|
DUI Reform
As passed by the Senate Judiciary Committee, S. 52 would reform the penalties for people convicted of driving under the influence. Those convicted of a second offense or more would be required to carry an SR-22 surety issued by an insurer. A Senate Judiciary subcommittee and the Senate Judiciary Committee both passed S. 52, and the Senate voted Thursday to place the bill into “special order” status, ensuring its debate next week.
Abortion-Inducing Drugs
H. 4760 would establish crimes and penalties for the use of abortion-inducing drugs, such as mifepristone and misoprostol, with exceptions. A House Judiciary subcommittee gave H. 4760 a favorable report, and the bill will be on the next full committee’s agenda.
Income Tax Reform
H. 4216, which was passed by the House in 2025, would change South Carolina’s individual income tax structure by reducing the tax rate over time until it reaches 1.99%. A Senate Finance subcommittee gave H. 4216 a favorable report, and the bill will be on the next full committee’s agenda.
Legislative Expenses
S. 779 would give all members of the General Assembly a legislative expense allowance of $1,000 per month. A Senate Finance subcommittee gave S. 779 a favorable report, and the bill will be on the next full committee’s agenda.
Driving without a License
S. 59 would increase the penalties for driving without a license. The Senate gave the bill second and third readings this week, sending S. 59 to the House.
Pending Gun Charges
S. 136 would require the dismissal of certain unlawful handgun possession charges from before the enactment of the South Carolina Constitutional Carry/Second Amendment Preservation Act of 2024. It also states that a dismissal would not necessitate dismissing related charges or serve as a basis for civil actions from the arrest. The governor vetoed S. 136 in May, and the Senate overrode the veto at the end of last session. The House overrode the veto Wednesday, and the bill will be enrolled for ratification.
Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) Public Records
H. 4902 would require that the total amount of revenue funds spent by an institution of higher learning during each fiscal year as part of an intercollegiate athletics revenue-sharing program be subject to public disclosure. However, the total amount and any percentage amount of those revenues paid to any specific athlete, or any specific sport or athletic program would be exempt from disclosure. Also, documents related to or created as part of the process of negotiating an agreement with an athlete are confidential and may not be considered a public record. The House gave H. 4902 second and third readings this week and sent the bill to the Senate.
|