Resolution
The EEOC filed a suit against Dollar General, claiming the company failed to accommodate Atkins, then fired her for her disability. The 6th Circuit reaffirmed a lower court’s ruling and sided with Atkins.
The court said Atkins never would’ve taken juice from the store if she was permitted to have her own. She never should’ve been fired for violating the grazing policy.
The court went on to say that when the company denied Atkins’ request to keep juice at her register, it didn’t go through the interactive process with her to find another accommodation for her disability.
“The employer had a duty to explore the nature of the employee’s limitations and what types of accommodations could be made, but the store manager categorically denied Atkins’ request, failed to explore any alternatives and never relayed the matter to a superior.”
BEST SOLUTION:
Call Alternative HRD!
Most employers would be happy to deal with an accommodation request that was as simple as keeping a bottle of juice nearby. But with this company refusing to bend its rules about eating or drinking on the job, it resulted in a costly legal battle and payout.
A little flexibility with company policies would’ve gone a long way. Now, Dollar General owes Atkins $725,000. That is much more than the cost of two bottles of orange juice!
Do you have questions on how to properly deal with ADA situations? We can help you navigate through the process and help you avoid a costly legal battle. Give Alternative HRD a call today at 605.335.8198!