We are pleased to release MaloneBailey's February 2024 issue of The Crunch, our newsletter highlighting recent accounting, regulatory and tax updates. Please note that the updates provided in this newsletter are not a comprehensive list.
We encourage you to visit the SEC, FASB and IRS websites for more information as well as a complete list of updated rules, regulations and proposals. We invite you to contact us should you have any questions about the information provided in this issue. Please visit our website to review archived versions of this newsletter containing past accounting, regulatory and tax updates.
The MaloneBailey Team
www.malonebailey.com
| |
What's the Crunch?
Featured Podcast
- FASB: What to Keep in Mind for 2024
Recent Accounting & Regulatory Updates
Recent FASB & AICPA Updates
- FASB Accounting Standards Updates - Accounting Standards Update No. 2023-09 -- Income Taxes (Topic 740) --- Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures
- FASB Accounting Standards Updates - Accounting Standards Update No. 2023-08 -- Intangibles Goodwill and Other Crypto Assets (Subtopic 350-60) --- Accounting for and Disclosure of Crypto Assets
- FASB Accounting Standards Updates - Accounting Standards Update No. 2023-07 — Segment Reporting (Topic 280) — Improvements to Reportable Segment Disclosures
- Financial Instruments –IASB Proposes Amendments to Accounting for Financial Instruments with Debt and Equity Features
- Tokens –AICPA Proposes Framework for Reporting on Stablecoins and Sufficiency of Assets for Redemption
- Public Interest Entities –AICPA PEEC Issues Guidance on Public Interest Entities
- Derivatives –FASB Discusses Derivatives
- Interim Reporting –FASB Discusses Interim Reporting
- Statement of Cash Flows –FASB Discusses Statement of Cash Flows
- Stock Compensation –FASB Discusses Stock Compensation
- FASB Agenda –FASB Discusses Potential Agenda Projects
Recent SEC & PCAOB Updates
- Cybersecurity –SEC Staff Updates Interpretations for Material Cybersecurity Incidents Guidance
-
AICPA & CIMA Conference on Current SEC and PCAOB Developments - 2023
- PCAOB Inspections –PCAOB Staff Outline 2024 Inspection Priorities with Focus on Driving Improvements in Audit Quality
- EDGAR –SEC Updates EDGAR Filer Manual
- Review of the “Accredited Investor” Definition under the Dodd-Frank Act
- Announcement Regarding Share Repurchase Disclosure Modernization Rule
Extra Crunch
- NYSE: (ART)ificial Intelligence
About MaloneBailey, LLP
| |
FASB: What to Keep in Mind for 2024
Summary - FASB made several updates throughout the past year, however, we highlighted two specific updates to discuss for the latest podcast; Business Combinations— Joint Venture Formations (Subtopic 805-60): Recognition and Initial Measurement and Segment Reporting (Topic 280): Improvements to Reportable Segment Disclosures. For the latest edition of Everybody Counts, we discussed with Hazel Jin, an Audit Manager at MaloneBailey, the importance of these updates as well as who these updates will impact the most.
Simply click on the image below to listen to the podcast. For this podcast and many more, please visit the Resources section of our website.
| |
Recent FASB & AICPA Updates | |
FASB Accounting Standards Updates - Accounting Standards Update No. 2023-09 -- Income Taxes (Topic 740) --- Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures
Summary -We have published a new edition of the Summary Checklist of Recent Authoritative U.S. Accounting Standards. This new edition reflects the issuance of Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2023-09, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures. This ASU is effective for public business entities for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2024. For other entities, the amendments are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2025. Early adoption is permitted for annual financial statements that have not yet been issued or made available for issuance.
For more information, click here.
© 2024 CCH Incorporated and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
| |
FASB Accounting Standards Updates - Accounting Standards Update No. 2023-08 -- Intangibles Goodwill and Other Crypto Assets (Subtopic 350-60) --- Accounting for and Disclosure of Crypto Assets
Summary -The FASB published an Accounting Standards Update (ASU) intended to improve the accounting for and disclosure of certain crypto assets. FASB ASU No. 2023-08, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other—Crypto Assets (Subtopic 350-60): Accounting for and Disclosure of Crypto Assets, is effective for all entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2024, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted for both interim and annual financial statements that have not yet been issued (or made available for issuance). If an entity adopts the amendments in an interim period, it must adopt them as of the beginning of the fiscal year that includes that interim period.
