Monthly Update
Summary
  • Quarterly Market Review
  • The "Shake It Off" Economy
  • Presidential Polls & Policies
  • Medicare Brief: Open Enrollment
  • Paying for College: A Different Landscape
  • Business Owners: CTA Deadline Is Near
  • Everything Apple


Quarterly Market Review


As we head into the last three months of 2024, the US Presidential election is a major source of uncertainty, and elevated geopolitical tensions are a cause for serious concern.


However, the rally in stock prices continued in the third quarter, and bonds showed a measure of resiliency, too.


A main mover of financial asset prices has been the anticipation of short-term interest rate reductions by the US Federal Reserve. In mid-September the Fed took action and lowered its target rate by 0.5% to a range of 4.75% to 5%.


The US economy, which has exhibited better-than-expected growth, has underpinned the stock rally. And bonds have done better because inflation has come to heel.


For the month of September, US large-company stocks rose by 2.1%; small-company stocks gained 1.9%, foreign stocks climbed by 0.8%, and bonds returned 1.3%.


The moves were more pronounced for the three-month period ending September 30: US large-company stocks rose by 5.8%; small-company stocks gained 9.1%, foreign stocks climbed by 6.8%, and bonds returned 5.3%.


Here’s a snapshot of stock and bond performance for the last six quarters:

US Stocks = S&P 500 Index; US Bonds = Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index

The "Shake It Off" Economy


Taylor Swift’s mega hit Shake It Off is a decade old this year. Over the course of ten years, the songwriter-musician-performer has gone from sensation to superstar. Her net worth, too, has gone from sensational to off the charts.


In addition to the financial benefits that have accrued to her personally, the demand created by The Eras Tour (149 concerts over 20 months spanning 5 continents) has had a meaningful economic impact. Swiftonomics refers to Taylor’s economic influence.


For example (according to Investopedia) ahead of her six concerts in Los Angeles, the California Center for Jobs & the Economy estimated the tour would result in a $320 million increase to the LA County GDP.


The Center also expected The Eras Tour would increase area employment by 3,300 and local earnings by $160 million.


Despite (or more likely because of) her success, there are haters. Imagine!


Like Taylor Swift, the US economy has been creating jobs and facilitating profits for companies since the last downturn in 2020.


The most recent jobs report, released by the Labor Department on October 4, showed US employers added more than a quarter million jobs in September, “blowing past expectations” according to the Wall Street Journal.


Nonetheless, the US economy still has its “haters”, too.


Bill Dudley, a well-respected economist and former head of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, had been one of the haters, but has recently shaken off his negative outlook.


Dudley wrote an editorial published by Bloomberg on October 3, where he stated: “I’ve been too pessimistic about the risks of a so-called hard landing (recession) for the US economy” and “a recession remains very much in doubt.”


Dudley went on to highlight the following positives:


  • The economy retains considerable forward momentum: “Growth in the second quarter was revised up to a 3.0% annualized rate, and the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta’s GDPNow estimate for the third quarter is currently 2.5%”
  • The labor market is holding together quite well: “Although the unemployment rate has risen above 4% from a low of 3.4% in 2023, the increase has mainly been driven by rapid growth in the labor force rather than permanent job layoffs”
  • Financial conditions have improved: “Although monetary policy remains tight by almost anyone’s standard (interest rates are high), financial conditions have eased massively over the past year (stock prices have soared and bond yields have declined)”


Dudley concludes with the following: “What does this mean for financial asset prices? As I see it, a soft-landing scenario (lower growth but no recession) implies a buoyant stock market.”


I concur with Dudley: a strong US jobs market and declining interest rates are supporting economic expansion and higher stock prices.


Absent a nationwide catastrophe, or an about-face on key government policies, it’s reasonable to expect more of the same in the coming months: more economic growth, more US profit growth, and satisfactory returns from the financial markets.


For those concerned about the potential impact of the presidential election on the economy and financial markets, it may be helpful to consider the following chart that shows the direction of the stock market during US presidential administrations from Roosevelt to Biden, courtesy of Clearnomics.

Source: Clearnomics

The stock market, like the US economy, has experienced long-term growth under both major political parties, and has the propensity to “shake it off” when it comes to dealing with adverse conditions.


It is not the case that the market or economy turns down when a particular political party is in office This is because the underlying drivers of market performance – including economic cycles and company earnings – are far more important than who occupies the White House.



Presidential Polls & Policy Update


We are now one month away from the next Presidential election, and the race continues to look like it will be very close.


What the Polls Say

 

The Economist forecasting model, which we’ve been following, has shown no change during the past month. The projection as of October 4 shows Harris leading by 274 electoral votes to 264, with 270 electoral votes required to win.

