January 8, 2026: Communications & Public Education
  • January 26 - 27, 2026: Full Board


Transition to Standard of Care


Under the provisions of Assembly Bill (AB) 1503 (Berman, Chapter 196, Statutes of 2025), the BoP Sunset Review, certain pharmacist-provided patient care services are transitioning to a Standard of Care practice model effective January 1, 2026.


The policy statement can be found HERE.


Pharmacist-in-Charge


Under AB 1503, new provisions reinforce the decision-making autonomy of the Pharmacist in Charge (PIC) related to staffing decisions. Read the full policy statement HERE


PIC Training Webinar


Pharmacist-in-Charge training webinar is available on the BoP website. This webinar provides an overview of pharmacy law related to the position and the responsibility of a pharmacist when associating as the PIC of a licensed facility. One hour of CE will be awarded for completing the webinar training; however, it does not count toward the required 2 hours of CE for Law and Ethics.


To take this course you must sign up for a PharmED account. Click HERE to sign up for an account.


California Medication Error Reporting (CAMER)


Register with ISMP to report medication errors to the California Medication Error Reporting (CAMER) system. Medication errors that occur on or after September 1, 2025, must be reported to the CAMER system. For information on how to register with ISMP’s medication error reporting program, click HEREFor technical issues please email clientservices@ecri.org. FAQs regarding medication error reporting can be found HERE.


Changes to GLP-1 Access Under Medi-Cal


The California Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) sent out a notice to Medi-Cal members that states due to the 2025-26 State Budget, Medi-Cal Rx benefits will change on January 1, 2026. Medi-Cal Rx will no longer cover drugs for weight loss uses (known as GLP-1 drugs).


Click HERE to view the sample letter DHCS has been sending out, which includes the list of GLP-1 drugs that will no longer be covered.


Click HERE to view a summary of the policy changes, including information on the appeals process and other resources.


Recent Developments Related to Vaccines


Under AB 1503, pharmacist authority to independently initiate and administer vaccines for persons three years of age and older will transition to a standard of care practice model. Such an approach is consistent with other health care practitioners with similar practice authority. In anticipation of this change, the Board encourages pharmacists to begin the transition to a standard of care practice model for immunizations for patients three years old and older. 


The Board also reminds pharmacists that Business and Professions Code section 4052(a)(11) currently provides a pharmacist with the authority to administer immunizations to any person, regardless of age, pursuant to a protocol with a prescriber. This current authority will exist until January 1, 2026, when AB 1503 takes effect.


California Albuterol and Epinephrine Standing Orders for Schools


California schools are authorized to stock unassigned albuterol metered-dose inhalers (MDIs), single-use disposable spacers, and epinephrine auto-injectors for emergency use.

The California Department of Public Health (CDPH) has issued statewide standing orders that enable all California TK–12 public, charter, and private schools, as well as local education agencies (school districts), and county offices of education, to obtain MDIs and single-use disposable spacers, as well as epinephrine auto-injectors without an independent physician's prescription.


Standing orders are issued to schools under the name of the school and medications are not assigned to any specific student or staff. To learn more about program eligibility, training requirements, and how schools can apply or renew, please visit the CDPH website or contact the Office of School Health at SafeSchoolsTeam@cdph.ca.gov.


Report a Drug Theft/Drug Loss Online Portal


The BoP has implemented a new online portal to report a drug theft/drug loss of controlled substances. Submissions via the online portal will ensure that the board is receiving all required information pertaining to California Code of Regulations, Title 16, §1715.6.


Although not required, the BoP encourages using the new online portal for future reporting.


Proposition 34 Update


The BoP reminds affected licensees about Proposition 34, a ballot initiative that was approved by the voters in November 2024. Proposition 34 added the Protect Patients Now Act of 2024 (Act) to the Welfare and Institutions Code (see sections 14124.39-14124.52).


Among its provisions, the Act establishes requirements for a “Prescription Drug Price Manipulator” (as defined in subdivision (l) of WIC section 14124.48) to report specified information to certain agencies, including the Board, by no later than December 31, 2025.


Additional information about Proposition 34 is available HERE.


Public comments related to the Act, and information relating to entities that qualify as Prescription Drug Price Manipulators, may be submitted to Prop34@dca.ca.gov.

Local and Federal Updates

Federal Updates


Improve and Enhance the Work Opportunity Tax Credit Act


CRA signed onto a support letter sent to the author's of the S. 3265/H.R. 6231, the Improve and Enhance the Work Opportunity Tax Credit Act. The Work Opportunity Tax Credit (WOTC) is an important hiring incentive that has been utilized for three decades to build strong workforces in communities across the country. WOTC provides individuals in hard-to-reach groups experiencing poverty, stigma, or other barriers to employment with opportunities for meaningful work in the coalition members' industries. The legislation takes important steps not only to strengthen WOTC but also to preserve this vital lifeline for years to come. Unless Congress acts, WOTC will expire at the end of this year.


Read the letter HERE.


