cVolume 9, Issue 3│January 24, 2025

Facebook  Instagram  Linkedin  

ASSOCIATION NEWS

Register here

East Peoria CE Is One Week Away! 📢


*All registrations received after Wednesday, January 29 will be considered on-site and will incur a $25 on-site registration fee.

Registration is still open for the 2025 Winter CE Series. All courses are 6 hours TQ (test included in registration). Courses run from 9am - 4pm CT.

February 2, 2025

Location: Holiday Inn & Suites // East Peoria, IL

Speaker: Mohammad Rafieetary, OD

Course: "Exploring the Retina: Diagnostic Tools, Case Presentation, and Clinical Management"


February 23, 2025

Location: DoubleTree by Hilton Chicago-Alsip // Alsip, IL

Speaker: Chris Borgman, OD

Course: "Unlocking Diagnostic Challenges: A Journey Through Vision Loss, Retinal Brainteasers, Pituitary Insights, and OCT Rounds"


March 2, 2025

Location: Westin Chicago North Shore // Wheeling, IL

Speaker: Mile Brujic, OD

Course: "Anterior Segment Assault: Updates and New Strategies for Patient Management"

IOA/AOA Membership Renewal

 

2025 membership invoices have been mailed out, members should begin receiving invoices! Those on a recurring monthly or quarterly payment do not need to respond as your payment schedule will be automatically renewed.


Retiring soon? Don't forget to let us know!


2025 Dues Contest - Win A FREE Annual Meeting Registration!



Pay membership dues in full by January 31 and be entered into a drawing to win FREE registration to the 2025 IOA Annual Meeting in Schaumburg, Illinois! This includes your registration for the meeting and all CE testing fees associated with your registration but does not include hotel reservations.

Pay dues online

2025 Labor Law Posters Now Available!


IOA has compiled the most recent Labor Law posters for both Federal and Illinois. Click the large photos below to download a PDF copy of the poster to send to your local printer. The poster will be 36"x 48". If you would like to print each document individually yourself, please use the links below to download each document individually.

Labor law posters

MEMBER NEWS




IOA member Chelsey Moore, OD joins the Women In Optometry advisory board and will serve from 2025-2027. Congratulations!


MEMBER BENEFITS

Medicare Fee Schedules:
Email Your Question Here
We want to hear from YOU!
Do you have a business question or a dilemma we can answer for you? Others may have the same inquiry. Ask away! We will answer your question in an upcoming issue.
(Don't worry, we won't include your name.)
Access the Labor Law Posters

Report illegal and unsafe contact lens sales to the FDA & FTC

MEMBER BENEFIT: Have a Billing and Coding Question?

Submit it to the experts at OBC Insurance Billing Specialists! Click here to submit your questions.


2/2- IOA Winter CE Series | East Peoria


2/4- Fox Valley Optometric Society Meeting & CE


2/23- IOA Winter CE Series | Alsip


3/2- IOA Winter CE Series | Wheeling

Report Vision Plan Abuses to the IOA



The IOA recognizes that Vision Care Plan Regulation Act constitutes a significant stride forward for optometry. However, it doesn't signal the conclusion of our efforts to champion fair contracting with vision plans. In the next few years, our members will be renewing and amending their contracts to reflect the changes in the new law. Throughout this process, we will gain valuable insight directly from our members regarding instances of vision plan abuses.


If you encounter vision plan abuses, we ask that you fill out the form below to report abuse. The IOA will collect this information to prevent further vision plan abuses on behalf of our members.

Vision Plan Abuse Reporting Form

ILLINOIS NEWS

Illinois Set to Receive Up To $154 Million In Settlement with Sackler Family, Purdue Pharma


Health News Illinois | By Ryan Voyles

January 23, 2025


Illinois would receive up to $154 million as part of a proposed $7.4 billion multi-state settlement with members of the Sackler family and their company, Purdue Pharma, over their role in the opioid crisis, Attorney General Kwame Raoul said Thursday.

 

The settlement, if approved by the court, would deliver funds over the next 15 years to participating states, local governments, affected individuals and other parties who have previously sued the Sacklers or Purdue.

 

Additionally, the settlement would end the Sacklers’ control of Purdue and prevent them from selling opioids in the United States.

