December 2024


From The Certified Elder Law Attorney's Desk:





Have You Spoken to Your Children about Your Will? Well Warren Buffet Has. Why Not You?










William W. "Bill" Erhart


Blog Spotlight:



Key Benefits of Delaware’s New Uniform Health-Care Decisions Act




By: Catherine Read


December 13th, 2024




Calendar of Events



Article of Interest:




Dick Van Dyke's Eventful Birthday Month: At 99, 'I'm Not Afraid Of' Death






After joyfully dancing in a new Coldplay music video, Van Dyke escaped from Malibu's wildfire days before celebrating his 99th birthday.







.

By: Chris Lindahl,

Patch Staff



December 13, 2024










From The Certified Elder Law

Attorney's Desk:



Have You Spoken to Your Children about Your Will? Well Warren Buffet Has. Why Not You?



By: William W. “Bill” Erhart

A recent article in the Wall Street Journal touts Warren Buffet’s philosophy for discussing an estate plan with one’s children before executing it. Mr. Buffet is worth about $150 billion. Probably your estate is a little less than that. But the principle behind the suggestion is sound however much you may have. Mature children should understand your plan and the rationale behind it.


At Estate & Elder Law Services that principle has been foundational for our estate planning process.


Several factors are in play. The first is not about transferring wealth, but teaching your agents, beneficiaries, and successors what is expected of them if you become incapacitated. Incapacity does not mean all of a sudden you have an accident or a stroke and cannot manage your finances or make medical decisions. Rarely is it that dramatic that a spouse or child is required to take over immediately. It is diminished capacity where one begins to need assistance, not have someone take over. A good plan is one in which your trusted family, friends, or professionals are there for you when you need them.


In most estate planning, the client simply gives the attorney a list of successor agents. The list usually starts with the spouse, then the oldest to youngest child, and maybe a friend or relative. Rarely has there been discussion of what the reasonability is, the duties are, and the expectations of the client.


What the inheritance is and how it is left to the family is the second major consideration. What if a parent wants to give more to one child than another because the second child is disabled? Or the first child was simply more fortunate? Or commonly in our practice, a grandchild has a severe disability, and the client wants to make provision by creating a supplemental needs trust for the grandchild when the children do not need the money? Failure to disclose may result in hurt feelings and perhaps worse: litigation among family members.


At our firm, we believe one purpose of estate planning is avoiding family discord. We all have worked hard to accumulate whatever we might have. If we can, most of us want to leave something of ourselves to our family. Although some may disagree, in a sense our property, money, wealth is a sign of our love for our families. It represents our time and effort of our lives poured out for those we love.


In our process, we like to have what we call a “Family Meeting” for our clients during the planning process. We do not necessarily talk about the money or who gets what, but what the responsibility and duties of the successors are if the client suffers diminished capacity and eventually death. How and to whom the inheritance is divided can be part of that meeting if it makes sense. An unequal division or skipping an adult child for a disabled grandchild is a common topic. You want your children to understand the logic of your decisions and what will occur after your death. You do not want unnecessary “why” questions lingering when you cannot answer. You do not want envy or bitterness to be inadvertently caused by misunderstood motives.


The Wall Street Journal article notes that “[a] no-surprises policy also avoids creating upset at a time when beneficiaries are grieving and prone to strong emotion….”


We offer and encourage our clients to have regular meetings with their family to remind them and review what might need to be changed. We have a broad definition of family, which includes trusted advisors, such as accountants and financial experts the clients rely upon. 


Occasionally things go bad in families and the client needs to disinherit a family member. Or there is some significant distribution scheme that the client knows a child is likely to object to.


In Delaware there is a process which is called a “Pre-mortem Notice.”  A person who may be excluded or whose share is not proportional is given formal notice of the estate plan while the client is still alive. Under the law the affected child or person has sixty days to challenge the Will or Trust. If the challenge is not made within that time, then the notified person is barred from claiming against the plan.


We can help with family harmony. Or help avoid an unpleasant challenge from a disgruntled heir. Let us know.


Key Benefits of Delaware’s New Uniform Health-Care Decisions Act



December 13th, 2024

by Catherine Read




This is the next installment in our series on Delaware’s new Uniform Health-Care Decisions Act, which was signed into law on September 30, 2024 and goes into effect in one year on September 20, 2025. Delaware is the first State to fully enact the Uniform Act (and made some Delaware-specific additions), and other states have legislation pending. The new Act completely replaces our existing Act of the same name. The new Act has a new Optional Form that completely replaces our old form.


The Act’s intricate limitations and processes will require significant training of and implementation by all involved in the health care community – individuals, hospitals, care facilities, attorneys, and families. As stakeholders roll up their sleeves to study, understand, train their staff on, and otherwise implement the Act, amendment and/or regulations may become appropriate as the one-year effective date approaches. I will be presenting on the Act this December to attorneys and financial professionals and will continue the conversation up to and through the effective date.


With any new and completely replacing legislation, there is

               To be sure, the Act is an improvement to existing law in many ways, generated by feedback since 1993 from the national health care community culminating in the magnum opus of the Uniform Law Commission’s promulgation of the Uniform Act in 2023. Chief benefits are ease of creation and documenting preferences and goals (rather than inapplicable treatments) in a plain language form.


