|
Support For a New High School
On the question of whether they generally support the idea of creating a second high school, 86 percent of the 49 respondents said they do support it; 12 percent said they do not; and one person said that the plans of where and when a second school would be built should have already been determined with the way the city has grown in recent years.
One respondent said they support a second high school “because I know that 800 to 1,000 students (based on research) is optimal for a high school and we’re well beyond that. We’re also a growing community so we have a need. We’re not seeing the dramatic drops in enrollment that other communities are experiencing.”
Another commenter noted, “the high school is too big and, while nice, a lot of students don’t want to feel like a number. With two high schools that are more normal sized, it will help students feel more comfortable, connected, and not to allow things to slide under the rug. This is a growing community and with that comes a growing number of schools.”
Among those not in favor of a new campus, reasons cited included additional cost to taxpayers, potential splitting of the community and concerns that a new high school would not offer students as many educational and co-curricular opportunities as Hollister High.
New School Focus
On the topic of what programs or services people would like to see at a new high school, approximately a third said the same as offered as the current high school, another third suggested a Career Technical Education or vocational focus, and 11 percent reference art programs.
Other ideas included “developing a smaller campus for only ninth-graders only to alleviate the stress on the student population and allow for a more supported experience for the younger class of high school students,” along with after-school programs and greater opportunities for more students to play sports.
Additional Outreach
Those responding to committee members suggested that other groups in the community that should be contacted regarding the new high school include parents, taxpayers, Spanish-speakers, families of special needs students, Gavilan College, Realtors, parent-teacher organizations, local service clubs, businesses, and feeder schools, among others.
Many respondents noted that the process needs to take a community approach to planning the second high school, while others said that developers need to pay their fair share for new facilities. The questions that they raised will be considered and addressed by the Facilities Needs Committee in its upcoming meetings and will factor in to the recommendations it makes to the Board of Trustees in May.
At its next meeting at 5:30 p.m. on March 1 in the Hollister High School Davis Library, the Facilities Needs Committee will focus on a vision for the new high school as it hears case studies about the construction of Liberty High School in the Perris Union High School District and Rancho San Juan High School in the Salinas Union High School District. The meeting will also feature a GIS (geographical information system) mapping presentation regarding a possible location of the second high school.
The community approach to planning for a new high school to meet the needs of our growing campus, city and county will continue to be a focus not just of the citizens committee that is doing such great work, but for the district as a whole. We appreciate everyone’s input and look forward to sharing more information in the coming weeks and months.
Sincerely,
San Benito High School District Superintendent Dr. Shawn Tennenbaum
|