The Gemorah in Mesechta Shabbos infers from the possuk, “Vayisyatzvu bisachtis hahar” that the Eibershter forced Klal Yisroel into accepting the Torah while holding the mountain, threateningly, over their heads until they acquiesced.
Tosfos asks that the possuk says that the Yidden proclaimed, “Na’aseh vinishma” which would indicate that they unhesitatingly accepted the Torah without even knowing the depth of their commitment. The Gemorah titles them “giborei koach”, a title bestowed only upon the angels. The malochim ran to crown them with two crowns apiece for the utterance of these two most famous words of kabolah.
Tosfos resolves this contradiction as follows. In reality, they accepted the Torah willingly and were not forced into its acceptance. However, Hashem foresaw the possibility of them backtracking during the awesome display of heavenly fire and the other awesome displays of thunder and lightning and all the astounding miracles that they were to be exposed to at Har Sinai. To counter this possibility, Hashem threateningly coerced them into a commitment while holding the mountain menacingly over their heads until they obliged.
The Medresh Tanchuma in Parshas Noach offers another solution to this contradiction. In a lengthy treatise on the essence of Torah sheba’al peh, the Medresh details the tremendous toil and effort involved in the study and acquisition of Torah sheba’al peh. There the Medresh points out that when Hashem offered the Torah shebiksav- the Written Torah, they accepted on the spot, “Na’aseh vinishma”. When the offer of Torah sheba’al peh came to the fore, they were not willing to accept it. That is where and when the episode of Hashem holding the mountain over their heads took place to force its acceptance.
This resolution requires further understanding. We know that the Torah shebiksav and the Torah sheba’al peh are inseparable. Proper understanding of Torah shebiksav is impossible without the explanation emanating from the Torah sheba’al peh. Often the Torah shebiksav cross-references Torah sheba’al peh to fill in missing information. For example, the Torah forbids eating meat without shechita. But the Torah does not tell us that shechita takes place by the neck. The Torah does not list all the assorted actions that disqualify a shechita. All of this data is left to be filled in by the Torah sheba’al peh. Another example would be the mitzvah of tefilin. If one relied simply on the written word, one would have no way of knowing that tefilin is black, square, lined with straps, letters sculpted onto its boxes and a myriad of other dinim. It is only through the Torah sheba’al peh complementing the Ksav that we have any inkling of how to perform the mitzvos and to understand its prohibitions. In short, one who observes only Torah shebiksav would be considered a Tzeduki or Baysousi, who deny the existence of Torah sheba’al peh.
How could Klal Yisroel have been commended for their acceptance of Torah shebiksav and rewarded for it if in essence they were accepting to act as the tzedukim who denied the existence of Torah sheba’al peh?