 

“This settlement has been a long time coming, as it holds the Sacklers and Purdue accountable for their role in a deadly epidemic that continues to affect our country,” Raoul said in a statement. “This settlement is the result of a bipartisan national effort, and I remain committed to ensuring funding is equitably distributed across Illinois to help fund services that mitigate opioid addiction.”


Illinois, as well as 14 other states, accused Purdue and the Sackler family of inventing, manufacturing and aggressively marketing opioid products for decades, fueling waves of addiction and overdose deaths in Illinois and across the country.

 

A previous multistate settlement covering Purdue and the Sackler family would have required them to pay more than $5.5 billion. The U.S. Supreme Court invalidated the bankruptcy settlement last summer, holding that the Sackler family was not entitled to a blanket or automatic shield from liability. 

 

The new settlement increases the total amount, but reportedly adds a provision where claimants, including states, municipalities and individuals, would have to set aside as much as $800 million in an account akin to a legal defense fund for the billionaires to fight such cases.

 

Purdue said in a statement that a reorganization plan is in the work and that it is “extremely pleased that a new agreement has been reached that will deliver billions of dollars to compensate victims, abate the opioid crisis and deliver treatment and overdose rescue medicines that will save lives.”


The Sackler family could not be reached for comment.

 

Raoul’s office said Thursday’s tentative settlement is the latest in his office’s push to hold opioid manufacturers and distributors accountable. National investigations and litigation against the pharmaceutical industry over the opioid crisis have led to more than $50 billion in settlements, with Illinois’ share at approximately $1.4 billion.

 

It also comes as groups that are battling the opioid crisis have expressed frustration over Illinois’ speed and overall process of distributing funds from its legal settlements.

AOA NEWS

In Rural America, Opportunity for Optometry Amid Shortfall of Ophthalmologists


AOA | Staff

January 23, 2025


Patient access to eye care and care itself in rural America is jeopardized by the shortage of ophthalmologists, a new study suggests. AOA President Steven T. Reed, O.D., says optometry can help close the gap between the shrinking supply of ophthalmologists and the demand for care. By comparison, more than 99% of Americans live in counties with a doctor of optometry.


There are consequences for the shortage of ophthalmologists in rural America, such as inconvenience to patients and “negative outcomes,” a new study says. Optometry, though, is positively positioned to mitigate the shortcoming in care.

The study, “Geographic Distribution of US Ophthalmic Surgical Subspecialists,” was published Jan. 2 in JAMA Ophthalmology.


Its conclusions?

  • Percentages of rural surgeons have declined over time.
  • Female surgeons and recent medical school graduates are less likely to practice rurally.


The results suggest that the rural U.S. increasingly faces a shortage of ophthalmic subspecialty surgeons that impacts patient access to care, the study’s authors write.


“It has been established that limited access to ophthalmic care generates negative outcomes among rural or patients in underserved communities, including increased prevalence of visual impairment, diabetic retinopathy, and macular degeneration.


“As such, it is crucial that there is a rural ophthalmic subspecialist workforce available to meet rural patients’ ophthalmic needs,” they add.


AOA President Steven T. Reed, O.D., says a serious shortage of ophthalmologists can be avoided—given the number of highly trained and well-educated doctors of optometry.


“The distribution of doctors of optometry across rural America is a high-quality and effective answer to the shortage of ophthalmologists in rural areas,” Dr. Reed says. “State laws must be updated to allow optometrists to practice what they are taught for the benefit of patients across the country, particularly rural America.


“To provide effective care, ophthalmology subspecialists should solely focus on the niche care they provide rather than duplicating services provided by optometrists,” he says.

Continue reading

Optometry's Fund for Disaster Relief (OFDR) Is Accepting Applications for Grants


Optometry’s Fund for Disaster Relief has changed the lives of many optometrists and students by providing immediate financial relief for critical and urgent needs, such as food, clothing, shelter, and other infrastructure needs.


Disasters are unpredictable and can be life-altering; it is our goal to ensure that the fund is always poised and ready to help, so doctors can get back to doing what they do best.


Qualifying disasters include but are not limited to hurricanes, tornadoes, civil unrest, earthquakes, floods and fires. OFDR is available to aid doctors and students who have experienced property damage to their home or business due to a disaster situation.


