|
Political Candidates Call for Imprisoning ‘Zionists’
Israel has become a litmus test in national, state and local elections. Some candidates are open about their real target: Jews.
Texas Congressional candidate Maureen Galindo pledged to turn an immigration processing center into a “prison for American Zionists” and a “castration processing center for pedophiles, which will probably be most of the Zionists.” A Zionist is anyone who supports Israel’s existence. Galindo won the most votes in the first round of the Democratic primary for a U.S. House seat that covers parts of San Antonio – but lost the runoff. She also claimed that Zionists are not real Jews. In California, Republican gubernatorial candidate Alicia Lapp made a similar demand. She won just 0.1% of the primary vote after calling for the deportation of “every single Zionist.”
Members of the Democratic Socialists of America have made significant inroads into the Democratic Party – condemning Israel is a major part of their platform. NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani is one of the most prominent DSA politicians in office. In a 2017 rap video, he referenced “My love to the Holy Land Five” who were convicted by a federal jury for sending $12 million to Hamas. Mamdani also repeatedly refused to condemn the phrase “Globalize the Intifada” on Meet the Press last year. The Intifada refers to repeated terror attacks against innocent Israeli civilians – globalizing it is a call to attack Jews around the world.
DSA candidates who share his views recently won Democratic primaries in long-held party strongholds from NY to Colorado. In NY, U.S. House candidate Darializa Avila Chevalier doubled down on her attendance at a pro-Hamas rally a day after Hamas’s Oct. 7 atrocities. The hostility is not confined to the DSA. In Michigan, progressive U.S. Sen. candidate Abdul El-Sayed branded Israel a “rogue state.”
In CO, Melat Kiros ousted a 15-term incumbent in a primary race for a U.S. House seat. She called Oct. 7 “inevitable.” A leading state Democrat criticized Kiros for refusing to call the deadly Boulder firebombing antisemitic – an attack on a march for Israeli hostages. Newly published research finds that American liberals are more tolerant of antisemitism when statements are framed as criticism of Israel.
The isolationist wing of the Republican Party also is a growing concern. U.S. Sen. Rand Paul has long opposed all foreign aid, including to Israel, and U.S. Rep. Tom Massie was the lone vote cast against resolutions condemning antisemitism in 2022 and 2025. Recently, VP Vance publicly warned Israeli leaders not to criticize the now unraveling U.S.-Iran deal or risk losing American military aid. Some on the far right align with the ‘America Only’ movement that blends isolationism, Christian nationalism and antisemitism.
Israelis Constantly Criticize Their Government
Israel is a vibrant democracy and many Israelis have strongly displayed their right to protest – filling the streets week after week in recent years to protest judicial overhaul, the fate of the hostages held in Gaza and whether the current government should remain in power. Polls routinely show many Israelis are dissatisfied with PM Netanyahu, and Israeli pundits and opposition politicians challenge his decisions daily.
That criticism does not stop at Israel’s borders. American officials across both parties, along with politicians in other countries, regularly fault specific Israeli policies – anti-terrorism measures, dialogue with Palestinians, judiciary changes – without treating it as an attack on Jews.
Many countries have agreed on where the line falls between criticism of Israel and antisemitism. The International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) working definition of antisemitism plainly states that “criticism of Israel similar to that leveled against any other country cannot be regarded as antisemitic.” The IHRA definition has been adopted by 47 countries and hundreds of governments and institutions around the world.
|