|
Many years ago an award-winning reporter and columnist for the now defunct Los Angeles Herald-Examiner newspaper, John Schwada, shared with a colleague how he viewed his job covering Los Angeles City Hall. “If you pulled in someone from off the street and they watched the proceedings for a few minutes, what would they be interested in? What would they think?”
Had that proverbial “someone from off the street” been sitting in Los Angeles City Hall last Tuesday listening to the Budget & Finance Committee we think they might take note of the following report on road repairs (or the lack of road repairs) in the city.
First, some background. In 2024 Los Angeles City voters passed Measure HLA, shorthand for “Healthy Streets Los Angeles.” The initiative, which passed by a wide margin, promised to hold the city accountable for implementing its long-term plan to make streets safer by adding more infrastructure to protect transit riders, cyclists and pedestrians. The trouble is, the measure contained no new funding for the changes, which were estimated to cost about $3.1 billion. Critics lambasted it a "road-diet" fiasco. Then, as now, the city is grappling with major budget deficits, and the bill is coming due. At this juncture it should also be noted that the City of Los Angeles, Bureau of Street Services, maintains the nation’s largest municipal street network at 23,000 lane miles, plus 800 miles of alleys.
We now join the committee hearing in progress:
Councilman Bob Blumenfield: Interpreting Measure HLA as applying only to resurfacing and not for large asphalt repairs. I obviously raise this question to raise the issue and wanted to get your takes on this, and where we’re going with this.
Rose Karagezyan, Division Manager, Financial Management, Bureau of Street Services: Good afternoon. Rose Karagezyan. In terms of the resurfacing program, let me give you the metrics, which is what you are asking for, correct?
Blumenfield: I couldn’t hear you. Say that again. And a similar question, the same kind of thing, is how many lane miles is HLA of other bike lanes and other infrastructure have been installed this year, if any?
Karagezyan: So, these are not HLA, these are the metrics for Street Services. So in terms of resurfacing, slurry and concrete panels, we have 562 lane miles that we plan on completing this year, and we’ve completed 165. In terms of large asphalt repairs, the plan is for 1,000 sites to be completed, and we have completed 327 sites as of last month, and that number will continue to go up.
Blumenfield: Right, and are we talking about slurry, and not resurfacing? Actual resurfacing?
Karagezyan: Um, the resurfacing program, we are planning on doing that in the last month of the fiscal year. At this point we have not done any resurfacing projects.
Blumenfield: Could you repeat that? You say you’ve done no resurfacing yet? You’re going to do that in the last month of the year?
Karagezyan: Correct.
Blumenfield: But you have done a certain amount of slurry.
Karagezyan: Correct. So 164 lane-miles of slurry, um, as well as 327 sites for large asphalt repairs. So since we have pivoted to large asphalt repairs, we have already completed 327 sites. In terms of the lane miles, that is (unintelligible). So, that was as of last month. So as of now, we’ve also, like I said, this is a moving target, so the number of sites has gone up to 435 already, as of this month, because it’s been a month since our last report, and that’s close to 32 lane miles.
Blumenfield: So the concern, of course, is, I know it’s budget and not to point fingers at anybody, but we haven’t done any actual resurfacing this year, just the slurry and the lane miles, from the asphalt repair, which is understandable given our budget, but problematic, you know, if this is the new normal. We can’t survive this way as a city, even if we do a few miles in the last month. I’m not sure why we’re pushing it to the last month, but that’s concerning. And I also want to understand the relationship with HLA. So does HLA only apply to the full resurfacing, or when we do these slurrys or asphalt repairs are there any HLA requirements?
Kevin Minne, Assistant General Manager, City of Los Angeles Department of Transportation: Good afternoon. Kevin Minn, assistant general manager, Department of Transportation. As far as I understand it, it only applies to full resurfacing. Slurry and large asphalt repairs would not be a trigger for HLA requirements.
Blumenfield: So … since we haven’t done any resurfacing, we haven’t done any HLA-mandated bike lanes or other infrastructure this year either, is that accurate?
Minne: I believe that’s accurate. We’ll double-check, but I don’t believe we’ve done any actual HLA-related bike lanes or infrastructure this year.
Blumenfield: Which is also concerning in terms of how we go about this. I realize a lot of this is budget issues, and we don’t have the budget that we need, but I raise these questions because it’s just not sustainable. We have to do resurfacing, and we have to do the HLA improvements, the bike lanes and the infrastructure, so I feel like since the last budget we’ve been sort of limping along but given that we’re not seeing new funds come in I don’t understand how we’re going to turn this around, and I raise this as a red flag, not that I have the answer to it, but I do want to see it turned around. I do want us to have resurfacing. Do you all have any insights, am I reading this wrong, or if there is light at the end of the tunnel, please enlighten me.
Councilwoman Eunisses Hernandez: Correct me if I’m wrong, but it’s my understanding that that the reason why we can’t do resurfacing as quickly as we would like to is, per the City Attorney, we have to do the ramps before, and so we can’t resurface until we do the ramps, and we are very delayed in doing the ramps because we don’t have enough ramp teams, and so it’s one bottleneck leads to another delay to another delay. But that’s one of the reasons why resurfacing can’t happen at regular speed.
Blumenfield: Right. That’s why we’re in this problem here, because we have to do the ramps, we have to do the HLA stuff, and we sort of stick our head in the sand doing slurry and large asphalt repair and sort of avoid these other requirements. But I raise it because it’s not a sustainable strategy. It’s a head-in-the-sand strategy waiting for money, but I don’t see any more money on the horizon so we have to figure something out.”
We now return to our regular programming.
Back in 2014 CalAPA’s association magazine, California Asphalt, exposed the rift between the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and pavement maintenance and rehabilitation, pitting U.S. Department of Justice lawyers against Federal Highway Administration engineers. One federal official at the time remarked ruefully that “It’s obvious to us that the FHWA got rolled by the DOJ.” A link to that issue is HERE.
Fast-forward to today, and the anti-road forces have further constrained road repairs, which in many municipalities like Los Angeles have slowed to a fraction of what is needed to keep them in reasonable shape.
Meanwhile, a Los Angeles city proposal to sell asphalt from the two city-owned asphalt plants on the commercial market continues to fly under the radar at 200 N. Spring Street, as reported previously HERE by Asphalt Insider. Here’s hoping that policymakers will recognize the conflict between finite resources, HLA restrictions and fixing L.A. pavements and, indeed, “figure something out.”
To learn more about the HLA measure, click HERE. A link to the City of Los Angeles mobility plan is HERE.
|