In light of the Change Healthcare cyberattacks and the national impact it has had on health care, OFDR is also recognized the cybersecurity attack as an eligible disaster the spring of 2024, according to its current criteria. We hope this recognition addresses the needs of our AOA members as they maneuver this crisis.


To Apply:


Applying for a disaster relief grant is the first step to recovery. If you have recently experienced the effects of a catastrophic event, please follow these steps:


The OFDR Committee makes every effort to respond to your application within 5-7 business days. We appreciate your patience and quick response to any follow-up questions the committee has about your application.


*Please note that our fund is set up to cover property damage to an optometrist’s or student’s home or practice. Though we do not discount the significant impact of lost income, we cannot currently cover such a loss.


Check out the recent AOA news story on OFDR.


Thank you to Optometry Cares and OFDR for the grant. It allowed me to reorder the new glasses and contact lenses that burned in my office (due to the Hawaii wildfires) while awaiting pick-up by patients. Luckily, I was able to contact most of them and get their new addresses (mostly post-office boxes because all their homes burned) and mail them. A few were so anxious, they picked up their glasses at my home.” -Rae Nagahiro, O.D.


Optometry’s Fund for Disaster Relief has provided more than $1.3 million dollars in aid to more than 700 optometrists across the country.

More information

INDUSTRY NEWS

Vision Plans' Hidden Agenda


LA Times | By David Lazarus

January 2025


People tend to think of the vision plans offered by employers as being like any other health insurance. They’re not.


The reality is that vision plans, headed by market leaders VSP and EyeMed, are primarily discount programs intended at least in part to promote sales of eyewear affiliated with each company.


“The vision plans expect you to get patients in, get them out, sell them glasses,” said Myles Zakheim, an optometrist with offices in Brentwood, Beverly Hills and Hollywood. “Their goal is to push as much product as they possibly can.”


Other health insurers may steer patients to specific drugs, say, but that’s because they have sweetheart deals with the drugmakers, not because the insurers themselves manufacture the drugs.


“It’s an incredible conflict of interest,” said E. Dean Butler, who founded both EyeMed and LensCrafters but is no longer involved with either business. He currently works as an optical-industry consultant.


“The vision plans are manipulating the market for their own benefit,” Butler told me. “Optometrists have lost control of their own profession.”


Many optometrists and opticians say they feel squeezed by the vision plans.


They want to do right by patients. At the same time, they’re mindful that steering customers to particular frames can result in larger reimbursements — which the patient likely isn’t aware of.

“It’s been like this for a long time,” said Norm Steinberg, owner of City Eyes Optometry in Sherman Oaks. “The plans want people to buy their own frames.”


This is another aspect of how the eyewear industry is characterized by consolidation, self-interest and price-fixing, with the biggest players doing all they can to stifle or eliminate competition.


As I’ve previously reported, if you wear designer glasses, it’s likely you’re wearing frames made by a single company: EssilorLuxottica. The company’s owned and licensed brands include Armani, Brooks Bros., Burberry, Chanel, Oliver Peoples, Persol, Polo Ralph Lauren and Ray-Ban.

EssilorLuxottica also runs LensCrafters, Pearle Vision, Sears Optical, Sunglass Hut and Target Optical. And, yes, EyeMed Vision Care.


VSP, aka Vision Service Plan, owns Marchon Eyewear, which controls or holds licenses for Altair, Calvin Klein, Karl Lagerfeld, LaCoste, Nautica, Nine West, Nike and other brands.


VSP also is following EyeMed into the world of bricks-and-mortar retailing. The company said last week it soon will open three stores in Chicago to see how consumers respond.


It said Monday that it’s partnering with Maui Jim eyewear to offer special discounts as part of a program “designed to provide VSP network doctors with greater opportunity for more patient flow and increased revenue.”


Butler described to me a system by which the big vision plans try to influence where you shop and what you buy, in some cases by greasing the palms of optometrists and opticians to boost sales of their own products.


He said the plans often shortchange optometrists in reimbursing for eye exams, with payments as low as $50. This keeps optometrists focused on sales of high-priced frames and lenses to cover overhead and meet expenses.


Even then, there may be more going on than meets the eye.


Let’s say you’re a VSP member. Let’s say you’re interested in both a Calvin Klein frame and a similar pair of Ralph Lauren specs.


