"Without a doubt, psychological warfare has proven its right to a place of dignity in our military arsenal."
- Dwight D. Eisenhower

"You never change things by fighting the existing reality.
To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete."
- Buckminster Fuller

"A clever person solves a problem. A wise person avoids it."
- Albert Einstein

It has been a one way agreement. South Korea and the Alliance implemented the confidence and trust building measures in good faith.  The north did not other than "demilitarized" the JSA/Panmunjom and destroy and vacate guard posts in the DMZ.  The alliance has limited training (ti include live fire training) in the fortonline areas and established no fly zones in the forward areas which impact both readiness as well as intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance operations.  Yes it is one of President Moon's signature achievements but the north has never fully lived up to its side of the agreement (as an example, the interpretation by supporters of the agreement is that the 21+ missile and rocket tests over the past year do not violate the agreement).

[Herald Interview] Former combined forces No. 2 defends 2018 military pact with North

koreaherald.com · by The Korea Herald · June 22, 2020
Published : Jun 22, 2020 - 15:56 Updated : Jun 22, 2020 - 17:10
Representative Kim Byung-joo (Courtesy of Kim)

Kim Byung-joo, former deputy commander of the ROK-US Combined Forces Command, said South Korea should manage military tensions to prevent them from getting out of control, while remaining on guard against aggression from North Korea.

Despite the North's escalating threats to undo all the progress both sides have made toward peace and reconciliation, Seoul should continue to honor its agreements with Pyongyang, he added.

"Returning to confrontation would further jeopardize the safety of our people here, and scuttle the hard-won momentum for dialogue the PyeongChang 2018 Winter Olympics ushered in," Kim, a commander-turned-lawmaker who now sits on the parliamentary defense committee, said.

"The top priority here is to not let the unfolding situation grow into a bigger crisis," Kim added.

The first-term lawmaker from the ruling Democratic Party of Korea highlighted the importance of the military pact signed in September 2018 by the incumbent leaders of both sides -- the South's Moon Jae-in and the North's Kim Jong-un -- in stopping accidental military encounters at the border from spiraling into armed clashes.

But Pyongyang has said it is withdrawing from the pact, and has already put its words into action by sending troops to restore border guard posts it had removed under the deal.

"The two sides, since signing the pact, have yet to have a visible military clash," Kim said.

Yet on May 3 the two Koreas exchanged gunfire in the Demilitarized Zone, which separates the two Koreas, when the North opened fire on one of the South's guard posts.

The United Nations Command, which handles DMZ affairs, did not accuse the North of provoking the South but said both sides had violated the armistice agreement.

Seoul's Unification Ministry, while saying the North's action was probably accidental, raised objections to the UNC decision, saying the South had responded appropriately by returning fire.

Kim agreed with the ministry that the Pyongyang's action was unintentional.

"The military accord helped to prevent additional confrontations from developing," Kim said.

The legislator, when asked how intent Pyongyang had seemed on upholding the bilateral military deal, mentioned that the communist regime had punished those responsible for the incident in May, referring to local news reports.

The Daily NK, a defector-run North Korea website, reported June 1 citing unnamed military sources in Pyongyang that the soldiers who opened fire had been suspended for six months and their commanders had received warnings.

"If those reports were true, that would be evidence of Pyongyang's determination to honor the pact," Kim said.

The former deputy commander strongly denied claims that the military accord hurt the combined forces' joint readiness or the S. Korea-US security alliance.

Since signing the pact in 2018, Seoul has not overseen any large-scale artillery drills on islands near the disputed maritime border in the West Sea. Since tensions have grown more intense recently, the South's military has reportedly halted even shooting drills there.

"Then-Cmdr. Vincent Brooks and I not only reviewed the potential impact of the deal on our forces' readiness, but also drew up countermeasures in response to the unexpected fallout," Kim said, without elaborating on the countermeasures.

Inter-Korean ties could have been much better, he said, had the National Assembly ratified the Panmunjom Declaration, the outcome of the very first summit between Moon and Kim Jong-un in April 2018.

As for the status of the S. Korea-US security alliance, the politician said the joint forces' readiness against North Korea was unmistakable and that the alliance was watertight.

"Without strength, peace is short-lived," Kim said, adding that Moon's "peace through strength" drive would expedite a thaw in inter-Korean relations and bring the two rivals closer to reconciliation.

Moon on Armed Forces Day in 2018 said the military had a mission to seek peace through strength.

"Pyongyang comes out for talks when we're strong. And it walks away when we aren't," Kim said.

By Choi Si-young ( siyoungchoi@heraldcorp.com)

De Oppresso Liber,

David Maxwell
Senior Fellow
Foundation for Defense of Democracies
Personal Email: david.maxwell161@gmail.com
Phone: 202-573-8647
Web Site:  www.fdd.org
Twitter: @davidmaxwell161
Subscribe to FDD's new podcastForeign Podicy
 
FDD is a Washington-based nonpartisan research institute focusing on national security and foreign policy.


If you do not read anything else in the 2017 National Security Strategy read this on page 14:

"A democracy is only as resilient as its people. An informed and engaged citizenry is the fundamental requirement for a free and resilient nation. For generations, our society has protected free press, free speech, and free thought. Today, actors such as Russia are using information tools in an attempt to undermine the legitimacy of democracies. Adversaries target media, political processes, financial networks, and personal data. The American public and private sectors must recognize this and work together to defend our way of life. No external threat can be allowed to shake our shared commitment to our values, undermine our system of government, or divide our Nation."