Edition #21
May 15, 2020
HSC COVID-19 Fast Response Team
We are here to help!

In these uncertain times with multimedia channels reporting conflicting and sometimes incorrect information, our firm is working to add clarity to this situation by providing new and verified information as it becomes available to us. We have also set up a Coronavirus Resource Center on our website for ongoing information. 

In addition, we have created the HSC COVID-19 Fast Response Team to serve our clients in addressing the difficult decisions they are being faced with on a daily basis. This dedicated multi-disciplinary team consists of our tax, payroll, HR, capital markets and accounting professionals. 

If you have questions or would like to speak with this team please contact your HSC team member or Kyle Wininger, CPA, CICA, CVA, CFE at kwininger@hsccpa.com
SBA Releases New Guidance on the Topic of FAQ31 with FAQ46 - UPDATED

UPDATE to Memo regarding FAQ46
The Safe Harbor date that expired 5/14/2020 has been extended to Monday 5/18/2020
47. Question: The SBA interim final rule posted on May 8, 2020 provided that any borrower
who applied for a PPP loan and repays the loan in full by May 14, 2020 will be deemed
by SBA to have made the required certification concerning the necessity of the loan
request in good faith. Is it possible for a borrower to obtain an extension of the May 14,
2020 repayment date?
Answer: Yes, SBA is extending the repayment date for this Safe Harbor to May 18,
2020, to give borrowers an opportunity to review and consider FAQ46. Borrowers do
not need to apply for this extension. This extension will be promptly implemented
through a revision to the SBA's interim final rule providing the Safe Harbor.

Original post from May 13, 2020

The SBA released new guidance today on the topic of FAQ31 with FAQ46 (captured below in full). The guidance comes just one day before the 5/14/2020 deadline for PPP borrowers to return loan proceeds in full if they are concerned over the FAQ31 attestation language expansion.
This guidance has been anxiously awaited by all borrowers, but particularly by those with loans in excess of $2 million which will be subject to mandatory audits previously announced by the Treasury Secretary. In addition, many borrowers are well underway with expending their loan proceeds on approved uses including staffing decisions based on the receipt of the PPP loan.
Loan Amounts under $2 million  
This new guidance has some very positive outcomes for most borrowers. Primarily, if the loan amount is less than $2 million (when taking into account affiliation rules of related companies that may have received separate loans), the borrower(s) is/are automatically granted Safe Harbor in regards to the expanded attestation question in FAQ31. In other words, borrowers no longer need take into account access to other sources of liquidity or consider the detrimental impacts to the business of using this liquidity. This will provide a sigh of relief for most small businesses that received these loans.
Loan Amounts over $2 million  
It has been noted that over 25,000 borrowers nationwide received loans over the $2 million threshold. These borrowers may still seek Safe Harbor if they return the loan by tomorrow (5/14/2020), but for most that elect to keep the loan, they will still be subject to a mandatory audit. The SBA noted that if borrowers choose not to seek Safe Harbor they may still have a case for keeping the loan proceeds.
It is unclear if this SBA audit is to occur within the 60 days after the borrower provides the necessary support to request loan forgiveness (as is provided for within the Cares Act) or some period much longer. Assuming it is within 60 days, the first test will be to determine if the borrower is eligible for any forgiveness at all, under the expanded attestation in FAQ31 and now FAQ46. If the SBA deems that the borrower fails this test, then this new guidance below indicates that the SBA will not "pursue administrative enforcement or referrals to other agencies" so long as the loan is paid back upon receiving notice from the SBA of this determination. In addition, the Bank is still entitled to its SBA guarantee of the loan.
If it is determined that the borrower is not eligible for forgiveness, this determination would occur after the covered period is over. For borrowers who took large loans to maintain or rebuild payrolls and who may have already spent all or most of the loan proceeds on approved expenses, the question is: how much time is there to pay the loan back? It is unclear at this time if it is due immediately upon SBA request or face "administrative enforcement" or whether the borrower would have the full 2 years to pay back the loan.
Even with this additional guidance, questions remain: Is the SBA trying to force borrowers with access to cash and available lines of credit larger than the PPP loans to use those funds to pay back the loans? Will the decision be a simple math equation in the audit or will the company-specific circumstances be the determining factor in deciding forgiveness? It is very unclear how the auditors will make this determination, but documentation of how the borrower meets the expanded attestation is as important as ever for these larger borrowers. Equally important may be the need to maintain access to liquidity in an amount of the PPP loan that was already spent. For those borrowers that do not have enough liquidity to pay back the PPP loans that they spent as intended, will they automatically pass this attestation test and be offered forgiveness? That remains to be seen.
Here is the FAQ46 from the guidance today, 5/13/2020
46. Question: How will SBA review borrowers' required good-faith certification concerning the necessity of their loan request?
Answer: When submitting a PPP application, all borrowers must certify in good faith that "[c]urrent economic uncertainty makes this loan request necessary to support the ongoing operations of the Applicant." SBA, in consultation with the Department of the Treasury, has determined that the following safe harbor will apply to SBA's review of PPP loans with respect to this issue: Any borrower that, together with its affiliates (20), received PPP loans with an original principal amount of less than $2 million will be deemed to have made the required certification concerning the necessity of the loan request in good faith.
SBA has determined that this safe harbor is appropriate because borrowers with loans below this threshold are generally less likely to have had access to adequate sources of liquidity in the current economic environment than borrowers that obtained larger loans. This safe harbor will also promote economic certainty as PPP borrowers with more limited resources endeavor to retain and rehire employees. In addition, given the large volume of PPP loans, this approach will enable SBA to conserve its finite audit resources and focus its reviews on larger loans, where the compliance effort may yield higher returns.
Importantly, borrowers with loans greater than $2 million that do not satisfy this safe harbor may still have an adequate basis for making the required good-faith certification, based on their individual circumstances in light of the language of the certification and SBA guidance. SBA has previously stated that all PPP loans in excess of $2 million, and other PPP loans as appropriate, will be subject to review by SBA for compliance with program requirements set forth in the PPP Interim Final Rules and in the Borrower Application Form.