Tariffs Update – CIT Denies Preliminary Injunction Against Tariff Liquidation


The Court of International Trade denied the preliminary injunction motion in the AGS cases because “the Government has taken the “unequivocal position” that “liquidation will not affect the availability of refunds after a final decision” in V.O.S. Gov’t Resp. at 2–3. The Government would be judicially estopped from “assum[ing] a contrary position” in the future. New Hampshire v. Maine, 532 U.S. at 749.


Additionally, this court has the authority to order reliquidation in cases involving constitutional challenges to duties under 28 U.S.C. § 1581(i). Accordingly, we find that Plaintiffs are not at risk of experiencing irreparable harm as a result of liquidation.” The Court also indicates in an earlier part of the decision that protests would be futile at this time while the legality of the duties is being challenged, and that 1581(i) jurisdiction is available to claim refunds instead, in the event the Supreme Court ultimately rules the duties unlawful.

 

We now have to wait for the Supreme Court decision on the IEEPA tariffs. If the IEEPA tariffs are found unlawful, we will learn thereafter whether administrative procedures will be adopted to facilitate refunds, whether court actions will be required, or whether some combination thereof will be needed based on an entry’s status. 


Amicus Brief Filed Regarding CIPA’s Pen Register Provision


CRA signed on to an amicus brief in support of interlocutory review by the Ninth Circuit of a recent ND Cal order denying a Motion to dismiss Fregosa v. Mashable (jurisdiction is N.D. Cal). The Order in the MTD establishes that CIPA’s pen register provisions may extend to software processes that record addressing information in electronic communications, including technology that records users’ IP addresses and device identifiers and transmits that data to third parties for advertising and profiling.


The ask to the Ninth Circuit is to declare that CIPA’s pen register provision, or any other provision of the law, is not meant to govern online activity. The amicus brief’s goal is to lay out the legislative history of both the pen register amendment from 2015 as well as the legislative and enforcement history of the CCPA, as amended by the CPRA, to show the legislative intent and how the AG has enforced activity around online tracking technology.


View the Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint HERE.


View the Order denying Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer HERE.


Local Updates


Los Angeles Draft CII Permit Update


On November 20, the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) held a workshop to consider improvements to the draft CII Permit. After receiving a briefing from RWQCB staff and comments from stakeholders, the Board asked staff to engage with stakeholders to consider possible improvements to the Permit. Some of the provisions that the Board directed staff to focus on included:


  • Who should be the permittee -- the facility owner or operator?
  • What should be in the Option 1 contract between the permittee and the Watershed Management Groups?
  • Permit implementation timing
  • Exemptions for residential properties identified as mixed use
  • Sampling requirements

 

The Board requested that staff report back on their progress in addressing these issues by the end of the first quarter of 2026. 


CRA is part of a coalition of industry and other impacted entities working on this issue including the development of white papers for the RWQCG's reference. Click HERE for white papers the coalition drafted. Coalition members are reviewing the documents so that the coalition can can update them as needed and provide them to Regional Board staff as a first step in the coalition's efforts to reengage and improve the current proposed permit. The white papers are intended to serve as the basis for workshops to dig into each of the issues outlined in the documents. If you have feedback and/or questions on these draft white papers, please send to sarah@calretailers.com by January 5.

 

The coalition will reconvene the second week of January to touch base and take assignments on red lines for various pain points within the permit. Click HERE for a list of issues of concern the coalition plans to address. The coalition's aims to develop a coalition redline of the permit to provide to the Regional Board early in the New Year.


Read previous coalition letter CRA is part of HERE and HERE.


National Non-Profit Demands $30 Minimum Wage in LA County for All Workers — Including Tipped Employees


One Fair Wage, a national organization representing nearly 300,000 restaurant and service workers, is currently advocating for a countywide minimum wage increase to $30 for all service employees, including those in tipped positions. This push is part of a broader national campaign to sharply increase minimum wages in a misguided effort to address the rising cost of living.


Paying tipped employees exorbitant wages would force restaurants to make difficult trade-offs, including cutting staff to control operating costs or shutting down entirely. Small and family-owned businesses would bear the brunt of the pressure, and the shift could shrink job opportunities for people just entering the workforce.


Currently, no specific ballot measures or legislation have been introduced. However, recent polling across four of the nation’s largest cities — including New York, Chicago, Los Angeles, and San Francisco — shows strong support for gradually raising the minimum wage for all workers, reaching $30 an hour over several years.


Ultimately, raising wages in select industries won’t solve the problems it aims to fix. Instead, it risks driving living costs even higher while reducing employee hours and eliminating jobs. That would be especially damaging for Los Angeles, a city still struggling to rebound from the pandemic and already strained by a series of recent anti-business measures, including the $30 minimum wage for hotel workers.

CRA and NRF Retail Summit Recap

The California Retailers Association and National Retail Federation hosted our third annual California Retail Law Summit on October 26-28 at the Meritage Resort & Spa in Napa Valley. Aptly named the 2025 Retail Law & Policy Uncorked: The California Summit, Where California Sets the Standard—Navigating Retail’s Legal, Regulatory and Policy Frontiers Nationwide, this event was our first Summit that intersected legal, regulatory and legislative issues and priorities for the retail industry.


