Showed up with Pride, overcame with joy

Hudson joined the growing number of small cities and communities celebrating Pride on Saturday, June 17.

Read more

Coming to your community?
Sodom, Gomorrah and Hudson?
Unfortunately, as we warned could happen, the drag queen story time with children took place at the Hudson "Pride" Fest, even though they took it off the public schedule. The police officer standing guard is not in the Hudson Star Observer picture. Why? The Hudson Police Department also stated on their Facebook: "We were happy to be a part of the first annual Hudson Valley Pride festival. Hudson WI Pride" (sic)

A similar photo of a police officer standing "guard" has since been removed from the HPD's Facebook page. We have to ask ourselves: Who is he protecting? Compare the pictures.
Click below for a full list
Vendors/Sponsors/Individuals of the Pride Fest
Banner Vendors/Sponsors/Booths/Individuals (may not be a complete list)

Waystone Coffee Co.
Andre and Rachel Perkins
Trish and Duane Johnson
Lynette and Kurt Beinlich
Tyler Beinlich
CMK Energy
Jen Marty
Michelle Ioppolo
Susan Kattas
Tricia Christiansen
Pete and Laura Foster
Paulette Mergendahl
Hudson Hospital & Clinic
Hudson Physicians
Aaron Nelson
Fine Arts Council, New Richmond, WI
Megan, Tony, Hudson Green
The Bruch Family
The Purple Tree
Bennett's Chop & Railhouse
St. Croix County Democrats
Lana and Roy Sjoberg
Dick's Bar and Grill
Hudson Flower Shop
Bridget Mayer
What do Disney, Target, Bud Light and many other “woke” corporations have in common? These corporations and others are enduring consumer boycotts with billions of dollars in profit losses. Could it be that We the People have finally had enough of the sexual deviancy that is LGBTQRSTUVWXYZ?  Chest binders? Drag queens? Penis tuckers? Gender changes? Satanic designer promoting “homophobe headrest” guillotine jewelry pins? 

Parents are confronting school boards throughout the nation, demanding their children be protected against pornography. Some of these parents are not even allowed to read out loud the grade school books loaded with pornography, yet, their children have access and are indoctrinated. Parents in North Hollywood are keeping their elementary children home from a pride event saying "Keep your kids home and innocent." Once seen and heard, pornography cannot be unseen and unheard.
On June 17, Hudson “Pride” Co is having an event at the Hudson (Wisconsin) Lakefront, with the promotion of the Hudson Chamber of Commerce. When questioned as to whether or not this event will have pornography available to children, either in written or drag queen form, there was no answer. Hudson Pride Co. has had fundraisers with drag queens in Minnesota, with names like “Slaymantha Fox, Daiquiri Defile” and other vile sexual deviants.  What are they bringing to Hudson?

Will your pastor try to save souls from this deviant lifestyle? Can we save the children? Will we even try? We will all be held accountable. Please attend and take pictures and videos. Pray for them all!

Hudson Area Biblical pastors--Where are you?
Sodom, Gomorrah and Hudson?

St. Croix County Sheriff's Department, Sheriff Scott Knudson email: [email protected], 715-386-4701 or 911

Hudson Police Department: Chief of Police Geoff Willems, email: [email protected], 715-386-4273

City of Hudson Mayor Rich O'Connor: [email protected];
phone 715-716-5723; City of Hudson Common Council members:

Hudson Chamber of Commerce: [email protected] 715-386-8411

Hudson Pride Co.: email: [email protected] Facebook; web site: According to the Hudson Chamber of Commerce, their contact information is 1786 Willow Ct. E., White Bear Lake, MN 55110.