ASU No. 2023-08 requires a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings (or other appropriate components of equity or net assets) as of the beginning of the annual reporting period in which an entity adopts the amendments.
The amendments in ASU No. 2023-08 are intended to improve the accounting for certain crypto assets by requiring an entity to measure those crypto assets at fair value each reporting period with changes in fair value recognized in net income. The amendments also improve the information provided to investors about an entity’s crypto asset holdings by requiring disclosure about significant holdings, contractual sale restrictions, and changes during the reporting period.
The amendments in the ASU apply to all assets that meet all the following criteria:
-
Meet the definition of intangible asset as defined in the FASB Accounting Standards Codification®;
- Do not provide the asset holder with enforceable rights to or claims on underlying goods, services, or other assets;
- Are created or reside on a distributed ledger based on blockchain or similar technology;
- Are secured through cryptography;
- Are fungible; and
- Are not created or issued by the reporting entity or its related parties.
For more information, click here.
© 2024 CCH Incorporated and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
| |
FASB Accounting Standards Updates - Accounting Standards Update No. 2023-07 — Segment Reporting (Topic 280) — Improvements to Reportable Segment Disclosures
Summary -The FASB issued a final Accounting Standards Update (ASU) that is intended to improve disclosures about a public entity’s reportable segments and addresses requests from investors and other allocators of capital for additional, more detailed information about a reportable segment’s expenses. ASU No. 2023-07, Segment Reporting (Topic 280): Improvements to Reportable Segment Disclosures, applies to all public entities that are required to report segment information in accordance with Topic 280. All public entities will be required to report segment information in accordance with the new guidance starting in annual periods beginning after December 15, 2023.
The amendments in the ASU are intended to improve reportable segment disclosure requirements primarily through enhanced disclosures about significant segment expenses. The key amendments:
- Require that a public entity disclose, on an annual and interim basis, significant segment expenses that are regularly provided to the chief operating decision maker (CODM) and included within each reported measure of segment profit or loss.
-
Require that a public entity disclose, on an annual and interim basis, an amount for other segment items by reportable segment and a description of its composition. The other segment items category is the difference between segment revenue less the significant expenses disclosed and each reported measure of segment profit or loss.
-
Require that a public entity provide all annual disclosures about a reportable segment’s profit or loss and assets currently required by FASB Accounting Standards Codification® Topic 280, Segment Reporting, in interim periods.
- Clarify that if the CODM uses more than one measure of a segment’s profit or loss in assessing segment performance and deciding how to allocate resources, a public entity may report one or more of those additional measures of segment profit or loss. However, at least one of the reported segment profit or loss measures (or the single reported measure, if only one is disclosed) should be the measure that is most consistent with the measurement principles used in measuring the corresponding amounts in the public entity’s consolidated financial statements.
- Require that a public entity disclose the title and position of the CODM and an explanation of how the CODM uses the reported measure(s) of segment profit or loss in assessing segment performance and deciding how to allocate resources.
- Require that a public entity that has a single reportable segment provide all the disclosures required by the amendments in the ASU and all existing segment disclosures in Topic 280.
For more information, click here.
© 2024 CCH Incorporated and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
| |
Financial Instruments –IASB Proposes Amendments to Accounting for Financial Instruments with Debt and Equity Features
Summary - The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) has issued the Exposure Draft, Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Equity—Proposed amendments to IAS 32, IFRS 7 and IAS 1. The Exposure Draft proposes amendments to address the challenges in companies’ financial reporting on instruments that have both debt and equity features. The comment deadline is March 29, 2024.
International Accounting Standard (IAS) 32, Financial Instruments: Presentation, sets out how a company that issues financial instruments should distinguish debt instruments from equity instruments. The distinction is important because the classification of the instruments affects the depiction of a company’s financial position and performance.
