Opinion: School Bond Secrecy Lobby Prevails Again In Sacramento
EXCERPT: ... Attempts to alert voters about the cost of school bonds have died in the state Legislature. Your school trustees would rather win than be transparent.
At issue are the 75 words voters see on the ballot when asked to grant a school district authority to float bonds for construction projects. ...
The wording never mentions that the bonds are a form of borrowing, nor that property taxes must be increased, often by hundreds of dollars a year, to pay off the bonds. And it certainly doesn't mention how much those bonds will cost homeowners.
It all contributes to a fiction that bonds are somehow magical, free money. "There's this underlying misperception that bonds aren't basically a tax increase," says Assemblyman Matthew Dababneh, D-Encino, whose efforts to bring more ballot transparency were gutted this year.
Voters are understandably confused: When they are asked to approve state bonds for something like parks or high-speed rail, the repayments come from existing funds. There is no tax increase.
Local bonds are different: They require a new revenue stream from tax increases to pay them off. School trustees, led by the California School Boards Association, would prefer voters don't figure that out. ...
This year, in separate bills, two legislators tried to fix this. Dababneh and Assemblymen Matthew Harper, R-Costa Mesa, each proposed that the ballot label contain information about the cost to property owners.
When lobbyists objected, they each scaled back their measures to require merely a mention on the ballot that voters should check the tax rate statement to learn about the cost.
Even that wasn't enough.
Harper's bill, AB 776
, died in a Senate committee.
Dababneh's bill, AB 1194
, passed the Legislature and is now on the governor's desk - but only after the assemblyman removed the key provision regarding ballot label language. ...
To read complete article, please visit:
CBOC Says West Contra Costa School District is Mismanaging Bonds and Could Run Out Of Funds for New Projects
Sept. 27, 2017 | By Yutao Chen
Members of a citizens-oversight committee questioned how the West Contra Costa school district uses bond money to construct or improve school facilities. They raised concerns about the district over-spending its budget and draining funds slated for future projects.
Despite the district's desire to align projects with the budget, an independent investigation echoed these concerns, calling several of the district's budgeting practices "high risk."
Currently, the district has an estimated $362 million available in the next five years for projects such as building new schools or renovating classrooms. But the district has planned projects beyond, which will cost more than $1 billion. ...
One of the concerns these community members have is setting up the budget that balances the needs of the schools and the financial constraints. El Cerrito resident and CBOC member Gregg Visineau said the district would increase the established budgets to match the costs, which can lead to over-spending and not being able to finish the projects already started. ...
For instance, more than $271 million has been added onto the budget initially approved by the board, across all six bond measures passed to carry out the facilities plan, according to a
drafted by business-consulting firm Vicenti, Lloyd & Stutzman.
The firm started investigating the district in 2015. Its goal was to make the budgeting process more transparent and assess the risk of "fraud, corruption and waste in the bond program," according to the CBOC. Its conclusions supported the claim that the district increases budgets to match costs, hindering the completion of ongoing projects. ...
The lack of clarity on how the district plans to spend bond dollars is another issue. Anton Jungherr, member of the CBOC and its audit subcommittee, suggested the district needs to do a better job communicating with voters when they ask for money.
"When you go to the voters, you're supposed to identify in the ballot measure the projects you're going to build with the bond money," Jungherr said.
But the ballot measures never cite specific projects that would be built with the bond money. "The only number you've got is the total number of the bond," he said. ...
To read complete article, please visit:
Board of Directors
Nov. 20, 2017
* Election of Officers
* Adopt Business Plan
To promote school district accountability by improving the training and resources available to California's Proposition 39 School Bond Oversight Committees and educating the state legislature, local school boards and the public about the oversight and reporting powers these Citizens' Bond Oversight Committees (CBOCs) have, and to advocate on a state level, where appropriate, on issues of common concern to all CBOCs.
To view all with topics visit:
- New Issues in Alum Rock CBOC Bylaws
- Bond Legislation Update
- Watchdog Blasts Pasadena Unified
- PVUSD Pushes Against
Grand Jury Report
- Gov. Brown Vetoes SB 341, CBOC Member Terms
- Court Sides With District Employee Who Balked at Order to Purge Emails
- State Superintendent Political Ties with Alum Rock Contractor
- Mello Roos Property Tax
- The Untold Story Behind the Sweetwater Schools Scandal
- Alum Rock Bond Review
- School Bond Watchdogs
- Field Turf & 1,000 lbs Glue
- Conference Agenda
- Alum Rock, Non-existent Construction?
Conference Keynote Speaker
- Little Hoover Commission Report Flaws in Oversight