Q & A with Rob Donohoe
by Sheryl Flatow
Rob Donohoe, who turns 70 on Christmas Day, has had a lifelong obsession with Charles Dickens’ A Christmas Carol. He’s also had the opportunity to play Scrooge several times in his career. He talked to us about performing in A Christmas Carol, and his enduring fascination with the piece.
 
How did this love affair with A Christmas Carol begin?
At some point in my childhood, my father brought home a set of 78 records of A Christmas Carol, a radio play with Lionel Barrymore playing Scrooge. I became obsessed. I would listen to them every Christmas. My father would get upset with me for listening to them so often. I would put them on the record player, lie on the floor with my head under the Christmas tree, look up at the lights, and listen. It became my own little personal tradition. I don't know what about it grabbed me. I think it was the ghost story, because it was scary, and the interesting characters. It drew me in and sparked my imagination. I think that was it: it really sparked my imagination and I fell in love with it then.
 
When did you first appear in the play?
I was 21 years old and stationed in Germany. I was asked to direct a production for the local community theatre, the Special Services theatre at the army base in Frankfurt. That’s probably the first time I sat down and read the whole book, because I wanted to really understand the depth of it before I took on the script. Unfortunately, it wasn't a great script. It was something the local artistic director had written for him and his wife to star in. It was a real vanity production. Originally, I was just directing it, but the fellow who was playing Fezziwig had to drop out at the last minute so I ended up stepping into the part. 
 
I played Scrooge for the first time when I was 36 years old. In 1986, I got cast to do an entire season of shows at a small theatre in Marengo, IL called the Shady Lane Playhouse, which no longer exists. We did seven different shows, and the last one was A Christmas Carol. It was a small, cut down version, with a cast of about eight people playing all the roles, but quite a good script. I started off as Dickens and I became Scrooge as I was describing the character onstage. I put on the makeup and the wig and turned into Scrooge right in front of the audience, and went from there into the play.
Did the role instantly resonate with you?
I think Lionel Barrymore came flooding back into my head. I’d listened to that recording so much as a child, it was hard not to try to imitate him. But I found my own voice in doing it, and I've been lucky to be able to approach it several times since then. I played Scrooge a second time at the Westchester Broadway Theatre here in New York, and last played him many years later at Charleston Stage in Charleston, SC. In between, I was involved for several years with the big musical production at Madison Square Garden, and got to go on as Scrooge once.

Q: Let’s delve into the production at the Garden, because it was a special part of your career. The show was directed by Mike Ockrent, choreographed by Susan Stroman, and had a score by Alan Menken and Lynn Ahrens. It was performed each December from 1994 to 2003.

It was a huge show, with a cast of 50. There was a live horse onstage. Tony Walton designed the set; it was gigantic and mechanical and amazing. The wonderful costumes were by William Ivey Long. I first got cast to cover all the character men, but not Scrooge. I went on all the time, because we were doing 16 shows a week and there was always someone getting sick or twisting his ankle.

They always had a star paying Scrooge, and in the third year the star was Tony Randall. Mike Ockrent asked me to go with him to a studio and rehearse with Tony Randall. Mike and I played all the parts so that Tony Randall could work on his lines. That’s when Mike realized how versatile I was and really appreciated my talents. Unfortunately, when you're that versatile you get to be the understudy all the time because you're more valuable that way. But he and Susan Stroman got to be big fans of mine, and after Mike died, she had me understudy Scrooge as well.

When Frank Langella was cast, Susan called and asked if I would train him. So, I spent a week in a studio with Frank Langella, teaching him the role of Scrooge while I played all the other roles for him. That was quite an experience. He has a reputation for being difficult, but he was a sweetheart. We had such a good time with each other. The one thing I really remember is we went out to lunch one day to this food court across the street from the rehearsal studio. We were coming down the escalator and these two teenagers saw him, and one of them said, “I know who you are, I know who you are. You’re Sean Connery.” And he said, “Why yes, I am.” I thought that was such class. 
You mentioned that you got to go on as Scrooge for one performance. What do you remember about the experience?
I had known ahead of time I was going to go on because Roddy McDowall had it in his contract that he was going to miss this particular performance. The horrible thing about going on for the star is the announcement made to the audience just before the curtain: “At this performance, the role of Scrooge usually played by Roddy McDowell will be played by Rob Donahoe.” Everyone warned me there was going to be booing when my name was announced. Fortunately, because I knew I was going on, my family had flown in from New Mexico and I had a lot of friends there, too. When my name was announced, my family and friends started cheering so I wouldn't hear the boos. That's the main thing I remember. The rest of it is a blur because your adrenaline kicks in.”