You may not know that Calvin Klein is affiliated with VSP. Ralph Lauren is affiliated with EyeMed. The optician will receive a larger reimbursement from VSP if he or she can get a plan member to buy a VSP-linked frame.


“Of course they’ll emphasize the Calvin Klein in that case,” Butler said. “They’ll make more money.”


Not much more, maybe a few bucks. But over time, that adds up.



If you’re like me, you’re probably reflecting at this moment on all the times an optometrist or optician said, “Those are totally you,” or words to that effect.


You’re probably wondering if the glasses were in fact less you and more them — that is, more for the store’s benefit than your own.


I spoke with more than a dozen optometrists and opticians. They told me that Rancho Cordova-based VSP, which is by far the largest vision-benefit provider with nearly 90 million members, is the most aggressive at promoting its own brands with payments to opticians.


Ohio-based EyeMed, which has 46 million members, uses its market power mainly to steer people to its own LensCrafters stores, where most if not all frames and lenses are made by parent company EssilorLuxottica, or to shops that feature EssilorLuxottica frames.


I ran a search on EyeMed’s site for service providers in my L.A. ZIP code. Of the 20 results that came up on the first page, five were for LensCrafters locations; four were for Eyexam of California facilities, which are located in LensCrafters stores; and every one of the others was an independent optician carrying EssilorLuxottica frames.


All health insurers have their own networks of doctors. But they generally don’t also run the hospital you’re visiting or manufacture the medical equipment used. (Kaiser Permanente operates sort of like that, but it’s structured to create savings for patients, not to inflate prices every step of the way.)


And when it comes to frames and lenses, prices routinely are marked up by as much 1,000% for no better reason than because there’s so little competition and transparency in the eyewear market.


Jace Duval, a VSP spokesman, said the company is “focused on providing value to VSP members and opportunities to our network doctors — private-practice optometrists — who choose what products they offer to their patients.”


He said VSP can provide “more value” to members by giving deeper discounts for the company’s own frames. He also acknowledged that optometrists receive larger reimbursements for selling VSP’s Marchon eyewear and affiliated brands.


“If the patient decides to apply their benefit towards one of those frames, the doctor’s payment is adjusted to reflect the enhanced benefit level,” Duval said.


An EyeMed spokeswoman, who insisted it’s company policy not to be quoted by name, said that “EyeMed members are not incentivized under their EyeMed vision benefit to shop at LensCrafters,” although my provider search suggests otherwise.


Unlike VSP, though, EyeMed doesn’t offer optometrists extra cash for pushing affiliated frames.

“EyeMed offers the same reimbursement to the provider regardless of whether he or she is selling a Luxottica product or a non-Luxottica product,” the spokeswoman said.


Nevertheless, just about every optometrist and optician I spoke with said he or she feels pressure to stay in good with the vision plans by emphasizing frame sales. Plan members can account for more than 75% of customers at many independent shops.


“It’s a totally rigged market,” said the manager of one West L.A. optical shop, who called back shortly afterward pleading with me not to use his name. “I’ll get in trouble with VSP and EyeMed,” he said.


He and others confirmed that their shops will promote brands that offer the biggest payoff, typically without the customer knowing.


High-end optical shops featuring independent brands, such as Salt or Garrett Leight California Optical, tend to be the exception. “Other places do that, but not us,” Andrea Diaz, an optician at Playa Vista’s Runway Optometry, said of pushing particular frames on customers.


Butler, 74, established LensCrafters in 1983. He told me he started EyeMed a few years later after seeing how VSP dominated the market for vision plans.


The original idea wasn’t to use EyeMed to move frames. “It was to prevent VSP from controlling everything,” Butler said.


Things changed after Luxottica bought out LensCrafters’ parent company, U.S. Shoe Corp., in 1995. EyeMed soon became a key piece of a vertically integrated business that controls everything from vision coverage to the retail store and glasses offered.


“It’s an unethical way to do business,” Butler said of the vision plans. “It should not be legal for an insurer to be involved in selling goods. Insurers should be independent of manufacturers.”

At the very least, potential conflicts should be clearly disclosed.



I suggest state lawmakers look at a rule requiring a posted notice that says some eyewear brands may have a business relationship with a particular vision plan, and that opticians may have a financial interest in favoring one brand over another.