Source: The Economist

The Economist also keeps a running average of national head-to-head polls, which gives a sense of how the race is progressing. In early September, Harris was ahead 49% to 47%. This margin has expanded slightly in favor of the Democrat, and as of early October was 50% to 46%.


Interestingly, during his previous two presidential campaigns, Trump never led in general-election polling averages. In 2016, he trailed Clinton by four percentage points on election day. In 2020, Trump’s deficit was eight percentage points.


The seven swing states, where the race likely will be decided, remain highly competitive according to the latest forecast from The Economist.


Currently, Democrats seem to have a slight edge in Michigan, Nevada and Wisconsin. Republicans have the lead in North Carolina, Georgia, and Arizona. And Pennsylvania appears to be a virtual dead heat.


Policy Points


While it’s unclear who will be sitting in the Oval Office in mid-January 2025, we can take a closer look at the two parties’ tax and spend proposals to get a better understanding of candidate and party priorities, and the future impact on Federal finances.


The bottom line is that both candidates’ proposals are out of balance (in terms of dollars and cents) and will continue the trend of running large deficits and push the US further into debt.


From what has been revealed so far, the impact on the deficit and debt looks to be less bad under Harris.


The two charts below, courtesy of Michael Cembalest of JP Morgan Asset Management, show the fiscal impact of the tax and spend policies of each candidate.


Harris’ fiscal policies take a standard redistributionist approach, where there are an additional $1.3 trillion of taxes on the wealthy and $2.8 trillion of taxes on corporations over a 10-year period.


This revenue would be used to extend tax cuts for people earning less than $400,000 in income and for a variety of entitlements for families and home buyers.


The Harris tax and spend plans will have about a $1.5 trillion net negative impact on the deficit, compared to the baseline forecast of the Congressional Budget Office.

Source: JP Morgan Asset Management

The fiscal impact under Trump would likely be two to three times worse than under Harris and translate to a $4 trillion net negative impact on the deficit, compared to the baseline forecast of the Congressional Budget Office.


Trump is proposing large tax cuts, including extending all the individual and business tax cuts initiated in 2017 that are set to expire in 2026; eliminating taxation on Social Security benefits; and repealing the cap on the State and Local Tax (SALT) deduction.


Also, further cuts to the corporate income tax rate have been floated. The cuts are to be partially offset by revenue raised from tariffs and a repeal of clean energy subsidies.

Source: JP Morgan Asset Management

Jason Furman, Harvard professor and former chair of the White House Council of Economic Advisors, recently noted that “the first modern presidential race between two candidates with undergraduate degrees in economics hasn’t thrilled economists”.


Both candidates’ plans pose longer-term risks to the US economy by further expanding the Federal deficit, but regarding this measure of risk, the scales are currently tipped toward Trump.


Apart from a widening budget deficit, a major risk under the Harris proposal is that higher corporate tax rates could push businesses to relocate headquarters out of the US to save on taxes.


This activity, known as “corporate inversion”, has slowed meaningfully since the Federal corporate tax rate dropped to 21% from 35% in 2017.


A major risk under the Trump proposal is the re-ignition of inflation from higher prices that are likely to result from tariffs on imports and potential retaliation from other countries.


It is worth noting that estimates of the fiscal impact of the Democrat and Republican policy proposals vary widely.


For example, the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, a nonpartisan group that favors lower deficits, estimates an even larger negative fiscal impact from both red and blue party policy proposals than what the JP Morgan analysis shows.


A Republican sweep or a Democratic sweep of the executive and legislative branches would probably result in more caution in the markets, as investors wait to see the scope and speed of enactment of new policies.


But the most likely outcome in the coming election is some kind of split government.


If this were to happen, neither candidate’s proposals likely would be passed into law as currently articulated. And divided government tends to have fewer negative implications for investors.


 

Medicare Brief: What to Know Prior to Open Enrollment


Our colleague and MFA founder Susan Moore contributed the following update on Medicare.


Medicare open enrollment period starts October 15 and continues through December 7.


During the open enrollment period, Medicare enrollees can make certain changes in their coverage. Here are some of the changes you might consider during this enrollment period:


  • If you’re enrolled in original (traditional) Medicare, change your Part D drug plan
  • If you’re enrolled in Medicare Advantage, switch to a different Advantage plan
  • Switch from original Medicare to Medicare Advantage
  • Switch from Medicare Advantage to original Medicare - but note below that limitations apply in some states


This year’s enrollment period may be one of the more significant in Medicare’s 59-year history due to some of the changes that are coming. Here is what we know about Medicare changes and costs for 2025.


Medicare Part D

 

Most Advantage plans include drug coverage at no extra cost, but many people on original Medicare buy a stand-alone Part D plan for drug coverage. While the average projected monthly Part D premium will decrease to $46.50 from $53.95 in 2024, some plans have announced significant increases in premiums.