948.12 Possession of child pornography.
(1m) Whoever possesses, or accesses in any way with the intent to view, any undeveloped film, photographic negative, photograph, motion picture, videotape, or other recording of a child engaged in sexually explicit conduct under all of the following circumstances may be penalized under sub. (3):
(a) The person knows that he or she possesses or has accessed the material.
(b) The person knows, or reasonably should know, that the material that is possessed or accessed contains depictions of sexually explicit conduct.
(c) The person knows or reasonably should know that the child depicted in the material who is engaged in sexually explicit conduct has not attained the age of 18 years.
(2m) Whoever exhibits or plays a recording of a child engaged in sexually explicit conduct, if all of the following apply, may be penalized under sub. (3):
(a) The person knows that he or she has exhibited or played the recording.
(b) Before the person exhibited or played the recording, he or she knew the character and content of the sexually explicit conduct.
(c) Before the person exhibited or played the recording, he or she knew or reasonably should have known that the child engaged in sexually explicit conduct had not attained the age of 18 years.
(3) (a) Except as provided in par. (b), a person who violates sub. (1m) or (2m) is guilty of a Class D felony.
(b) A person who violates sub. (1m) or (2m) is guilty of a Class I felony if the person is under 18 years of age when the offense occurs.
A violation of this section must be based on the content of the photograph and how it was produced. Evidence of the location and manner of storing the photo are not properly considered. State v. A.H., 211 Wis. 2d 561566 N.W.2d 858 (Ct. App. 1997), 96-2311.
For purposes of multiplicity analysis, each image possessed can be prosecuted separately. Prosecution is not based upon the medium of reproduction. Multiple punishment is appropriate for a defendant who compiled and stored multiple images over time. State v. Multaler, 2002 WI 35252 Wis. 2d 54643 N.W.2d 43700-1846.
Criminalizing child pornography presents the risk of self-censorship of constitutionally protected material. Criminal responsibility may not be imposed without some element of scienter, the degree of knowledge that makes a person legally responsible for the consequences of his or her act or omission. In this section, “reasonably should know" is less than actual knowledge but still requires more than the standard used in civil negligence actions, which is constitutionally sufficient. State v. Schaefer, 2003 WI App 164266 Wis. 2d 719668 N.W.2d 76001-2691.
There was sufficient evidence in the record to demonstrate that the defendant knowingly possessed the child pornography images on his computer because he repeatedly visited child pornography Web sites, clicked on thumbnail images to create larger pictures for viewing, accessed five images twice, and saved at least one image to his personal folder. State v. Lindgren, 2004 WI App 159275 Wis. 2d 851687 N.W.2d 6003-1868.
Sub. (1m) forbids only depictions of real children engaged in sexually explicit activity. Sub. (1m) (c) specifies that to be convicted under the statute, the person possessing the pornography must know or have reason to know that the child engaged in sexually explicit conduct has not attained the age of 18 years. This element does not speak of depictions at all, but rather of a child who has not attained the age of 18 years. State v. Van Buren, 2008 WI App 26307 Wis. 2d 447746 N.W.2d 54506-3025.
Sub. (1m) criminalizes the knowing possession of any photograph of a child engaging in sexually explicit conduct. Expert testimony or other evidence to establish the reality of apparently real photographs is not required. When there has been no evidence adduced that the photographs are anything other than what they appear to be, the photographs themselves are sufficient evidence of the reality of what they depict. State v. Van Buren, 2008 WI App 26307 Wis. 2d 447746 N.W.2d 54506-3025.
Individuals who purposely view digital images of child pornography on the Internet, even though the images are not found in the person's computer hard drive, nonetheless knowingly possess those images in violation of sub. (1m). An individual knowingly possesses child pornography when he or she affirmatively pulls up images of child pornography on the Internet and views those images knowing that they contain child pornography. Whether the proof is hard drive evidence or something else should not matter. State v. Mercer, 2010 WI App 47324 Wis. 2d 506782 N.W.2d 12508-1763.

Gender Confusion resources


A Label That Sticks by Paul Scalia

“…In recent years, society has brought social and legislative approval to all types of sexual relationships that used to be considered sinful. Since the biblical vision of what it means to be human tells us that not every friendship or love can be expressed in sexual relations, the church’s teaching on these issues is now evidence of intolerance for what the civil law upholds and even imposes. What was once a request to live and let live has now become a demand for approval. The “ruling class,” those who shape public opinion in politics, in education, in communications, in entertainment, is using the civil law to impose its own form of morality on everyone. We are told that, even in marriage itself, there is no difference between men and women, although nature and our very bodies clearly evidence that men and women are not interchangeable at will in forming a family. Nevertheless, those who do not conform to the official religion, we are warned, place their citizenship in danger….”
If you would like to donate to the Citizens for the St. Croix Valley, please mail your donation to PO Box 144, Star Prairie, WI 54026. Providing truthful information is our goal. If that's your goal, please consider helping us out. Thank you.
All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. Edmund Burke
Citizens for the St. Croix Valley | Email | Website