Marin/Sonoma CCL Newsletter


March 9, 2026

View as Webpage (or if images don't appear)

Pop Quiz:

Which of these 10 goals would be addressed by a fully refunded, predictably rising carbon fee, dividend and border carbon adjustment -- i.e. taking responsibility for our waste products? (Hint: See the Economists' Statement below.)


The new Climate and Democracy Discussion Group (CDDG)

hosted its first guest lecture on February 18 with

Dr. Benjamin D. Santer, Ph.D.

Former atmospheric scientist, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, IPCC author, now Professor at East Anglia University in the U.K.


"Year One of Trump Two: What Climate Science has Lost, is Losing and How Climate Advocacy Moves Forward"

You can now watch it.


Join the next CDDG meeting on

Weds, March 18 at 5 PM here




Most of the info Dr. Santer presents is public, but seeing it in one package is shocking and infuriating. And for him, it's personal.


Take an hour to hear from one of the world's most articulate climate scientists, one who's been deep in the trenches of the epic battle to tell the truth, and now, to save American climate science.


Watch it here.


And here are the Cliff notes from his talk

(There will be no quiz.)

You can read more from Dr. Santer here:

DOE climate report ‘demonstrably incorrect’, say leading scientists in new analysis


Letter to Donald J. Trump


Interview with Carbon Brief


Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists


CDDG's discussion site can be found on Reddit. For help getting connected, contact sethhead@comcast.net


The Marin and Sonoma CCL Chapters invite you to their monthly meeting,

Saturday, March 14 at 9 AM PT here.


We'll discuss our upcoming Earth Day messaging around carbon pricing and how California CCL members are working to extend and improve it in California. We'll also discuss the messages in Dr. Santer's presentation and what we as citizens can do about them. The new Carbon Pricing Action Team will be of interest (see below.) There will be time for sharing personal observations about the alarming state of the world and our role as citizens.



Then, at 10 AM PT, join National's monthly meeting here. 



Considering CCL's eternal focus on how best to communicate the dangers and solutions to the climate crisis, this should be most interesting.


Marija Verner is the Digital Education Manager and Research Specialist at the Yale Program on Climate Change Communication. She studies how people around the world understand, experience, and respond to climate change and she co-leads the design and instruction of a professional education program in strategic climate communication for global audiences.

Trump sidelines climate contrarians in science rollback

February 13, 2026


[Well, well. After all the drama and hoopla (see previous newsletters) over the team of climate skeptics illegally hired to write a scurrilous, incompetent report challenging decades of established climate science in order to justify the EPA's repeal of the "Endangerment Finding," the Trump administration has apparently decided to jettison them in favor of a different strategy. The benighted report, however, is still up on the DOE website.]


"For all of the administration’s public mockery of climate change, which Trump calls a “hoax,” it appears EPA and White House are unwilling to risk a court battle over climate science and instead will make a regulatory argument. A final version of the rule confirmed EPA would not rely on the DOE report “for any aspect of this final action.”


"It’s an important subplot in the Trump administration’s efforts to roll back climate regulations, and it provides a silver lining perhaps for climate activists and scientists who are angry over EPA’s decision to abandon a principle that has stood since 2009."


“They would have been obliterated in court,” said Andrew Dessler, a climate scientist at Texas A&M University who helped organize a 450-page rebuttal to the climate contrarian report. “This is the gold standard of climate skepticism and if this is the best they can do, then they’ve proven how robust climate science actually is.”


Read on!



Carbon Fee, Dividend and Border Adjustment still lives.


This is where CCL started, and it's still the best policy, especially now that the E.U. has imposed a carbon border adjustment which should prompt the U.S. to enact its own carbon price. Since the climate crisis is the result of a huge market failure, ("externalizing" the true social costs of the product -- their enormous environmental damages -- thus distorting normal market functioning), we should listen to the experts in the field: the economists, the professionals who study markets. See how many of the 3,649 signers you recognize here.

Economists’ Statement on Carbon Dividends



Global climate change is a serious problem calling for immediate national action. Guided by sound economic principles, we are united in the following policy recommendations.


I.          A carbon tax offers the most cost-effective lever to reduce carbon emissions at the scale and speed that is necessary. By correcting a well-known market failure, a carbon tax will send a powerful price signal that harnesses the invisible hand of the marketplace to steer economic actors towards a low-carbon future.


II.         A carbon tax should increase every year until emissions reductions goals are met and be revenue neutral to avoid debates over the size of government. A consistently rising carbon price will encourage technological innovation and large-scale infrastructure development. It will also accelerate the diffusion of carbon-efficient goods and services.


III.        A sufficiently robust and gradually rising carbon tax will replace the need for various carbon regulations that are less efficient. Substituting a price signal for cumbersome regulations will promote economic growth and provide the regulatory certainty companies need for long- term investment in clean-energy alternatives.


IV.        To prevent carbon leakage and to protect U.S. competitiveness, a border carbon adjustment system should be established. This system would enhance the competitiveness of American firms that are more energy-efficient than their global competitors. It would also create an incentive for other nations to adopt similar carbon pricing.


V.         To maximize the fairness and political viability of a rising carbon tax, all the revenue should be returned directly to U.S. citizens through equal lump-sum rebates. The majority of American families, including the most vulnerable, will benefit financially by receiving more in “carbon dividends” than they pay in increased energy prices.


Now that you've read what the experts recommend, here again is Marin CCL's Jonathan Marshall's summary of why a carbon fee and dividend can get the job done. Download it here.


Those wishing to get more involved can join the new Carbon Pricing Action Team on Community. Next meeting, March 25 at 10 AM PT here.

Actionable Intelligence: March 28:

CCL's motto from the start has been "Our solution to climate change: Democracy," now threatened as never before. No matter your political affiliation, this is a serious issue for all Americans who value our history and Constitution. Check out how you can participate (as an individual patriot, not as CCL) with millions of your fellow Americans on March 28. Use your voice before it's too late. Find out more here. 


You're invited, but... 

This is how one behaves inside The Capitol:

Make an appointment. Business attire recommended. Bring nothing that even looks like a weapon. 

Long live democracy.



Earth


Prepared by Peter G. Joseph, M.D. 

Peter.Joseph@cclvolunteer.org

Apologies for cross postings.

If you know someone who would like to be added to this distribution list, please suggest they join Marin or Sonoma CCL, or if not in this area, contact me.