|
Block Grants and Time Limits Would Wreak Havoc on Low-Income Tenants and Destabilize the Housing Market
The President's budget proposes to combine all programs that directly house low-income tenants and serve individuals experiencing homelessness into two block grants and impose two-year limits on assistance. The administration argues that this approach would, "strip away bureaucracy and allow federal funds to flow more efficiently," but in reality, it would destroy the existing housing safety net and create fiscal crises for states.
Rental Assistance Programs
President Trump proposes rolling the Section 8 Tenant and Project Based Voucher Programs, Public Housing, and Housing for the Elderly and Disabled into one block grant program and cutting them by over $30 billion - or almost half. This could force termination of assistance in these fully subscribed programs. The President further proposes two-year time limits on assistance for non-elderly or disabled households.
Half a million households throughout the state are stably housed through these federal programs. In FY24, over $8.7 billion was obligated to NY for these programs - 15 percent of the national appropriation. NYHC estimates under this proposal, New York would only receive about $4.8 billion to continue serving these households - a 46 percent cut. This would leave state and local governments to make up the $4 billion difference, an amount that far exceeds available resources. This estimate is based on New York's historic share, but the budget request gives the Secretary major discretion in determining formula language for the new program.
Time Limits on Rental Assistance
On top of already steep funding cuts, the President's proposal instructs the HUD Secretary to "establish program requirements to incentivize self-sufficiency, as appropriate, including but not limited to two-year time limits on assistance for households in which neither the elderly or persons with disabilities reside."
Imposing time limits on low-income Americans will create homelessness rather than self sufficiency. 24% of HUD-assisted people in New York are elderly and 30% are disabled. Three quarters of non-disabled households are working but they are earning too little to afford market rent. There is simply a shortage of rental housing affordable to low income renters in New York and in most states.
In New York, the average income for households receiving HUD assistance is about $22,000, enough to afford $550 in rent. However, the HUD determined Fair Market Rent (FMR) for a two-bedroom in the New York Metro Area is $2,752. The average HUD assisted household would need to increase their income 5X to afford that rent. All of these factors lead to an average tenure of 15 years on HUD assistance but under the President's proposal, if some of these households do not find a way to quadruple their income in two years, they would be evicted. Forcing families into a cycle of homelessness sabotages self sufficiency rather than promotes it.
Further analysis is needed to determine how many assisted households would be exempt from time limits but up to 200k households could be forced to move after two years of assistance, flooding housing courts and homeless shelters.
Impact on NYCHA
Through various programs, NYCHA serves over half a million residents - the equivalent of a large city - and its preservation strategy is dependent on having a reliable federal partner. PACT is slated to convert 62,000 apartments; 24,584 apartments have already converted since the program’s inception. Out of the remaining 37,416 apartments, 14,082 apartments at 48 developments are in active planning and are slated for comprehensive repairs and upgrades in the upcoming months and years. This successful preservation strategy is at risk with deep cuts in a proposed rental assistance block grant.
The Preservation Trust is authorized to convert 25,000 apartments, and three developments have already voted to participate in it. Without federal rental assistance, NYCHA cannot reasonably plan a pipeline for either preservation strategy.
NYCHA’s traditional Section 9 public housing is also at risk with a proposal from the Trump Administration to eliminate public housing capital funding entirely. This funding is used to make repairs and capital upgrades to roofs, facades, elevators, heating plants, and security systems, as well as lead and mold remediation and apartment upgrades, to comply with progress goals set in the federal monitor agreement.
Additionally, time limits would upend housing stability for thousands of families who live in public housing for 26 years on average.
|