Credit unions in 'perilous' position on taxation
Credit unions are under serious threat of losing their tax-exempt status, former National Credit Union Administration board member Todd Harper said.
With President Donald Trump's 2017 tax cuts set to expire later this year and the Republican-led Congress working to advance new tax legislation, bank industry interest groups are making a renewed push to eliminate some credit unions' tax-exempt status. The exemption has drawn the ire of bank industry advocates, who say it gives credit unions, which have become increasingly active acquirers of banks in recent years, an unfair advantage over banks as they bid for potential acquisition targets.
At the same time, support for credit unions' tax-exempt status appears to be eroding among Democratic lawmakers, Harper, himself a Democrat, said during a May 1 event at the Brookings Institution.
"Credit unions are in the most perilous place that they've been on the taxation issue in the 25 years that I've worked on credit union policy issues," Harper said.
Trump fired Harper and his fellow Democratic National Credit Union Administration board member, Tanya Otsuka, in April, leaving Republican Chairman Kyle Hauptman as the only remaining board member. The pair subsequently launched a lawsuit against the administration seeking reinstatement and alleging that their removal was "patently unlawful."
America's Credit Unions, the top credit union trade association in the US, is not speaking in favor of Harper and Otsuka's lawsuit, and that lack of public support, in combination with recent reports of redlining, or racial discrimination in mortgage lending, at certain credit unions, has weakened the industry's position with Democrats in Congress, Harper said.
He also cited new legislation in Washington State that would repeal the business and occupation tax for state-chartered credit unions that merge with or acquire banks in the state. The bill passed in both of the state's Democrat-led legislative chambers.
If credit unions lose their tax-exempt status, they would build retained earnings, and therefore capital, at a slower rate, which could pose risks to their safety and soundness, Harper said.
"Unlike banks, which can go to the equities markets or can go to the debt markets and raise funds, credit unions are limited," Harper said. "I see a slowing of growth, so that concerns me."
Taxing credit unions would also have implications for credit union members, who would receive lower yields on their deposits and would have to pay higher rates on loans, Harper told S&P Global Market Intelligence in an interview following his remarks.
"That 25-basis-point typical difference you see in home lending would shrink, and that would be a bad thing for consumers," Harper said.
Harper also targeted credit union stadium naming rights deals. He raised questions about the return on average assets for these deals, said using complimentary seats for prospective mortgage borrowers could violate RESPA restrictions against lender kickbacks, and warned that naming-rights deals are hurting the credit union industry’s reputation.
“There’s an identity crisis out there with credit unions,” Harper said. “Big banks like to name stadiums. Do credit unions want to be banks? … If you’re going to be a bank, there should be other changes that happen along the way. There also needs to be greater regulation, oversight, practices, and watchfulness.”
The growing debate over the credit union tax exemption and community bank acquisitions has continued to generate headlines, with CUToday reporting that more credit unions are considering converting to mutual banks, CU Daily writing that some in the credit union industry are concerned about larger mergers, Banking Dive spotlighting ICBA’s advocacy efforts, and ICBA’s Mickey Marshall telling American Banker that the growth of large credit unions is fueled by acquisitions of community banks.
Source: S&P Global Market Intelligence; ICBA
|