|
A new proposal from the US Department of Education, if adopted, would require accrediting agencies and affiliated membership organizations to operate with greater structural and operational independence, including restrictions on shared administrative and support services. Such requirements would have significant implications for the longstanding relationship between COA and ATS.
It is important to emphasize that COA and ATS already operate with safeguards designed to protect accreditor independence. The organizations are incorporated separately and have separate boards, budgets, bylaws, and decision-making structures. Accreditation decisions remain independent from ATS membership and programmatic activities, and these governance safeguards have long supported the integrity of the accreditation process.
Because of this, COA and ATS recently submitted a joint public comment to the Department of Education regarding the proposed regulations. In the comment, we affirm the importance of accreditor independence and support the department's goals of accountability, transparency, and public trust. At the same time, we urged the department to consider several important factors.
|