Do you remember the response at the end of the show?
I got a standing ovation. And the producers called me to their office afterwards and said, “This is the first time we watched the show where it made us cry.” I was very touched. When the stars did it, the stars were sort of being themselves. They were stars playing Scrooge. I went on as a character actor playing Scrooge and I was determined to do it my way. I thought, “This is my one shot, and it’s gonna be perfect.” So, I was acting my heart out. It was a wonderful experience.   

Have your thoughts about and interpretation of the character changed over the years?
When you read the book, he’s described as being this craggy, little old man with a wiry chin and sharp features and a hoarse voice. But over the years we've seen him played by younger men, by women, by different ethnicities. Some productions are set in modern times. I still like going back to the original Dickens. When I first played him as a younger man, I made him very angry. As an older man, I realized he wasn't angry so much as fed up with what he considered the frivolity of the whole thing. If it didn’t make money, what was the point? He was a bit bitter about how his life turned out, and he was very business-minded and focused. So, today I would play him with a lot less anger and more as a level-headed, smart businessman who just thinks everything else is frivolous and not worth bothering with. I think that came with age. When you’re younger and you're asked to play an older man, you tend to think, okay, he’s going to be stooped over and he’s going to walk funny, and he talks like this [he does a clichéd, old-man voice]. Now that I’m turning 70, I think, “I don’t look or talk like that.” This character could have been in his 60s. He’s certainly not stooped over and arthritic, his teeth are not falling out.

You’re going to be reading the book at PBD. What’s the difference between doing the novel and doing the play?
The book is in public domain, so every theatre has its own version of the script because the artistic director can adapt it as a play for his theatre and doesn’t have to pay any royalties. But what I find is, so many people talk down to the audience. They change the words, because they think, “Oh, they're not going to understand that.” They'll Americanize some of the dialogue, they'll drop storylines. They fail to emphasize why Dickens wrote the story in the first place. They want to make it all about Scrooge, this nasty man who sees ghosts. And it's really about rediscovering the joy of Christmas and the humanity that it represents.

I think the most important line in the play is probably in the first scene, when Scrooge’s nephew comes to him in his counting house. Fred says he thinks of Christmas “as a good time, a kind, forgiving, charitable, pleasant time; the only time I know of, in the long calendar of the year, when men and women seem by one consent to open their shut-up hearts freely, and to think of people below them as if they really were fellow-passengers to the grave, and not another race of creatures bound on other journeys.” When Dickens wrote this, Christmas was on a downslide. They didn't really have a lot of traditions that they were maintaining because they thought it was too paganistic. And when Dickens wrote this story, it rejuvenated people’s joy of the humanity of Christmas, and made it a celebration of the season rather than just a religious ceremony. It became a time to celebrate the changing of the season and the bounty of our lives. It's not just Christmas: it’s the winter solstice. I think people tend to forget that the story is more about our humanity than it is about Scrooge. It’s Scrooge rediscovering his own humanity and embracing it again. And in doing so, we all learn that lesson from him.

Are you a collector of A Christmas Carol memorabilia?
To some extent. I have a lot of different copies of A Christmas Carol, including a reprint of the original with all the illustrations. I have the edition that we’re using for this reading. I also have something called A Christmas Carol: The Original Manuscript. It’s in Dickens’ handwriting, and it’s impossible to read. Right now, for Christmas, I’ve got figurines all over the house rather than a Christian creche. I have Scrooge and Marley and the three ghosts standing around them on a table in my front foyer. I have nutcrackers of Scrooge and Marley, and Christmas decorations of Scrooge and Marley. [Yes, the figurines in the photos are his.]

And there’s one other thing. When we worked on Ordinary Americans, I was telling David Kwiat about my obsession with the Lionel Barrymore record set. He said, “I think I have it, but I've never listened to it.” And he gave it to me. It’s not the one that I listened to as a child; it’s a later version. But it’s still Lionel Barrymore.