If SBA determines in the course of its review that a borrower lacked an adequate basis for the required certification concerning the necessity of the loan request, SBA will seek repayment of the outstanding PPP loan balance and will inform the lender that the borrower is not eligible for loan forgiveness. If the borrower repays the loan after receiving notification from SBA, SBA will not pursue administrative enforcement or referrals to other agencies based on its determination with respect to the certification concerning necessity of the loan request. SBA's determination concerning the certification regarding the necessity of the loan request will not affect SBA's loan guarantee.

(20) For purposes of this safe harbor, a borrower must include its affiliates to the extent required under the interim final rule on affiliates, 85 FR 20817 (April 15, 2020).
(21) Question 46 published May 13, 2020.

Please contact Scott Touro, MBA at stouro@hsccpa.com with any questions. 
SBA Allows Increased PPP Loans to Partnerships, Extends Safe Harbor to 
May 18, 2020

The U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) issued a  new interim final rule 5/13/2020 which allows lenders to increase existing Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loans to partnerships and seasonal employers. An excerpt from the applicable section is provided below and the full interim final rule may be accessed here:

The ability to increase loans applies to partnerships who submitted their loans prior to April 14th because the guidance issued that date stated that the self-employment income of general active partners was now to be reported as a payroll cost, up to $100,000 annualized, on a PPP loan application filed by, or on behalf of, the partnership. This means that applications from partnerships made prior to April 14th were likely granted loans in amounts less than they would qualify for under the new guidance. Similarly, an interim final rule dated April 28th established an alternative criterion for calculating the maximum loan amount for PPP loans issued to seasonal employers.

The interim final rule issued 5/13/2020 as outlined below allows all PPP lenders to increase existing PPP loans to partnerships or seasonal employers to include appropriate amounts to cover partner compensation in accordance with the April 14th guidance.

Question: If a partnership received a PPP loan that did not include any compensation for its partners, can the loan amount be increased to include partner compensation?

Answer: Yes. If a partnership received a PPP loan that only included amounts necessary for payroll costs of the partnership's employees and other eligible operating expenses, but did not include any amount for partner compensation, the lender may electronically submit a request through SBA's E-Tran Servicing site to increase the PPP loan amount to include appropriate partner compensation, even if the loan has been fully disbursed, provided that the lender's first SBA Form 1502 report to SBA on the PPP loan has not been submitted.

After the initial SBA Form 1502 report on the PPP loan has been submitted to SBA, or after the date the first SBA Form 1502 was required to be submitted to SBA, the loan cannot be increased. In no event can the increased loan amount exceed the maximum loan amount allowed under the PPP Program, which is $10 million for an individual borrower or $20 million for a corporate group. Additionally, the borrower must provide the lender with required documentation to support the calculation of the increase.

The interim final rule posted on April 14, 2020, describes how partnerships, rather than individual partners are eligible for a PPP loan. The interim final rule further explained that the self-employment income of general active partners could be reported as a payroll cost, up to $100,000 annualized, on a PPP loan application filed by or on behalf of the partnership. Guidance describing how to calculate partnership PPP loan amounts and defining the self-employment income of partners was posted on April 24, 2020.

Please contact Scott Touro, MBA at stouro@hsccpa.com with any questions. 
Keeping Other Members of Your Team Informed

If you would like other members of your team to begin receiving this communication, please forward to each individual and they can subscribe here or email Leslie Wight at lwight@hsccpa.com and she will add them to the communications.

Disclaimer: The information contained in this email is for general guidance on matters of interest only. The publication does not, and is not, intended to provide legal, tax or accounting advice.  
Internal Revenue Service rules require us to inform you that this communication may be deemed a solicitation to provide tax services. This communication is being sent to individuals who have subscribed to receive it or who we believe would have an interest in the topics discussed.  

RSM US Alliance provides its members with access to resources of RSM US LLP. RSM US Alliance member firms are separate and independent businesses and legal entities that are responsible for their own acts and omissions, and each are separate and independent from RSM US LLP. RSM US LLP is the U.S. member firm of RSM International, a global network of independent audit, tax, and consulting firms. Members of RSM US Alliance have access to RSM International resources through RSM US LLP but are not member firm
s of RSM International. Visit rsmus.com/about us for more information regarding RSM US LLP and RSM International. The RSMâ„¢ logo is used under license by RSM US LLP. RSM US Alliance products and services ar proprietary to RSM U  S LLP.
Harding, Shymanski & Company, P.S.C.
800.880.7800 | info@hsccpa.com  | www.hsccpa.com