For this reason, it’s especially important this year to shop for your Plan D coverage. You may be able to lower your annual drug costs by switching to a different Plan D. 


To compare plans, go to the Medicare.gov site and set up your account. In the “What do you want to do?” section, select “Open all options”, then “Find health & drug plans.”


One of the bigger developments for 2025 is a new, $2,000 cap on out-of-pocket drug costs. It applies to drug coverage through both stand-alone Part D and Advantage plans.


But it only applies to covered drugs, so it’s really important to make sure your plan covers the specific medications you take. Approximately 1.5 million Medicare beneficiaries have drug costs that exceed that amount, so this change will be a big help to them.


Switching to a Different Medicare Advantage Plan

 

Medicare Advantage plans are also seeing big changes. Insurers are facing increasing cost pressures, and many will push higher expenses onto members.


Enrollees may see changes in out of pocket costs. Although the average monthly premium for all Advantage plans is likely to drop slightly, it’s important to pay attention to changes in copays, deductibles, and other benefits (e.g., dental, vision, health clubs, etc.)


Switching from Medicare Advantage to Original Medicare

 

Some Advantage plans may even exit the market next year. If your Medicare Advantage plan is being eliminated, you must actively enroll in a new plan to stay in the Advantage program.


If you don’t make a choice, you will automatically be placed in traditional Medicare for 2025 and have the chance to buy a Medigap supplement plan without going through an underwriting process.


Normally in most states (except during a narrow period when you first enroll in Medicare,) when someone switches from Advantage to original Medicare, they must pass underwriting to buy a Medigap supplement plan. (MA, CT, ME and NY do not allow Medigap insurers to require underwriting for those who switch.)


If you switch from Medicare Advantage to original Medicare because your insurer exited the market, you will not have to undergo underwriting in order to obtain a Medigap plan.


Some people switch from Medicare Advantage to original Medicare because they don’t like the restricted network of an Advantage plan, or because frequent copays for services have become expensive.


If you make this change and you want drug coverage, be sure to sign up for a Medicare stand-alone prescription drug plan (Plan D), unless you have creditable drug coverage from another source. If you do not, and you decide to sign up for Part D coverage later, you may face a penalty for late enrollment.


 And if you want a Medicare Supplement Plan (or Medigap Plan, which covers most out of pocket costs) you’ll need to sign up for that then, too.


In most states (except MA, CT, ME, and NY) Medigap insurers are not required to sell you a policy after your first year on Medicare if you don’t meet the medical underwriting requirements. In that situation, they can deny coverage or charge higher premiums.

 

Medicare Part B

 

Everyone who has Medicare coverage (original Medicare or Medicare Advantage) gets Medicare Part A free, but pays for Medicare Part B.


The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) hasn’t said yet how much the base cost of Part B will be in 2024, but the annual Medicare Trustees report in March forecast the monthly price to rise from $174.70 to $185.00, a 6% increase, in 2025.


Income-Related Monthly Adjustment Amount (IRMAA)

 

Some people pay more in IRMAA charges for Medicare Part B and Part D based on income.


Your tax return for 2023 will be used to determine whether you will be subject to an IRMAA charge for 2025. If you retired in or after 2023, or had another life-changing event (e.g., marriage, divorce, death of spouse, etc.) you can file form SSA-44 to request that your IRMAA amount be reduced or eliminated.


IRMAA charges have not been released yet for 2025, but are expected to be about 6% higher than in 2023.


If you have questions or would like help evaluating your Medicare options, please let us know.


 

Paying For College: The Landscape Looks a Lot Different Today (Even When Compared to a Few Years Ago)


Our colleague and college specialist Donna Cournoyer contributed the following update for college planning, as a follow-up to her April article, Shifting the “Dream School” Mindset


There are many factors that shape the philosophies, policies, and practices of colleges throughout the US. However, the overarching key factor is this: colleges are businesses that need revenue to exist.


Most of this revenue comes in the form of tuition and housing fees that families pay each year. And of course, fundraising and building upon existing endowments are significant contributors, too.


Endowments are permanent funds, used as a self-sustaining funding source for the school’s mission, including funding for scholarships and grants for students.


However, endowments are invested funds and only a small portion is consumed each year. In many cases most universities spend only the interest that accrues annually from the investments.


The need for colleges and universities to enroll a certain number of students each year, in order to stay within their operating budgets, drives institutional goals and determines how the schools market to students they want to attract.


The Enrollment Cliff


Another factor driving the enrollment policies of universities is the significant decline in the number of college-bound students expected in the years ahead.


This drop in predicted enrollment is a function of a declining birth rate; fewer high school graduates choosing to go to college (related to price and value perception, among other reasons); and predicted lower high school graduation rates.


This puts a lot of pressure on colleges and universities to meet their enrollment goals each year, in an environment where it’s getting harder and harder to do.