The premier three-day event set in the scenic Napa Valley, brought together national retailers, policy makers, regulators and legal experts in addressing the most pressing legislative, legal and regulatory issues impacting the retail industry in California and beyond.


Featured speakers included:

  • The Honorable Rob Bonta, California Attorney General (video message)
  • Director Zoe Heller, CalRecycle 
  • Executive Director Tom Kemp, California Consumer Privacy Protection Agency 
  • Assistant Majority Leader Diane Papan, Member of the Assembly Environmental Safety & Toxic Materials and Judiciary Committees 
  • Vice-Chair Roger Niello, Senate Judiciary Committee 
  • Assemblymember Chris Ward, Member of the Assembly Privacy Committee and Author of AB 446 Pricing Surveillance; Two-Year Bill
  • Chairman José Luis Solache, Jr., Assembly Committee on Economic Development, Growth, and Housing Impact
  • Assemblymember Rick Zbur, Assembly Caucas Chair; Member of the Assembly Natural Resources Committee 
  • Assemblymember Tina McKinnor, Member, Assembly Environmental Safety & Toxic Materials 
  • Assemblymember Josh Hoover, Member of the Assembly Natural Resources Committee 
  • Assemblywoman Ali Macedo, Member of the Assembly Judiciary Committee 
  • Assemblymember David Tangipa, Member of the Assembly Higher Education Commitee 
  • Doug Kobold, Executive Director, California Product Stewardship Council (SB 707 sponsor) 
  • And Legal Professionals from throughout the country


The event featured a memorable welcome dinner with California's policymakers in the resort’s wine cave and engaging panels on environmental compliance, consumer protection, privacy, and AI. Attendees gained valuable insights into California’s evolving legal landscape. The summit fostered open dialogue and provided practical guidance for navigating complex regulations and legal challenges.


This was a uniquely intimate setting where attendees had rare, direct access to California's decision-makers. We’re grateful to everyone who joined us. To explore more highlights and resources from the summit, click on the link below.

What People Are Saying About the Summit


"The California Retailers Association Legal and Legislative Summit exceeded expectations! Thanks to the entire team at California Retailers Association and National Retail Federation for hosting a lively and exciting policy forum. We look forward to continuing our partnership in 2026 and beyond."


"Kudos to Rachel Michelin and her team at CRA for putting together an incredible line-up of expert speakers, legislators and policymakers."


"Thank you to the California Retailers Association and the National Retail Federation for having me on their California's Workforce Mandates panel. It was a pleasure speaking with Assemblymember José Luis Solache, Jr., Assemblywoman Ali Macedo, and Assemblymember David Tangipa."

New CRA Coalitions Launch

Environmental Innovation and Grocery

California Retailers for Environmental Innovation Coalition

We are excited to have officially launched our California Retailers for Environmental Innovation coalition. The coalition was launched during the California Retail Law Summit and is a transformative coalition dedicated to advancing sustainability and environmental leadership within the state's retail sector.


The coalition brings together retailers, service providers, local governments and industry partners to shape California’s complex environmental policy landscape through collaborative and practical solutions. This strategic coalition leverages collective expertise and advocacy to address issues ranging from sustainable packaging and textile recovery to e-waste management and extended producer responsibility (EPR) programs, always with consumer affordability at the forefront.


All current CRA members can participate in the coalition but need to register their interest. Learn more HERE and click HERE to be added to our coalition activities.


California Retail Grocery Coalition

CRA also launched our California Retail Grocery Coalition formed to assist members on regulatory and legislative advocacy issues such as SNAP and WIC funding (keep scrolling for more information on those programs). The Coalition represents a transformative opportunity for grocery retailers across the state to unite in addressing the industry’s most pressing challenges while maximizing their influence on policy and regulatory outcomes. To learn more about the coalition and join, click HERE.

CRA Member News

Holiday cheer Filled the Target in El Dorado Hills as the Community Came Together for the Snowball Heroes and Helpers Shopping Event.


At-risk children received $200 each to shop for items on their Christmas wish list.


"What will stand out in my mind and in my heart forever is the very fact that you had a little boy that received the necessities that he needed, then he also picked out a book, he couldn't even wait to get out of Target," said Lisette Suder from the District Attorney's Office. "He sat down in the little entryway and started reading his book, and that just warmed my heart."


Deputies, officers, firefighters, and volunteers played Santa's helpers, witnessing firsthand that many children were not looking for toys or technology.


"They want shoes, they want a warm jacket, the things that all kids shouldn't have to go without, especially this time of year," one participant said.


Watch HERE and read more HERE.

Other Outreach and Activities

California Retailers Association https://calretailers.com/

Follow CRA on Facebook, Twitter, Linkedin and Instgram to stay up to date on the latest developments in statewide and local legislation and policies, regulations, relevant industry and member related news and association events.

Facebook  Twitter  Linkedin  Instagram