Do you have a question or topic related to REALTOR® ethics that you would like addressed in a future issue of Ethics Exchange? Click here to e-mail Scott Bush at the GMAR.
Touring a Property with Buyers and their Children? Additional Awareness Needed!
Recently, there has been an increase in the number of concerns stemming from buyers touring properties with their children and, in some cases, the children being left to freely roam the house while their parents tour alongside an agent. Reported concerns include a variety of issues, including, but not limited to the theft of personal belongings, walking or jumping on furniture, and eating/drinking food items inside the home.

Although fair housing laws may prevent sellers from banning children from a tour of their home, buyers' agents should be mindful of the fact that the home is not public property and remind clients with children to keep them in close proximity at all times during the tour. Many of the incidents reported to the GMAR have been recorded on video cameras inside the home. Which brings up another issue... Always assume that you’re being recorded, because there’s a good chance that you are! 
Do Not Leave the Key in the Deadbolt
As we dive into the summer months and schedules become busy with back-to-back showings, it's a good time to remind ourselves that when entering a property after unlocking the door with the owner's key, agents need to double check that they have placed the key back into the lock box instead of leaving it in the door lock. This is not a safe practice and leaves the seller's property unprotected.
Ascertaining Whether a Consumer is Subject to an Exclusive Representation Agreement
REALTOR® A was holding an open house for their client’s home, which had been on the market for several months, so REALTOR®A was thrilled to see Buyer C approach the home after two hours with no visitors. REALTOR® A gave her a tour of the space, but Buyer C indicated she was looking for more of a “fixer upper”, as she had almost singlehandedly completed some significant renovation projects in her previous homes and was looking for the perfect next project.

REALTOR® A had another listing that she knew was perfect for Buyer C, and hadn’t been listed in the MLS yet as the client had just signed their agreement earlier that morning. REALTOR® A described the home to Buyer C, and offered to show it to her. Buyer C replied, “Oh, thank you, I am actually working with someone. I should probably ask them about it.” REALTOR® A responded, “that’s fine, but to be honest, I’m not sure if your agent will even get a chance to see it. At the price at which it’s listed, I’m confident it will sell before I can even get it in the MLS.” Somewhat reluctantly, Buyer C agreed to let REALTOR® A show her the second home. REALTOR® A drafted an offer, which was accepted, and the parties completed a quick close.

Proud of a job well done for her client, REALTOR® A was shocked when she received notice of an ethics complaint filed against her by REALTOR® B, alleging a violation of Article 16 for interfering with his exclusive relationship with Buyer C. At the hearing, REALTOR® B provided the hearing panel with copies of this exclusive buyer agency agreement with Buyer C, and Buyer C testified that she did tell REALTOR® A she was working with someone, but felt pressured to tour and submit an offer with REALTOR® A or risk losing the house.

REALTOR® A defended her actions, stating, “Listen, if I had known that Buyer C had an exclusive agreement with someone, I would have backed off. But she never said that she was working with someone exclusively; just that she was working with someone. It’s not my responsibility to fill in the gaps on what she told me or hammer her with questions and drive away a potential buyer just to determine what sort of relationship she has. That doesn’t serve my client well.”

The Hearing Panel decided that REALTOR® A had violated Article 16, as Standard of Practice 16-9 provides, “REALTORS®, prior to entering into a representation agreement, have an affirmative obligation to make reasonable efforts to determine whether the prospect is subject to a current, valid exclusive agreement to provide the same type of real estate service.” As REALTOR® A had made no affirmative effort to ascertain whether Buyer C’s relationship with another agent was exclusive or not, the Hearing Panel concluded she had made no reasonable efforts to determine the nature of the relationship as required by Article 16.
We hope you enjoyed the May 24 Issue of Ethics Exchange 2022 brought to you by the Greater Milwaukee Association of REALTORS® (GMAR). The GMAR created this newsletter, each issue dedicated to a unique issue, because the REALTOR® Code of Ethics, on which our industry is built, is the foundation of what it means to be a REALTOR®.
Your proactive support of the Code of Ethics will assure your fellow REALTORS®, as well as members of the public, that every member of GMAR operates under the highest ethical standards.
Questions, comments or concerns regarding this issue can be directed to
Scott Bush at the GMAR Office (414-778-4929 or [email protected]).