Call-for-service Survey
The survey focuses on the traditional police call-for-service (CFS) model and explores whether certain police calls might be better addressed through non-traditional methods. For example, for a littering call, would you be comfortable if a non-sworn police staff member responded to the incident to take the report? In the case of an accident with no injuries, how would you feel about filing a report through a telephone response unit or online reporting portal?
To develop this survey, BerryDunn worked with Dunwoody Police and examined more than 200 call-for-service types to see which ones might be handled differently to maximize resources, balance workloads, and improve efficiency. These CFS types generally fall into three categories:
- The incident is no longer in progress.
- The suspect is no longer present.
- There is minimal or no evidence to be collected.
Sworn officers would continue to respond to in-progress incidents and those with substantial evidence to be collected. What’s more, Dunwoody Police would not divert any CFS types if there is a known risk or expected danger to the responders, based on the circumstances of the reported event.
This community survey is a critical part of the overall CFS evaluation process, which also involves internal discussions with police staff and City officials, plus external discussions with service providers, advocacy groups, and other stakeholders. The survey will be available through April 14.