From the Nation’s Capital | | CSRO, Same Day Care Coalition Push Back on Modifier -25 Proposal | | |
The Same Day Care Coalition, of which CSRO is a member, will soon meet with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), and the White House Domestic Policy Council (DPC) to oppose the Modifier -25 proposal in the CY 2027 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule. Under the proposal, when a separately identifiable office or outpatient E/M service is furnished on the same day as a procedure with a 0-, 10-, or 90-day global period, CMS would pay the highest-valued service at 100 percent and reduce payment for the other service by 50 percent. The Coalition, made up of organizations representing a broad range of physician specialties, medical group practices, and patients, is urging CMS not to finalize the proposal.
CSRO also launched a grassroots campaign this week giving rheumatologists an opportunity to urge policymakers to oppose the proposal. Please follow the instructions in the action alert below and make your voice heard.
| | Update on IV Orencia in the CGS Jurisdiction | | |
On August 14, CSRO received confirmation from senior staff in the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Administrator’s Office that the agency had reviewed concerns raised by CSRO regarding Medicare coverage of IV Orencia (abatacept). Following CMS engagement, CGS revised its J0129 Orencia Educational Fact Sheet, removing the previous requirement that providers demonstrate why a patient could not receive self-administered subcutaneous Orencia, including the prior three-month “trial” requirement.
Yesterday, CGS confirmed with CSRO that Part B Medical Review will re-review denied claims from the Targeted Probe and Educate (TPE) in 2026 for medical necessity based on the revised J0129 Orencia Fact Sheet. Upon completion of the claim re-reviews, including appeals results, CGS will re-evaluate each provider’s status in the TPE program, including error rates and potential progression into the next round of the TPE process. Providers will be notified via End of Round Results Letters. In addition, based on CGS’s clarification that all reviews will be conducted for medical necessity using the revised fact sheet, CSRO expects that claims currently in appeals will also be considered using the revised fact sheet.
While these developments represent important progress, CSRO will continue working with CMS and CGS to monitor implementation and address any remaining issues for practices with TPE audits, appeals, or other claims affected by the prior policy. Please continue to share any challenges you encounter, as well as successful appeal outcomes, with CSRO.
| | CA: CSRO Calls on California Lawmakers to Prioritize Patient Protections | | Earlier this month, CSRO joined comments led by the All Copays Count Coalition to the Assembly Health Committee, opposing recent changes to SB 1199, a copay accumulator adjustment ban bill, that weakened patient protections in the underlying legislation. Among the changes the Coalition opposed was expanding the bill's "generic exclusion" provision to include biologics and interchangeable biosimilars—meaning patients could be forced to switch to a potentially less effective drug simply to avoid a copay accumulator adjustment program. The amended bill also introduced new loopholes allowing payers and PBMs to impose additional administrative burdens on patients seeking copay assistance. While the Coalition couldn't restore the bill to its original version, the payer-backed version ultimately failed to advance out of the Assembly Appropriations Committee this month. | | OR: CSRO Weighs In on PDAB's Drug Reviews of Skyrizi and Tremfya | | |
Ahead of the Oregon Prescription Drug Affordability Board's (PDAB) August 19th meeting, CSRO submitted comments outlining concerns about the Board's drug reviews of Skyrizi and Tremfya. CSRO cautioned that PDAB policy can target the wrong problem: reducing payer reimbursement while leaving patients' cost-sharing obligations unchanged. The Coalition called on the PDAB, during its drug reviews, to get to the root of the problem — which requires looking at multiple factors, such as insurance benefit design, list price, and failures to pass rebates and discounts directly to patients.
In reviewing both Skyrizi and Tremfya, CSRO urged the PDAB to recognize that not all therapeutic alternatives are therapeutically equivalent, and that only alternatives that are true therapeutic equivalents to Skyrizi and Tremfya should be considered clinically appropriate for substitution. Finally, while Oregon does not currently have upper payment limit (UPL) authority, the state continues to explore authorizing it for drug reviews. CSRO strongly cautioned against UPL authority, noting that intended savings do not automatically flow directly to patients.
| |
Want to learn more about the legislation introduced in your state? Visit CSRO’s Map Tool to find all of the new and enacted bills within CSRO’s policy priorities.
| |
| | |
Explore the PIRT Archive
CSRO's Payer Issue Response Team (PIRT) has helped address payer challenges affecting rheumatology practices across the country. Now, you can browse the new PIRT Archive to explore past payer issues, the actions taken by CSRO, and the outcomes achieved. Whether you're facing a similar challenge or want to learn more about CSRO's advocacy efforts, this resource is a valuable place to start.
| |
| | |
What's Happening in the States
Interested in learning more about CSRO’s engagement in the states? Visit our State Legislation Correspondence page to review the letters submitted to state legislatures on CSRO’s priority issues.
| Click above to access CSRO’s new State Legislative Tracker to find the status of CSRO’s priority legislation affecting the rheumatology community and its patients at the state level. | | Mark Your Calendar: Upcoming Events
| | |
Action Center
Use CSRO's convenient online platform to easily find out who your elected officials are and engage with them directly.
Career Center
Locate the perfect fit whether you're looking for new career opportunities or trying to find the right candidate.
Explanatory Statement: “Underwater” Biosimilars
To aid in addressing the issue of "underwater" biosimilars with payers, CSRO has created a document to illustrate the extent of the problem.
Legislative Map Tool
Find your state on our interactive map tool to learn about current or proposed policy and ways you can take action to make an impact.
Payer Issues Reporting Form
Request assistance with any payer relation issues that may be impacting your patients or office.
Policy Correspondence
Easily access all of CSRO’s policy letters submitted to payers, state, and federal governments as an informational resource.
Rheum for Action
Learn about the latest advocacy issues in CSRO's advocacy column authored by Dr. Madelaine Feldman and produced in partnership with Medscape.
Step Therapy Cover Sheets
Review CSRO's state-specific step therapy materials that help guide practices in gaining an exemption from step therapy protocols.
| | |
Questions?
Please visit the CSRO website for other news and updates, and do not hesitate to contact us with any questions at info@csro.info.
| | | | |