You're welcome to read for free, but you can chip in for the cost of the newsletter by clicking here and filling in the amount of your choice. You don't need a PayPal account; the link lets you use a credit card. If you have trouble, let me know. Or you can Venmo @Steven-Sheffey (if it asks, last four phone digits are 9479).

Friends,

It’s not often that we experience the real-time failure of a political philosophy, but thousands of Americans are paying with their lives for the failure of Republicanism. We need a strong, active central government to organize the efficient distribution of vaccines. Millions of Americans need financial help from the government. The free market cannot handle this crisis any more than the free market could land a man on the moon, but Republicans refuse to pass legislation we need because they can't accept that government exists to help us.

Republicans didn't mind that their tax cut for the wealthy added $1 trillion to the deficit, nor did they ask how we'd pay for a $740 billion defense budget. But $2,000 in COVID relief for every American? That's where the GOP draws the line.

Republicans think government exists only to safeguard and increase their wealth, and since the top 1% isn’t exactly a governing majority, they divide us by telling us that “others”: immigrants, people of color, non-Christians--anyone who doesn’t look like they do--are to blame for the suffering caused by GOP polices. And sometimes it works, especially when combined with emotional issues like abortion and guns.

Ronald Reagan was wrong. The nine most terrifying words in the English language are not “I’m from the government and I’m here to help.” The nine most terrifying words in the English language are “I’m Mitch McConnell and I control the U.S. Senate.” That will change on January 5 if Georgia elects Jon Ossoff and Rev. Raphael Warnock in its Senate runoff elections.

The Biden administration will be pro-Israel. Biden has a longer and stronger record on Israel than any incoming president in history. We don't need to guess what his plans are; he's told us. In the last Congress, Democrats overwhelmingly supported Israel and opposed antisemitism, and that won't change. Democrats adopted a platform in 2020 that provides a working definition of what it means to be pro-Israel (see page 91).

The U.S.-Israel relationship is grounded in shared foreign policy interests and shared values. “Shared” does not mean identical, which is why every administration, from Truman to Trump, has at times publicly disagreed with Israel. The U.S.-Israel bond is, as President Obama often said, “unbreakable,”not because the two nations always agree, but because our bonds are stronger than the inevitable disagreements between leaders and governments of allies. Pro-Israel means supporting the values and interests that bind the U.S. and Israel and speaking out when either country weakens those foundations.

Pro-Israel is not necessarily pro-Bibi, nor is the most hawkish or right-wing view necessarily the pro-Israel view. In his farewell column last week, Chemi Shalev wrote that "American Jews who still care about Israel might rethink whether their top priority is to blindly back the policies of whatever government is in power there or to make sure their cherished values aren’t snuffed out in Israel as well."

Zionism expresses "the natural right of the Jewish people to be masters of their own fate, like all other nations, in their own sovereign State." Zionism does not require the rejection of the Palestinian national identity, nor does it require Jewish control of the entire Jewish homeland: Israel accepted U.N. Resolution 181, which established an Arab state in what is now called the West Bank and put Jerusalem under international administration. The Arabs, not the Zionists, rejected partition, and Zionism needs partition (two states) today for the same reason Zionism needed it then.

Former Israeli Prime Minister and Defense Minister Ehud Barak, the most decorated soldier in Israel's history, wrote in My Country, My Life: Fighting for Israel Searching for Peace that the ultimate aim of Zionism was "not to secure every inch of the Land of Israel: it was to redeem, reinvigorate, and rededicate themselves to the People of Israel." Those who support, or would turn a blind eye toward, unilateral or creeping annexation forget this lesson.

When asked in 1998 how his life might have turned out if he had been born a Palestinian, Barak replied "At some stage, I would have entered into one of the terror organizations and fought from there." Imagine if a Democrat said that.

Barak was clear that he abhors terrorism, but he "simply answered as honestly as I could, trying to imagine I'd been one of the Palestinian babies in Wadi Khaweret, yet with the same mind and approach to life that had defined me as an Israeli." That's called empathy, and that explains why there is no contradiction between sympathizing with the plight of the Palestinians while still supporting Israel's safety and security.

Barak cited Moshe Dayan's famous 1956 eulogy for Roi Rotberg, who was murdered by Arab terrorists. Dayan said that "For eight years, [the Palestinians] have been sitting in the refugee camps of Gaza, while before their eyes we have been transforming the lands and villages where their fathers dwelt." Sounds like something you'd expect a naive lefty to say, but this is Moshe Dayan speaking in 1956, quoted by Ehud Barak in 2018.