That’s not to say Calvin Klein glasses (affiliated with VSP) are better or worse than Ralph Lauren glasses (affiliated with EyeMed).


But if there’s more at stake than just which one looks better on me, I want to know.

If an optician is getting a bigger paycheck for selling me one or the other, I want to know.

Scratch that. I have a right to know.


It’s high time lawmakers opened their eyes to that fact. 

NATIONAL NEWS

FTC Updates Antitrust Guidance for Employers

-- The document reiterates the agency's stance on noncompete agreements


SHRM | By Roy Maurer

January 17, 2025


Wage-fixing, no-poaching, and noncompete agreements are included in business practices that may violate antitrust laws, according to updated guidelines from the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division.


On Jan. 16, the agencies issued an update to its antitrust guidance for HR professionals, first published in 2016. The guidelines outline specific types of agreements—and practices, such as sharing competitively sensitive information about wages and making false claims about workers’ potential earnings—that may violate federal law. The guidance reflects updated case law.



The FTC’s stance on noncompete agreements is listed, even though a federal court blocked the agency’s final rule that explicitly banned noncompete agreements.


“The antitrust laws protect all Americans, including workers, from illegal monopolization, collusion, and unfair methods of competition,” said outgoing FTC Chair Lina M. Khan. “These antitrust guidelines provide clarity to businesses about the practices that can violate the law—from agreements between firms to fix workers’ wages to coercive noncompetes.”

The FTC vote approving the joint guidance was 3-2, with the two Republican commissioners dissenting because “the lame-duck Biden-Harris FTC…has no future.”


Key parts of the guidance include:

  • Businesses that compete with each other for workers may be committing a crime if they enter into an agreement not to recruit, solicit, or hire workers or an agreement to fix wages or terms of employment.
  • Agreements between franchisees and franchisors not to compete for workers could be per se illegal under antitrust law.
  • Sharing sensitive information about compensation, benefits, and employment contract terms with competitors may violate antitrust laws.
  • Restrictive covenants such as nondisclosure agreements, nonsolicitation agreements, exit fees, and training repayment provisions could be illegal depending on the circumstances.
  • Making false or misleading claims about workers’ potential earnings can violate the law.
  • Enforcing noncompete clauses that restrict workers from switching jobs or starting a competing business can violate antitrust laws. The FTC may investigate and take action against noncompete agreements and other restraints on worker mobility that limit competition, the guidance states.


In April 2024, the FTC issued a final rule banning most noncompete agreements. Before that rule went into effect in September, however, the District Court for the Northern District of Texas issued an order on Aug. 20, 2024, setting it aside. The order is currently on appeal.


The FTC retains the legal authority to address noncompete agreements through case-by-case enforcement actions under the FTC Act, as it has done in the past, the guidance reiterated.

NAIC Announces 2025 Commitee Leaders


NAIC | News Release

January 16, 2025


The National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) has named its chairs and vice chairs of the organization's standing committees for 2025.  


"As the insurance industry faces an evolving landscape of risks, the NAIC's eight letter committees are working collaboratively to strengthen insurance regulation," said NAIC President and North Dakota Insurance Commissioner Jon Godfread. "I look forward to the innovative solutions my fellow regulators will develop to protect consumers and foster a more resilient insurance sector." 


The 2025 NAIC committee leadership assignments are based on requirements established by the NAIC Bylaws. Click on the committee leader's name to view each biography: 


Life Insurance and Annuities (A) Committee 

Chair: Judith L. French, Director, Ohio Department of Insurance 

Co-Vice Chair: Doug Ommen, Commissioner, Iowa Insurance Division 

Co-Vice Chair: Carter Lawrence, Commissioner, Tennessee Department of Commerce and Insurance 


Health Insurance and Managed Care (B) Committee 

Chair: Glen Mulready, Commissioner, Oklahoma Insurance Department 

Co-Vice Chair: Ann Gillespie, Acting Director, Illinois Department of Insurance 

Co-Vice Chair: Grace Arnold, Commissioner, Minnesota Department of Commerce 


Property and Casualty Insurance (C) Committee 

Chair: Michael Conway, Commissioner, Colorado Department of Regulatory Agencies, Division of Insurance 