IASB believes that IAS 32 works well for most financial instruments. However, financial instruments have evolved since this IFRS Accounting Standard was initially issued; they are more complex and present new reporting challenges for companies. Companies’ solutions to the reporting challenges differ, resulting in diverse accounting practices that make it difficult for investors to assess and compare companies’ financial position and performance. Investors are calling for better information, particularly about equity instruments.
To address these challenges, the proposals in the Exposure Draft would amend IAS 32; IFRS 7, Financial Instruments: Disclosures; and IAS 1, Presentation of Financial Statements.
The IASB proposes:
- Clarification of the underlying classification principles of IAS 32 to help companies distinguish between debt and equity;
- Requirements for companies to disclose information to further explain the complexities of instruments that have both debt and equity features; and
- New presentation requirements for amounts, including profit and total comprehensive income, attributable to ordinary shareholders separate from the amounts attributable to other holders of equity instruments.
For more information, click here.
© 2024 CCH Incorporated and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
| |
Tokens – AICPA Proposes Framework for Reporting on Stablecoins and Sufficiency of Assets for Redemption
Summary - The AICPA’s Assurance Services Executive Committee (ASEC) has released the Exposure Draft, Proposed Criteria for the Presentation of the Sufficiency of Assets for Redemption: Specific to Asset-Backed Fiat-Pegged Tokens. The comment deadline is January 29, 2024.
The Exposure Draft sets forth what ASEC intends to be a comprehensive set of criteria to help increase transparency around stablecoins, a type of digital asset backed by traditional currency or other types of assets. The AICPA believes that, if adopted as proposed, these criteria would constitute the first framework of its kind to those issuing stablecoins, backed by fiat currency, for reporting relevant information to stakeholders. The AICPA also intends this framework to provide the basis for attestation services around this asset class and for practitioners to use the criteria when conducting an attestation engagement to perform procedures and generate a report on the issuer's claims about the sufficiency of assets for redemption linked to asset-backed, fiat-pegged tokens (that is, stablecoins).
Crypto assets and other digital assets make news for reasons ranging from their novelty, unpredictability, or utility in various markets. Stablecoins in particular have gained prominence for their role in trading, making them attractive to investors and businesses, although information available to token holders for stablecoins has not been consistent. The AICPA intends the draft criteria to remedy this.
Certain regulatory bodies, including the New York State Department of Financial Services (DFS), at the present time require reporting on and attestation of stablecoins, underlining the increasing importance of regulatory compliance.
The AICPA believes that the criteria will provide transparency to benefit token issuers as well as token holders, regulators, and the wider industry. By creating a standardized framework, the AICPA aims to reduce inconsistencies in measuring and reporting issued tokens and available assets backing those tokens.
For more information, click here.
© 2024 CCH Incorporated and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
| |
Public Interest Entities –AICPA PEEC Issues Guidance on Public Interest Entities
Summary - The AICPA’s Professional Ethics Executive Committee (PEEC) has released its New and revised definitions related to public interest entities, which amends the Code of Professional Conduct, under ET Section: 0.400 Definitions. The PEEC adopted the changes at its meeting in November.
The affected definitions are as follows:
- New definition “publicly traded entity” (ET Section 0.400.45) includes entities that issue financial instruments that are transferable and traded through a publicly accessible market mechanism, including through listing on a stock exchange. For an entity that is required to file a registration statement with the SEC, the entity becomes a publicly traded entity when its registration statement is effective.
- Revised definition “public interest entity” (ET Section 0.400.43) includes entities that meet one of several categories, including entities the auditors of which are subject to Regulation S-X, SEC Rule 2-01; certain entities that take deposits from the public; certain entities that provide insurance to the public; and SEC registered investment companies.
Effective dates
The new definition of “publicly traded entity” is effective December 15, 2023. The revision of “public interest entity,” as noted in the introduction to the release document, “is effective for periods beginning on or after December 15, 2024, with early implementation allowed. For an entity that, under the revised definition, is no longer considered a public interest entity, the revised definition is effective December 15, 2023.
For more information, click here.
© 2024 CCH Incorporated and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
| |
Derivatives – FASB Discusses Derivatives
Summary - As reported in its “Summary of Decisions” publication, the FASB met on December 6, 2023, and discussed whether to add a project to its technical agenda to refine the scope of Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging, and began initial deliberations. The FASB discussed feedback on the application of the definition of a derivative to various arrangements with contingent features that the FASB received in comment letters on the June 2021 Invitation to Comment, Agenda Consultation, and through additional stakeholder outreach. The FASB decided to add a project to its technical agenda to refine the scope of Topic 815.
For more information, click here.
© 2024 CCH Incorporated and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
| |
Interim Reporting –FASB Discusses Interim Reporting
Summary - As reported in its “Summary of Decisions” publication, the FASB met on November 15, 2023, and continued redeliberations on the 2021 proposed ASU, Interim Reporting (Topic 270): Disclosure Framework—Changes to Interim Disclosure Requirements. The FASB reached a number of decisions, including agreeing with the FASB staff’s methodology for identifying interim disclosure requirements. Key aspects of the methodology include whether the word interim is used in the existing disclosure as well as consideration of references within current GAAP (including Topic 270) and source literature.
For more information, click here.
© 2024 CCH Incorporated and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
| |
Statement of Cash Flows –FASB Discusses Statement of Cash Flows
Summary - As reported in its “Summary of Decisions” publication, the FASB met on November 8, 2023, and decided to add a project to its technical agenda to make targeted improvements to the statement of cash flows to provide investors with decision-useful information.
The FASB decided that the scope of the project is to:
- Reorganize and disaggregate the statement of cash flows for financial institutions to improve the decision-usefulness of that statement; and
- Develop a disclosure about an entity’s cash interest income received.
The FASB chair retained a project about the statement of cash flows on the research agenda to explore further potential improvements.
For more information, click here.
© 2024 CCH Incorporated and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
| |
Stock Compensation –FASB Discusses Stock Compensation
Summary - As reported in its “Summary of Decisions” publication, the FASB met on November 1, 2023, and discussed feedback received and issues for redeliberation on the proposed ASU, Compensation: Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope Application of Profits Interest Awards, and made a number of decisions, including the following:
Affirmed its decision that the amendments apply to all entities, including public business entities (PBEs) and entities other than PBEs;
Clarified that the amendments apply to awards to both employees and nonemployees; and
Decided that the amendments will be effective for PBEs for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2024, and interim periods within those fiscal years.
For more information, click here.
© 2024 CCH Incorporated and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
| |
FASB Agenda –FASB Discusses Potential Agenda Projects
Summary - As reported in its “Summary of Decisions” publication, the FASB met on December 20, 2023, and discussed the results of staff research and analysis on several potential projects related to recent agenda requests. The FASB decided not to add the following potential projects to its agenda:
-
Clarifying the Scope and Application of Topic 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity, for Legal Form Debt Instruments;
- Accounting for Equity Securities;
- Eliminating the Held-to-Maturity (HTM) Classification for Debt Securities;
- Making Other Amendments to the Accounting for HTM Debt Securities; and
-
Topic 740, Income Taxes, Backwards Tracing.
The FASB also decided not to add a project to its technical agenda on accounting for commodities at this time but supported retaining the project on the research agenda.
For more information, click here.
© 2024 CCH Incorporated and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
| |
Recent SEC & PCAOB Updates | |
Cybersecurity –SEC Staff Updates Interpretations for Material Cybersecurity Incidents Guidance
Summary - The staff in the SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance (Corp Fin) has updated its Compliance and Disclosure Interpretation (CDI), Exchange Act Form 8-K. Corp Fin has added new questions 104B.01-104B.04. These new questions provide guidance on material cybersecurity incidents.
For more information, click here.
© 2024 CCH Incorporated and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
| |
AICPA & CIMA Conference on Current SEC and PCAOB Developments - 2023
Summary - As discussed above, on December 4-6, 2023, representatives of the SEC, FASB, PCAOB, IASB, and AICPA spoke at the 2023 AICPA & CIMA Conference on Current SEC and PCAOB Developments. Topics discussed during the 2023 conference covered a number of important financial reporting and auditing issues. Principal themes of the conference included:
- Disclosure and assurance of climate change and economic, social, or governance (ESG) matters.
- Disclosures and reporting on crypto assets.
- Accounting and auditing during challenging economic times plagued by geopolitical issues, inflation, supply chain issues, and labor constraints.
- The importance of transparency and integrity of financial reporting, including investor protections and the role of the auditor in providing assurance and trust in the financial reports of entities.
- The importance of internal control over financial reporting (ICFR), including the designing and implementation of controls, and the important role of auditors have in testing the effectiveness of ICFR.
- PCAOB standard-setting, inspection, and enforcement.
- Accounting standard-setting.
For more information, click here.
© 2024 CCH Incorporated and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
| |
PCAOB Inspections – PCAOB Staff Outline 2024 Inspection Priorities with Focus on Driving Improvements in Audit Quality
Summary - The PCAOB inspectors outlined their priorities for 2024 inspections in a PCAOB staff report. The staff report includes key risks, like high interest rates, and other considerations, like audit areas with recurring deficiencies, that auditors should focus on when planning and performing audit procedures. It notes the PCAOB will continue to prioritize inspections of financial-services sector audits, digital assets, and more. The report also includes suggested questions for audit committees to hold firms accountable to high standards when hiring and overseeing the audit process.
The report also reiterates the inspection staff’s commitment to enhancements to the PCAOB’s inspection program, such as increasing the number of engagements reviewed and improving the timeliness of inspection reports.
Among the PCAOB’s inspection enhancements in 2024 will be the creation of a PCAOB team that will evaluate culture across the largest domestic audit firms. This initiative will include interviewing firm personnel and evaluating other documentation, with the aim of using this information to enhance the PCAOB’s understanding of how audit firm cultures may be affecting audit quality.
The staff report addresses the following areas for consideration in the PCAOB’s 2024 inspection program:
Overall Business Risk Considerations
- Persistent high interest rates, tightening of credit availability, and/or inflationary challenges.
- Disruptions in the supply chain and rising costs.
- Business models that are significantly impacted by rapidly changing technology.
- Geopolitical conflicts.
- Financial statements that include areas with a higher inherent risk of fraud, estimates involving complex models or processes, and/or presentation and disclosures that may be impacted by complexities in the public company’s activities.
Prioritized Sectors/Industries for audit selection and inspection
- Continued emphasis on companies engaging in merger and acquisition activities or business combinations.
- Continued emphasis on audits of broker-dealers that file compliance reports and others that provide customers with various investment opportunities, such as introducing brokers.
- Continued selection of non-traditional audit areas.
- Continuing emphasis on public companies in industries and sectors with specialized accounting and/or that may be negatively impacted by uncertainties and volatility in the economic and geopolitical environment, prioritizing in particular Financials, Information Technology, and Other.
Inspections Considerations
The report also discusses a range of considerations that should be important for auditors when planning and performing risk assessments and audit procedures, including:
- Challenges and Recurring Deficiencies Observed in Inspections of Auditors of Broker-Dealers.
- Recurring Deficiencies.
- Evaluating Audit Evidence.
- Understanding the Company and Its Environment.
- Use of Other Auditors.
- Going Concern.
- Critical Audit Matters (CAMs).
- Digital Assets.
- Cybersecurity.
- Use of Data and Technology.
Updated List of Questions that Audit Committees May Want to Consider
In the context of the PCAOB’s 2024 inspections, the report contains suggested questions for audit committee members to consider amongst themselves or in discussions with their independent auditors. These questions are designed principally to further two-way communication on topics such as auditor understanding of the business, fraud, going concern, other auditors, CAMs, and the company’s use of technology. Chair Williams has encouraged audit committees to ask questions in order to hold firms accountable to performing high-quality audits.
For more information, click here.
© 2024 CCH Incorporated and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
| |
EDGAR –SEC Updates EDGAR Filer Manual
Summary - The SEC has published a Final Rule, Adoption of Updated EDGAR Filer Manual. This new edition of the EDGAR Filer Manual has been updated to reflect recent SEC rulemaking, including changes for the new disclosure requirements for cybersecurity incidents. The SEC adopted new rules to enhance and standardize disclosures regarding cybersecurity risk management, strategy, governance, and incidents by public companies in Forms 10-K and 8-K.
For more information, click here.
© 2024 CCH Incorporated and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
| |
Release No. 34-98959: Clearing Agency Governance and Conflicts of Interest
Summary -The SEC has adopted Securities Act Rule 192 to implement Section 27B of the Securities Act of 1933, a provision added by Section 621 of the Dodd-Frank Act. The rule is intended to prevent the sale of asset-backed securities (ABS) that are tainted by material conflicts of interest. It prohibits a securitization participant, for a specified period of time, from engaging, directly or indirectly, in any transaction that would involve or result in any material conflict of interest between the securitization participant and an investor in the relevant ABS. Under new Rule 192, such transactions would be “conflicted transactions.”
Rule 192 provides exceptions for risk-mitigating hedging activities, liquidity commitments, and bona fide market-making activities of a securitization participant. These exceptions permit certain market activities, subject to satisfaction of the specified conditions, which will allow securitization participants to continue important risk management, liquidity commitment, and market-making activities.
Under new Rule 192, conflicted transactions include a short sale of the relevant ABS, the purchase of a credit default swap or other credit derivative that entitles the securitization participant to receive payments upon the occurrence of specified credit events in respect of the ABS, or a transaction that is substantially the economic equivalent of the aforementioned transactions, other than any transaction that only hedges general interest rate or currency exchange risk.
Effective date: February 5, 2024. Compliance date: The applicable compliance dates are discussed in Part III of this release.
For more information, click here.
© 2024 CCH Incorporated and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
| |
Announcement Regarding Share Repurchase Disclosure Modernization Rule
Summary -The SEC has published an announcement postponing the effective date of the SEC’s Final Rule, Share Repurchase Disclosure Modernization (Repurchase Rule). The Repurchase Rule adopted amendments to modernize and improve disclosure about repurchases of an issuer’s equity securities that are registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Among other things, the Repurchase Rule requires additional detail regarding the structure of an issuer’s repurchase program and its share repurchases, require the filing of daily quantitative repurchase data either quarterly or semi-annually, and eliminate the requirement to file monthly repurchase data in an issuer’s periodic reports.
The SEC cited the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit opinion in Chamber of Com. of the USA v. SEC, No. 23-60255 (5th Cir.), in which petitioners challenge the Repurchase Rule, which became effective on July 31, 2023. The court granted the petition for review and remanded to the SEC “to correct the defects” the court identified in the Repurchase Rule by November 30, 2023.
The SEC indicates that in light of the court’s decision, the SEC issued an order postponing the effective date of the Repurchase Rule pursuant to Section 705 of the Administrative Procedure Act. As a result, the Repurchase Rule is stayed pending further SEC action.
For more information, click here.
© 2024 CCH Incorporated and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
| |
Review of the “Accredited Investor” Definition under the Dodd-Frank Act
Summary -The SEC issued a staff report on the accredited investor definition. The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act directs the SEC to review the accredited investor definition as it relates to natural persons every four years to determine whether the definition should be modified or adjusted. The SEC staff previously reviewed the definition in 2015 and in 2019 (as part of the Concept Release on Harmonization of Securities Offering Exemptions). Staff from the SEC’s Divisions of Corporation Finance and Economic and Risk Analysis prepared the report in connection with this third review of the definition.
The report examines the current status of the accredited investor pool and concludes with a review of frequently suggested revisions to the accredited investor definition received from a variety of sources, including public commenters, the Investor Advisory Committee, and the Small Business Capital Formation Advisory Committee.
For more information, click here.
© 2024 CCH Incorporated and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
| |
NYSE: (ART)ificial Intelligence
Summary - The NYSE attended Madrona's IA Summit in Seattle to engage with leaders of AI companies, collecting thought-provoking questions and prompts from them. Rather than a traditional Q&A series, the NYSE transformed these responses into art using artificial intelligence.
For more information, please visit here.
| | | | |