Zionism means rejecting galut mentality. "Galut" is the Hebrew word for diaspora (exile). Barak writes that Netanyahu's refusal to take risks to disentangle Israel from Palestinians on the West Bank is "living proof of the old saying that it's easier to take Jews out of the galut, than take the galut out of the Jews." He could have been writing about certain Americans who move to Israel and use their fluency in English and their status as Israelis to validate the right-wing politics they took with them from America.

Barak believes that as long as the occupation is an interim arrangement with the ultimate goal of a political resolution of the conflict with the Palestinians, treating Jewish settlers differently from Palestinians in the West Bank, legally and politically, is defensible. "But under a one-state vision, it will become harder and harder to rebut comparisons made with the old South Africa."

Former prime ministers Ehud Olmert, and Yitzhak Rabin(who compared settlements to cancer) have also warned that Israel risks becoming an apartheid state (their words) if it does not achieve a two-state solution. Yet some Republicans blame Black American leaders for seeing what Barak, Olmert, and Rabin saw and speaking out for the values shared by the U.S. and Israel--even in the breach, and even while continuing to support the U.S.-Israel relationship.

Some pro-Israel groups seem infatuated with an Israel that never was, except perhaps on the pages of Leon Uris's Exodus, and they want Israel portrayed as they imagine it, not as it is. They are doing more harm than they realize--as Chemi Shalev wrote, "One of the main reasons for the growing disillusionment of American Jews, especially the younger generation, is the unbearable discrepancy between the idyllic Israel they were sold and their realization of reality on the ground."

The section of President Obama's memoir on Israel is a powerful statement of support for Israel in part because it shows how we can support Israel without ignoring unpleasant facts.

Effective pro-Israel requires a mature understanding and love for the real Israel, wonders, flaws, and all, grounded in shared values, not right-wing talking points, and we should support candidates who share and model that understanding.

Last week's newsletter.

ICYMI. Rev. Raphael Warnock is pro-Israel.

Tweet of the Week. Steve Sheffey (and not just because it's my newsletter).

Idiot of the Year, 2020. Sen. Kelly L0effler (R-GA). The new year is only three days old, but a dozen (and counting) Republican senators have already staked a strong claim for the 2021 title. Mitt Romney is right.

Video Clip of the Week. Chariots of Fire.

Political Clip of the Week. Jon Ossoff on Fox News rolling live (watch the first minute for the free campaign ad, watch the second minute for the mic drop).

Books and Movies of 2020. My list. Let me know yours.

Facebook Post of the Week. Joe Walsh.

I guess this is a good problem to have: This list is now so large that while many people are local, even more live outside the Chicago area and have no interest in local news. If you want to be on a list that will receive infrequent newsletters about local issues and events, reply to this email and I'll add you.

Did someone forward this newsletter to you? Why not subscribe? It's free! Just click here. 

Donations are welcome (because this costs money to send). If you'd like to chip in, click here and fill in the amount of your choice. You don't need a PayPal account; the link allows you to use a credit card. If you'd rather send a check, please reply and I'll send you mailing information (please do NOT send checks to the P.O. Box). Venmo to @Steven-Sheffey (last four 9479) is fine too.

You’re reading this. So are other influentials. If you want the right people to know about your candidate, cause, or event, reply to this email to discuss your ad.

The Fine Print: This newsletter usually runs on Sunday mornings. Unless stated otherwise, my views do not necessarily reflect the views of any candidates or organizations that I support or am associated with. I reserve the right to change my mind as I learn more. Intelligent, well-informed people may disagree with me; read opposing views and decide for yourself. A link to an article doesn't mean that I agree with everything its author has ever said or that I even agree with everything in the article; it means that the article supports or elaborates on the point I was making. I take pride in accurately reporting the facts on which I base my opinions. Tell me if you spot any inaccuracies, typos, or other mistakes so that I can correct them in the next newsletter (and give you credit if you want it). Advertisements reflect the views of the advertisers, not necessarily of me, and advertisers are solely responsible for the content of their advertisements. I read, value, and encourage replies to my newsletters, but I don't always have time to acknowledge replies or to engage in one-on-one discussion. Don't expect a reply if your message is uncivil or if it's clear from your message that you haven't read the newsletter or clicked on the relevant links. © 2021 Steve Sheffey. All rights reserved.