Co-Vice Chair: Michael Yaworsky, Commissioner, Florida Office of Insurance Regulation 

Co-Vice Chair: Larry D. Deiter, Director, South Dakota Division of Insurance  


Market Regulation and Consumer Affairs (D) Committee 

Chair: Dean L. Cameron, Director, Idaho Department of Insurance 

Co-Vice Chair: Trinidad Navarro, Commissioner, Delaware Department of Insurance 

Co-Vice Chair: Scott Kipper, Commissioner, Nevada Division of Insurance 


Financial Condition (E) Committee 

Chair: Nathan Houdek, Commissioner, Wisconsin Office of the Commissioner of Insurance 

Co-Vice Chair: Justin Zimmerman, Commissioner, New Jersey Department of Banking and Insurance   

Co-Vice Chair: Michael Wise, Director, South Carolina Department of Insurance 


Financial Regulation Standards and Accreditation (F) Committee 

Chair: Lori K. Wing-Heier, Director, Alaska Department of Commerce, Community, and Economic Development, Division of Insurance 

Co-Vice Chair: Sharon P. Clark, Commissioner, Kentucky Department of Insurance 

Co-Vice Chair: Andrew R. Stolfi, Director/Insurance Commissioner, Oregon Department of Consumer and Business Services 


International Insurance Relations (G) Committee 

Chair: Eric Dunning, Director, Nebraska Department of Insurance 

Co-Vice Chair: Timothy J. Temple, Commissioner, Louisiana Department of Insurance  

Co-Vice Chair: Justin Zimmerman, Commissioner, New Jersey Department of Banking and Insurance 


Innovation, Cybersecurity, and Technology (H) Committee 

Chair: Barbara D. Richardson, Director, Arizona Department of Insurance and Financial Institutions 

Co-Vice Chair: Karima M. Woods, Commissioner, District of Columbia Department of Insurance, Securities and Banking 

Co-Vice Chair: Michael Yaworsky, Commissioner, Florida Office of Insurance Regulation 


About the National Association of Insurance Commissioners

As part of our state-based system of insurance regulation in the United States, the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) provides expertise, data, and analysis for insurance commissioners to effectively regulate the industry and protect consumers. The U.S. standard-setting organization is governed by the chief insurance regulators from the 50 states, the District of Columbia and five U.S. territories. Through the NAIC, state insurance regulators establish standards and best practices, conduct peer reviews, and coordinate regulatory oversight. NAIC staff supports these efforts and represents the collective views of state regulators domestically and internationally.

CLASSIFIEDS

Check out the newest IOA classifieds here!


ODs Wanted:


Chicago IL:

OD needed 1-2 days per week (Read more)


Optometrist needed in the heart of Chicago (Read more)


Looking for an OD to help with regular fill-in work at growing office in Jefferson Park (Read more)


Friendly and family-oriented part-time optometrist needed for a private practice in Oak Park 2 days/week. (Read more)


Chicago Suburbs:

Looking for extra $$$, OD needed 1-2 days a week (Read more)


Looking for 2 optometrist in Buffalo Grove & Schaumburg offices (Read more)


Optometrist needed at privately owned practice (Read more)


Medical Optometrist opportunity with private practice in Chicagloand area (Read more)


OD needed for assistant professor, pediatrics, and vision therapy (Read more)


Optometrist needed at private practice, part-time in Chicago Heights (Read more)


OD needed at Wheaton Eye Clinic, full or part-time (Read more)


Part-time OD wanted in the southwest suburbs (Read more)


Full-time Optometrist needed in Buffalo Grove & Barrington (Read more)


Southern IL:

Optometrist Needed – Part-Time Opportunity at Metro Eye Care (Read more)



Southern IL Optometrist Needed, Part-Time (Read more)


Out of State:

Optometrist needed in Door County Wisconsin (Read more)


Medical Optometrist opportunities in Iowa (Read more)


Practices for Sale:

Northwest Suburb of Chicago Practice for Sale (Read more)


Practice for Sale in Western Illinois (Read more)


Fully- Booked Practice for Sale in Southeast Michigan Community (Read more)

INDUSTRY PARTNERS

THANK YOU TO OUR INDUSTRY PARTNERS!
Illinois Optometric Association
217-525-8012
Connect with us
Facebook  Instagram  LinkedIn