Equal Shared Parenting - Thought of the Day


Issue #99: June 1, 2023


Gene C. Colman Introduction: Yes, my friends. It has been a while. I published my previous ESP Thought of the Day #98 on May 3, 2022. My apologies to you ESP advocates. Let's start today with some exciting news....


(In case you no longer wish to receive the "Gene C. Colman Family Law Centre Equal Shared Parenting Thought of the Day" emails, you can easily unsubscribe at the bottom (and I apologize for the intrusion).


INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SHARED PARENTING 2023

Held May 5, 6 and 7, 2023 in Athens, Greece and on line

There were over 100 speakers.

Conference theme was: New Paradigms: Advances in Research and Practice on Shared Parenting.

The Conference published nine conclusions. Here they are. I have taken the liberty of adding bold italics to help you catch the essence of this very important conference.


The Conclusions of the Sixth International Conference on Shared Parenting are

as follows:


1. We reaffirmed the main conclusion from our first international

conference: There is a consensus that neither the discretionary best

interests of the child standard nor sole custody or primary residence

orders are serving the needs of children and families of divorce. There is

a consensus that shared parenting is a viable post-divorce parenting

arrangement that is optimal to child development and well-being,

including for children of high conflict parents. The amount of shared

parenting time necessary to achieve child well being and positive

outcomes is a minimum of one-third time with each parent, with

additional benefits accruing up to and including equal (50-50) parenting

time, including both weekday (routine) and weekend (leisure) time.


2. We reaffirmed the main conclusion from our second international

conference: “As shared parenting encompasses both shared parental

authority (decision-making) and shared parental responsibility for the day-

to-day upbringing and welfare of children, between fathers and mothers,

in keeping with children's age and stage of development, there is

consensus that the legal implementation of shared parenting, including

both the assumption of shared responsibilities and presumption of shared

rights in regard to the parenting of children by fathers and mothers who

are living together or apart, be enshrined in law.”


3. We strengthened the main conclusion from our third international

conference: On the basis of current research evidence, social scientists

can now confidently recommend presumptive shared parenting to policy

makers. Shared parenting now has enough evidence that the burden of

proof should fall to those who oppose it rather than those who promote

it.


4. We reaffirmed the main recommendation from our fourth international

conference, calling upon the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child,

governments and professional associations to identify shared parenting as

a fundamental right of the child. We went further to state that a

corresponding Charter of Responsibilities to Children’s Needs in the

Separation and Divorce Transition is needed, and that shared parenting

responsibility is most in keeping with a responsibility-to-needs approach

to the best interests of the child. There is a consensus that it is the

responsibility of social institutions, including public and private social

welfare institutions, courts of law, administrative authorities and

legislative bodies, to support parents in their shared responsibility to

address their children’s needs in the separation and divorce transition.


5. There is consensus that the lack of responsibility and the lack of

accountability of social institutions, including public and private social

welfare institutions, courts of law, administrative authorities and

legislative bodies, is a significant factor compromising the well-being of

children of separation and divorce and their families, and strong

accountability structures are urgently needed and should be established

forthwith.


6. At the same time, there is consensus that parents bear responsibility for

inducing problems such as parental alienation and psychological disorders

in children. Parents and professionals should be conscious about parents’

attachment styles and motivational beliefs, and professional support to

break the intergenerational cycle of such harmful family patterns and

dynamics is vital.


7. We reaffirmed the main conclusions from our fifth international

conference: Shared parenting is a viable post-divorce parenting

arrangement that is optimal to child development and well-being,

including for children of high conflict parents. Shared parenting serves as

a bulwark against first-time family violence, and we thus support a

rebuttable presumption of shared parenting in contested cases of child

custody, and advocate for shared parenting as the foundation of family

law reform. At the same time, there is a consensus that shared parenting

is an optimal arrangement for the majority of children and families,

including high conflict families, but not for situations of substantiated

family violence and child abuse. We thus support a rebuttable legal

presumption against shared parenting in family violence cases.


8. There is consensus that addressing the issue of family violence in

separation and divorce cases, and addressing parental alienation

subsequent to separation and divorce, are not mutually exclusive

endeavors. Recognition of parental alienation as a form of family violence

is part of our collective responsibility to address family violence in all its

forms. All attempts to polarize the need to address parental alienation on

the one hand, and other forms of family violence on the other, place

children and family members at risk.


9. Formal and informal social support is vital not only to the well-being of

children, parents and extended families undergoing separation and

divorce, but also to the success of shared parenting arrangements. The

role of social capital in assisting children and families in their transition

to shared parenting arrangements cannot be underestimated.




Link to Gene C. Colman's Equal Shared Parenting Web Page


Link to past issues of the ESP Thought of the Day publication


Sincerely,


Gene C. Colman

Gene C. Colman Family Law Centre

https://www.complexfamilylaw.com

Email: gene@complexfamilylaw.com


Phone: 416-635-9264, Ext. 101


To view previous E.S.P. Thoughts of the Day, click here.

25 Bowring Walk
Toronto, Ontario M3H 5Z8