How Colleges Entice Students


Marketing is a large expense at many colleges and universities. Schools want to entice students by creating beautiful grounds, building new dorms, providing the latest technology in classrooms, and guiding families on tours where they aim to make an emotional connection with the student.


Schools market to all students and families on the tours – even the ones who cannot afford to attend.


Think about this: as has been a common practice for decades, many families create a list of schools based on perceived elite status, reputation, location, aesthetics, amenities, and, of course, academic programs. Sometimes, price is considered before visiting. But often it isn’t.


Then families visit their chosen schools, where tour guides aim to make that highly charged emotional connection with the student (and the student’s family). They are often very successful. When you come down to it, this is the process of the sale, and tour guides are selling the school to the student.


What happens next?


The student makes a snap decision to attend one of the visited schools based on feeling and emotion (I have seen this many times in my experience working at a university) and ultimately the family agrees.


Cost might not even have factored into the decision, and this can have far-reaching financial implications for the student and parents.


Consider this: the four-year sticker price for many schools now totals nearly $400,000, which is very close to the current median price for existing-home sales in the US, according to the National Association of Realtors.


In a Bloomberg article from September 26, columnist Charlie Wells said something that resonates with me as a college planner and financial advisor:


Financial advisers say having a budget and setting expectations is crucial to avoiding disappointment — or mountains of debt — later. (Just think: Would you let your 16-year-old decide which house you were going to buy after one walk-through? School choice is not so different.)”


Looking at a family’s plan to pay for college is intertwined with many factors including the ways in which colleges aim to attract and solidify commitments from students to attend their school.


When planning your strategy for choosing and paying for college, remember these key points:


  • Rankings: Some of the factors that have been touted for years about U.S. News and World rankings, for example, are starting to take a back seat as many people no longer believe they are relevant to deciding on a college.
  • Elite Status: Studies have shown that WHERE a student goes to college is not a significant factor in their success.
  • Apply to Competing Schools: This may give you a chance to leverage offers from one school to gain additional funds from another, as many schools will “match offers” to get a student to commit.
  • Set Financial Expectations: Have a Financial Plan and start early. Discuss together as a family what are the realistic and agreed upon financial strategies: How much are parent(s) willing and able to contribute? Will anyone need to borrow? What is the student’s responsibility? Do this BEFORE visiting and applying to schools.
  •  Merit Scholarships and Financial Aid: Research the financial health of the school, along with their policy and average amounts of aid and merit scholarships. This is not always transparent so call the Admissions staff to ask for average, if necessary.
  • Appeals: While not everyone’s favorite process, often students may benefit from appealing their offer. Remember, schools need to make their enrollment, so offering additional incentives is a way in which they aim to do so.


One of my goals as a college financial planner is to help shift how parents perceive “what is the best school for my student”.


I’ve observed that families with well-planned strategies that consider the current landscape of college admissions are more likely to conclude their college search confidently, and are more successful in ensuring that, in the end, their college dollars are well-spent.

 


CTA Deadline Is Near for Business Owners

 

The Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) is a new federal law that aims to curtail money laundering and other illegal activities by making it clear who the individuals behind a particular business entity are.


The CTA was enacted in early 2021 and requires “reporting companies” to file information by January 1, 2025.


If you are a small business owner or own a corporate entity, such as an LLC, you likely will be required to report your company’s beneficial ownership information (BOI) to the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) bureau, which is a division of the US Department of the Treasury.


We encourage all of our clients who think that they might be subject to the CTA to contact their CPA or attorney to determine if they are subject to CTA reporting and to assist in handling the filing.


Below are links to resources so that you can learn more about the CTA if you think you might be required to file.


Key CTA Resources:



Moore Financial Advisors cannot give specific CTA advice or assist with actual filing. We will provide a more extensive note on this topic in coming days.



Everything Apple

 

In a newsletter from your financial planner, you’d probably expect an apple excerpt to be something to do with a California-based technology company. But given we’ve just turned the calendar into October, and being based in New England, fruit rather than phone is top of mind.


The six New England states collectively produce about 150 million pounds of apples annually. And there are more than 200 varieties of apples grown locally.


If you’re an apple (emphasis on lower case “a”) lover, a great resource is New England Apples, a non-profit association founded in 1935 by a group of wholesale growers from the region.


Have a look at the site and enjoy a brief history of apples in the US, which includes lots of videos shot at the orchard, and even some great recipes.


How do you like them apples?

Share your thoughts on this Client Letter
Thumbs Up 👍
Meh 😐
Thumbs Down 👎
Best regards,

Rob
If you like this letter, and want to share it, please feel free to forward it to a friend!
Moore Financial Advisors
83 Leonard St, Suite 9
Belmont, MA 02478 
617-393-9999
Contact Us