|
"Conflict Management Leadership"
SRN: Are you considering that if enough people chose to write your name in, when they vote in November, that you could get elected?
BARTELL:
I am considering that if enough people choose to say, “We must have a different approach than political vengeance – we must have conflict management leadership”, the American people will have created a tipping point for impacting political vengeance not just in America – but around the world. If that also means I get elected as a United States Senator, I will be honored, and roll up my sleeves to expand the engagement framework of roundtable discussions, development sessions, summits, and conferences on issues of pressing, immediate importance to Georgians, Americans, and the world.
In the critical stakeholder engagement I have been involved in, particularly over the past six years, stakeholder groups are beginning to consider there is a viable alternative to political vengeance through conflict management assessment models. Something else becomes available, and begins to occur– through conflict management communication. The engagement with stakeholder groups involves utilizing a human rights approach, instead of a political vengeance approach to issues, situations, and conflict. Whether here in America – or somewhere else in the world, regardless of the issue, at the heart lies a doggedly determined, duel-to-the-death opposition between one political view – and another.
It’s been that way down through the ages. However, there’s something starkly different about this dynamic in the 21st century: the world has become more connected, economies are more connected, communications are more connected than in any other time in human history. The impact of violent political vengeance is greater, more severe. Murders are happening on live television. The global stakes are escalating.
What’s been missing: 21st century conflict management leadership.
I’m putting my personal reputation, my life, and my work on the line, to take a stand for being that leadership. From the Deep South. We have a particular relationship to conflict here in the Deep South. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. said it this way: “In a real sense all life is inter-related. All men are caught in an inescapable network of mutuality, tied in a single garment of destiny.”
SRN: You have been working closely with people whose homeland is Iran, who are living in the state of Georgia, particularly in metropolitan Atlanta. You have referred to them as human rights stakeholders. Given the current situation in Iran, and the U.S. current involvement in Iran, what comments do you have at this time?
BARTELL:
These are my comments about the current situation in Iran:
A human rights approach to people who live in Iran is denied, dismantled, and destroyed by the Iranian government. It is useful for Iranian stakeholders in America to take on the human rights causes of the culture in their homeland. The critical reference point is this: Who among us in America is willing to embrace the clarion call for human rights and be champions with Iranian stakeholders who live in America?
Roundtable discussions, summits, and conferences can deliver that communication to the full U.S. Senate Committees on Foreign Relations, Armed Services, and Homeland Security.
That is the conflict management work I am doing now. As a United States Senator, I would be doing this work. Being an Independent just means I am not obligated to any party, I am not affiliated or beholden to any party, in performing my duties as a United States Senator for the people of Georgia.
I am often asked, who do I see myself caucusing with? I would determine which party I would caucus with, on an issue by issue basis.
SRN: The killing of Christians in Nigeria is another issue you have recently been called upon to address by those who live in Georgia who consider Nigeria to be their birth home. Are there any comments you’d like to make regarding the situation in Nigeria?
BARTELL:
Here are my comments about the situation in Nigeria from a conflict management leadership reference point:
A human rights approach to people who live in Nigeria is being questioned by the U.S. Congressional assessment strategy, particularly by the House Committee on Foreign Affairs, Subcommittee on Africa and the Western Hemisphere.
It is useful for Nigerian stakeholders in America to take on communicating the human rights scope of work in their homeland. Again – who among us in America is willing to embrace this clarion call for human rights and be champions with Nigerian stakeholders who live in America, and have that conflict management communication get delivered to the U.S. House Committee on Foreign Affairs Subcommittee on Africa and the Western Hemisphere? I am taking a leadership stand to be the face of those who are willing to do so.
SRN: What other stakeholder groups are you currently working with in Georgia, if you would care to share, that are engaging in this unique conflict management assessment model approach?
BARTELL:
Some of the stakeholder groups I am currently working with include the issues of: affordable housing, veterans, prostate cancer prevention, small business economic development, sustainability, violence prevention, cultural diplomacy, developmental communication models, and alternative educational models.
|