Nevada news & updates
September 2023 | Vol. 32, No. 4
CEU Seminar Registration Open
Join us for the 11th Annual NSBAIDRD / AIANV CEU Seminar, where attendees can earn all 8 CEUs required for registration renewal in Nevada. This virtual seminar will be held on Friday, November 3, 2023.

Registration is $95 and includes all 8 CEUs. CEUs will be earned only for sessions attended. Register through the button below or by going to aialasvegas.org.


Annual Registration Renewal News
Renewal Notices to Be Sent in October

Renewal notices will be emailed to the email address on file for all registrants in mid-October. If you received this newsletter email directly from the board, we have your current email address. If this newsletter was forwarded to you by a colleague or downloaded from our website, we likely do not have your current email address. 

You can update your email address and other contact information through the registrant portal, or by contacting our office at 702-486-7300 or [email protected].
Applications for CEU Exemption Due Sept 30

Nevada law requires registrants to complete 8 CEUs each year for registration renewal. Registrants who are unable to meet the continuing education requirements due to illness, physical disability or undue hardship may apply to the board for an exemption. Exemption applications must be submitted by September 30, 2023. 

The following registrants are exempt from the CEU requirement and are not required to submit an application for exemption:
  • A registrant holding an initial certificate of registration is exempt from the requirements for continuing education for the year in which the registration was issued and the following year.
  • A registrant who serves on active duty in the Armed Forces of the United States for a period of more than 120 consecutive days during a calendar year is exempt from the requirements for continuing education for that calendar year.
Board Adopts Part of Proposed Regulation
New Registrants by Examination
Congratulations to the new Nevada registrants sworn-in at the August board meeting!
Architects
Caitlin Davis (Reno) #9246
Nasreen Al Tamini (Bellevue, WA) #9251
Kevin Marer (Auburn, CA) #9247
Registered Interior Designers
Mona Nahm (San Jose, CA) #304-ID
Marcio Decker (Reno) #305-ID
New Rules of Conduct Adopted for Architects and Residential Designers
Updated ROC Effective Aug 1, 2023

During the NCARB Annual Business Meeting, new Model Rules of Conduct were adopted. Per NAC 623.900, the board adopts the most recent NCARB Rules of Conduct as the rules of conduct for architects and residential designers. 

Three new rules were added to the previous Rules of Conduct. The new changes address current ethical conflicts architects may face in their day-to-day work. The additions include:

Rule 2.6: “An architect serving in a public capacity, whether paid or voluntary, shall not accept payments or gifts that are intended to influence the architect’s professional judgment.”

Rule 4.3 “An architect shall not counsel or assist a client in conduct that the architect knows, or reasonably should know, is fraudulent or illegal.”

Rule 6.1: “An architect serving as an AXP Supervisor for a candidate for licensure shall reasonably assist the candidate in proper and timely documentation in accordance with that program.”

The Rules of Conduct can be downloaded from the board’s website.
NCARB Issues Sanctions for Exam Candidate Misconduct
NCARB announced that it issued sanctions for six candidates who violated the ARE Candidate Agreement, with specific misconduct ranging from copying and sharing exam questions to attempting to sell exam questions online, as well as utilizing exposed exam questions prior to attempting at least one division.

The ARE plays an important role in protecting the public’s health, safety and welfare by affirming that candidates have the required knowledge and skills to competently practice architecture. To ensure the validity of exam results, NCARB takes several steps to protect the security of ARE, including requiring all candidates abide by the ARE Candidate Agreement. The agreement prohibits candidates from attempting to access or distribute exam content before or after taking any ARE division and outlines other responsibilities of each candidate for licensure.  

More information about the case can be found on the NCARB website.
Board Finds Non-Registrant in Violation of Law
Case No. 23-020N
The respondents, Scott Corridan and Scott Corridan Design, were alleged to have violated NRS 623.360.1(a)(b)(c) by holding themselves out as being able to practice as registered interior designers and practicing as registered interior designers, without having a certificate of registration issued by the board.

The board unanimously found Scott Corridan and Scott Corridan Design to be in violation of NRS 623.360.1(a)(b)(c). The board imposed an administrative fine of $40,000 and ordered the respondents to pay all costs and fees for the investigation and hearing. Additionally, the respondents were ordered to remove content from their websites that is in violation of the order. The board authorized legal counsel to seek injunctive relief if necessary.
Disciplinary Actions
(May 24 through August 22, 2023)
Inquiries are routinely sent to both registrants and non-registrants for alleged violations of Nevada Revised Statutes (NRS) and Nevada Administrative Codes (NAC).  

There were five cases this period that were submitted for board consideration and approved. Additionally, 10 cases were closed because there was no basis for the allegations or the complaint did not fall within the board's jurisdiction.

The following cases were closed by means of settlement agreement; as part of the agreement respondents agreed to assure compliance with Chapter 623. Should the respondents be involved in a subsequent case and found to have again violated NRS, NAC or Rules of Conduct, the case may be used as an aggravating factor.

Every effort is made to ensure that the following information is correct. Before making any decision based on this information you should contact the NSBAIDRD.

Engaged in the Practice of Architecture, Registered Interior Design or Residential Design With Expired Certificate of Registration: NRS 623.185.3 and NRS 623.360.1(c)

Case 24-002R
The allegations against Lynn Centner and Architect Lynn Centner & Associates were that they engaged in the practice of architecture while the respondent's registration was lapsed. The matter was resolved through a settlement agreement incorporating an administrative penalty of $5,000 plus investigative costs of $1,500.

Holding Oneself Out and Advertising Qualifications to Practice Architecture, Registered Interior Design or Residential Design: NRS 623.360.1(a)(b)

Case 23-038N
The allegations against Jacob Charles and JNC Interiors were that they held themselves out as being qualified to provide services that fall under the practices of architecture and registered interior design without having a certificate of registration with the board. The matter was resolved through a settlement agreement incorporating an administrative penalty of $4,000 plus investigative costs of $1,500.

Holding Oneself Out, Advertising and Unlicensed Practice of Architecture, Registered Interior Design or Residential Design: NRS 623.360.1(a)(b)(c) 

Case 23-050N
The allegations against Andrew Stevenson and Andrew Hull Stevenson Architects were that they held themselves out as being qualified to provide services that fall under the practice of architecture and engaged in the practice of architecture without having a certificate of registration with the board. The matter was resolved through a settlement agreement incorporating an administrative penalty of $3,500 plus investigative costs of $1,300.

Advertising and Unlicensed Practice of Architecture, Registered Interior Design or Residential Design: NRS 623.360.1(b)(c) 

Case 23-028N
The allegations against Melody Gangi and House of Four Design were that they put out a device saying they were qualified to provide services that fall under the practices of architecture and residential design and engaged in the practices of architecture and residential design without having a certificate of registration with the board. The matter was resolved through a settlement agreement incorporating an administrative penalty of $4,000 plus investigative costs of $2,000.

Unlicensed Practice of Architecture, Registered Interior Design or Residential Design: NRS 623.360.1(c) 

Case 23-027N
The allegations against Tanya Kash and Cloud 9 Interiors were that they engaged in the practice of architecture and residential design without having a certificate of registration with the board. The matter was resolved through a settlement agreement incorporating an administrative penalty of $3,000 plus investigative costs of $2,400.