After close study of the new Delaware Act, following are some of the key benefits:


  • To increase the creation of health-care directives, it simplifies signing and witness requirements and allows electronic signing and remote witnessing in certain circumstances.
  • It authorizes a new kind of health-care directive, an Advance Directive for Mental Health-Care, which is a growing trend in the United States and includes a Ulysses clause that allows a principal to require that certain instructions be carried out later even if they object.
  • It clarifies when agents may act and outlines their powers in ways intended to clear up possible ambiguities in the former Act.
  • It states certain powers that must be expressly stated in the Health-Care Power of Attorney or else such powers do not exist. These powers relate to the highly important topics of: mental health facility admission, nursing home placement, obtaining and sharing health care information, and giving an agent flexibility in following instructions. These limitations are not necessarily a good thing as currently drafted. But many will call these limitations a benefit and so they are included as such here.
  • It modernizes the definition of capacity to require what is called a “functional standard,” meaning it recognizes a person may have capacity for this but not for that. The capacity needed to appoint an agent is a lower standard than the capacity to approve a complex medical treatment.
  • It modernizes approaches to capacity determinations in several ways. It expands the list of who can assess and find a lack of capacity to a long list that goes past a physician. It outlines a process for a person to object if he disagrees with a finding of his lack of capacity, and a process to overcome that objection. It is a series of if-then statements. While there is much room for improvement, it is true that a clearly defined process has value.
  • It updates default surrogate provisions to mirror more family structures. These come into play when a person loses capacity and has not designated an agent beforehand. The law provides a default list of classes of surrogates, in descending order of priority. The new Act expands that list to include cohabitants and domestic partners, for example.
  • It provides a process for decision-making when default surrogates do not agree.
  • It includes a new Optional Form in plain language designed to make it easier for laypersons to appoint agents and share their preferences and goals.
  • It answers a growing call from the medical community for the principal to express their preferences about how they want to live, rather than give specific treatment directions that might or might not correspond to their ailment. It is more helpful to the decisionmaker faced with a medical decision on someone else’s behalf to know the person’s goals and preferences, and the priority of those goals and preferences, about how that person wants to live. The Optional Form therefore includes questions to elicit and document this information.
  • For Advance Mental Health-Care Directives, it establishes a process – similar to 1990s law enacted to promote the use of health-care directives – for mental health facilities to ask patients if they have a Mental Health-Care Directive and to prompt them to review or create one, to make resources available to patients about mental health directives, and even to assist in preparing the Mental Health-Care Directive in limited circumstances authorized by the Act.

 

For a good summary of the Uniform Act (on which Delaware’s full enactment was based), see: The New Uniform Health Care Decisions Act: An Overview

https://www.americanbar.org/groups/law_aging/publications/bifocal/vol45/vol45issue1/new-health-care-decisions-act By Nina A. Kohn Bifocal Volume 45, Issue 1, September 2023, American Bar Association



CLICK HERE TO ACCESS ALL OF THE EAELS BLOGS


To allow our employees the opportunity to spend quality time with their loved ones, our office will be closed:

  • Thursday 12/19/24 – Thursday 1/2/25 with limited access to our voicemail.
  • Our office will resume regular hours Friday, 1/3/25.

Dick Van Dyke's Eventful Birthday Month: At 99, 'I'm Not Afraid Of' Death


After joyfully dancing in a new Coldplay music video, Van Dyke escaped from Malibu's wildfire days before celebrating his 99th birthday.

By: Chris Lindahl,Patch Staff


MALIBU, CA — Dick Van Dyke has had an eventful month.


After starring in a Coldplay music video, he got separated from his cat when he had to flee his Malibu home in the wake of a destructive wildfire. Van Dyke, his wife, their cat and their home are all safe as the legendary entertainer turned 99 years old on Friday.

“I’m acutely aware that I’m, you know, could go any day now but I don’t know why it doesn’t concern me,” Van Dyke says in the Coldplay video. “I’m not afraid of it. I have that feeling, totally against anything intellectual, that I’m going to be all right.”


Van Dyke adds that he's been lucky to be able to "play and act silly" for a living, which he continues to do in the "All My Love" video. In the clip — which introduces Van Dyke with his 1925 birth day — he pokes fun at his age, joking about naps before skillfully breaking out into some of his old physical comedy bits and dancing without shoes on.


The video, directed by Spike Jonze and Mary Wigmore, includes images from Van Dyke's personal life and from his long career. There's a photo of him and Mary Tyler Moore, his "Dick Van Dyke Show" costar. And shots of memorabilia from "Mary Poppins," in which he played one of his most memorable roles, the charismatic cockney musician/artist/chimney sweep/kite seller, Bert.


Van Dyke was among the residents who were ordered to evacuate after the Franklin Fire broke out in Malibu Monday night. Flames spread so quickly in his neighborhood, Serra Retreat, that Van Dyke and his wife, Arlene Silver, lost their cat, Bobo, during the frantic evacuation.



“Arlene and I have safely evacuated with our animals except for Bobo escaped as we were leaving," Van Dyke wrote on a Facebook post.



Click Here to Continue Reading
Facebook  Linkedin