The Tuesday Council meeting's main item is the decision on Valero Crude by Rail EIR and Land Use Permit.  The complete packet is online here.

The following are potential scenarios for action:

1.  Valero could submit a formal written request for continuation of the appeal in order for the Federal Surface Transportation Board to render a decision on federal preemption of local land use authority.  This request would be considered under the Open Government Ordinance as "new and substantial information" and the Council would decide whether or not this request is new and substantial.  If the council votes in the majority, the consideration for delay for STB decision would be on the next agenda.  The council would then have to decide whether to proceed or not with the action on the current agenda which is the appeal of the Planning Commission denial of the project.  Staff is recommending approving the appeal.

2.  No request in writing for continuation but during the council consideration of the Valero appeal, Valero could request a "point of order" and ask for council consideration of continuing the delay.  Council again would have to act on the point of order before proceeding to the agenda item.  There could be the same outcome as in #1.

3.  No request for continuation by Valero and consideration of the appeal of the denial by the Planning Commission.  A councilmember could request a continuation but council  cannot continue the item without Valero's consent - so a council member could ask for a continuation and if Valero agrees the consideration of continuation would have to be at the next meeting.  See #1 for steps.

4.  No request for continuation by anyone.  The council will hear staff report - there is no public comment on this item unless there is demonstrably new and substantial information (see above for steps by council for consideration).  So the decision can be as follows:

a.  motion and second to deny appeal and thus let stand Planning Commission denial of the land use permit with or without prejudice ( with means a new application of the same project must wait one year; without means no such restriction. A modified project would be considered a new application).
b.  motion and second to consider certification of Final Environmental Impact Report followed by a motion to deny appeal.
c.  motion to certify the FEIR and grant the appeal and approve the land use permit.

"We've been lucky thus far that derailments involving flammable liquids in America have not yet occurred in a populated area," Hart [current head of the National Transportation Safety Board] said. "But an American version of Lac-M├ęgantic could happen at any time. Instead of happening out in the middle of a wheat field it could happen in the middle of a big city."

The Bakken oil train explosion in Lac-M├ęgantic, Quebec, Canada, killed 47 people. 
As these safety issues are ignored, dismissed, or continued to be studied, an important question remains: How long until that luck runs out?

This site is my responsibility and my discretion including recipients and material.  Requests for posting are honored and I encourage readers to share information.  An informed society is essential.  Material on this site is my personal domain and does not reflect official city policy.  Posting material on this site does not indicate bias for future decision making.  Use of words and terminology, notice about events, forums and public concerns is not dicta nor determinative for future decisions.  The more sunshine on issues, events, happenings and concerns, the better the public is aware of choices so that government is open and accessible to all and not just the few. Public discourse is the path to fair and informed decisions.  

Want to receive  ELIZABETH PATTERSON [ELOPATO@ELIZABETHPATTERSON.COM] and other e-Alerts on Benicia political and community issues and events delivered to your email address?  Email your name and email address and/or the names and email addresses of others who would like to be placed on the mailing list and the message "subscribe" to elopato@elizabethpatterson.com.  Comments, arguments and corrections are welcome. Mayor Patterson expresses opinions and views on the e-Alert which may not reflect the official position or future decisions.  Mayor Patterson's opinions are in no way prejudicial for decision making as each item on council agendas are considered with an open mind and impartiality.  Citizens, business owners, officials - including staff - opinions will be noted by attribution as appropriate.  YOU CAN ALSO CONTACT ME AT MY CITY HALL - EMAIL:  epatterson@ci.benicia.ca.us OR CALL: 707.746.5668.
STAY CONNECTED: