As of writing this update, WMS is aware of at least eight legislative proposals to expand the scope of an existing profession or license a new provider type in Wyoming. Not all eight will see debate this year, but that doesn't mean they aren't coming back in the future. A bill to grant Ph.D. psychologists prescription authority was drafted and later withdrawn by the sponsor but not because the sponsor doesn't remain passionate about pushing the issue. Initiatives to license new provider types like anesthesiology assistants and denturists as well as separate proposals to amend certification requirements for certified addictions practitioners and mental health professionals only represent the tip of the iceberg. This year will see the return of a bill authorizing optometrists access to laser and scalpel procedures, optimal team practice models for PAs, and an expansion of scope for athletic trainers.
WMS is proud of our history in protecting patient safety inside of these battles for scope expansion. Whether it's arguing that surgeons are the only healthcare providers uniquely qualified to perform surgery or that only a few specially qualified physicians hold the necessary training to safely perform nerve conduction studies, we've drawn a bright line of what is safe and appropriate inside patient care and what is not.
These historic battles have all been fought based on the underlying premise that the state legislature accepts its role in maintaining patient safety by carefully vetting the specifics of professional licensure which serves as the primary way of delineating the lanes of the multi-lane superhighway that is our current healthcare delivery system. However, tides seem to be shifting with legislators indicating they no longer believe it the role of government to make healthcare decisions for the public. Philosophically, an overwhelming majority seem to subscribe to the more libertarian principles of limited government when it comes to professional licensure issues. Many legislators believe that it's the government's role to take down barriers and open as many access points as possible leaving it to the patient to decide which member of the healthcare team is appropriately trained to safely deliver the care they need.
While WMS feels just as strongly this year as we have in years past about the critical role of government in protecting the public through vetting licensure, we recognize the political risks in doubling down on what seems to recently be a losing advocacy strategy. In an effort to protect our respected voice in a number of other important healthcare policy conversations, we must be mindful of which fights we pick as well as the way in which those fights are picked. WMS will remain a resource for any legislator seeking a deeper understanding of the licensure issues, but will be making an important pivot in our future strategy.
WMS will be working to build a coalition of organizations to help us move policy that empowers patients and forces transparency for all members of the healthcare team. If it is the legislative will to remove all lanes on the highway of healthcare delivery, then patients will have to draw their own lines on the highway as they make decisions about their care. WMS believes patients deserve information about their provider's training, background and qualifications in order to do that.
The March hybrid session will be an important one as we anticipate the legislature making big decisions around professional licensure. We hope that we will find success in compelling our state's lawmakers to stress the importance of transparency by our healthcare providers if, in fact, we will be working to diminish the role of licensure in assuring patient safety in the healthcare delivery system. The language WMS will be working to integrate into any practice act that is opened can be viewed
HERE.
For the WMS position stances on the various scope of practice bills facing lawmakers this year, you can visit the tracking sheet. WMS has also published a
position paper on the PA Optimal Team Practice proposal for your consideration and review.